Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The case for Keith Earls to start ahead of BOD

Options
  • 13-08-2013 1:13am
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 392 ✭✭JagerScout


    8zfki0.jpg

    Stats borrowed from another forum.
    *Earls missed Wales game in 2012. Stats were taken from welsh game previous season.

    Do these stats change your opinion on Keith Earls versus BOD?


«1345678

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 445 ✭✭Brian_Zeluz


    Nope I still have the same opinion. BOD will forever be the starting 13 in my ultimate team and no amount of mortal stats will change that. I am of course tremendously biased.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,442 ✭✭✭its_phil


    Brian O'Driscoll. Man of the match v Wales 2013.

    Nuff said really


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    Number and stats rarely change my opinion on anything to be honest. Especially stats that are as conspicuous as these.

    'Earls missed Wales game in 2012. Stats were taken from welsh game previous season.'

    I mean how non-sensical is that?! Especially as given Earl's try count, one can only assume that the stats were taken from the 2010 Welsh game where Earls scored two tries. So you have a mixture of his 2012 6N stats, and a game he played against Wales in 2010....right.:confused:

    I mean at the end of the day, though my memories aren't vivd, I don't recall ever saying to myself in 2012 "you know what? Earls has played so well that I think he's good enough to oust Brian O'Driscoll at outside centre". So therefore no amount of figures will ever change that.

    I will add though, that I do remember being satisfied with Earl's performances in the 2012 6nations. He looked capable of playing at 13 in the international arena.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,889 ✭✭✭tolosenc


    Did Earls not say he was giving up on being a centre, or was I dreaming?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    tolosenc wrote: »
    Did Earls not say he was giving up on being a centre, or was I dreaming?

    No, he said that he was happy to play anywhere recently. I'm pretty sure he still prefers to play 13, but he appears to be more at ease with the idea of playing anywhere.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    I would echo the comments from the rugby jersey thread, that Keith should just hope to have an injury-free 2013/2014 and look to hit top form wherever he plays. Owing to previous defensive and distributive issues I would have some concerns about Keith as an international 13, but I wouldn't fully shut the door on him there yet. To a certain extent Schmidt will have to trial and error his selections as he seeks to find a longterm replacement for BOD.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭danthefan


    JagerScout wrote: »

    Do these stats change your opinion on Keith Earls versus BOD?

    No.


  • Registered Users Posts: 720 ✭✭✭peterako


    Earls is a bit selfish with the ball (or at best myopic with ball in hand).

    Not the best attribute for said position....

    Not a problem for a winger though!

    So...NO....BOD still #1, Earls a good bit down the pecking order....


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,300 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    Whats really interesting in those stats is BOD 2009 v BOD 2013.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,309 ✭✭✭former legend


    Those "stats" suggest that Earls was better in 2012 than O'Driscoll was in 2009. You know, when O'Driscoll single-handedly won us the Six Nations.

    So, erm, serious pinch of salt required.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,829 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    jm08 wrote: »
    Whats really interesting in those stats is BOD 2009 v BOD 2013.

    I'd be loathe to use stats from 2013 to judge anyone. It was a complete cluster**** of a season.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,300 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    Those "stats" suggest that Earls was better in 2012 than O'Driscoll was in 2009. You know, when O'Driscoll single-handedly won us the Six Nations.

    So, erm, serious pinch of salt required.

    Look at BOD's defence in 2009. 53 tackles - that was monumental for a centre. He also scored 4 tries. He passed the ball a lot less back then than he does now. I think its interesting to see how his game changed since then.


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    jm08 wrote: »
    Look at BOD's defence in 2009. 53 tackles - that was monumental for a centre. He also scored 4 tries. He passed the ball a lot less back then than he does now. I think its interesting to see how his game changed since then.

    Interesting that ESPNs interns have become less generous over the years


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,308 Mod ✭✭✭✭.ak


    All I got from those stats is that BOD in 2009 wasn't human.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,997 ✭✭✭Grimebox


    These stats are meaningless in comparison


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators Posts: 23,934 Mod ✭✭✭✭Clareman


    Ah j@ysus, this again, it must be the start of the season or a few months away for internationals or something.

    Personally I wouldn't mind seeing a Cave vs. Earls discussion as BoD is the form Irish centre, he started 2 Lions tests, he was player of the 6N last year, he's BoD ffs.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,970 ✭✭✭Tim Robbins


    Where do those stats show the inside pass Earls didn't give that cocked up a certain try in a VI nations match.

    Earls is a far weaker player. You are talking one of the best players in the world against a player who wouldn't make most international teams and is not even in his best position.

    It's a ridiculous argument


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,906 ✭✭✭jamiedav2011


    Where do those stats show the inside pass Earls didn't give that cocked up a certain try in a VI nations match.

    Earls is a far weaker player. You are talking one of the best players in the world against a player who wouldn't make most international teams and is not even in his best position.

    It's a ridiculous argument

    We really, really need to get over this now.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,829 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    .ak wrote: »
    All I got from those stats is that BOD in 2009 wasn't human.

    Except you don't even get that from the stats.

    Stats in rugby are useful as an aid for judging a player but they are not the be all and end all that they are in American sports.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,435 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    Am I missing something obvious here, but where are BODs stats from 2010-2012? Surly they should be included? Not just stats that reinforce one particular point of view.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,197 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    So I don't like Ireland's Call and ROG or Humph, people?

    Seeing as we're discussing mind-numbing topics that have been done to death....


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,300 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    Am I missing something obvious here, but where are BODs stats from 2010-2012? Surly they should be included? Not just stats that reinforce one particular point of view.

    The stats come from a thread on Munsterfans that also gives the stats for J Davies & Conrad Smith over a series of 5 games against the same opposition which is reasonable enough sample to take from. I'd imagine the 2009 season for BOD was included because he had a phenomenal year in 2009 (and shows what it takes to win silverwear i.e., you need your top performers at the very top of their game.

    http://www.munsterfans.com/threads/25615-Earls-targets-centre-this-year/page13?p=1263362#post1263362


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 392 ✭✭JagerScout


    I believe the argument is that 2009 is considered BOD's best season, 2013 is his latest and 2012 is the only time earls had a similar opportunity at playing 13 consistently in a first string side. Earls at 13 in 2012 > BOD at 13 in 2013. I don't agree but thats the argument being made I believe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    Buer wrote: »
    So I don't like Ireland's Call and ROG or Humph, people?

    Seeing as we're discussing mind-numbing topics that have been done to death....

    Let's throw in Pacific Island poaching, Richie McCaw, Craig Joubert, the Haka for others topics that have only ever been briefly discussed ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,375 ✭✭✭padser


    JagerScout wrote: »
    8zfki0.jpg

    Stats borrowed from another forum.
    *Earls missed Wales game in 2012. Stats were taken from welsh game previous season.

    Do these stats change your opinion on Keith Earls versus BOD?


    The may be a case for starting Earls ahead of BOD this year (I wouldn't personally, but can see some logic to it) but any suggestion that there is a case based on either the previous performances of Earls at 13 or any reasonable expectation of their relative strengths at 13 this coming is utter madness.

    The only reason to consider it would be with building for the World Cup in mind.


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,308 Mod ✭✭✭✭.ak


    Let's throw in Pacific Island poaching, Richie McCaw, Craig Joubert, the Haka for others topics that have only ever been briefly discussed ;)

    They all suck. How'd you like them apples?


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,766 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    To be fair apart from the Welsh game BOD didn't have the best 6Ns so Earls might well have out performed him in 2012 if we're comparing the two years. But then Ireland were better in 2012 so while the stats are interesting they aren't confirmation of anything IMO.

    Anyway I'd be worried if Earls wasn't at least close to the 34 year old BOD now. If he is the man who will have the 13 jersey in the future (obviously that's open to debate) then we'd probably need him to be putting an aging BOD under a bit of pressure now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,415 ✭✭✭Swiwi.


    .ak wrote: »
    They all suck. How'd you like them apples?

    Crisp juicy NZ apples can't be beat! Sadly by the time they arrive in Ireland on the ship they are usually mushy...


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,308 Mod ✭✭✭✭.ak


    Crisp juicy NZ apples can't be beat! Sadly by the time they arrive in Ireland on the ship they are usually mushy...

    Hopefully it's the same for the ABs after a long season as they finish a long haul journey to landsdowne road. ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭Tox56


    jm08 wrote: »
    The stats come from a thread on Munsterfans that also gives the stats for J Davies & Conrad Smith over a series of 5 games against the same opposition which is reasonable enough sample to take from. I'd imagine the 2009 season for BOD was included because he had a phenomenal year in 2009 (and shows what it takes to win silverwear i.e., you need your top performers at the very top of their game.

    http://www.munsterfans.com/threads/25615-Earls-targets-centre-this-year/page13?p=1263362#post1263362

    BOD does not need to play like he did in 2009 for Ireland to win silverware. I can save you the time now; he will never again play like he did in 2009. No 13 in Ireland is capable of producing the Six Nations he did in 2009. That was the outstanding season of one of the most outstanding players to ever play the game. Judging BOD against himself in 2009 simply isn't fair and to suggest we need that type of season to win silverware is total nonsense. Earls is not going to usurp BOD as Irish 13 next season, let's just end this thread


Advertisement