Forewarning of False Flag events July/August

omnithanos

Houston July 4th - 6th Warning

In a Craigslist ad posted about 17 days ago, the US Federal Government is looking for crisis actors for July 4th through July 6th. - See more at: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/false-flag-alert-craigslist-ad-asking-for-crisis-actors-in-houston-for-july-4th_062014

This is the actual ad they posted -
“We are looking for crisis actors for a government emergency drill between July 4-6th. Actors will be responsible for portraying different emergency scenarios in a simulated government terror drill. No experience is needed. Confidentiality agreements are required. Pay is $200. Please message for details.” ~Houston Craigslist

This ad has been taken down due to national exposure but you can see the archived ad here -
https://web.archive.org/web/20140620050516/http://houston.craigslist.org/tlg/4501039849.html
Interestingly they use a photo of the faked Boston Bombing event as an example of crisis actors.

London 7/7 TV show warning

Last's nights program shown on UTV at 9pm about the 7/7 bombing in London suspiciously did not make any reference to the bomb drill they carried out in the Underground that very same day.
http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-terror-rehearsal.html

They may have included a subtle warning in last nights program as to the next planned terrorist hoax.
In the opening scenes they showed a close up of a plane flying through the path of Nelsons Column. Immediately following this they showed a plane reflected in a buildings window, giving the impression that it was going into the building. There was also a small digital glitch as the plane in the reflected window shifted slightly, a subtle reference to the digital planes used on 9/11.
Later in the same program, on 45 minutes, this time in the background, they again showed a plane flying through the path of Nelsons Column.

Is Nelsons Column the next target or will more planes be involved?

Police Intelligence Analyst Tony Farrell was fired for not going along with the lies of the Government with regard to the 7/7 bombing.

Over 13 months before the 7/7 attack Panorama aired the following program specifically detailing the events of the forthcoming terrorist attack.

Bus Survivor Daniel Obachike reports how the bus was diverted to a planned location where he witnessed fake injured and other suspicious observers.

London Terror Drills Warning

There are also Terror drills being staged in London today with a simulated attack at Aldwych tube station.
http://www.channel4.com/news/dramatic-scenes-londons-largest-terror-attack-rehersal

London August 3rd Warning

August 3rd has been alluded to in many Hollywood productions as the date of a major terrorist attack in London.

Big Ben is shown as the main target in this video. This target could be taken literally or it could be just shown to represent terror in London.

Another possible target could be Buckingham Palace as it has been reported that this historic building needs major repair work to the tune of £150 million.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-33250274

Desmonddoyle

omnithanos wrote: »

Houston July 4th - 6th Warning

This is the actual ad they posted -
“We are looking for crisis actors for a government emergency drill between July 4-6th. Actors will be responsible for portraying different emergency scenarios in a simulated government terror drill. No experience is needed. Confidentiality agreements are required. Pay is $200. Please message for details.” ~Houston Craigslist

Gonna get a hell of a lot of loyalty on those confidentiality agreements for $200. Also sure to be attracting professional types who understand the importance of confidentiality in the workplace and won't go blabbing to all n'sundry.:rolleyes:

If we can get away from the micro detail, and look at the macro picture, can I just ask what you think is the end goal of all these false events, because quite frankly, its difficult to put all the pieces together into any logical framework that makes sense.

omnithanos

Desmonddoyle wrote: »

Gonna get a hell of a lot of loyalty on those confidentiality agreements for $200. Also sure to be attracting professional types who understand the importance of confidentiality in the workplace and won't go blabbing to all n'sundry.:rolleyes:

If we can get away from the micro detail, and look at the macro picture, can I just ask what you think is the end goal of all these false events, because quite frankly, its difficult to put all the pieces together into any logical framework that makes sense.

Various reasons

To create panic in order to obtain greater controls over people
To promote distrust and hatred of Muslims
To gain support to invade other countries
To introduce Martial Law and take away peoples freedoms
To introduce gun control and censorship over the internet

ScumLord

But this is the flimsiest links I've ever seen. They've just scoured TV shows and movies for anything that could possibly be construed as being in any way related to their theories and said that these certainly mean what we want them to mean. It would be like your neighbour coming over to your house and accusing you of sleeping with his wife because something similar happened on eastenders last night. I never trust lay people who talk in certainties, there is no way they can know these are facts, or truths.

This is all confirmation bias, nothing you've presented is actually evidence.

Desmonddoyle

omnithanos wrote: »

Various reasons

To create panic in order to obtain greater controls over people
To promote distrust and hatred of Muslims
To gain support to invade other countries
To introduce Martial Law and take away peoples freedoms
To introduce gun control and censorship over the internet

Ok, I can understand that being the policy of a particular regime during their reign, but how and why do these survive through numerous regime changes. Bust to Obama, Brown to Cameron - would outsiders coming in not change things if they didn't agree with them. It's just the mechanics of how this would work is confusing me.
Also, it's a particularly risky, long-winded way to achieve things. Why on earth would the US or the UK want to invade other countries ? The demise of the British empire and the recent slow down in the US will pay testament that war games is long term economic suicide.

Intifada

omnithanos wrote: »

Various reasons

To create panic in order to obtain greater controls over people
To promote distrust and hatred of Muslims
To gain support to invade other countries
To introduce Martial Law and take away peoples freedoms
To introduce gun control and censorship over the internet

But why would they bother going to all this ridiculous hassle when they could just do these things anyway?

omnithanos

Desmonddoyle wrote: »

Ok, I can understand that being the policy of a particular regime during their reign, but how and why do these survive through numerous regime changes. Bust to Obama, Brown to Cameron - would outsiders coming in not change things if they didn't agree with them. It's just the mechanics of how this would work is confusing me.
Also, it's a particularly risky, long-winded way to achieve things. Why on earth would the US or the UK want to invade other countries ? The demise of the British empire and the recent slow down in the US will pay testament that war games is long term economic suicide.

Obama wants to invade Syria.

Desmonddoyle

omnithanos wrote: »

Obama wants to invade Syria.

Why, though ?
Syria have given him enough opportunities if that's what he really wanted to do. Iraq cost the best part of a trillion - I assume he must have some personal grudge, because he certainly wouldn't be doing it for the good of the nation.

Maybe its for the oil

omnithanos

Desmonddoyle wrote: »

Why, though ?
Syria have given him enough opportunities if that's what he really wanted to do. Iraq cost the best part of a trillion - I assume he must have some personal grudge, because he certainly wouldn't be doing it for the good of the nation.

Maybe its for the oil

He has no interest in the good of the nation only the fulfillment of his masters goals.

ejabrod

Desmonddoyle wrote: »

Ok, I can understand that being the policy of a particular regime during their reign, but how and why do these survive through numerous regime changes. Bust to Obama, Brown to Cameron - would outsiders coming in not change things if they didn't agree with them. It's just the mechanics of how this would work is confusing me.
Also, it's a particularly risky, long-winded way to achieve things. Why on earth would the US or the UK want to invade other countries ? The demise of the British empire and the recent slow down in the US will pay testament that war games is long term economic suicide.

Ok, so these 'changes' in regime are all but non existent. Looking at the 2012 contributors you will see that they are basically the same on both sides. In the 2012 election Obama raised $1.2Bn and Romney raised $1.18Bn so the policy is determined by the paymasters. As well as that, they bet on (contribute to) both sides. Stats here

While I agree with the OP in relation to a lot of what he is trying to convey, the way in which he is doing it is (imo) poor.

There is documented evidence of corruption and conspiracy at the highest levels from Michael Ruppert, Greg Palast, Alex Jones, Max Keiser et al. going back through the years.

For those who simply think that conspiracies of great magnitude are impossible you are either naive or simply ignore what is going on (or maybe just don't want to believe it). The fact of the matter is that what is at stake is Trillions and even more than that - control.

Just because the OP is making his point in a bad way, it does not necessarily mean that what he is trying to say is untrue.

There is a whole other world out there beyond the green fields of Ireland

ScumLord

ejabrod wrote: »

Ok, so these 'changes' in regime are all but non existent. Looking at the 2012 contributors you will see that they are basically the same on both sides. In the 2012 election Obama raised $1.2Bn and Romney raised $1.18Bn so the policy is determined by the paymasters. As well as that, they bet on (contribute to) both sides. Stats here

There isn't really any prove of a global conspiracy in that statement. It does highlight a well known conflict of interest in US presidential elections but giving money to a president guarantees them nothing. There is still the American constitution and law to protect the people, presidents and politicians don't get to do what they like and most of what they do and say in relation to official policies is publicly accessible.

While I agree with the OP in relation to a lot of what he is trying to convey, the way in which he is doing it is (imo) poor.

So you also agree that there's a satanic conspiracy controlling the world?

There is documented evidence of corruption and conspiracy at the highest levels from Michael Ruppert, Greg Palast, Alex Jones, Max Keiser et al. going back through the years.

Governments are probably always going to have some form of corruption and I suppose any meeting between a politician and anyone else that happens behind closed doors could be considered conspiring. I don't think there's really any prove that there's a global conspiracy that controls the world and everything good or bad that happens is a planned part of that conspiracy.

For those who simply think that conspiracies of great magnitude are impossible you are either naive or simply ignore what is going on (or maybe just don't want to believe it). The fact of the matter is that what is at stake is Trillions and even more than that - control.

Man's crusade for power is eternal and well documented. It's a bit redundant in this day and age of profit though. You don't need control to make profit, but control is going to cost a lot of money. Think of all the specialised administration that would be needed to maintain this conspiracy, all the payoffs, all the equipment. The financial cost of maintaining a conspiracy of this size would negate any profits made. We see companies today outsource everything from financial to production to remove all these headaches onto specialists. The whole quest for profits breaks down when you own everything. Why hurt the productiveness of the global economy that you control with wars and violence. If if all these terrorist attacks are fake the cost of running them, cleaning up after them and closed businesses would only affect the conspirators bottom line. What they would want is a peaceful world with lots of trade.

Just because the OP is making his point in a bad way, it does not necessarily mean that what he is trying to say is untrue.

No, it's the point itself that's the problem not the way it's said. There's no way to sugar coat his point to make it seem more reasonable.

There is a whole other world out there beyond the green fields of Ireland

Yes there is, but what these conspiracies describe is the fantasy world of fundamentalist christian nightmares.

ejabrod

ScumLord wrote: »

There isn't really any proof of a global conspiracy in that statement. It does highlight a well known conflict of interest in US presidential elections but giving money to a president guarantees them nothing. There is still the American constitution and law to protect the people, presidents and politicians don't get to do what they like and most of what they do and say in relation to official policies is publicly accessible.

I wasn't indicating that there was a proof of global conspiracy in that statement but when the same big businesses contributes to both camps is a 2 camp race, there is conspiracy

You're either very, very naive or simply are unaware of the way America and it's political system works (highlighted in bold)

ScumLord wrote: »

So you also agree that there's a satanic conspiracy controlling the world?

I never said that and would appreciate that you do not state your interpretation of my beliefs as my actual beliefs

ScumLord wrote: »

Governments are probably always going to have some form of corruption and I suppose any meeting between a politician and anyone else that happens behind closed doors could be considered conspiring. I don't think there's really any prove that there's a global conspiracy that controls the world and everything good or bad that happens is a planned part of that conspiracy.

You are looking at this from a perspective of individual politicians. The politicians are pawns in the 'bigger game'. You have probably never heard of the NAFTA, TTIP, AFTA are all examples of agreements that are made with the view to consolidation...I'm not going to explain the intricacies of each and how they will be amalgamated. If you are interested you can read about them and the objectives of the amalgamation.

ScumLord wrote: »

Man's crusade for power is eternal and well documented. It's a bit redundant in this day and age of profit though. You don't need control to make profit, but control is going to cost a lot of money. Think of all the specialised administration that would be needed to maintain this conspiracy, all the payoffs, all the equipment. The financial cost of maintaining a conspiracy of this size would negate any profits made. We see companies today outsource everything from financial to production to remove all these headaches onto specialists. The whole quest for profits breaks down when you own everything. Why hurt the productiveness of the global economy that you control with wars and violence. If if all these terrorist attacks are fake the cost of running them, cleaning up after them and closed businesses would only affect the conspirators bottom line. What they would want is a peaceful world with lots of trade.

I think my reply above answers that aswell

ScumLord wrote: »

No, it's the point itself that's the problem not the way it's said. There's no way to sugar coat his point to make it seem more reasonable.

It's not reasonable to who and why? Because you are told that the gov't are there to represent you and your needs?

It's not reasonable because it's not what you believe to be happening? (some of the things the OP has alluded to I find totally unreasonable - the reason I even viewed this thread was due to the Charlie H reference in the 1st post which, even I admit is ridiculous)

It's not reasonable because there could never be a conspiracy of that size? Why? Because you have never experienced it?

ScumLord wrote: »

Yes there is, but what these conspiracies describe is the fantasy world of fundamentalist christian nightmares.

Why is the other world "the fantasy world of fundamentalist christian nightmares"? Why bring Christians into it? Has the OP stated his religious beliefs? I am an atheist so does that mean I live in a fantasy world? If so why? Why do you get to decide what is fantasy and what is real?

If you want to believe that there is nothing untoward happening with an Endgame in sight, that's up to you.

If you believe that the crash of 2008 was 'cyclical', 'accidental', 'unexpected' or any of the analogies used to describe it you may was to look at the derivatives that were sold by Goldman-Sachs and Fannie Mae and the other 4 of the 'big six' in the early 2000's, knowing they were worth nothing. Also knowing the outcome of the sale of these financial instruments. You may also want to look at the Glass Steagall act and how similar the current situation is to that of 1929 onward.

There is a wealth of information publicly available (and verified) that support the thoughts of what are now referred to as Conspiracy Theorists. Why that 'tag'? because that is you have been told to call those who question and push.

People may also want to look at the Definition of a conspiracy .

Q:Was 9-11 a conspiracy?
A: Yes, it was

Q:Was the 1st Gulf War a conspiracy?
A: yes, it was...................

Reg'stoy

ejabrod wrote: »

... when the same big businesses contributes to both camps is a 2 camp race, there is conspiracy.....

People may also want to look at the Definition of a conspiracy .

Q:Was 9-11 a conspiracy?
A: Yes, it was

Q:Was the 1st Gulf War a conspiracy?
A: yes, it was...................

Of course big businesses are going to contribute to both sides in a two horse race, I don't see any conspiracy in that; just good business. If there was to be any 'conspiracies' in a US presidential election, why not simply rig the electronic voting machines to elect 'their' man or indeed woman. Hell the American electoral college system (white land owners would cast their votes in their states, supposedly based on their tenants wishes) is of itself rigged (Bush v Gore).

You gave us the literal meaning of a conspiracy, based on that you say 9/11 was one.
So, how far back down the chain of events did the plan begin? The CIA it is nearly universally accepted, funded the Afghan Rebels in their war against the Russians in Afghanistan. Some would say that Al-Qaeda evolved from that conflict; which is a very reasonable supposition.
They then went on to commit various atrocities culminating in 9/11.
So, did Al-Qaeda plan and execute the attack alone, were they commissioned or was 9/11 a shadow group operation with Al-Qaeda being the fall guy.
Was the actual attack a conspiracy in your opinion, based solely on the fact that the CIA had a hand in the creation of Al-Qaeda (either deliberately or by happy accident) or because a group of individuals planned it.

You say that the first Gulf war was again a conspiracy. Was this based on the American involvement in the Gulf and their help for one particular regime over another.
Did they allow this one regime to flourish so that they could bring it down at a later date or did it's leader grow too big for his boots and needed to be taken out.
I'll gladly say that the Americans have always tried to influence countries who were going down an ideological road that they did not like (Communism). Mainly this was done out a fear of that particular ideology (in my opinion) rather than some plan for global domination.

Now as for the 2008 crash. Yes some people made huge profits and some people, mainly Joe Sixpack lost it all (401k's). The thing is a lot of very wealthy people also lost huge amounts of money.
There lies my problem; why manufacture such a huge loss in wealth? Big business makes money by selling us stuff we neither need nor require and it does this by creating the want and desire for us to have it (control). Why remove the majority of your customer base by manufacturing an event to rob them of their spending power.
You mentioned alex jones as a source of yours, he claims that big business/NWO wants to kill off half of us/80%/90% the figure changes daily. Again why kill off your customer base. If it's power they want, well they are currently huge fish in a big pond but if they kill most of us off; they will be equally sized fish in a small pond.
They already 'control' us through their businesses, we all want 50" TV's now and most will gladly remortgage to buy the next must have item.

Incidentally how many people control this conspiracy? Do you believe like jones that the Queen of England is the head of 'Spectre' and the City of London the seat of power. Hell that loon thinks British Intelligence created the events that caused the American Civil War

omnithanos

ejabrod wrote: »

the reason I even viewed this thread was due to the Charlie H reference in the 1st post which, even I admit is ridiculous

Linked article explains why the Paris event meets the false flag checklist
https://www.intellihub.com/vindicated-paris-events-meet-false-flag-checklist/

Dohnjoe

ejabrod wrote: »

There is a wealth of information publicly available (and verified) that support the thoughts of what are now referred to as Conspiracy Theorists. Why that 'tag'? because that is you have been told to call those who question and push.

Many economists, analysts and experts saw what was coming, but didn't realise the scale/scope of the crash. It was caused by many factors combining to form the "perfect storm" so to speak.

However, because some people benefited from the crash, that is motive enough for other people to suspect and manufacture a conspiracy surrounding the crash and ignore the large numbers of normal and wealthy/powerful people who lost out in that crash

It's good to ask questions... but not so good to question only to seek a conspiracy or validate an agenda

ScumLord

ejabrod wrote: »

I wasn't indicating that there was a proof of global conspiracy in that statement but when the same big businesses contributes to both camps is a 2 camp race, there is conspiracy

You're either very, very naive or simply are unaware of the way America and it's political system works (highlighted in bold)

So you know for a fact that your statement is correct and I'm naive for not believing what the person on the internet said? It's not ideal but it's the same thing as backing a horse each way.

You are looking at this from a perspective of individual politicians. The politicians are pawns in the 'bigger game'. You have probably never heard of the NAFTA, TTIP, AFTA are all examples of agreements that are made with the view to consolidation...I'm not going to explain the intricacies of each and how they will be amalgamated. If you are interested you can read about them and the objectives of the amalgamation.

I'm well away of trade agreements. You'll have to go into detail, I don't see why you'd pick out these trade agreements over other trade agreements. They're an essential part of international trade.



It's not reasonable to who and why? Because you are told that the gov't are there to represent you and your needs?

It's not reasonable because there could never be a conspiracy of that size? Why? Because you have never experienced it?

Because of the practicalities of running something like this. omnithanos claims that a satanic group is controlling the world media, that all Islamic terrorists are actually working for this group, all news media groups are working for the satanists, that the satanists are in control of nearly every government in the world and most TV and film is just a vehicle for the satanists to pass messages between each other.

Why is the other world "the fantasy world of fundamentalist christian nightmares"? Why bring Christians into it? Has the OP stated his religious beliefs? I am an atheist so does that mean I live in a fantasy world? If so why? Why do you get to decide what is fantasy and what is real?

Just watch the videos posted, their all based on religious believe. god is mentioned constantly and the fact they think it's satanists behind everything shows that this is just an extension of the US fundamentalist Christian believe that we're in the end times. They keep labeling Obama as the leader of the satanists (while also calling him a puppet). Many of these conspiracies are clearly coming from the US bible belt. If you say you're an atheist you need to go back and look at the backgrounds to the people making these claims and where they're claims are coming out of because you've been duped into believing Christian doomsday propaganda.

If you believe that the crash of 2008 was 'cyclical', 'accidental', 'unexpected' or any of the analogies used to describe it you may was to look at the derivatives that were sold by Goldman-Sachs and Fannie Mae and the other 4 of the 'big six' in the early 2000's, knowing they were worth nothing. Also knowing the outcome of the sale of these financial instruments. You may also want to look at the Glass Steagall act and how similar the current situation is to that of 1929 onward.

I don't believe anything about the crash, but clearly you do. Why Don't you expand on these theories?

There is a wealth of information publicly available (and verified) that support the thoughts of what are now referred to as Conspiracy Theorists. Why that 'tag'? because that is you have been told to call those who question and push.

But what's promoted in threads like this is not conspiracies, as in individual separate conspiracies that do happen. What's being promoted in this thread is one global conspiracy that controls just about everything to the point they can run fake terrorist attacks right in front of the world media. The implication is also that this conspiracy goes back at least decades more likely centuries.

Desmonddoyle

So, to sum up - basically, pretty much everyone on the planet are conditioned idiots living in a matrix like false world of ignorance, without so much as the foggiest notion what is really going on in their world.

Meanwhile a very small, select few individuals (devils) are controlling us and ultimately want to either completely control or destroy the world, but they can only do it in a very overly complicated and slow way, through the generations so as to leave a few cryptic clues to make it vaguely interesting for them.

Meanwhile, there are an even smaller elite of intellectual heavyweights who have put all the pieces together, made the jigsaw, and now spend their time trying to educate the rest of the world, via internet boards, in a heroic attempt to save the planet and maintain their secrecy (their lives are most likely in danger)

Let me know if I missed anything. Sadly, my place in life is as a conditioned fool, unwilling to accept the real facts, until its too late.

weisses

Desmonddoyle wrote: »

So, to sum up - basically, pretty much everyone on the planet are conditioned idiots living in a matrix like false world of ignorance, without so much as the foggiest notion what is really going on in their world.

I would not say idiots ... But conditioned yes at least to a certain degree

omnithanos

Desmonddoyle wrote: »

So, to sum up - basically, pretty much everyone on the planet are conditioned idiots living in a matrix like false world of ignorance, without so much as the foggiest notion what is really going on in their world.

Meanwhile a very small, select few individuals (devils) are controlling us and ultimately want to either completely control or destroy the world, but they can only do it in a very overly complicated and slow way, through the generations so as to leave a few cryptic clues to make it vaguely interesting for them.

Meanwhile, there are an even smaller elite of intellectual heavyweights who have put all the pieces together, made the jigsaw, and now spend their time trying to educate the rest of the world, via internet boards, in a heroic attempt to save the planet and maintain their secrecy (their lives are most likely in danger)

Let me know if I missed anything. Sadly, my place in life is as a conditioned fool, unwilling to accept the real facts, until its too late.

We are all conditioned by the media. Obvious discrepancies exist. Whether one chooses to investigate such discrepancies and form conclusions as to the truth behind these or simply ignore them is a matter of personal choice. Those who investigate should not be classed as intellectual heavyweights, merely concerned and interested parties who form theories with varying degrees of believability from Reptilian Aliens, Satanic Cults or Political Corruption. My own belief is that the Reptilian theory is deliberately peddled by those in power as a form of disinformation used to discredit the plausibility of those who highlight these discrepancies. The satanic angle may be a similar ploy as there is a definite satanic connection to many of these events.
Some individuals appear to be completely brainwashed so that when they come across an opinion which contradicts their belief system they lash out and call the informant a loopy loon. Logical debate is often disregarded completely. Hitler highlighted this concept in his book Mein Kamp where he said the greater the lie the greater the possibility it will be believed.
What one should do is form an opinion based on fact and logic and not blindly accept any version of events.
I admit that I am now biased towards not believing official accounts but I won't declare something is fake unless some evidence exists. For example I'm dubious about whether those 39 people actually died on the beach in Tunisia but as I don't have much evidence to back this up I won't disrespect the berieved.

It's up in the air whether something will happen in Huston over the weekend.
There could be another staged terror attack, or perhaps a genuine drill as happened in London this week or perhaps nothing at all which would indicate their plans were rumbled by national coverage of the Craigslist ad.

Desmonddoyle

omnithanos wrote: »

.
What one should do is form an opinion based on fact and logic and not blindly accept any version of events.



It's up in the air whether something will happen in Huston over the weekend.
There could be another staged terror attack, or perhaps a genuine drill as happened in London this week or perhaps nothing at all which would indicate their plans were rumbled by national coverage of the Craigslist ad.

I am a skeptic by nature, precisely because I'm a huge, loyal fan of fact, logic, science and common sense. No evidence you have presented over rides fact, logic and most importantly common sense.

But I will give you this - if something big happens in Houston this weekend, I'll certainly be well on my way to being convinced and i'll be going back over your 'evidence' with a fine tooth comb.

welchywelch

Anything happening yet OP?

Merry Prankster

omnithanos wrote: »

Some individuals appear to be completely brainwashed so that when they come across an opinion which contradicts their belief system they lash out and call the informant a loopy loon.

I respectfully disagree - people are labelled loopy loons if they continually posit outlandish theories without any credible supporting evidence. Watergate challenged people's 'belief systems' but no one will call Woodward and Bernstein nuts because they supplied proper evidence.

omnithanos wrote: »

For example I'm dubious about whether those 39 people actually died on the beach in Tunisia but as I don't have much evidence to back this up I won't disrespect the berieved.

Just take a look at the pictures of the funerals of the Irish victims today. How can this be faked? Do you think Irish people would put their families and communities through all of this pain merely to provide the west with a needless pretext to invade Syria? There's ample justification on humanitarian grounds for the world to take action; the Tunisian massacre adds nothing. It just does not make sense.

Overheal

Merry Prankster wrote: »

Just take a look at the pictures of the funerals of the Irish victims today. How can this be faked? Do you think Irish people would put their families and communities through all of this pain merely to provide the west with a needless pretext to invade Syria? There's ample justification on humanitarian grounds for the world to take action; the Tunisian massacre adds nothing. It just does not make sense.

can you at least wait until they're resting in the ground?

Merry Prankster

Overheal wrote: »

can you at least wait until they're resting in the ground?

Sorry, my bad.

Ipso

Does a false flag have 49 stars instead of 50?

omnithanos

welchywelch wrote: »

Anything happening yet OP?

Yeah there was a train crash in Houston on July 4th but nobdody got hurt cos they had taken down the craigslist ad

http://abc13.com/news/train-crashes-into-big-rig-in-northwest-houston/828389/

degrassinoel

omnithanos wrote: »

Yeah there was a train crash in Houston on July 4th but nobdody got hurt cos they had taken down the craigslist ad

http://abc13.com/news/train-crashes-into-big-rig-in-northwest-houston/828389/

So much for that prediction then. Which one is next?

Dohnjoe

omnithanos wrote: »

Yeah there was a train crash in Houston on July 4th but nobdody got hurt cos they had taken down the craigslist ad

It was a freight train hitting a truck stuck at crossroads

"The truck spilled the empty cardboard boxes it was carrying. No one was hurt."

Also, it's a bit unlikely any government would use a public internet message board to recruit actors for some highly risky staged attack

With all respect, I don't get this "crisis acting" thing anyway, I mean if I were to be chosen, the government would have to pay me a hell of a lot more than 200 dollars to fake a story to the national and international press, as well as investigators, police and potentially court. Not that my story would stand up very well considering the 100 or so friends, colleagues, family who would call it out straight away. And that's just me, they'd need hundreds of witnesses, not to mention all the fake doctors, nurses, healthcare staff, physicians, after-care to treat the "casualties".. and then there's all the first responders, forensics, coroners to treat the fake "dead".. and on top of that all the cops, firemen, emergency services, investigators would have to be in on it too to overlook everything

Whoever has to constantly dream up and organise these events must be one stressed out individual

pmasterson95

I love how "they" supposedly have the power/wealth to be able to bribe amongst others, Family Guy to air the desired episodes, the Police to alter a crime scene in miliseconds before photos are taken, Forensics to tamper results, hundreds of eye witnesses to support the contrived tale and yet DESPITE all this wealth and power, when they need people they just stick an ad publically on Craigslist.

Caovyn Lineah

The crisis actors wouldn't have been needed for a July 4th re-enactment of some sort, no sirree

omnithanos

Caovyn Lineah wrote: »

The crisis actors wouldn't have been needed for a July 4th re-enactment of some sort, no sirree

The ad asked for people to portray different emergency scenarios in a standard government terror drill and they posted a photo of the Boston Bombing as an example of Crisis Actors



This link mentions how another Craigslist Ad was discovered looking for Crisis Actors before the LAX shooting.
http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2015/06/false-flag-alert-craigslist-ad-asking-for-crisis-actors-in-houston-for-july-4th-2470564.html

Here's the Linkedin page for the lady who organised the staged Boston event.
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/rene-fielding/2a/403/b75