Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Golf Digest Top 100 Courses... again

  • 16-12-2014 11:26pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,003 ✭✭✭


    The Golf Digest Ireland Rankings are out. A few surprises... but where would the fun go if there weren't any. They're up on my blog, alongside the rankings for the past five years - for comparison purposes. Some 'interesting' trends.

    Golf Digest Ireland reviewers - what are your thoughts on the process and how your contributions were received?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 998 ✭✭✭John Divney


    Lahinch above Waterville, I agree.

    Old head moving up four spots? Nah

    Macreddin scrapes top 100 lol.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 492 ✭✭TrapperChamonix


    I find the big movers to be interesting. Should we assume that there has been significant course improvement in Dooks & Old Head in the last 4years to warrant an increase of 9 and 10 places respectively? What has happened to Dundalk to see it in free fall (I know they had problems with the Greens last year but this year they are back to their normal quality). Portstewart has gone back 3 places in the last 2 years and yet during this time they made significant improvements to the course under the supervision of no less than the R&A (in prep for the British Amateur).
    Ted, I'm confused:confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,003 ✭✭✭Kevinmarkham


    I find the big movers to be interesting. Should we assume that there has been significant course improvement in Dooks & Old Head in the last 4years to warrant an increase of 9 and 10 places respectively? What has happened to Dundalk to see it in free fall (I know they had problems with the Greens last year but this year they are back to their normal quality). Portstewart has gone back 3 places in the last 2 years and yet during this time they made significant improvements to the course under the supervision of no less than the R&A (in prep for the British Amateur).
    Ted, I'm confused:confused:

    Old Head has added a new hole, putting the par three 13th on the cliffs. It opened this year. Otherwise the same dramatic course. Dooks had its 125th anniversary - a friend is a member who tells me the course is in as good a shape as it has ever been... the only changes have been to the line of trees between 16 and 17, which have been removed.

    Dundalk is a strong parkland, but I've never really understood why it's Top 100 material. As for Portstewart... well, I guess all you can do is look at who has overtaken it. Funnily enough, I expected to see Carne slip a bit because of their greens this year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,512 ✭✭✭✭Rikand


    Glad to see Athlone holding its top 100 spot


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,512 ✭✭✭✭Rikand


    Also very glad to see New Forest break in for the first time. Gorgeous course with some very memorable holes on it. The walled garden par 3 is pretty cool. A couple of holes on it I dont like, the 12th for example I think is a very unfair hole, but overall a lovely course


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 211 ✭✭shabalala


    These rankings, apart from maybe the top 10 are completely driven by who spends money advertising with Golf Digest Ireland. Until they are done independently there will always be an amount of LOL


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,315 ✭✭✭✭Mantis Toboggan


    No course from the county of tipperary is a little harsh I think.

    Free Palestine 🇵🇸



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,174 ✭✭✭benny79


    Jesus how is the Smurfit course on there! thats one of the worse courses I've played and in very poor condition each time I played it and ahead of Bunclody and the likes! shocking stuff..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,426 ✭✭✭Miley Byrne


    Old Head has added a new hole, putting the par three 13th on the cliffs. It opened this year. Otherwise the same dramatic course. Dooks had its 125th anniversary - a friend is a member who tells me the course is in as good a shape as it has ever been... the only changes have been to the line of trees between 16 and 17, which have been removed.

    Dundalk is a strong parkland, but I've never really understood why it's Top 100 material. As for Portstewart... well, I guess all you can do is look at who has overtaken it. Funnily enough, I expected to see Carne slip a bit because of their greens this year.

    Didn't know they removed them trees, thats no harm anyway because them two holes looked like they belonged to a different course. I love links golf but Dooks is not a favourite of mine for some reason


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 211 ✭✭shabalala


    I find the big movers to be interesting. Should we assume that there has been significant course improvement in Dooks & Old Head in the last 4years to warrant an increase of 9 and 10 places respectively? What has happened to Dundalk to see it in free fall (I know they had problems with the Greens last year but this year they are back to their normal quality). Portstewart has gone back 3 places in the last 2 years and yet during this time they made significant improvements to the course under the supervision of no less than the R&A (in prep for the British Amateur).
    Ted, I'm confused:confused:

    Subscribe to Golf Digest Ireland and you will see why, Dooks (whose manager is on the voting panel) advertise a lot, as do Old head... these rankings annoy me for that reason, they are all about advertising spend, not at all about the golf course.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 248 ✭✭LucidLife


    How many spent more than ballybunion? Where it place? Old and New make it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,512 ✭✭✭✭Rikand


    LucidLife wrote: »
    How many spent more than ballybunion? Where it place? Old and New make it?

    Ballybunion (old) is ranked number 6
    Ballybunion (Cashen) is rising as quickly up the rankings as is probably allowable (93,81,79,66,56)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,003 ✭✭✭Kevinmarkham


    LucidLife wrote: »
    How many spent more than ballybunion? Where it place? Old and New make it?

    Are you asking a question or making a point?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,480 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    ...
    Golf Digest Ireland reviewers - what are your thoughts on the process and how your contributions were received?....

    Have to say, pretty much laid out as I expected it (the reviews I carried out and comments made re comparison to other courses).
    As I posted over on another thread I believe an injustice has been put right with New Forest and Macreddin taking much deserved places.
    Perhaps the only thing I can see is Carlow is too high IMHO, would like to see the 'nearly there' list too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 321 ✭✭kevgaa


    shabalala wrote: »
    Subscribe to Golf Digest Ireland and you will see why, Dooks (whose manager is on the voting panel) advertise a lot, as do Old head... these rankings annoy me for that reason, they are all about advertising spend, not at all about the golf course.

    The pro from St Margaret's is heavily involved in the main voting panel and I don't see his course on the list!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 211 ✭✭shabalala


    kevgaa wrote: »
    The pro from St Margaret's is heavily involved in the main voting panel and I don't see his course on the list!!!


    They don't spend enough advertising money clearly!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,191 ✭✭✭Dr_Colossus


    slave1 wrote: »
    As I posted over on another thread I believe an injustice has been put right with New Forest and Macreddin taking much deserved places.
    Perhaps the only thing I can see is Carlow is too high IMHO, would like to see the 'nearly there' list too.

    +1 regarding Macreddin although it could be higher (have yet to play New Forest).
    Carlow is about fair I reckon in the rankings, I think it's a class layout and course in general with tough and demanding greens and penal rough. I'd dock it points perhaps for reducing it's Junior Scratch Cup to only 18 holes but that isn't a factor.
    The likes of Royal Dublin and Connemara for me are ranked too highly but there's always been a bias in favor of links courses in these rankings.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,480 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    ...but there's always been a bias in favor of links courses in these rankings...

    100%, stands out by a mile, shame for me in Athlone, talk about far from any coastal links course:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭Ally McIntosh


    Seeing as this comes up every year, I may as well kill the rumour that the rankings have anything at all to do with advertising spend. It is a completely independent process voted on by a completely independent panel.

    I don't see the ratings having a links bias. I see a lot of links courses near the top because they are the best courses, relative to others in the country.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,378 ✭✭✭HighLine


    The first 2 that strike me as needing to be higher on the list are Druids Glen and Macreddin.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 248 ✭✭LucidLife


    Are you asking a question or making a point?

    Was asking genuinely. I live abroad so caught my eye just. I knew the Old would be up there but had no idea about the Cashen.

    I am glad the Cashen is rising. It really does deserve to be closer to the Old. It gets under rated because of proximity to the Old! (I feel)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,003 ✭✭✭Kevinmarkham


    LucidLife wrote: »
    I am glad the Cashen is rising. It really does deserve to be closer to the Old. It gets under rated because of proximity to the Old! (I feel)

    I agree it deserves its rise up the ranking. It will never get that close to the Old as its not traditional links golf. On the Cashen you have to fire directly at greens as the bump-and-run option is often taken out of the equation by the heavy dips below greens.

    A case in point - approach to the par five 15th:
    wu30qb.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 248 ✭✭LucidLife


    I agree it deserves its rise up the ranking. It will never get that close to the Old as its not traditional links golf. On the Cashen you have to fire directly at greens as the bump-and-run option is often taken out of the equation by the heavy dips below greens.

    A case in point - approach to 15

    Great hole but a lot really are as you know. Thanks for the taste of home :)

    (Cant paste links as im new)


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,480 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    I don't see the ratings having a links bias. I see a lot of links courses near the top because they are the best courses, relative to others in the country.

    Ah it's still an opinion at the end of the day Ally, 17 of the top 20 are links and the 'bottom' 50 dominated by parkland.
    For the right or wrong reason this is bias to links IMHO.
    There is a divide between links and parkland, they are both golf courses but in many respects with different heritage, approach and design (whether architect or 'God') they are quite different requiring a different approach by the golfer as their challenges are just so fundamentally distinct.
    I love both as it happens, but don't feel they are readily inter comparable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 211 ✭✭shabalala


    Seeing as this comes up every year, I may as well kill the rumour that the rankings have anything at all to do with advertising spend. It is a completely independent process voted on by a completely independent panel.

    I don't see the ratings having a links bias. I see a lot of links courses near the top because they are the best courses, relative to others in the country.


    How can it be an independent panel if some of the panellists are working for/in some of the clubs listed? That is completely the opposite of independent.

    As a GDI reader and someone that has worked in advertising it looks clear cut to me, of course this is just my opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,003 ✭✭✭Kevinmarkham


    shabalala wrote: »
    How can it be an independent panel if some of the panellists are working for/in some of the clubs listed? That is completely the opposite of independent.

    As a GDI reader and someone that has worked in advertising it looks clear cut to me, of course this is just my opinion.

    Yes, it's a challenge alright. Trouble is, to get people who have the necessary experience to be on a panel, you get people who are deeply involved in the sport. A couple of years back you had someone from Portmarnock on the panel, and that was the year Portmarnock pipped RCD to top spot. It is, unfortunately, somewhat unavoidable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 211 ✭✭shabalala


    Yes, it's a challenge alright. Trouble is, to get people who have the necessary experience to be on a panel, you get people who are deeply involved in the sport. A couple of years back you had someone from Portmarnock on the panel, and that was the year Portmarnock pipped RCD to top spot. It is, unfortunately, somewhat unavoidable.

    Then if the sniff of it being unfair is unavoidable, why do it at all?

    Why have reviewers out playing the courses when at the end of the day its a panel of biased golf club employees etc making the final decisions?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,003 ✭✭✭Kevinmarkham


    shabalala wrote: »
    at the end of the day its a panel of biased golf club employees etc making the final decisions

    I think that's a sweeping generalisation. There have to be people closely involved in golf on the panel because they know the courses and the very nature of how golf courses work... and anyone involved in golf has their opinions... some biased and some less so... I have my opinions, just as you do - give me your top 5 courses and I guarantee I'll find fault with your list... just as you'd find fault with mine.

    The reviewers - several who participate on Boards - get their say and their contributions are weighted alongside those of everybody else.

    At the end of the day it's a general ranking, there to be debated... not the 10 commandments.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,480 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    shabalala wrote: »
    Why have reviewers out playing the courses when at the end of the day its a panel of biased golf club employees etc making the final decisions?

    Ah, I think that comment is a bit harsh mate and not a reflection of the process.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭Ally McIntosh


    shabalala wrote: »
    How can it be an independent panel if some of the panellists are working for/in some of the clubs listed? That is completely the opposite of independent.

    As a GDI reader and someone that has worked in advertising it looks clear cut to me, of course this is just my opinion.

    This is a different complaint.

    Your original question was about magazine advertising affecting the rankings, not conflicts of interest that individual panel members may have.

    Regards these conflicts of interest, those on the panel who are involved with a particular club in one way or another invariably try to give an honest appraisal and then let the other panel members debate the pro's and con's.

    Best Regards,
    Ally


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 867 ✭✭✭thewobbler


    Having followed these types of list closely since being on the first GD reader's panel, I would suggest the following:

    - It should be reduced to a top 50. Once you take out the 40-50 course in Ireland that are really fields with sticks, it means every course has a 1 in 3 chance appearing. Making the list isn't so much an honour a not making the list being an embarrassment. I honestly doubt there's a hare's breadth between the 80th and 200th placed courses in Ireland. That's why being omitted gets people annoyed; anyone can look at the list and make a case for their own course. It's also why people get convinced that advertising plays a role in deciding place.

    - Like all selections in all walks of life, it tends to become harder to get removed than to get involved. Personally I find it quite galling that a course (the Heritage) which has allowed its condition to deteriorate continuously over a number of years, is always given a strong nod. No doubt it was originally a top track. But along with Smurfit is gains mostly negative feedback these days. Doesn't add up.

    - I doubt anyone bar Kevin has actually played every golf course in Ireland. But there's 50-60 high profile courses across the country that everyone on the main panel will have played. And when push comes to shove, it means they can be discussed at a full committee level. It's a natural advantage for high profile courses.

    - I haven't seen the magazine yet so haven't seen the 'those who nearly made it' list. Every year Roe Park makes this list, which can only actually be a nod to advertising money. Should it ever make the big cut (it won't) then the list is done for an 'independent' assessment.

    - The links preference has now come to be expected. Personally I'd prefer if some of the blander links I've stood on - Baltray, Tom Morris - had to work as hard as a parkland course for their position. But truth is, links golf IS better!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,370 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    thewobbler wrote: »
    I honestly doubt there's a hare's breadth between the 80th and 200th placed courses in Ireland.

    I have to disagree, speaking as a member of a >80 course (and having played some of the others) There are some very rough courses out there.

    As an example, I wouldnt put Esker Hills above Grange (my course) or Castle.
    Grange has been steadily improving course condition over the last 5 years and yet has slipped some 10 places in 4 years.

    I guess I just dont get it, what makes Hermitage that much better than Castle?

    As you rightly pointed out, a number of the marquee courses are looking rough these days, I found esker hills very rough, same for castleknock & luttrelstown when I played them. Far more unkempt than Grange or Castle, the greens in Grange are perfect 12 months a year (barring pole forking), I couldnt say the same about Druids Glen when I played it a few months ago, likewise for their bunkers.

    I think Im going to go ahead and just start ignoring it tbh.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,480 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    I played luttrelstown and castleknock in May and June, both courses were in pristine condition on the day. What the GD process does is get reviewers to visit at different times of the year so isolated visits where perhaps the course was out of sorts are balanced with visits say, a month later when the course is better prepared.
    I think we all acknowledge that it is subjective, for example if you're a golfer who hates links then you'll have massive issues.
    Personally I look on it as a quartile rating, kinda helps me understand the qualities of the top tier and so on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 998 ✭✭✭John Divney


    Castleknock has always been good when I've played it but Luttrellstown has gone downhill bigtime.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,144 ✭✭✭Benny Cake


    Moyvalley can't be far from a return, super track on the way back to its best...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,185 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    Played the most course I ever played in a year, last year. I'm a 5 day member and love playing new courses - typically use society golf to do it - or Opens.

    If I was to put them in 3 groups, would do as follows. I know sometimes you just get a course on a bad day.

    Was blown away with (Condition/Course) - I've put them in order as far as I can remember. Was lucky to be invited to a good few for cheap rounds / free rounds.

    Royal County Down
    The Island
    Enniscrone
    Strandhill
    Carlow
    Royal Curragh
    Portmarnock Links
    Portmarnock
    The European Club
    Concra Wood (But rained off going back in Feb)
    Tullamore
    Portumna
    County Sligo
    Galway Bay
    Douglas


    Was very Impressed with

    Mount Juilet
    Fota (wasn't as good as expected, still class)
    Esker Hills
    Bearna
    Roscrea
    Enniscorthy
    Naas
    Black Bush
    Castlewarden
    Cahir Park
    Bettystown
    Beaverstown
    Grange Castle ( For all the talk of it being a "kip" - great public golf course)
    Carne (Big Trip for poor condition and forward tees, almost below)


    Dissapointed (Condition or course) I think if you pay big money condition should be Top.

    Druids Glen (Great layout - poor enough condition, shoud be in group 1 if right)
    The Heritage (Shocked how much it has fallen)
    Lutrellstown (Was always in top condition - fairways too long - greens poor)
    New Ross ( I like course - but a little rough these days)
    Donabate (Holes too alike - seems to be struggling)
    Ballykisteen (Grand - couple of nice holes - but a hotel then course)

    Loved the year - best golf year ever - can't see it being repeated. I'd have no problem going back to any course I played if it was handy.

    Haven't even started to see courses up North or West/South. Some country for golf.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,480 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    That's a great list, just great variety of courses, give us a shout if you're playing courses in the midlands, always looking for an excuse...


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,480 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Getting back to the Top100, played 32 of them and have plans for getting to another 10 or so next year, would be great to get to play them all...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 879 ✭✭✭Montgolfier


    Played the most course I ever played in a year, last year. I'm a 5 day member and love playing new courses - typically use society golf to do it - or Opens.

    If I was to put them in 3 groups, would do as follows. I know sometimes you just get a course on a bad day.

    Was blown away with (Condition/Course) - I've put them in order as far as I can remember. Was lucky to be invited to a good few for cheap rounds / free rounds.

    Royal County Down
    The Island
    Enniscrone
    Strandhill
    Carlow
    Royal Curragh
    Portmarnock Links
    Portmarnock
    The European Club
    Concra Wood (But rained off going back in Feb)
    Tullamore
    Portumna
    County Sligo
    Galway Bay
    Douglas


    Was very Impressed with

    Mount Juilet
    Fota (wasn't as good as expected, still class)
    Esker Hills
    Bearna
    Roscrea
    Enniscorthy
    Naas
    Black Bush
    Castlewarden
    Cahir Park
    Bettystown
    Beaverstown
    Grange Castle ( For all the talk of it being a "kip" - great public golf course)
    Carne (Big Trip for poor condition and forward tees, almost below)


    Dissapointed (Condition or course) I think if you pay big money condition should be Top.

    Druids Glen (Great layout - poor enough condition, shoud be in group 1 if right)
    The Heritage (Shocked how much it has fallen)
    Lutrellstown (Was always in top condition - fairways too long - greens poor)
    New Ross ( I like course - but a little rough these days)
    Donabate (Holes too alike - seems to be struggling)
    Ballykisteen (Grand - couple of nice holes - but a hotel then course)

    Loved the year - best golf year ever - can't see it being repeated. I'd have no problem going back to any course I played if it was handy.

    Haven't even started to see courses up North or West/South. Some country for golf.

    What do you think about Roscrea going down the crazy golf route? Windmills behind the greens an all...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 492 ✭✭TrapperChamonix


    Played the most course I ever played in a year, last year. I'm a 5 day member and love playing new courses - typically use society golf to do it - or Opens.

    If I was to put them in 3 groups, would do as follows. I know sometimes you just get a course on a bad day.

    Was blown away with (Condition/Course) - I've put them in order as far as I can remember. Was lucky to be invited to a good few for cheap rounds / free rounds.

    Royal County Down
    The Island
    Enniscrone
    Strandhill
    Carlow
    Royal Curragh
    Portmarnock Links
    Portmarnock
    The European Club
    Concra Wood (But rained off going back in Feb)
    Tullamore
    Portumna
    County Sligo
    Galway Bay
    Douglas


    Was very Impressed with

    Mount Juilet
    Fota (wasn't as good as expected, still class)
    Esker Hills
    Bearna
    Roscrea
    Enniscorthy
    Naas
    Black Bush
    Castlewarden
    Cahir Park
    Bettystown
    Beaverstown
    Grange Castle ( For all the talk of it being a "kip" - great public golf course)
    Carne (Big Trip for poor condition and forward tees, almost below)


    Dissapointed (Condition or course) I think if you pay big money condition should be Top.

    Druids Glen (Great layout - poor enough condition, shoud be in group 1 if right)
    The Heritage (Shocked how much it has fallen)
    Lutrellstown (Was always in top condition - fairways too long - greens poor)
    New Ross ( I like course - but a little rough these days)
    Donabate (Holes too alike - seems to be struggling)
    Ballykisteen (Grand - couple of nice holes - but a hotel then course)

    Loved the year - best golf year ever - can't see it being repeated. I'd have no problem going back to any course I played if it was handy.

    Haven't even started to see courses up North or West/South. Some country for golf.

    Kevin = Master
    FDP= Apprentice


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 492 ✭✭TrapperChamonix


    slave1 wrote: »
    Getting back to the Top100, played 32 of them and have plans for getting to another 10 or so next year, would be great to get to play them all...

    I've played 33 and have 6 planned for next year. The real goal is for me and my son to play as many as possible of the top 20 (while we can still get him on juvenile rates :D) Currently I'm at 8 with 3 more planned for next year. He's at 3 with another 5 planned.
    I'm sure lots of people would see this as rather sad, but in a couple more years I'll be lucky if he acknowledges me in public never mind actually wanting to play with me.
    European, Rosses Point, Enniscrone, Donegal, Portrush and maybe Lahinch on the wish list for next year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,512 ✭✭✭✭Rikand


    What do you think about Roscrea going down the crazy golf route? Windmills behind the greens an all...

    oh you are quite the wit sir!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,003 ✭✭✭Kevinmarkham


    thewobbler wrote: »
    - It should be reduced to a top 50.

    - Personally I find it quite galling that a course (the Heritage) which has allowed its condition to deteriorate continuously over a number of years, is always given a strong nod. No doubt it was originally a top track. But along with Smurfit is gains mostly negative feedback these days. Doesn't add up.

    - there's 50-60 high profile courses across the country that everyone on the main panel will have played. And when push comes to shove, it means they can be discussed at a full committee level. It's a natural advantage for high profile courses.

    - The links preference has now come to be expected. Personally I'd prefer if some of the blander links I've stood on - Baltray, Tom Morris - had to work as hard as a parkland course for their position. But truth is, links golf IS better!

    Agreed, on all counts.
    GreeBo wrote: »
    I have to disagree, speaking as a member of a >80 course (and having played some of the others) There are some very rough courses out there.

    As an example, I wouldnt put Esker Hills above Grange (my course) or Castle.
    Grange has been steadily improving course condition over the last 5 years and yet has slipped some 10 places in 4 years.

    I guess I just dont get it, what makes Hermitage that much better than Castle?

    Conditioning is only a part of it. You know yourself that if fertilisers are added or the greens are pole-forked and then the weather doesn't behave it can cause all kinds of problems. And if the reviewer arrives on a good/bad condition day, then it affects results. Fortunately that's only one criterion in the assessment. But you make a very valid point about The Hermitage - it is no way 30 places better than Grange.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,003 ✭✭✭Kevinmarkham


    If I was to put them in 3 groups, would do as follows. I know sometimes you just get a course on a bad day.

    Was blown away with (Condition/Course) - I've put them in order as far as I can remember. Was lucky to be invited to a good few for cheap rounds / free rounds.

    Royal County Down
    The Island
    Enniscrone
    Strandhill
    Carlow
    Royal Curragh
    Portmarnock Links
    Portmarnock
    The European Club
    Concra Wood (But rained off going back in Feb)
    Tullamore
    Portumna
    County Sligo
    Galway Bay
    Douglas


    Was very Impressed with

    Mount Juilet
    Fota (wasn't as good as expected, still class)
    Esker Hills
    Bearna
    Roscrea
    Enniscorthy
    Naas
    Black Bush
    Castlewarden
    Cahir Park
    Bettystown
    Beaverstown
    Grange Castle ( For all the talk of it being a "kip" - great public golf course)
    Carne (Big Trip for poor condition and forward tees, almost below)


    Dissapointed (Condition or course) I think if you pay big money condition should be Top.

    Druids Glen (Great layout - poor enough condition, shoud be in group 1 if right)
    The Heritage (Shocked how much it has fallen)
    Lutrellstown (Was always in top condition - fairways too long - greens poor)
    New Ross ( I like course - but a little rough these days)
    Donabate (Holes too alike - seems to be struggling)
    Ballykisteen (Grand - couple of nice holes - but a hotel then course)

    Nicely done, Fix. You'll be glad to know that new green keeping staff are on board at Carne and all should be right with the world this coming summer.
    Great to see names like Douglas, Royal Curragh and Portumna on that top list. Makes me want to get back to Douglas, for sure... I wasn't overwhelmed.

    How many of that top 100 would you say you've played now?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭mike12


    Have played 50 plus of the top 100, grest list of courses for Fixde this year.
    Carne was disappointing this year, weather had been tough the year before so the decision was made to move the tees up and the green keepers seem to be spending too much time getting the new 9 ready and not looking after the course.

    Think a lot of the ranking points go towards course design a poor design no matter how well kept will ever have a high ranking or Swords open/Corballis would be top 100. Location/setting are also big pluses so when you have a super seaside setting it is always going to score higher than a converted field.

    As someone said eariler the top 50 are reasonable but 50 to 150 would be hard to seperate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭Ally McIntosh


    mike12 wrote: »
    Have played 50 plus of the top 100, grest list of courses for Fixde this year.
    Carne was disappointing this year, weather had been tough the year before so the decision was made to move the tees up and the green keepers seem to be spending too much time getting the new 9 ready and not looking after the course.

    Think a lot of the ranking points go towards course design a poor design no matter how well kept will ever have a high ranking or Swords open/Corballis would be top 100. Location/setting are also big pluses so when you have a super seaside setting it is always going to score higher than a converted field.

    As someone said eariler the top 50 are reasonable but 50 to 150 would be hard to seperate.

    The greens at Carne got off to a slow start last year and for a few reasons, were affected well in to the summer season. It wasn't - despite rumours - that the green staff were spending their time on the new nine.

    You make a good point regards how people rate courses. One of my pet peeves is that people put too much emphasis on day-to-day conditioning. Whilst I like a course to be presented well, there are many more fundamental issues that decide whether a course is great, good, ordinary or poor. One advantage of the panel is that it utilises people from different parts of the industry. The agronomists / greenkeepers think more about turf quality, the players sometimes get too caught up on challenge... I think more about topography, design and variety.

    Going back to the links bias, I know it looks that way but in reality, most of the great inland courses are great because they share some similarities with links golf e.g. firm conditions, undulating land, strategic bunkering... in essence the ground game...

    Kevin - The magazine wish to keep a Top 100. Personally, I'd like to see the second 50 just listed in alphabetical order. Don't think it will happen though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭mike12


    The greens at Carne got off to a slow start last year and for a few reasons, were affected well in to the summer season. It wasn't - despite rumours - that the green staff were spending their time on the new nine.

    You make a good point regards how people rate courses. One of my pet peeves is that people put too much emphasis on day-to-day conditioning. Whilst I like a course to be presented well, there are many more fundamental issues that decide whether a course is great, good, ordinary or poor. One advantage of the panel is that it utilises people from different parts of the industry. The agronomists / greenkeepers think more about turf quality, the players sometimes get too caught up on challenge... I think more about topography, design and variety.

    Going back to the links bias, I know it looks that way but in reality, most of the great inland courses are great because they share some similarities with links golf e.g. firm conditions, undulating land, strategic bunkering... in essence the ground game...

    Kevin - The magazine wish to keep a Top 100. Personally, I'd like to see the second 50 just listed in alphabetical order. Don't think it will happen though.

    Glad to hear Carne will be back to it's best next year and Mary has assuared me we will be playing off the white tee's. I have to say i fell in love with the place the first time i played it and hate that i only get to play it once a year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,185 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    Trapper – lol , seriously doubt it.

    Have played 41 of top 100.

    Was a crazy year – had a few tough years, so 2014 we just spoilt ourselves, doing stuff we wanted to do for a change. 2015 will be different, but still intend to finish the top 50. I know the actual number is not important, but want to play all the best courses in Ireland. I will too – may take 10 years – 20 years and realistically and hopefully will be with kids too, if they like golf.

    Started off with a cracking course Portumna – massive journey to get to there, on the road I was thinking how mental it was, what Kevin did, some of these courses are in places you wouldn’t go to for any other reason. It really is a stunning little country and you never see most of it. The drive from Enniscrone to Carne is up with anything I have ever seen. Even when late and after about 15 pints. When you travel around Ireland you stick to main motorway routes, no option of motorway for so many courses.

    Then from meeting people and playing on Boards’ Golf Society had a whirlwind of golf, just went with it, a no regrets sort of thing. Was very lucky to get invited out, play opens and even get a few freebies from lads on here – class stuff, actually The Forum at its best. Sometimes in life/work, you are always thinking about golf, or on a long drive or train journey looking for as long as possible at a passing course. For years I was thinking, am I the only one like this, but over the last year I've discovered I'm not. It is a peculiar small group of golfers, but you can smell them out after a few rounds.

    As a young lad was always interested in who gets to play these great courses (“Lucky Bastards”) , would often hear of lads getting invited out on them, funny how things turn out in the end, if you just go for it. Take a chance. Thanks lads – ye know who ye are.

    I know it is only golf, it is only a hobby, but some of my best days have been on a golf course, of course the best best days of your life are off a course, but the worst days of your life are never on a course. (lol - too many courses even when trying to talk about real life)

    The Atlantic Coast Challenge and getting to play Strandhill again, was a great few days, had never gone away to play golf for a few days, was like a Stag of Links Golf. Highly recommend , but hard-core away from family work and real life too long.
    There were a couple of courses that really surprised me, as I had heard so little about them - Royal Curragh / Douglas / Portumna / Carlow / Bearna / Enniscorthy /Galway Bay, not courses you hear lads talk about too much. Not just saying it, but found Kevin’s book excellent – if it was near or over 80 points in Hooked , I’d give it the green light.

    But, I have an unusual taste in courses – I like courses that are naturally on the land and if woodland - natural woodland, The likes of The Heath and Royal Curragh would be a nice middle ground from Links to link me into Parkland courses – was also impressed with the way Carlow is shaped and has allowed longer grass to define course and used hills and contours naturally.

    So if it is going to be a course like Roscrea or Thurles or courses in the general Irish parkland group – they have to be more like Tullamore or Carlow to impress me. But I love golf and you don’t need to be on a great course to have a fantastic day out, I wouldn't be fanatical about it, you hear lads saying “Kip” “Wouldn't play it”, madness. It is golf lads. You should rarely get stressed out about golf, never mind a course.

    I played courses too that wouldn’t have a chance of making the top 100 – Corballis, Grange Castle, Deer Park, Portlaoise, Waterrock . All these courses always had good crowds and all have great holes and some are great/good courses. In fact there isn't a course in the country, I wouldn’t go back to, if the place, company and time was right. I was playing some of these courses as my friends are getting into golf and these courses are important as an introduction to golf for so many.

    So, sorry for a little aside on/off topic. But that was my crazy year of 2014. Perhaps a mid-life post traumatic golf crisis – but hey, could have been much worse. 2015 will be back to normal, more club golf and pick a few more off the list. Becoming a full member and trying to get into weekend stuff more, maybe Interclub.

    One thing that is for sure - going to all these old course, pictures on walls, old carpets and finish. You get a sense the golden era of golf is past. You see how important the golf club was, it was a social centre of some of the communities. I was concerned with how in decline golf was. How we may have lost a generation, how are all these clubs and way of life going to continue ?

    So, thanks a million to all the lads who helped me out – “Some Speech” (:p)
    As Shane Mcgowan says –“ Won’t see another one” (like it).

    Fix (“Lucky Bastard”).
    :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 761 ✭✭✭Dayor Knight


    Great to see Ceann Sibeal, Dingle moving up to 75. A beaut of a spot. Anybody who gets to Dingle for a week-end or longer, you've got to get out to Ceann Sibeal for a game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,370 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo





    Conditioning is only a part of it. You know yourself that if fertilisers are added or the greens are pole-forked and then the weather doesn't behave it can cause all kinds of problems. And if the reviewer arrives on a good/bad condition day, then it affects results. Fortunately that's only one criterion in the assessment. But you make a very valid point about The Hermitage - it is no way 30 places better than Grange.

    True, but I dont think you can rate a course based on one random visit, you should pick it at its best (end of summer) and "worst" end of winter and make a decision then.

    I'd rate a course with year round full greens over one that moves to temps when its wet, regardless of the layout or anything else about the place.

    I think condition has to be a huge part of it, Esker Hills had some nice holes but was a rough bog when I was there, I'd be very unlikely to back whereas macreddin, same time of year was much better.

    Maybe I'm spoilt by the condition of my own course, but then, for me, surely that should be part of the ratings?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement