Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Today I saw.....

  • 25-06-2014 7:29pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,674 ✭✭✭


    Was travelling on the M50 this evening between the Ballymun and Finglas exits when I saw a woman cycling with a baby on the back and what looked like a 9/10 year old girl following behind on her own bike.

    This was during rush hour traffic and fairly heavy rain so I was fairly shocked at what I was seeing and had to do a double take !

    It's not too uncommon to see a really idiotic lone cyclist do this on the motorway occasionally so I wouldn't normally be too shocked by that. The presence of the two kids however though and that this woman had made the conscious decision to cycle with two children, on the busiest road in the country, at one of the busiest times and in fairly poor visibility/weather conditions is just completely beyond insane and reckless !

    Did anyone else see this crazy lady !?


Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,425 ✭✭✭FearDark


    Its totally illegal. I hope she is brought before the courts and fined as much as possible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,093 ✭✭✭rawn


    I bet she didn't even pay road tax, Joe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,263 ✭✭✭Gongoozler


    You called it in to that traffic line I assume?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,218 ✭✭✭Lucifer MorningStar


    No, I'm not in Dublin


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,396 ✭✭✭Frosty McSnowballs


    What a silly bastard!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    This time someone should actually think of the children..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 740 ✭✭✭Alf. A. Male


    Were you getting from a to b aaabbb?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,674 ✭✭✭aaabbbb


    FearDark wrote: »
    Its totally illegal. I hope she is brought before the courts and fined as much as possible.

    Indeed. Normally I wouldn't pay much heed, call her a ****ing idiot and keep going. But with the two kids with her I really really really hope she got caught.

    I actually wanted to phone it in so badly but I'd no credit :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,147 ✭✭✭PizzamanIRL


    Yeah I saw her. Didn't feel the need to start a thread though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,480 ✭✭✭wexie


    aaabbbb wrote: »
    Indeed. Normally I wouldn't pay much heed, call her a ****ing idiot and keep going. But with the two kids with her I really really really hope she got caught.

    I actually wanted to phone it in so badly but I'd no credit :cool:

    I think in this case you'd have been forgiven for making an emergency call

    :mad:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,500 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    I'm sure somebody rang Gardai about it. I've seen it before alright never with children though, In the instances I've witnessed motorists were laying on the horn big time, flashing lights and shouting out the window.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 559 ✭✭✭urabell


    You should have rang bord gais immediately, don't assume someone else will.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 740 ✭✭✭Alf. A. Male


    aaabbbb wrote: »
    Indeed. Normally I wouldn't pay much heed, call her a ****ing idiot and keep going. But with the two kids with her I really really really hope she got caught.

    I actually wanted to phone it in so badly but I'd no credit :cool:

    You don't need credit to make an emergency call, but you already know that and just needed even a pathetic and incorrect excuse to justify your abdication.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,674 ✭✭✭aaabbbb


    wexie wrote: »
    I think in this case you'd have been forgiven for making an emergency call

    :mad:

    I'd actually forgotten about the free emergency calls thing :o
    Were you getting from a to b aaabbb?

    Doctors to Pharmacy so more like d to p but you were close ;)
    I'm sure somebody rang Gardai about it. I've seen it before alright never with children though, In the instances I've witnessed motorists were laying on the horn big time, flashing lights and shouting out the window.

    Hopefully they did. I actually can't help but wonder what possessed her to do this with two kids in tow !?

    I mean by herself I'd get it. Although she's still a crazy idiot who's taking a "shortcut". But with two kids and do be doing this is just on another level of madness, especially when one of the children is cycling themselves.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,007 ✭✭✭knird evol


    You don't need credit to make an emergency call, but you already know that and just needed even a pathetic and incorrect excuse to justify your abdication.

    She quite correctly did not make an emergency call as the incident was not an emergency.

    She also wisely avoided using a mobile phone while driving. Which is a dangerous habit.

    She was right not to pull into the hard shoulder to make a phone call as the hard shoulder is only for emergencies and is also frequentd by cyclists and so is a dangerous place to drive into.

    'Abdication of responsibility' is a troublesome concept as morality is subjective and relative.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,442 ✭✭✭Sulla Felix


    knird evol wrote: »
    She quite correctly did not make an emergency call as the incident was not an emergency.

    She also wisely avoided using a mobile phone while driving. Which is a dangerous habit.

    She was right not to pull into the hard shoulder to make a phone call as the hard shoulder is only for emergencies and is also frequentd by cyclists and so is a dangerous place to drive into.

    'Abdication of responsibility' is a troublesome concept as morality is subjective and relative.

    Eh, it was an ongoing situation that required an immediate Garda response. That's how the garda themselves define when/when not to use 999.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,007 ✭✭✭knird evol


    required an immediate Garda response.

    That's nonsense. Which you know as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,954 ✭✭✭Tail Docker


    You don't need credit to make an emergency call, but you already know that and just needed even a pathetic and incorrect excuse to justify your abdication.

    It's your fault OP - you almost pushed them onto that road and are a bad person. Lol.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,674 ✭✭✭aaabbbb


    knird evol wrote: »

    She also wisely avoided using a mobile phone while driving. Which is a dangerous habit.

    I was actually a passenger so I could have made the call safely
    You don't need credit to make an emergency call, but you already know that and just needed even a pathetic and incorrect excuse to justify your abdication.

    Nah I've just a pathetically silly memory and initial reactions to these situations. I've actually not called 999 for the same reason before when I was involved an actual emergency.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 740 ✭✭✭Alf. A. Male


    knird evol wrote: »
    She quite correctly did not make an emergency call as the incident was not an emergency.

    She also wisely avoided using a mobile phone while driving. Which is a dangerous habit.

    She was right not to pull into the hard shoulder to make a phone call as the hard shoulder is only for emergencies and is also frequentd by cyclists and so is a dangerous place to drive into.

    'Abdication of responsibility' is a troublesome concept as morality is subjective and relative.

    What a lot of bollocks. There is nothing subjective or relative about people being in a potentially lethal situation and it is indeed an emergency very suitable for a call from the nearest safe place the OP could reach.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 26,052 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Those kids were in substantial immediate danger. Sounds like an emergency to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,646 ✭✭✭✭Sauve


    In those situations where you're unsure, it's better to call anyway and let the emergency services decide whether it needs attending or not. It's what they're good at.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 740 ✭✭✭Alf. A. Male


    aaabbbb wrote: »
    I was actually a passenger so I could have made the call safely



    Nah I've just a pathetically silly memory and initial reactions to these situations. I've actually not called 999 for the same reason before when I was involved an actual emergency.

    Yet you could remember every detail of the situation well enough to write an account. I really don't believe you didn't remember that an emergency call would be free.


  • Site Banned Posts: 10 Sellecks_Tache


    urabell wrote: »
    You should have rang bord gais immediately, don't assume someone else will.

    Landlords and old people should be extra vigilant. Carbon Monoxide IS a silent killer.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,480 ✭✭✭wexie


    Candie wrote: »
    Those kids were in substantial immediate danger. Sounds like an emergency to me.

    Ah shure....what's the worst that could happen really?

    ;)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,007 ✭✭✭knird evol


    a potentially lethal situation

    I think you need to ramp up the melodrama a bit more there precious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81 ✭✭MattD1349


    Hardly surprising this happened. The level of ignorance displayed by some road users is staggering at times. Yesterday I saw a guy cycling over Sally's Bridge towards O'Donovan road with one hand on the handle bars & in his other hand was cradled a young child no more than 3 years old. Cycling after them was a boy I'd put no older than 6-7 years old. Couple that with going through the red lights at the south circular road & you have kamikaze potential.

    I was that taken aback I never rang the guards. A surreal response to a surreal situation. Always thought I'd know how to react instinctively but I guess you never know do you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,674 ✭✭✭aaabbbb


    MattD1349 wrote: »
    Hardly surprising this happened. The level of ignorance displayed by some road users is staggering at times. Yesterday I saw a guy cycling over Sally's Bridge towards O'Donovan road with one hand on the handle bars & in his other hand was cradled a young child no more than 3 years old. Cycling after them was a boy I'd put no older than 6-7 years old. Couple that with going through the red lights at the south circular road & you have kamikaze potential.

    I was that taken aback I never rang the guards. A surreal response to a surreal situation. Always thought I'd know how to react instinctively but I guess you never know do you.

    If my Mum hadn't been with me too I would have definitely assumed I was imagining things !
    Pugsly wrote: »
    As far as I'm concerned OP if you weren't arsed doing anything about it you shouldn't have bothered your arse starting a thread to gossip about it.

    Forgot you can make emergency calls without credit my arse.

    Trust me I did. Embarrassingly enough its not the first time either. I've a broken nose to show for that !


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,290 ✭✭✭mickydoomsux


    Must be the day for it it something because i saw a guy with a girl who couldn't have been more than 9 years old as a pillion passenger on his motorbike this afternoon, this was in traffic that was moving in the 80-100kph range. Plus she was only wearing shorts which is just retarded for anyone on a motorbike.

    My friend was driving at the time and i was a passenger and we both did a double-take as we drove past them. I rang the local police station straight away and they said they'd look into it.

    Seriously though, i'm not easily shocked but i had trouble believing what i was seeing. If that was his daughter she should just have been taken off him immediately because he is obviously too stupid to raise a child.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,414 ✭✭✭Awkward Badger


    aaabbbb wrote: »
    Trust me I did. Embarrassingly enough its not the first time either. I've a broken nose to show for that !

    I deleted my post as I figured its not my place to be telling anyone what they should or shouldn't post.

    But tbh I don't buy your story.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,808 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    Must be the day for it it something because i saw a guy with a girl who couldn't have been more than 9 years old as a pillion passenger on his motorbike this afternoon, this was in traffic that was moving in the 80-100kph range. Plus she was only wearing shorts which is just retarded for anyone on a motorbike.

    My friend was driving at the time and i was a passenger and we both did a double-take as we drove past them. I rang the local police station straight away and they said they'd look into it.

    Seriously though, i'm not easily shocked but i had trouble believing what i was seeing. If that was his daughter she should just have been taken off him immediately because he is obviously too stupid to raise a child.

    So they weren't breaking any law at all but you think his child should be put into protective custody?
    Fair enough, shorts leave your legs completely unprotected and it is a bad attitude to wear them, or allow a pillion to wear them, but protective trousers are not a legal requirement.
    You overreacted and rang the gardai to waste there time about a road user who was doing nothing wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,482 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    She was trying to save ducklings for Gods sake!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,028 ✭✭✭✭--LOS--


    ye let's all blame the OP for not making a call instead of the irresponsible woman :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,990 ✭✭✭JustAddWater


    rawn wrote: »
    I bet she didn't even pay road tax, Joe.

    sure nobody pays road tax :)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,290 ✭✭✭mickydoomsux


    So they weren't breaking any law at all but you think his child should be put into protective custody?
    Fair enough, shorts leave your legs completely unprotected and it is a bad attitude to wear them, or allow a pillion to wear them, but protective trousers are not a legal requirement.
    You overreacted and rang the gardai to waste there time about a road user who was doing nothing wrong.

    It has to be negligence or child endangerment or something.

    Have you every seen someone who has come off a motorbike at even a modest speed when they weren't wearing proper protective gear?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement