Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Gameweek 4 captain

24

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,478 ✭✭✭OneColdHand


    Sturridge(H) v Aston Villa
    I don't know how anyone is captaining a United player.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,604 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Valencia(A) v Hull
    I don't know how anyone is captaining a United player.
    I think they'll be much improved at home to a dire QPR team.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,969 ✭✭✭✭alchemist33


    Di Maria(H) v QPR
    I don't know how anyone is captaining a United player.

    QPR at home. First choice players coming back. Should be more stable at the back and midfield.

    Costa injured. Sturridge out. City play Arsenal. Siggy away to Chelsea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,428 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    Don't want to abandon Costa but i am really leaning towards Sterling at home to Villa.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,267 ✭✭✭✭manual_man


    Fabregas(H) v Swansea
    CSF wrote: »
    I think they'll be much improved at home to a dire QPR team.

    i think a QPR team who had one dire performance would be more accurate. simply calling them dire, after that one game, and 3 league games in total, is ludicrous


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,604 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Valencia(A) v Hull
    manual_man wrote: »
    i think a QPR team who had one dire performance would be more accurate. simply calling them dire, after that one game, and 3 league games in total, is ludicrous

    Was not under the impression that QPR v Hull was their first ever game. I thought I'd watched them lots last season and them largely unimpressive but it must have been all in my head.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 202 ✭✭Arnold Tanzarian


    Valencia(A) v Hull
    Hope United win 3-1 with two RVP penalties and an own goal for caulker , late consolation goal for QPR to sicken those with de gea in goal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,267 ✭✭✭✭manual_man


    Fabregas(H) v Swansea
    CSF wrote: »
    Was not under the impression that QPR v Hull was their first ever game. I thought I'd watched them lots last season and them largely unimpressive but it must have been all in my head.

    it's only fair to judge them based on what we've seen this season. they've lost one narrowly, lost one badly, and won one narrowly. they were piss poor against Spurs, yes, but that's one single game so far. United were largely unimpressive last season, doesn't mean the same will be the case this year. both teams have alot of new signings. etc. etc. it's way too early to be making these judgements about any team so far (i could understand if they'd got hammered in all 3 games, but that clearly isn't the case)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,604 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Valencia(A) v Hull
    manual_man wrote: »
    it's only fair to judge them based on what we've seen this season. they've lost one narrowly, lost one badly, and won one narrowly. they were piss poor against Spurs, yes, but that's one single game so far. United were largely unimpressive last season, doesn't mean the same will be the case this year. both teams have alot of new signings. etc. etc. it's way too early to be making these judgements about any team so far (i could understand if they'd got hammered in all 3 games, but that clearly isn't the case)
    It's not about what's fair, it's about what logical, and all signs have pointed to QPR being the same poor team they've been for a long time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,267 ✭✭✭✭manual_man


    Fabregas(H) v Swansea
    CSF wrote: »
    It's not about what's fair, it's about what logical, and all signs have pointed to QPR being the same poor team they've been for a long time.

    we'll agree to disagree. i don't see the logic there


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,604 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Valencia(A) v Hull
    manual_man wrote: »
    we'll agree to disagree. i don't see the logic there

    Putting every team on a fresh slate at the start of every season is not logical.

    Past performance is a key indicator to future success. We are a full transfer window and 3 games in and there have been absolutely no signs of anything changing. Illogical to ignore that information.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,267 ✭✭✭✭manual_man


    Fabregas(H) v Swansea
    CSF wrote: »
    Putting every team on a fresh slate at the start of every season is not logical.

    Past performance is a key indicator to future success. We are a full transfer window and 3 games in and there have been absolutely no signs of anything changing. Illogical to ignore that information.

    So by that 'logic', Man United should have finished 2nd last season, and Liverpool 7th, no? Also, QPR won their last game, and are ahead of United in the table. That doesn't seem very 'logical' to me, yet its fact!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,305 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Prodston


    Di Maria(H) v QPR
    CSF wrote: »
    Was not under the impression that QPR v Hull was their first ever game. I thought I'd watched them lots last season and them largely unimpressive but it must have been all in my head.

    Well QPR have brought in Rio Ferdinand, Caulker, Mutch, Fer and Sandro. Isla and Vargas on loan too. That's quite a solid spine that they didn't have last season which can only change things.

    They haven't re-invented the wheel but they should be stronger than they were. They switched back to 4 at the back against Sunderland after the 4-0 demolition by Spurs and won. In my eyes its not quite so clear cut


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,604 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Valencia(A) v Hull
    manual_man wrote: »
    So by that 'logic', Man United should have finished 2nd last season, and Liverpool 7th, no? Also, QPR won their last game, and are ahead of United in the table. That doesn't seem very 'logical' to me, yet its fact!
    No, key indicator doesn't mean the exact same will happen. There are factors which create change, Ferguson leaving was the factor for United, Suarez being amazing was the one for Liverpool. Nothing really for QPR.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,604 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Valencia(A) v Hull
    Well QPR have brought in Rio Ferdinand, Caulker, Mutch, Fer and Sandro. Isla and Vargas on loan too. That's quite a solid spine that they didn't have last season which can only change things.

    They haven't re-invented the wheel but they should be stronger than they were. They switched back to 4 at the back against Sunderland after the 4-0 demolition by Spurs and won. In my eyes its not quite so clear cut
    They aren't significant signings when you look at what many of the teams who were already better than them are signing, most notably this week's opponents, Man United.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 202 ✭✭Arnold Tanzarian


    Valencia(A) v Hull
    CSF wrote: »
    No, key indicator doesn't mean the exact same will happen. There are factors which create change, Ferguson leaving was the factor for United, Suarez being amazing was the one for Liverpool. Nothing really for QPR.

    Jesus. Your talking about footie as if its some sort of scientific equation and that everything can be explained, calm down man!! This is sport on any given day anything can happen thats what makes it great :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 378 ✭✭bezuaua


    Fabregas(H) v Swansea
    Am I mad to atm be considering crazy-mario??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,201 ✭✭✭jamesbondings


    Sterling(H) v Aston Villa
    Flecktarn wrote: »
    I'm going with Naismith for the differential choice.

    I thought I was the only one with this brainwave! Naismith has scored in all 3 of his games so far. Coming up against West Bromwich (losing their last two games and drawing the first) I would expect Naismith to get at least one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 415 ✭✭TaytoCrisps


    Di Maria(H) v QPR
    Minefield this week with Costa and Rooney dodgy to start/play 90mins . going with Rooney C and Fab VC


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    Falcao(H) v QPR
    May end up with balotelli capt as I'm fearful of Rvp starting and I don't have costa.Im also considering Fabregas. Bookies odds have balotelli and Costa shortest at 8/13 for anytime goal with RVP and Falcao both at 4/6.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,675 ✭✭✭HighClass


    Probably going to take a punt on Falcao. It's a risky one but it could pay off nicely. With the week that's in it it's not the worst time to take a risk.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,679 ✭✭✭✭wonski


    Di Maria(H) v QPR
    I will leave it with Rooney for the very last time.
    No other options for me - Costa not guaranteed to start, Naismith is not worth it imo and all mids have tricky games this week.

    Rooney(c) and Costa(vc)

    Looks like I am not really prepared for this week, wildcard saved at least.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,267 ✭✭✭✭manual_man


    Fabregas(H) v Swansea
    getting serious itchy finger to change it over to Ivan!! he has attacking returns in all 3 games and has a good chance of a clean sheet!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,679 ✭✭✭✭wonski


    Di Maria(H) v QPR
    manual_man wrote: »
    getting serious itchy finger to change it over to Ivan!! he has attacking returns in all 3 games and has a good chance of a clean sheet!!

    Rule number one for me - never, ever captain a defender.

    Not saying it is a terribly bad idea, but you know what I mean.
    This game is very important for Chelsea, they might play it safe this time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,267 ✭✭✭✭manual_man


    Fabregas(H) v Swansea
    wonski wrote: »
    Rule number one for me - never, ever captain a defender.

    Not saying it is a terribly bad idea, but you know what I mean.
    This game is very important for Chelsea, they might play it safe this time.

    yeah i know...

    but:pac::pac::pac::pac::pac::pac::pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,260 ✭✭✭shano_88


    Sturridge(H) v Aston Villa
    Went with Sterling. Tempted by Costa but with doubts over his fitness I'm gonna stick with Sterling.

    Que Costa doing what he did last time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,648 ✭✭✭✭Rikand


    Di Maria(H) v QPR
    I have it on Costa at the moment.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    It would be Costa all day long but due to injury concerns I'm going with Rooney.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,568 ✭✭✭thewools


    Paully D wrote: »
    It would be Costa all day long but due to injury concerns I'm going with Rooney.

    me too...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 433 ✭✭JR6


    Rooney(H) v QPR
    Think I'm going to go with Sterling. Costa may start but if actually injured he may not complete 90 mins! He may also score a couple though!
    Think Aguero will score a couple too in a high scoring game!


Advertisement