Post images of ugly **only quote images if absolutely necessary**

Boscoirl

cunavalos wrote: »

Those dash saddles would want to be very comfortable to put up with the aesthetics and cost
.png

It would need to be, because you wouldn't be getting off the bike until you got Ho,e, imp case anyone saw it.

RobFowl

Boscoirl wrote: »

It would need to be, because you wouldn't be getting off the bike until you got Ho,e, imp case anyone saw it.

Suspect they are not UCI compliant either as not flat....

tigerboon

cunavalos wrote: »

Those dash saddles would want to be very comfortable to put up with the aesthetics and cost

They seem to have the decimal point in the wrong place or maybe it's supposed to be in sterling

wanderer 22

Ok, so TT bikes are low-hanging fruit but even so

Senecio

It looks like a transformer.

Raam

outfox

Whats going on with the stem thing?

TychoCaine

outfox wrote: »

Whats going on with the stem thing?

Someone who overestimated their lower back flexibility....

Darkglasses

Is it just how it ships brand new, and you're expected to cut it down to whatever suits your bike fit?

outfox

Well, whatever it is, it's pretty damn ugly.

Darkglasses

Darkglasses wrote: »

Is it just how it ships brand new, and you're expected to cut it down to whatever suits your bike fit?

Can confirm, and yeah it's pretty horrible

AstraMonti

There is ugly.. and then there is this:

cunavalos

AstraMonti wrote: »

There is ugly.. and then there is this:

So much wrong with that. Saddle, shifters, gear ratios, cabling, rim depth, handlebar angle
The wheels look like 26" wheels and the tyres are more like commuting tyres. Had a look around and apparently on sale for $298 from singapore
http://bicycles.sg/shop/eurobike-xc550/

On the same site i found this. A 20kg folding bike

magicbastarder

AstraMonti wrote: »

There is ugly.. and then there is this:

that kickstand should be more aero.

Bloggsie

AstraMonti wrote: »

There is ugly.. and then there is this:

thats ugly to the bone! seriously fugly.

Finnrocco

Bloggsie wrote: »

thats ugly to the bone! seriously fugly.

As a project would someone buy this and "normalize" it?

magicbastarder

a lot of the components look quite cheap. doesn't seem to have QR on the rear wheel, and the seatstays look a little odd.

petethedrummer

Finnrocco wrote: »

As a project would someone buy this and "normalize" it?

Only one thing for it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xraLMlSDgiI

fat bloke

Whoops!

Wrong thread indeed!

wanderer 22

Wrong thread I suspect...good thing you didn't post pictures of the kids :-P

Eamonnator

^^^^^
for the life of me, I can't see the ugly in that

Raam

Thargor

Having to check if its the beauty or ugly thread yet again, great looking bike^

Raam

cunavalos

Not sure if its the paint job, the disc brakes , the hydration reservoir, the aero covers for the disc brakes or the geometry but i am putting this in the ugly pile

outfox

It has a certificate tho, so it must be good.

magicbastarder

that paint scheme is a bit early 90s acid house.

recedite

outfox wrote: »

It has a certificate..

That's from the mental asylum.

Thud

another Tri bike....

http://road.cc/content/tech-news/204767-wow-diamondback-reveals-%E2%80%9C-fastest-triathlon-bike-world%E2%80%9D

dragratchet

I like that lunchbox compartment at the bottom, you'd get a couple sandwiches and a capri-sun in the there.

Thud wrote: »

another Tri bike....

http://road.cc/content/tech-news/204767-wow-diamondback-reveals-%E2%80%9C-fastest-triathlon-bike-world%E2%80%9D