Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Transfer Talk/Gossip/Rumour Thread - Summer 2014 - Mod note in OP

1414244464792

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,206 ✭✭✭Lucas Hood


    ASOT wrote: »
    8 goals for 12m is a terrible return lets be honest.

    They're buying him for longer than 1 season you know?

    Ross McCormack went for 11m recently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,781 ✭✭✭ASOT


    Lucas Hood wrote: »
    They're buying him for longer than 1 season you know?

    Ross McCormack went for 11m recently.

    I know but for a 12m investment youd expect a striker to score more than 8 goals a season.

    Yeah i know Ross went for that much, 51 goals in the last three seasons all beit in the championship but in an absolutely terrible leeds team is a good return. Hes home grown and english, so nomatter how mad it sounds it seems about right with how footballs gone these days.

    Long has 23 goals in that period but obviously scored his goals in the premiership.

    Mad money for both of them anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭Frankie Lee


    His game is about a lot more than just goals though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,781 ✭✭✭ASOT


    His game is about a lot more than just goals though.

    I know his work rate is tremendous, dont get me wrong i think hes a good player but i just think for 12m they could have done alot better!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭Vinz Mesrine


    ASOT wrote: »
    I know but for a 12m investment youd expect a striker to score more than 8 goals a season.

    Yeah i know Ross went for that much, 51 goals in the last three seasons all beit in the championship but in an absolutely terrible leeds team is a good return. Hes home grown and english, so nomatter how mad it sounds it seems about right with how footballs gone these days.

    Long has 23 goals in that period but obviously scored his goals in the premiership.

    Mad money for both of them anyway.

    He's Scottish.

    Magath will have him crawling through London over the next few weeks after slating his fitness levels.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,781 ✭✭✭ASOT


    He's Scottish.

    Magath will have him crawling through London over the next few weeks after slating his fitness levels.

    That he is, completely slipped my mind. Magath is nuts, reminds me of di canio.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,668 ✭✭✭✭JPA


    Kiwi_knock wrote: »
    Shane Long being linked with a £12 million move to Southampton. A lot of money for a striker who is not a guaranteed goal scorer.

    Madness. Now let's see what overpriced gem Brucie replaces him with.


  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Long for 12m. Wtf? he's very average imo.

    Prices in England are ridiculous. A good housing market style crash is needed


  • Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 23,255 Mod ✭✭✭✭GLaDOS


    Great move for Long.

    Poor deal for Southampton, big downgrade on Lambert, apart from Long being younger.

    Cake, and grief counseling, will be available at the conclusion of the test



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,134 ✭✭✭✭Rayne Wooney


    Guillem Balague
    "Moreno will pass his medical in Liverpool tomorrow"

    I didn't know Balague was psychic, another talent added to the mans repertoire


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭Vinz Mesrine


    Guillem Balague
    "Moreno will pass his medical in Liverpool tomorrow"

    I didn't know Balague was psychic, another talent added to the mans repertoire

    Good lord, you are obsessed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,365 ✭✭✭death1234567


    £12m for a striker who can't finish? Jesus Southampton really are a mess.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,084 ✭✭✭✭Kirby


    Long is a much better player than a lot of you in here are giving him credit for.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭stiffler123


    Kirby wrote: »
    Long is a much better player than a lot of you in here are giving him credit for.

    I like him, but twelve million is nuts. He just doesn't score enough, misses loads of easy chances. They probably could of got Jordan Rhodes for a lot cheaper, and he's a far better finisher.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,084 ✭✭✭✭Kirby


    I like him, but twelve million is nuts. He just doesn't score enough, misses loads of easy chances. They probably could of got Jordan Rhodes for a lot cheaper, and he's a far better finisher.

    People used to say that about Andy Cole but what people don't realise is that a striker who has a bunch of chances and misses most of them, is preferable to the striker who has no chances because he doesn't have the work rate, pace or positioning to ever be in the right place to receive or make the chance.

    Just ask the Spurs fans about Soldado. He was a "goalscorer" but if you need every chance you ever get laid on a plate for you, you wont score many in the premier league and your team wont score many either. Long may not be a natural finisher but he is a team player. If he stays fit, I'd fancy him to do very well this season, even with the mass exodus at Southampton.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭stiffler123


    Kirby wrote: »
    People used to say that about Andy Cole but what people don't realise is that a striker who has a bunch of chances and misses most of them, is preferable to the striker who has no chances because he doesn't have the work rate, pace or positioning to ever be in the right place to receive or make the chance.

    Andy Cole was a 20-30 goal a season player though. Shane Long will never be that. Daft comparison tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,084 ✭✭✭✭Kirby


    Andy Cole was a 20-30 goal a season player though. Shane Long will never be that. Daft comparison tbh.

    Andy cole is similar/dissimilar to Shane Long.

    See that? That's a comparison. That's not what I did so kindly put that strawman back in your box.

    What I actually did was highlight another, different striker who played for United in a different era who was criticised for missing easy chances.....and how his teammates didn't care because there is more to being a player than how many goals you score. To quote Scholes, "If he's getting those chances in the first place, I want him in my team."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,267 ✭✭✭✭GavRedKing


    Transfers between English clubs are always fairly mad, throw in the extra money available and clubs will hold out for even more money.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭stiffler123


    Kirby wrote: »
    Andy cole is similar/dissimilar to Shane Long.

    See that? That's a comparison. That's not what I did so kindly put that strawman back in your box.

    What I actually did was highlight another, different striker who played for United in a different era who was criticised for missing easy chances.....and how his teammates didn't care because there is more to being a player than how many goals you score. To quote Scholes, "If he's getting those chances in the first place, I want him in my team."

    Andy Cole scored a crap load of goals though. If he scored 8 goals a season like Long, he would have never been signed by United in the first place. A strikers number one job is to score goals. Don't give a crap what Paul Scholes says either, why are you quoting him?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,084 ✭✭✭✭Kirby


    Andy Cole scored a crap load of goals though. If he scored 8 goals a season like Long, he would have never been signed by United in the first place. A strikers number one job is to score goals. Don't give a crap what Paul Scholes says either, why are you quoting him?

    Because it echoes what I said. If you could find a quote from a player as good as that backing up your opinion, you would post it too.

    You could always make one up. Zidane, "Long is shoite. Serious like!" :P


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,937 ✭✭✭✭ctrl-alt-delete


    I like him, but twelve million is nuts. He just doesn't score enough, misses loads of easy chances. They probably could of got Jordan Rhodes for a lot cheaper, and he's a far better finisher.

    Blackburn paid £8 million for Rhodes who recently signed a contract extension which I imagine will have a minimum fee.

    I don't think they would sell for much less than £12 million, given recent fees. However another season in the Championship without promotion and that might change.

    Another factor is Long has PL experience. I rate him and his style of play will suit Southampton, much the same as theirs will suit him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭stiffler123


    Kirby wrote: »
    Because it echoes what I said. If you could find a quote from a player as good as that backing up your opinion, you would post it too.

    You could always make one up. Zidane, "Long is shoite. Serious like!" :P

    Not as good as Scholes, but the lad knows a thing or two about being a striker. "My job is to score goals"- Robbie Keane. For the national teams sake, I really hope Long proves me wrong and scores a tonne of goals, I just don't see it though.

    You seem to rate workrate as highly as putting the ball in the back of the net. We will have to agree to disagree on that point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,377 ✭✭✭Smithwicks Man


    Long is a decent PL player, not worth £12m though. But then again, almost every transfer a PL club makes involves an excessive transfer fee.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,134 ✭✭✭✭Rayne Wooney


    Ronald Koeman is currently undergoing a medical at Southampton after agreeing to spend £12.5m on Shane Long!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,134 ✭✭✭✭Rayne Wooney


    The thing about Long is he should be scoring more, for 12 million I'd expect him to chip in with 12-15 goals in the league

    A goal every 2.5 games isn't much to ask


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 469 ✭✭hjkl


    With the money going around the EPL these days 12 million isn't same amount of money it was 2-3 years ago. Southampton got 77 million in prize and tv money for finishing 8th last year. That's around 17 million more than Man City got for winning the league in 2012.
    The outrage at Long's price is overblown.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,882 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    frimpong wrote: »
    With the money going around the EPL these days 12 million isn't same amount of money it was 2-3 years ago. Southampton got 77 million in prize and tv money for finishing 8th last year. That's around 17 million more than Man City got for winning the league in 2012.
    The outrage at Long's price is overblown.
    It's still lunacy, you could get so much better on the market for that.

    A 27 year old with very limited room for improvement who has a record of about 1 goal in every 5 premiership games.

    It's about 3 times what they got for Lambert and does not hold up well when compared to the transfer fee for other strikers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Whatever way you feel about Long it's a nice bit of business from Hull making £5m profit on a player they only bought in January.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,204 ✭✭✭kensutz


    Anthony Pilkington moved to Cardiff from Norwich for £1million. Seemed a decent player for us but injury prone. Best to cash in now.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,354 ✭✭✭MR NINE


    Lads 12m really isnt that much nowadays. He signed for hull in jan for 7m and noone batted an eyelid


Advertisement