RTE Coverage of the Boston Bombing Trial

adrian522

I see, that clears everything up then I guess. :eek:

AndyBoBandy

omnithanos wrote: »

Because I saw them ask the authorities about this in the press conference after the bombing and the authorities refused to answer these questions and there were other confirmed reports of this happening elsewhere.

You have to confirm reports before you can accept them.

Maybe because in the aftermath of a bombing, they hadn't a scooby doo about what had happened, or what was happening, and in such a tight security scenario, they might be slightly fearful of giving too much information out on an investigation which was still in progress.

That 1 reason doesn't justify your entire argument that the whole thing was faked.

(you'll notice I'm using words/phrases like scooby doo to try and get into your level of thinking. dude.)

omnithanos

adrian522 wrote: »

So Family Guy are in on the plot? Maybe they organized the whole thing as a publicity stunt?:rolleyes:

Maybe they killed Robin Williams as a publicity stunt as well.

irelandrover

omnithanos wrote: »

Claiming something is true when you have no concrete evidence and when plenty of evidence exists which points to fakery conclusively shows RTE and TV3 up in a similar vein to their factually incorrect reporting of the priest who didn't father a child in Africa.

I mentioned in the Boston board that the bomb drill which took place in the library accross the road from the m&m shop where the hoax bomb happened explains how the street shook. It was reported that the authorities were telling people to remain calm immediately before the bombs went off so that confirms that the drill took place. I also pointed to the fact that both the library and the m&m's were both mentioned along with russian terriorists who had converted to Islam, blood and body parts on the streets of Boston and two bombs going off in quick sucession in the Boston marathon episode of Family Guy which was aired 29 day before the event and which was called Turban Cowboy alluding to the terriorists and the hero in the cowboy hat who was shown pushing Boston bomb poster boy Jeff Bauman, who had allegedly just lost both his legs, to safety in a wheelchair.
The videos showed hardly any debris and showed nobody being injured directly.

I'm not going to comment on the 9/11 stuff. It isn't the thread for it.

The family guy episode was edited to put two scenes together.

When a bomb goes off the entire place is covered in smoke. How can you see anyone getting injured? There are plenty of videos afterwards showing injured people but you don't believe those.

If a bomb detonated big enough to shake the street how did it not injure people?

This is the tree from beside the bombing showing damage.
http://www.capecodtimes.com/storyimage/CC/20150226/NEWS/150229610/AR/0/AR-150229610.jpg

You've had no concrete evidence of anything but you have no issue declaring it as fact.

omnithanos

Andybobandy wrote: »

Maybe because in the aftermath of a bombing, they hadn't a scooby doo about what had happened, or what was happening, and in such a tight security scenario, they might be slightly fearful of giving too much information out on an investigation which was still in progress.

That 1 reason doesn't justify your entire argument that the whole thing was faked.

I've given at least a dozen reasons now.

Here's a couple more

Fake trial lawyer confirmed

Krystell Campbell died but she looks fine right after the blast

irelandrover

omnithanos wrote: »

I've given at least a dozen reasons now.

Here's a couple more


Krystell Campbell died but she looks fine right after the blast

She looks in extreme pain in that video. And it is very possible to be alive at one point and later be dead.

And the only person who could judge 4:24 to be a blood pack or something like that is someone who want to see that.

ohnonotgmail

I'm afraid to watch any of those videos in case they cause my IQ to drop.

omnithanos

irelandrover wrote: »

I'm not going to comment on the 9/11 stuff. It isn't the thread for it.

The family guy episode was edited to put two scenes together.

When a bomb goes off the entire place is covered in smoke. How can you see anyone getting injured? There are plenty of videos afterwards showing injured people but you don't believe those.

If a bomb detonated big enough to shake the street how did it not injure people?

This is the tree from beside the bombing showing damage.
http://www.capecodtimes.com/storyimage/CC/20150226/NEWS/150229610/AR/0/AR-150229610.jpg

You've had no concrete evidence of anything but you have no issue declaring it as fact.

I referred to more than 2 scenes in the Family Guy episode.
A smoke bomb creates smoke to cover the fact that nobody was injured.
The people with injuries are all fake, I have posted videos showing them puting on fake limbs, fake blood etc.
If a real bomb had to be used to shake the street, this was a controlled bomb which was exploded inside the library.

I haven't seen that picture of the tree before so fair dues for bringing something real to the party.

galljga1

omnithanos wrote: »

First off, the 9/11 wikipedia page is completely and obviously inaccurate and does not hold up to any scrutiny. For example, it claims that 19 hijackers died that day when it has since been proven that at least 7 of these are still alive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks

Where did RTE put any effort into establishing that this bombing was real? Where are the actual concrete facts? A video showing an explosion where nobody is seen getting injured? If RTE visit Sioux City will they then claim that people are being shot dead for entertainment? I'm saying this was definite substandard reporting as was last nights TV3 report into the hoax crash site in the Alps which claims that supposition is truth.

How do you explain, with reasoning, how the little girl, who was said to have had to have her leg amputated afterwards, could stand up independently immediately after the "bomb"?

How do you explain, with reasoning, how the same little girl is shown exposing the stump of her leg in the second video I posted when it was reported that she hadn't lost her leg yet?

This is not a case of the girl looking similar here, this is footage taken from the official reports of the Boston bombing.

Watch the following video carefully from 1 minute 50 seconds and answer me the following;

How do you explain why the lady runner in green tosses something to the man who is falling behind her immediately after the blast?

How do you explain why this man, who appears to be falling over because of the blast, actually dives to catch the object thrown by the lady in green?

Notice also how she throws the object behind her without turning around. Are you telling me you don't think there is anything suspicious about this?

Why were these two people interviewed afterwards by the corrupt hoax American media if they weren't all in on it together?

Notice also how the above video also links the illuminati card game published in 1995 with the Boston Marathon and how this woman in green, who appears to set off the fake bomb with a detonator, is dressed in a very similar fashion to the jogger in the game card. Note also that the same illuminati card game predicted both the pentagon attack and the twin tower attack.

I do not believe this is a theory I believe this to be fact and I would have to say that all the propaganda put out by the US media ever since they contrived the reports on 9/11 is the real collection of videos put together by seriously deranged people who are actually perpetrating these crimes.

The Irish Government appear to have been complicit in this ever since they allowed rendition flights to operate out of Shannon when we actually saw US tanks roll up and down the runways of Shannon on public access TV which was then taken off the air. Our president Michael D. Higgins was present to witness this happening and to protest against this. Now we appear to have either propaganda reporting by both the RTE and TV3 or else very shoddy work which is not researched correctly and makes no attempt to report fact. Remember how the story about that priest who was supposed to have fathered a child in Africa turned out to be complete baloney?

Where are the 7 9/11 hijackers that are still alive?

No idea what Sioux city is about.

9/11, The Boston bombing, the recent crash (which you actually predicted, well you actually said something was going to happen somewhere on the 22nd which it did not but the 24th in the alps was near enough), all false flag opps or whatever you want to call them. Based on the rambling youtube videos put together by extremely deranged people or else they are having a laugh.

You are looking at grainy video here, a lot of which was taken by mobile devices. There are breaks in these videos, they could have been edited, the chronology may not be as it is presented in the video. Be the sceptic, you are supposed to be. Do not accept these videos as depicting the truth because they are on Youtube or accept some thing because it is on a website particularly Wikipedia.

So something falls out of a woman's hand (who has nothing to do with a card in a boardgame) at the same time as a bomb detonates. A man behind her falls and the item ends up on the ground. So what?

As for the Illuminati cards, there are over 500 cards in circulation depicting all manner of people and events. The cards do not provide any link to events at a date in the future to which they have been printed. This is complete nonsense.

Personally I believe rendition flights have operated through Shannon and armaments have come through this country (I am vague on the legal standing of that one). Can I prove it? No. Could I find something on Youtube to back it up? Probably. Will I? No, because it would be halfbaked nonsense. We should have been spot searching these planes from day one. On the other hand maybe if some pink shirted baboon and his cohorts had been transported and swapped pink for orange, it may have been worth it. That is in jest, by the way.

Priests have fathered children all over the world since the dawn of time. Coincidentally, I worked with two guys at the same time whose names were Mac an tSagairt and Mac an Easpaig.

I still hold onto the faint hope that you are conducting a social experiment.

galljga1

irelandrover wrote: »

The last I will say on it is that the illuminati card for 9/11 is a nuclear attack. They picked a card that suited the most.

You have been shown videos of the street shaking, videos that show debris. You have ignored then or offered counter points. What evidence do you think would make you believe that the bombing was real. Any video that people show you, you will claim is fake.

The fact that you don't agree with it doesn't mean that the coverage sucked.

The bombing was real. That is an accepted fact by the overwhelming majority of the world. Videos appear on You tube claiming so many recent 'world events' are hoax. I believe a lot of these are extracting the michael. Regardless whether they are in jest or are exposing a joint lizard/zionist/illuminatti plot (or are they all the same people? i am confused) gullible people get sucked in and believe this crap.

omnithanos

galljga1 wrote: »

Where are the 7 9/11 hijackers that are still alive?

No idea what Sioux city is about.

9/11, The Boston bombing, the recent crash (which you actually predicted, well you actually said something was going to happen somewhere on the 22nd which it did not but the 24th in the alps was near enough), all false flag opps or whatever you want to call them. Based on the rambling youtube videos put together by extremely deranged people or else they are having a laugh.

You are looking at grainy video here, a lot of which was taken by mobile devices. There are breaks in these videos, they could have been edited, the chronology may not be as it is presented in the video. Be the sceptic, you are supposed to be. Do not accept these videos as depicting the truth because they are on Youtube or accept some thing because it is on a website particularly Wikipedia.

So something falls out of a woman's hand (who has nothing to do with a card in a boardgame) at the same time as a bomb detonates. A man behind her falls and the item ends up on the ground. So what?

As for the Illuminati cards, there are over 500 cards in circulation depicting all manner of people and events. The cards do not provide any link to events at a date in the future to which they have been printed. This is complete nonsense.

Personally I believe rendition flights have operated through Shannon and armaments have come through this country (I am vague on the legal standing of that one). Can I prove it? No. Could I find something on Youtube to back it up? Probably. Will I? No, because it would be halfbaked nonsense. We should have been spot searching these planes from day one. On the other hand maybe if some pink shirted baboon and his cohorts had been transported and swapped pink for orange, it may have been worth it. That is in jest, by the way.

Priests have fathered children all over the world since the dawn of time. Coincidentally, I worked with two guys at the same time whose names were Mac an tSagairt and Mac an Easpaig.

I still hold onto the faint hope that you are conducting a social experiment.

No I'm not conducting a social experiment, it appears O Bomb A is.
The hijackers are all coincidentally working in McDonalds in Roscommon apart from one who now works as an administrator in the Pentagon.
Sioux City is a cowboy attraction in Spain where they stage gunfight shows.

If the videos were faked they did a much better job than they did on 9/11. There are just too many out there to confirm they aren't fake.

We could always ask our President about Shannon cos he was there on the scene but there's a possibility that he was replaced by a reptilian clone.

I'm taking a sabbatical cos I have to organise some legal papers to expose some corrupt solicitors.

Peace and love to all.

galljga1

omnithanos wrote: »

I referred to more than 2 scenes in the Family Guy episode.
A smoke bomb creates smoke to cover the fact that nobody was injured.
The people with injuries are all fake, I have posted videos showing them puting on fake limbs, fake blood etc.
If a real bomb had to be used to shake the street, this was a controlled bomb which was exploded inside the library.

I haven't seen that picture of the tree before so fair dues for bringing something real to the party.

The fact that you are quoting Family Guy speaks volumes. It has nothing to do with the Boston Bombing or Robin Williams death.

A smoke bomb creates smoke, so does a real bomb.

I have watched the videos supposedly showing the attachment of fake limbs, fake blood and did not see what you did.

Controlled bomb? The mind boggles.

And by the way, my six year old found a video of Charlie and Lola which was posted by Frank somebody. If only we had found it in time, we could have prevented the attack on Charlie Hebdo. For those of you who do not know, the words Charlie and Frank (meaning France) were in an add for the iPad Air pre the attack which obviously predicted it. Oh and this was also a joint US/Mossad operation.

omnithanos

galljga1 wrote: »

The fact that you are quoting Family Guy speaks volumes. It has nothing to do with the Boston Bombing or Robin Williams death.

A smoke bomb creates smoke, so does a real bomb.

I have watched the videos supposedly showing the attachment of fake limbs, fake blood and did not see what you did.

Controlled bomb? The mind boggles.

And by the way, my six year old found a video of Charlie and Lola which was posted by Frank somebody. If only we had found it in time, we could have prevented the attack on Charlie Hebdo. For those of you who do not know, the words Charlie and Frank (meaning France) were in an add for the iPad Air pre the attack which obviously predicted it. Oh and this was also a joint US/Mossad operation.

Did that video also contain satanic imagery?

galljga1

omnithanos wrote: »

Did that video also contain satanic imagery?

Yes, as does all Charlie and Lola.

Licks eyeball with long tongue.

spacetweek

omnithanos wrote: »

Here's a video showing what was in the Family Guy episode that was aired 29 days before the Boston Bombing.

Read the wiki page on that Family Guy episode. The idea that it mentioned many of the features of the Boston bombing is a hoax.

omnithanos

spacetweek wrote: »

Read the wiki page on that Family Guy episode. The idea that it mentioned many of the features of the Boston bombing is a hoax.

It's not a hoax. If it were why would they have deleted the entire episode from box sets?

And here's the clip from the other Seth McFarlane show American Dad which aired the night before the marathon and which specifically mentioned the two blasts.

Here's another interesting one. The guy who took the video footage at the Boston marathon also witnessed the “plane” hitting the second tower on 9/11.

adrian522

The trial of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects is now at an end with deliberations starting this week. Hopefully the families get the justice they deserve after this shocking crime.

adrian522

Guilty on all counts, sentencing to follow. Funny how the defense didn't raise the point that there was no bomb, presumably it would have helped their case.

omnithanos

adrian522 wrote: »

Guilty on all counts, sentencing to follow. Funny how the defense didn't raise the point that there was no bomb, presumably it would have helped their case.

Since it's a fake trial I wouldn't think so.

Yesterday was the first day of the satanic ritual of abduction and ceremonial preparation and holding of sacrificial victims. I wonder if Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is enjoying his abduction and ceremonial preparation and holding?

RTE were at it again on the news at 9 saying that 3 people were killed and 260 people were injured as if it were a confirmed fact which it isn't. You can't confirm something that didn't happen. Is this grounds to withhold my TV licence?

ohnonotgmail

omnithanos wrote: »

Since it's a fake trial I wouldn't think so.

Yesterday was the first day of the satanic ritual of abduction and ceremonial preparation and holding of sacrificial victims. I wonder if Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is enjoying his abduction and ceremonial preparation and holding?

RTE were at it again on the news at 9 saying that 3 people were killed and 260 people were injured as if it were a confirmed fact which it isn't. You can't confirm something that didn't happen. Is this grounds to withhold my TV licence?

So a fake bomb AND a fake trial. Is there anything real in the world? What media can we trust oh wise one?

omnithanos

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

So a fake bomb AND a fake trial. Is there anything real in the world? What media can we trust oh wise one?

Good question. Alex Ross, David Icke, Russell Brand and even the great Jesse the Body Ventura (cos he wore a leather jacket with a dodgy design at a wwe event), are being labeled Illuminati controlled opposition.

I have to give credit to Peekay Boston for exposing the Boston hoax.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3SQjinnAIgbxBTL61PSEng/videos

AndyBoBandy

omnithanos wrote: »

RTE were at it again on the news at 9 saying that 3 people were killed and 260 people were injured as if it were a confirmed fact which it isn't. You can't confirm something that didn't happen. Is this grounds to withhold my TV licence?

Absolutely. I've point blank refused to pay my TV licence ever since RTÉ started reporting on the events of July 1969, and will continue to do so until RTÉ proves that man did actually stand on the moon.

ohnonotgmail

omnithanos wrote: »

Good question. Alex Ross, David Icke, Russell Brand and even the great Jesse the Body Ventura (cos he wore a leather jacket with a dodgy design at a wwe event), are being labeled Illuminati controlled opposition.

I have to give credit to Peekay Boston for exposing the Boston hoax.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3SQjinnAIgbxBTL61PSEng/videos

another youtube video. tedious

omnithanos

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

another youtube video. tedious

Not a video, a youtube channel which proves the events of the Boston Bombing were staged through observing and commenting on actual CCTV footage.

This channel actually shows you the evidence in a way that neither RTE nor TV3 do.

TV3 were at it again this morning claiming 3 died and over 260 were injured that day in Boston with no corroborating evidence and yesterday in the morning show they claimed that police procedures in the US were changed as a result of the terrorist attack on 9/11. There was no evidence of a terrorist attack on 9/11 other than an inside job.
Bin Laden was not on the official wanted list and he condemned the attack saying that he would not direct an attack towards innocent citizens. At least 7 of the 19 alleged hijackers are still alive, did they telleport off the planes at the last moment?
And if you examine the evidence they used to implicate the terrorists, passports found at the scene of a plane crash at Shanksville which allegedly disintegrated the entire plane and all the passengers but not the passports and a passport found by an FBI man among the rubble at ground zero. Perhaps it fell out of the terrorists pocket while he was telleporting?

adrian522

Pretty inspirational stuff in my opinion, Bombing survivor completing Monday's 2015 edition of the race:

http://www.wpxi.com/news/news/national/video-bombing-survivor-crosses-boston-marathon-fin/nky28/#__federated=1

omnithanos

adrian522 wrote: »

Pretty inspirational stuff in my opinion, Bombing survivor completing Monday's 2015 edition of the race:

http://www.wpxi.com/news/news/national/video-bombing-survivor-crosses-boston-marathon-fin/nky28/#__federated=1

Fair play but it says she only ran the last few miles.

ohnonotgmail

omnithanos wrote: »

Fair play but it says she only ran the last few miles.

given that she only has one working leg i think that's excusable.

adrian522

omnithanos wrote: »

Fair play but it says she only ran the last few miles.

The last few miles are the most difficult though.

omnithanos

TV3 were at it again this morning. They spoke of their disgust at the Bombers apology. They also played footage yesterday morning clearly showing the lady runner dressed in green throwing her detonator to the man behind her, who fell while trying to catch it, immediately after the first blast went off. If it were a real terrorist attack they why wasn't she questioned?

If the Boston Bombing was a real terrorist attack then what happened to the planned Operation Urban Shield?
Surely it would have been more relevant to stage a massive bomb drill in the wake of such a terrorist attack.

If it were real then why was a random lady with a huge bag allowed to walk up to a cop, ask for his blue gloves, enter the scene and fanny about doing nothing except make calls on her mobile?

If you believe this was a genuine terrorist attack then you must agree that it was only mere coincidence that the finish line where the blast went off was at 666 Boyslan Street, that it happened on the anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic, that sentencing started on the satanic feast of abduction and sacrifice, that two girls in the crowd would kiss each other immediately before the first blast, that the lady in green was dressed exactly like the lady on the Illuminati card printed in 1995 which said "nobody suspects a jogger", that the American Dad episode that aired the night before mentioned "call the bomb squad cos that makes two blasts", that the Family Guy episode aired 29 days earlier made reference to conversion to Islam, Russian terrorists, amputees, people dying at the Boston Marathon, m&m's, the library, two blasts and a cowboy hat, that a bomb drill was announced before the blast went off, that the authorities told people to stay calm before the blast went off, that tables and chairs which were not damaged by the blast were smashed up afterwards, that the tree beside the blast was removed, that the three first responders at the Sandy Hook elementary school massacre just happened to be there, that people who had no blood on them immediately after the blast were covered in blood when they were taken away, that a little girl looked exactly like a dummy, that a lady was shielding Jeff Bauman from view while someone was attending to his legs, that people pushing the injured in wheelchairs would stop running as soon as they thought they were out of view of the camera, that a man went nowhere near his wife after the blast despite standing in close proximity, that a girl who later had her leg amputated was able to stand independently immediately after the blast, that a man would walk away with his uninjured son leaving behind his dead son and his daughter who would later have her leg amputated?