Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Controversial Plans for First Feis in Israel

Options
1235789

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    LDN_Irish wrote: »
    Go have your morning coffee and read my post again, because you clearly didn't understand it the first time. The paragraph you're apparently replying to actually starts with "the anti-Semitism lie..." and not "observing that 200,000 have died..." just to get you started.

    Pointing out anti Semitism, where it exists, is not a lie.

    I understood your post. Despite your claim to be amused, you got annoyed when the real massacre in the Middle East, just over the border from Israel in neighbouring Syria, was invoked.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭LDN_Irish


    LDN_Irish wrote: »
    The anti-Semitism lie is right up there with screaming "islamophobia!" when any aspect of Islam is criticised for most cowardly copout tropes we all have to see every time these debates rear their head.
    What are you on about?

    Observing that 200,000 have died in Syria, which has some 20 Jews left in it, is Zionist and cowardly?

    I would have though it merely...counting.

    So you understood that I was saying that claiming any criticism of Israel is anti-semitic is cowardly and a lie, and yet decided to write the post I've just quoted? So, you're a liar basically. Deliberately misinterpreting and replying to whatever you want because if you reply to what's said your arguments fall apart.

    You link me to any posts containing anti-semitism in this thread and we can report them together, won't be a big job because if there are any they must be few and far between because I haven't seen them.

    Also, nice try pretending that the Syrian civil war that started in 2011 and how many Jewish people there are in Syria is a major factor in the colonisation of Palestine. Typical dishonest nonsense, but what else would you expect?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭LDN_Irish


    LDN_Irish wrote: »
    Ah ok, so being against apartheid SA was fine because the Afrikaans weren't jewish. Do you really think that's a logical position? That the history of Jews means that their colonisation of Palestine is beyond reproach?

    And 20 Jews in Syria doesn't say anything about , it's as irrelevant as talking about how many free Presbyterians there are in Italy to justify British involvement in the North. Amusing that the only 2 weapons in a Zionist's arsenal are "but muslims kill muslims" and "but Israelis are Jewish?? So any criticism of Israel basically makes you a neo Nazi!!"

    I'll just leave this here again so you can have a bash at replying to what I said rather than deliberately pretending I've said something else that you know how to argue with. Do you want to have a bash at explaining why it was OK to oppose apartheid in SA because the Afrikaans aren't Jewish and so haven't been persecuted as you claimed here?
    No it doesn't.

    It's simply objecting to anti Semitism. I think 20 Jews left in Syria says something. You may dismiss it with some curious reference to anti Dutch prejudice. That is your prerogative. I do not think the history of persecution of the Dutch and the Jews are comparable.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    LDN_Irish wrote: »
    So, you're a liar basically.

    Oh dear.

    Insert "trope" about having your morning coffee. Or something about the Dutch and the Italians and Presbyterians.

    Pity, because only a few posts back you were "amused"!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭LDN_Irish


    Oh dear.

    Insert "trope" about having your morning coffee. Or something about the Dutch and the Italians and Presbyterians.

    Pity, because only a few posts back you were "amused"!
    Do you think anyone will notice if I dodge every point made? I've already mentioned that he said he was amused in his first post twice, I don't know how long I can keep saying that and pretending I'm still replying to the posts that have been made.

    Yes Conor, everyone will notice.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭LDN_Irish


    LDN_Irish wrote: »
    You link me to any posts containing anti-semitism in this thread and we can report them together, won't be a big job because if there are any they must be few and far between because I haven't seen them.

    *tumbleweed*

    You link it, I'll report it. If you're not lying, it will actually be easier than evading so you've got no excuse.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,678 ✭✭✭Crooked Jack


    FFS why can't people separate the actions of the Israeli government from the general people of Israel?

    Why do we hold them to a higher standard than nearly every other country in the middle east?

    Well to be fair the people of Israel, with notable exception, elect the people who make these decisions and by and large condone what israel does in gaza and the West Bank.

    Until Israeli aggression stops Im all for a total boycott of Israel in everything from international trade and expelling diplomats right down to artists not performing there and athletes refusing to compete with their international teams


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Until Israeli aggression stops Im all for a total boycott of Israel in everything from international trade and expelling diplomats...

    Seriously?

    Expelling diplomats?

    I think that would be insane. People are entitled to boycott, to seek labelling etc. But to sever diplomatic ties with Israel while maintaining them with so many others...including Syria...that has no basis in reality at all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,678 ✭✭✭Crooked Jack


    Seriously?

    Expelling diplomats?

    I think that would be insane. People are entitled to boycott, to seek labelling etc. But to sever diplomatic ties with Israel while maintaining them with so many others...including Syria...that has no basis in reality at all.

    The situation in Syria is vastly different from that in Palestine. There's a dozen different sides out there knockin the shite out of each other with hundreds of different agendas. Who knows what sort of government is eventually going to emerge from that.

    Israel on the other hand has been systematically punishing the palestinian people since the foundation of the state. Mealy mouthed words of condemnation over specific incidents so terrible that they manage to stand out from the general background noise of horror have no effect. Israel must be totally isolated from the international community until they make real efforts for peace. Of course, there are certain countries that support/prop up israel so that is unlikely to happen but that doesnt mean countries with a conscience shouldnt take any stand they can.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,789 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Until Israeli aggression stops Im all for a total boycott of Israel in everything from international trade and expelling diplomats right down to artists not performing there and athletes refusing to compete with their international teams

    I'm sure you will also call for the expulsion of diplomats of Russia (occupying Crimea and Eastern Ukraine) and China, (occupying Tibet, East Turkestan, building artificial islands in the disputed South China Sea, claiming the entirety of Taiwan and territory of most of its neighbors).

    Or is it just the Jews "Israelis" that have only a small patch of land and nowhere else to go?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,178 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    Does anyone else keep misreading this thread title as "Fine Gael Ard Fheis in Israel"?? No? I'm just a mental then! :pac:


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The situation in Syria is vastly different from that in Palestine.

    It is. It is on a whole other scale in terms of numbers and barbarity. Such as the use of chemical weapons by the Government to wipe out hundreds at a time, with bodies of children piled high.

    And you would maintain ties with that country, on the basis that sure they're all at it there, but sever them with Israel?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭jank


    Nodin wrote: »
    Syria under sanctions from various bodies, Israel barely a peep.

    Perhaps that is what you can tell yourself to rationalise the fact that 200,000 dead in Syria gets nowhere near the same air time or bandwidth in Irish circles then something to do with Israel. The fact is that these people could not give a rats ass about your average Syrian or Palestinian, but the do care about the great Satan of the them all, America and as Israel and the US are very very close allies, Israel is elevated for criticism by using the 'sanctions' pretense.

    This is not new. We had the usual Socialist and Marxist suspects in Ireland and Europe during the 60's marching in opposition to all things U.S. purely out of ideology, while in the eastern block in Poland, Berlin, Prague and so on they were trying to escape from a regime that these people were trying to espouse.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,747 ✭✭✭✭wes


    SeanW wrote: »
    Or is it just the Jews "Israelis" that have only a small patch of land and nowhere else to go?

    Palestinians have no where else to go either (not welcome any where else, and treated like garbage in refugee camps), and are still being currently displaced by Israel, who seem unable to stop settlement expansion, which will permanently kill a 2 state solution.

    You seem intent on ignoring the simple fact that Israel was created by displacing other people, and that this is still going on to this day.

    Far too many people claim to support the 2 state solution, but seem completely unwilling for any action to be taken to save it. IMHO, people support for the 2 state solution is hollow at best, and defacto against it, as all steps to save it are seen as no better than violent terrorism, which of course exposes the hypocrisy of Westerners who called on Palestinians to embrace non-violence, and now that some have done so, a call for boycott is regarded the same as violent terrorism and being called Anti-semtic. Clearly shows me that the problem was not the violence but rather the Palestinians themselves.

    We are fast approaching a situation, where a 2 state solution simply become impossible, with a lot of commentators saying we have already reached that point.

    Yes, the Israelis have no where else to go, but neither do the Palestinians, and the defacto opposition to the 2 state solutions from supporters of Israel, will ensure that we will see more and more violence, with the Palestinian civilians being the receiving end of it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 43,028 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    surely the people of Israel have been through enough without inflicting a "feis" on them


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,747 ✭✭✭✭wes


    It is. It is on a whole other scale in terms of numbers and barbarity. Such as the use of chemical weapons by the Government to wipe out hundreds at a time, with bodies of children piled high.

    You don't care about Syria, seeing as your using the suffering of the people there to defend Israel. It is a fairly common and rather repugnant debating tactic, to claim someone else doesn't care about this other conflict, when you are solely using it to deflect attention from Israel (supporters of the Russian regime use the same tactic as well).


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    wes wrote: »
    You don't care about Syria, seeing as your using the suffering of the people there to defend Israel. It is a fairly common and rather repugnant debating tactic, to claim someone else doesn't care about this other conflict, when you are solely using it to deflect attention from Israel (supporters of the Russian regime use the same tactic as well).

    :D

    You don't know me at all. Do you?

    Pretending you do "is a fairly common and rather repugnant debating tactic".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    No it doesn't.

    It's simply objecting to anti Semitism. .............

    Please link to the anti-Semitic posts in this thread then, if you would.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    It would be quite idiotic for a post to say, that because something bad happens somewhere else in the world that we aren't doing anything about, then we should not do anything about something bad that Israel does - or should prioritize the 'bad' things that we choose the act on, and ignore all others until we have dealt with the ones at the top of the list (when multiple things can instead be done at once).

    These posts always show an inconsistency in their use of this logic, because the same logic is never used to argue against Russia's sanctions or Syria's - showing that these posts have one standard for Israel, and another for different countries, i.e. they show double-standards/hypocrisy, which such posts usually reserve primarily for Israel and the US.

    Such posts pretend to display concern - crocodile tears - for innocent life, through deaths in Ukraine/Syria, but it is obvious that the concern is disingenuous/not-real, as there is no concern for the innocent life murdered by Israeli/IDF hands (I'll happily await posters proving this point, by trying to defend Israeli actions as 'not murder').


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,678 ✭✭✭Crooked Jack


    It is. It is on a whole other scale in terms of numbers and barbarity. Such as the use of chemical weapons by the Government to wipe out hundreds at a time, with bodies of children piled high.

    And you would maintain ties with that country, on the basis that sure they're all at it there, but sever them with Israel?

    Not on the basis that "they're all at it." On the basis that it's a fluctuating situation. We dont know who is going to be in power there in a year or what the set up will be. I mean, the government there is basically theoretical in huge swathes of territory. With Israel/Palestine there is very clearly an aggressor (with overwhelming power and an itchy trigger finger) and a resister.

    Im not expressing any support for the Assad regime and it's sadly typical of israeli apologists to try and deflect from israeli actions by pointing elsewhere


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,678 ✭✭✭Crooked Jack


    SeanW wrote: »
    I'm sure you will also call for the expulsion of diplomats of Russia (occupying Crimea and Eastern Ukraine) and China, (occupying Tibet, East Turkestan, building artificial islands in the disputed South China Sea, claiming the entirety of Taiwan and territory of most of its neighbors).

    Or is it just the Jews "Israelis" that have only a small patch of land and nowhere else to go?

    Ah that other old pro-Israeli trope. If pointing fingers elsewhere doesnt work, cry anti-semitism. Sorry, that doesn't cut it these days.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,372 ✭✭✭LorMal


    steddyeddy wrote: »
    Irish aren't always very warmly received in Israel.

    Can you explain that? Do you mean because we are Irish? I have never experienced that in Israel


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,747 ✭✭✭✭wes


    :D

    You don't know me at all. Do you?

    Pretending you do "is a fairly common and rather repugnant debating tactic".

    I don't need to know you, just know the tactic all to well...


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    wes wrote: »
    I don't need to know you, just know the tactic all to well...

    So you don't need to know me to make the personal comment that I don't care about dead children?

    Riiiiiiiiiiight. I won't even attempt to analyse that one. If it makes sense to you, fair enough.
    Not on the basis that "they're all at it." On the basis that it's a fluctuating situation.

    The gas attacks are not a "fluctuating situation". They happened. This idea that we must withhold condemnation until we figure out who might win and whether we like them is...it's as insane as the idea that we sever ties with Israel but maintain them with a Government that gasses it's own civilians by the hundred.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,372 ✭✭✭LorMal


    Israel has acted in a reprehensible manner for many years now. It has gone beyond political - it is now based on a visceral hatred of the Palestinians - inexcusable and very hard to rationalise given their experiences in the holocaust.
    However, I do agree with Conor here -in Ireland, we seem to hold Israel to account much more than we other countries in the region.
    Syria, Libya, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Egypt.....all states with horrendous civil rights records and horribly repressive regimes that make Israel appear benign in comparison.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,678 ✭✭✭Crooked Jack



    The gas attacks are not a "fluctuating situation". They happened. This idea that we must withhold condemnation until we figure out who might win and whether we like them is...it's as insane as the idea that we sever ties with Israel but maintain them with a Government that gasses it's own civilians by the hundred.

    Doesnt really matter whether its insane or not because that's not what I'm saying.
    And has been pointed out numerous times, wrongs elsewhere in the world are not an adequate reason to ignore Israel's wrongs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    So you don't(...............)it's own civilians by the hundred.

    Going to link to those anti-semetic posts now conor?
    Lormal wrote:
    However, I do agree with Conor here -in Ireland, we seem to hold Israel to
    account much more than we other countries in the region.
    Syria, Libya,
    Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Egypt.....all states with horrendous civil
    rights records and horribly repressive regimes that make Israel appear benign in comparison.

    Those countries in bold are or were all under some type of sanction (unsure about Yemen). Those that were not were considered 'allies' of the US.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,372 ✭✭✭LorMal


    Nodin wrote: »
    Going to link to those anti-semetic posts now conor?



    Those countries in bold are or were all under some type of sanction (unsure about Yemen). Those that were not were considered 'allies' of the US.

    I'm not sure about your point?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    LorMal wrote: »
    I'm not sure about your point?

    Well whats the point in protesting for action against regimes where action has been taken?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,372 ✭✭✭LorMal


    Nodin wrote: »
    Well whats the point in protesting for action against regimes where action has been taken?

    I'm not. I said that we tend to focus more on Israel than we do on these other nut job regimes.
    I would inflict marathon Fheis Ceols on them all if I could.


Advertisement