Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Dial 999 and get sued
Options
-
31-03-2013 7:59pm#1Taken from sky news ,claim culture really loses the plot.
A man who dialled 999 fearing a burglary at his petrol station is being sued by the policewoman who answered the call because she fell on the premises.
The officer, Kelly Jones, tripped over a kerbstone when she went to the station in Thetford, Norfolk, owned by Steve Jones last August.
Her lawyers say she was hurt and argue that he failed to keep her safe while she was investigating the possible break-in.
Mr Jones says the move raises bigger questions about Britain's culture of compensation.
"I think it's the compensation culture gone a little too far, this is one step too far. Something needs to be done.
"I feel we need a minister of the common sense in this country," he told Sky News.
Mr Jones said he felt "astounded, worried, slightly anxious" upon receiving notification of the lawsuit last week.
"It's implying that I virtually should have done her job for her, it's implying I didn't keep her safe on my premises," Mr Jones said.
"We really need the police to be on our side right now," he added, citing what he says is an increased numbers of shoplifters or people who drive off without paying after filling up the tank.
The kerb at the Norfolk petrol station where the incident occurred
Ms Jones could not immediately be reached.
But Norfolk Police said in a statement that they had been "wholly unaware of this litigation which appears to be instigated privately by the individual officer".
The statement added: "We have a duty of care to any officer injured whilst on duty, to support their continued health and well-being and fitness to return to work. Officers can, in addition, receive further support from their staff association, as well as pursuing private treatment."
Mr Jones was called out late at night in August 25 after an alarm went off at the petrol station. Fearing a burglary, he called the police for backup.
"We were walking around to see if there had been any signs of entry in the premises and she tripped over the kerb," Mr Jones recalled.
"She got up and we carried on," he said, adding that the officer did not mention anything at the time and that she seemed to be "more embarrassed than hurt".
There was no burglary so Mr Jones said he didn't think about the incident until receiving the letter months later.
The lawsuit said the policewoman had suffered wrist and leg injuries.
Mr Jones received the letter months after the incident
Her lawyers say the area was not properly lit. Mr Jones counters that some lights were on and some more light was coming from a back street.
If successful, the claim could put people off calling emergency services. But Mr Jones said this was an isolated incident.
"On the whole the police do a great job."
The Police Federation said in a statement that "the Constables Central Committee is funding this particular case and the decision making for this lies with them."
It said most officers have public protection rather than any potential risk to themselves as their top priority.
It added: “On occasion private prosecutions and civil claims are made by police officers - and they must be treated each on their own merits.
"However, we share the public view that policing is a job that carries with it a reasonable amount of risk, at times much higher than that."
0
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
So he called the police to help keep him safe and ends up getting sued for not keeping the police safe??
Dafuq?
You shouldn't have changed your post!
It's hard to believe that they can sue as a result of a call out. It would make more sense for them to contribute to a fund to cover this.0 -
-
-
-
shopaholic01 wrote: »You shouldn't have changed your post!
It made no sense once I realised I read the OP wrong! Think I overdosed on Easter eggs and now my eyes no work good.0 -
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
Fox_In_Socks wrote: »Your post is causing me mental distress.
why?
(I'm sorry by the way - I hate causing mental distress , grammar, punctuation, clumsily written, the opinions expressed therein...what was it? aaaah the waiting is causing me mental distress
) 0 -
-
why?
(I'm sorry by the way - I hate causing mental distress , grammar, punctuation, clumsily written, the opinions expressed therein...what was it? aaaah the waiting is causing me mental distress)
You'll find out on Tuesday when my solicitors contact you.
I have been advised to say no more.:P0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Advertisement