Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread - Mod Notes in OP,22/7

1265266268270271334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,925 ✭✭✭Whatsisname


    Bruno Martins Indi off to Porto for 8m to replace Mangala


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,222 ✭✭✭✭Will I Amnt


    Bruno Martins Indi off to Porto for 8m to replace Mangala

    Wouldn't be too worried about missing out on him to be honest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,181 ✭✭✭Crimson King


    Bruno Martins Indi off to Porto for 8m to replace Mangala

    He looked positively awful at times at the WC. I paid attention to him because we were linked with him. Think it's a blessing the speculation died down rapidly as matches went on.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,333 ✭✭✭brinty


    Bruno Martins Indi off to Porto for 8m to replace Mangala

    So long as its not De Vrij


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 552 ✭✭✭RichFTW


    He looked positively awful at times at the WC. I paid attention to him because we were linked with him. Think it's a blessing the speculation died down rapidly as matches went on.

    Ya but think of the combination of Martins Indi's eyes and Phil Jones' face...strikers would run away in fear!

    BqCaeXkCcAAWG21.png

    article-2306398-19309729000005DC-124_306x423.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,828 ✭✭✭gosplan


    Very realistic chance of Vidal. I think 60\40 in our favour personally.

    Slim to none!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,437 ✭✭✭redbaron_99


    gosplan wrote: »
    Slim to none!!

    Why do you think that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,333 ✭✭✭brinty


    Why do you think that?

    Cause FutureGuy said so.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,391 ✭✭✭Danye


    Vidal to be unveiled tomorrow ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,437 ✭✭✭redbaron_99


    brinty wrote: »
    Cause FutureGuy said so.....

    Oh, that's disappointing...


    [IMG][/img]jxGK8O.gif


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,416 ✭✭✭Jimmy Iovine


    Don't know if this has been posted before. Pretty cool idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,166 ✭✭✭dor843088


    brinty wrote: »
    Cause FutureGuy said so.....

    Said a dozen times yesterday we are not signing vidal then said today we are in for vidal ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,577 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    Do we really have the luxury of finding out though? We are top heavy with attackers and have fewer than usual games next season, where are we going to find 10/15 matches that we can give Bebe meaningful gametime for his development?

    We have to focus on the league next season, we simply cannot miss out on top four and so we just cannot be taking chances on a guy like Bebe. Letting him go is the right call.

    Why do we have to throw Bebe into the first team next season.

    If he goes this summer in his last year of contract we will get 4 or 5 million.

    If he signs a new contract and goes on loan to a Premiership side we will get a better idea about him. If he flops we will still get 3 or 4 million. If he performs well he can come back the following season and challenge for a first team spot.

    Bebe might never turn into a United regular but i would rather be safe than sorry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    Don't know if this has been posted before. Pretty cool idea.

    Savage. The scary thing is, they'd probably still be able to do the same if you replaced the all kids with everyone from this thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,071 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Nuts102 wrote: »
    Why do we have to throw Bebe into the first team next season.

    If he goes this summer in his last year of contract we will get 4 or 5 million.

    If he signs a new contract and goes on loan to a Premiership side we will get a better idea about him. If he flops we will still get 3 or 4 million. If he performs well he can come back the following season and challenge for a first team spot.

    Bebe might never turn into a United regular but i would rather be safe than sorry.

    At least have a buy back clause for when he tears it up and Real try to sign him in 2 years.


  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 15,257 Mod ✭✭✭✭FutureGuy


    dor843088 wrote: »
    Said a dozen times yesterday we are not signing vidal then said today we are in for vidal ?

    I didn't say a dozen times yesterday we are not signing Vidal and I didn't say today we were signing him.

    Accurate reporting of facts is crucial in my line of work.

    Case in point, there's a lad sitting across from me. He has Zaha 28 on his shirt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,274 ✭✭✭duffman13


    dor843088 wrote: »
    Said a dozen times yesterday we are not signing vidal then said today we are in for vidal ?

    It's an ongoing joke. FutureGuy says "we aren't signing x" and he is often very wrong. It's a good omen, think of future guy as our lucky thread leprechaun!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,408 ✭✭✭✭J. Marston


    BsmXjP5CUAAmORm.jpg:large

    Vidal!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,219 ✭✭✭✭Pro. F


    Nuts102 wrote: »
    Why do we have to throw Bebe into the first team next season.

    If he goes this summer in his last year of contract we will get 4 or 5 million.

    If he signs a new contract and goes on loan to a Premiership side we will get a better idea about him. If he flops we will still get 3 or 4 million. If he performs well he can come back the following season and challenge for a first team spot.

    Bebe might never turn into a United regular but i would rather be safe than sorry.

    There's no guarantee that Bebe was willing to sign a new contract with United. He's had a few loans already, he might not have been interested in another one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,166 ✭✭✭dor843088


    duffman13 wrote: »
    It's an ongoing joke. FutureGuy says "we aren't signing x" and he is often very wrong. It's a good omen, think of future guy as our lucky thread leprechaun!

    Ok I hqve now come to the realisation that I actually have no fcuking idea what the hell is going on in this thread in regards to futureguy. Some say hes a prophet others say when he says we are not signing someone its good luck . I am only a mere mortal can someone please aware me on wtf the craic is around here.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    J. Marston wrote: »
    BsmXjP5CUAAmORm.jpg:large

    Vidal!

    What I've learned from the responses to that tweet...

    1) Everyone wants us to sign Vidal.

    2) Tom Cleverley has a massive fan in Indonesia.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,925 ✭✭✭Whatsisname


    dor843088 wrote: »
    Ok I hqve now come to the realisation that I actually have no fcuking idea what the hell is going on in this thread in regards to futureguy. Some say hes a prophet others say when he says we are not signing someone its good luck . I am only a mere mortal can someone please aware me on wtf the craic is around here.

    Oh but we are all only mere mortals here my child


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,248 ✭✭✭✭dahat


    dor843088 wrote: »
    can someone please aware me on wtf the craic is around here.

    We are not signing Vidal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,925 ✭✭✭Whatsisname


    Whoaaa whoaaa whoaa
    Sport Witness ‏@Sport_Witness 1m
    Reports coming from Italy that Antonio Conte has resigned.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,446 ✭✭✭glued


    Gazetta dello Sport and Sky Italia are speculating that it's over signing Evra and selling Vidal.


  • Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    dor843088 wrote: »
    Ok I hqve now come to the realisation that I actually have no fcuking idea what the hell is going on in this thread in regards to futureguy. Some say hes a prophet others say when he says we are not signing someone its good luck . I am only a mere mortal can someone please aware me on wtf the craic is around here.

    Future Guy has received 24,567,838 thanks from 6,700 posts where he states that "We are not signing X" (source Bill O' Herlihy)

    The majority of us here are quite fond of these posts and consider it good luck for future signings. If there is something you definitely want to happen in your life, try to get Future Guy to say that it is not happening, and then watch as your wish comes true. But shhh, he's ours and we don't want the mainstream media catching onto and taking advantage of his charms.

    Consider yourself 'awared' :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,116 ✭✭✭Professional Griefer


    glued wrote: »
    Gazetta dello Sport and Sky Italia are speculating that it's over signing Evra and selling Vidal.

    Apparently, he said he would leave if they sold Vidal. Plsplsplsplspls


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,631 ✭✭✭✭Hank Scorpio


    Whoaaa whoaaa whoaa

    Just seen that, disheartening for Juve to be honest, but great for us. Loosing their best player and now their manager.

    I won't feel too bad though, we haven't been shrewd enough in the transfer market for a long time when chasing big name targets, will all be forgotten if he lines out for United next year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,775 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    Whoaaa whoaaa whoaa

    Yeah huge news from Juventus, speculation it is over the sale of Vidal without the now former manager's agreement.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,477 ✭✭✭Adamcp898


    glued wrote: »
    Gazetta dello Sport and Sky Italia are speculating that it's over signing Evra and selling Vidal.

    I'm going to guess that if it is over one of the those two things, that it's the latter and not the former.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement