Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Flightradar24 Thread

1…214215217219220…334

Comments

  • #6482
    bronn
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 484 ✭✭bronn


    weisses wrote: »
    Any idea what this bird is up to ?


    http://www.flightradar24.com/HZXY7/431b1fc
    Huh. How odd. It seems to have overshot the runway in New York... by a few thousand miles. :pac:

    th_ScreenShot2014-08-29at112454_zps448311c5.jpg


  • #6483
    L1011
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,268 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The routes on Flightradar are guessed, not squawked and hence cannot be considered to be accurate.


  • #6484
    weisses
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,820 ✭✭✭weisses


    MYOB wrote: »
    The routes on Flightradar are guessed, not squawked and hence cannot be considered to be accurate.

    In the History it showed as flying between Las Vegas And New York a couple of times in a row .. Is that guessed as well then ?


  • #6485
    L1011
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,268 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    weisses wrote: »
    In the History it showed as flying between Las Vegas And New York a couple of times in a row .. Is that guessed as well then ?

    Possibly, take a look at the tracks recorded for them rather than the airport codes.

    Reused squawk codes lead to this, people enter the route actually flown when the code is first seen/recorded and then when its reused the airports get shown again.


  • #6486
    mickger844posts
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 4,516 Mod ✭✭✭✭mickger844posts


    b757 wrote: »
    Lovely Phenom 300, apparently going to be a regular. :)

    Any idea when she is due back or departing again?


  • Advertisement
  • #6487
    b757
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,370 ✭✭✭b757


    mickger844posts wrote: »
    Any idea when she is due back or departing again?

    Will let you know if I hear anything.


  • #6488
    billie1b
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,886 ✭✭✭billie1b


    RYR57KA FEZ to MRS squawking 7700


  • #6489
    KoolKid
    Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,790 Mod ✭✭✭✭KoolKid


    Just looking at that now.
    Seems like a standard approach.


  • #6490
    billie1b
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,886 ✭✭✭billie1b


    Seems to be dropping quite fast now, 4500fpm a minute ago


  • #6491
    breanach78
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,042 ✭✭✭breanach78


    Hope it gets down ok. Any ATC info?


  • Advertisement
  • #6492
    fr336
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    breanach78 wrote: »
    Hope it get down ok. Any ATC info?

    I looked but didn't find anything.


  • #6493
    breanach78
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,042 ✭✭✭breanach78


    fr336 wrote: »
    I looked but didn't find anything.

    Seems to be down ok.


  • #6494
    cyclops999
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 405 ✭✭cyclops999


    Landed ok


  • #6495
    fr336
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    On the ground.


  • #6496
    fr336
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    Not sure how it's known for aircraft to be ok or safe purely for getting on the ground but ok :pac:


  • #6497
    breanach78
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,042 ✭✭✭breanach78


    fr336 wrote: »
    Not sure how it's known for aircraft to be ok or safe purely for getting on the ground but ok :pac:

    A hopeful presumption. Approach from FR24 seems good so hope it's ok.


  • #6498
    owenc
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭owenc


    Does the dreamliner fly faster?

    Noticed one from Glasgow to NYC reaching NYC in 5 hours!?


  • #6499
    fr336
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    owenc wrote: »
    Does the dreamliner fly faster?

    Noticed one from Glasgow to NYC reaching NYC in 5 hours!?

    Glasgow to NYC route eh.


  • #6500
    owenc
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭owenc


    No it was flying over NYC after only 5 hours


  • #6501
    fr336
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    owenc wrote: »
    No it was flying over NYC after only 5 hours

    Where was its destination?


  • Advertisement
  • #6502
    owenc
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭owenc


    Florida


  • #6503
    fr336
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,179 ✭✭✭✭fr336


    Ah ok


  • #6504
    arubex
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭arubex


    owenc wrote: »
    Does the dreamliner fly faster?

    They are designed for Mach 0.85 cruising, about the same as a 747-400 and a smidge more than the 777 ( 0.84 ). So quite nippy for a twin, seem to cruise about 10 or 20 knots faster thhan an A330 in practice.

    But there were some grand jetstreams yesterday that really pushed them along, Thomson's G-TUIF hit 578 knots / 665 mph; in my logs for the same day only a Kalitta 747 beat that at 584 kts.


  • #6505
    arubex
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭arubex


    RSAF C-130H over Lough Neagh, 25,000 ft

    http://planefinder.net/flight/RSF191


  • #6506
    arubex
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭arubex


    G-POWD must rake in the cash for Titan. Operating Norwegian Long Haul this morning, usually Euroatlantic sub on this one for the sickly Dreamliners.

    http://fr24.com/NAX7012


  • #6507
    Tenger
    Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 10,177 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Will the EIDW feed pick up the F-16's today?


  • #6508
    owenc
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,524 ✭✭✭owenc


    arubex wrote: »
    They are designed for Mach 0.85 cruising, about the same as a 747-400 and a smidge more than the 777 ( 0.84 ). So quite nippy for a twin, seem to cruise about 10 or 20 knots faster thhan an A330 in practice.

    But there were some grand jetstreams yesterday that really pushed them along, Thomson's G-TUIF hit 578 knots / 665 mph; in my logs for the same day only a Kalitta 747 beat that at 584 kts.

    Really? :confused: The flights from Ireland to NYC weren't any faster.. I think it might be the height and speed it goes at.


  • #6509
    Mech1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,170 ✭✭✭Mech1


    Tenger wrote: »
    Will the EIDW feed pick up the F-16's today?

    I dont know, but I have silenced all the ground based freq to give us as much chance as poss.


  • #6510
    billie1b
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,886 ✭✭✭billie1b


    BA830 not too happy about the Fly-by, said if they are delayed anymore than a couple of minutes they'll be short on fuel


  • Advertisement
  • #6511
    billie1b
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,886 ✭✭✭billie1b


    Mech1 wrote: »
    I dont know, but I have silenced all the ground based freq to give us as much chance as poss.

    Can hear them loud and clear Pat, Sabre 1 cleared to flight level 6000


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement