Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

ISIS vs The IRA ?

Options
145791018

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 323 ✭✭emigrate2012


    We can all agree that England is messed up. They attack you then promise to leave you alone if you give them part of your country.

    The British are evil. The IRA fought for a Republic, they got it. It doesn't make any sense. They weren't playing a game of chess. They were fighting over a country. The country belonged to the Irish and the English randomly came in. I find it ridiculous that when someone says "Northern Ireland" they're referring to a different country. UNITED IRELAND!

    Are you for fcking real?have you no concept of why the civil war happened?
    You really are a cnut(stupid,thick,dopey)take you're pick.idiot.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭Arsemageddon


    Are you for fcking real?have you no concept of why the civil war happened?
    You really are a cnut(stupid,thick,dopey)take you're pick.idiot.

    .....and people in glass houses shouldn't through stones. The Civil War was fought over the oath of allegiance and the South's status as a dominion rather than a republic. It wasn't about Northern Ireland.



    northern Ireland is now a separate entity to both the republic and the UK?

    Northern Ireland is part of the UK. The official name of our near neighbours is the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Scotland and Wales also have their own parliaments and are also still part of the UK


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭DarkyHughes


    You haven't a fcking clue have you?......ever given thought to the fact that northern Ireland is now a separate entity to both the republic and the UK?

    It's a separate country in evolution ATM, you must be about 20 yrs old or just a thick tbh.....

    Anyways, this is after hours. So bend right over and suck your own ball's.

    Wow, you actually managed to talk more sh!te than the person your quoting. I didn't think that was possible because the first quote was so mad.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    GaryTLynch wrote: »
    Fr. Ted Crilly,
    Could you please summarise the events that led to the outbreak of the Troubles, the war that ensued and the eventual signing of the Good Friday Agreement (as YOU see it).

    This should be good.

    Starting with "dem Brits was allus evil" and right up to "Warrington was for de Black an Tans".


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭DarkyHughes


    .....and people in glass houses shouldn't through stones. The Civil War was fought over the oath of allegiance and the South's status as a dominion rather than a republic. It wasn't about Northern Ireland.






    Northern Ireland is part of the UK. The official name of our near neighbours is the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Scotland and Wales also have their own parliaments and are also still part of the UK

    As f*cked up as the North is atleast they don't have to live with the never ending nightmare of being governed by Fine Gail & Finna Fail your whole existence, it's worse than be being governed by Tories


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭DarkyHughes


    Starting with "dem Brits was allus evil" and right up to "Warrington was for de Black an Tans".

    It started with a kiss.....


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,161 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Come on, Ireland is so much better than England. England is full of weirdos. Must I mention Jimmy Savile? Too late.

    when it comes to institutional child abuse Ireland wins hands down.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    AnnaStezia wrote: »
    If ISIS v IRA ended in a draw would there be a shoot-out to decide the winner ?

    The victors of that shoot out should then have to fight 'Boko Haram' in the hot African jungle to decide the 'ultimate bas ass terrorists'.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭To Elland Back


    It started with a kiss.....

    Too soon :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭smurgen


    LordSutch wrote: »
    The victors of that shoot out should then have to fight 'Boko Haram' in the hot African jungle to decide the 'ultimate bas ass terrorists'.

    Yeah jungles of Nigeria? where the British killed and murdered thousands to establish a colony and gut Nigeria of its natural resources ?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,923 ✭✭✭To Elland Back


    Can we not all just agree that it is OK for our preferred group to be mass murderers, because everybody's doing it? Where's the harm?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    smurgen wrote: »
    Yeah jungles of Nigeria? where the British killed and murdered thousands to establish a colony and gut Nigeria of its natural resources ?


    You might well put a questionmark after your waffle, anyway (what the British did or didn't do, a hundred years ago is neither here nor there) in this fight to the death between Boko Harm and the winner of the ISIS Vs PIRA Terror match. :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭fergus1001


    It started with a kiss.....


    How did it end up like this ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭LDN_Irish


    As f*cked up as the North is atleast they don't have to live with the never ending nightmare of being governed by Fine Gail & Finna Fail your whole existence, it's worse than be being governed by Tories

    I take FF/FG for eternity over the DUP. They are right up there with the most bonkers parties in Europe. They make UKIP look centrist.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,567 ✭✭✭✭Fratton Fred


    smurgen wrote: »
    Yeah jungles of Nigeria? where the British killed and murdered thousands to establish a colony and gut Nigeria of its natural resources ?

    Yep, Where all those immigrants come from who get free houses, taxis and an endless supply of pushchairs to leave at bus stops.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    LordSutch wrote: »
    You might well put a questionmark after your waffle, anyway (what the British did or didn't do, a hundred years ago is neither here nor there) in this fight to the death between Boko Harm and the winner of the ISIS Vs PIRA Terror match. :D

    The 1950's are not 100 years ago, unless I've been buying out of date calendars lately.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,567 ✭✭✭✭Fratton Fred


    Nodin wrote: »
    The 1950's are not 100 years ago, unless I've been buying out of date calendars lately.

    Aren't we supposed to be moving on Nodin?

    Oh yeah, that's only when it comes to Gerry's past activities. otherwise it's a good bit of deflection for when the IRA are getting a bit of a bashing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Aren't we supposed to be moving on Nodin?

    Oh yeah, that's only when it comes to Gerry's past activities. otherwise it's a good bit of deflection for when the IRA are getting a bit of a bashing.


    There's moving on, and there's saying something happened "centuries ago" when it was happening midway through the 20th century. When I refer to Gerry as Adams of the Clan McAdams, hero of the 11th century cattle raid of the lower falls road, you can get onto me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Nodin wrote: »
    There's moving on, and there's saying something happened "centuries ago" when it was happening midway through the 20th century. When I refer to Gerry as Adams of the Clan McAdams, hero of the 11th century cattle raid of the lower falls road, you can get onto me.

    Now that 'the bearded one' has been introduced into the ISIS Vs IRA face off, let's discuss his contribution to such a confrontation. No doubt Adams would not be directly involved in the fracas seeing as he was never in the PIRA, therefore he probably wouldn't have the slightest idea how to point and fire a Kalashnikov, so maybe a role as book keeper or negotiator might suit him better? Failing that, what about him being a double agent in ISIS? With that lovely old beard of his, I guess he could blend right into either ISIS or the Taliban for a spell.

    Not sure Adams would blend into the ranks of Book Harem very convincingly though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    LordSutch wrote: »
    Now that 'the bearded one' has been introduced into the ISIS Vs IRA face off, let's discuss his contribution to such a confrontation. No doubt Adams would not be directly involved in the fracas seeing as he was never in the PIRA, therefore he probably wouldn't have the slightest idea how to point and fire a Kalashnikov, so maybe a role as book keeper or negotiator might suit him better? Failing that, what about him being a double agent in ISIS? With that lovely old beard of his, I guess he could blend right into either ISIS or the Taliban for a spell.

    Not sure Adams would blend into the ranks of Book Harem very convincingly though.


    Neither would James Bond.

    Having links with the Palestinians and ANC means many things might be accomplished, though as you point out The Bearded One himself would not obviously be directly involved.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Nodin wrote: »
    Neither would James Bond.

    Having links with the Palestinians and ANC means many things might be accomplished, though as you point out The Bearded One himself would not obviously be directly involved.

    James Bond would of course have the SAS in tow, which would spell the end of the line for Boko Haram, the PIRA, ISIS, and their kindrid spirits the Taliban, whose beards would all become a liability in the hot african jungle.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,933 ✭✭✭smurgen


    LordSutch wrote: »
    You might well put a questionmark after your waffle, anyway (what the British did or didn't do, a hundred years ago is neither here nor there) in this fight to the death between Boko Harm and the winner of the ISIS Vs PIRA Terror match. :D

    The British gave em independence in the 1960.Slavery was still legal there until 1936.Another country in a heap over the British terrorist Empire.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    smurgen wrote: »
    The British gave em independence in the 1960.Slavery was still legal there until 1936.Another country in a heap over the British terrorist Empire.

    Why don't you and Nodin start a new thread named Colonial forces Face Off.

    British Empire Vs French Empire, with the victors fighting the Dutch.


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,297 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    LDN_Irish wrote: »
    I take FF/FG for eternity over the DUP. They are right up there with the most bonkers parties in Europe. They make UKIP look centrist.
    Nationalist bias aside, are SF that much different than DUP?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,567 ✭✭✭✭Fratton Fred


    smurgen wrote: »
    The British gave em independence in the 1960.Slavery was still legal there until 1936.Another country in a heap over the British terrorist Empire.

    lol, the IRA bashing upsetting you is it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    LordSutch wrote: »
    James Bond would of course have the SAS in tow, which would spell the end of the line for Boko Haram, the PIRA, ISIS, and their kindrid spirits the Taliban, whose beards would all become a liability in the hot african jungle.

    I think you'll find the PIRA survived the attentions of the Special Assasination Squad for a considerable period and would doubtless do so again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Beards Vs balaclavas.

    ISIS would beat the Provo's every time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 275 ✭✭Colinf1212


    Religious fanatic terrorists vs freedom fighers?

    What a stupid debate. It's like debating who would win between British squaddies and Barnardo's volunteers


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,248 ✭✭✭✭BoJack Horseman


    Colinf1212 wrote: »
    Religious fanatic terrorists vs freedom fighers?

    Terrorist scum vs terrorist scum.

    I predict terrorist scum would win.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement