Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Remember When Al Gore Was A Living God?

  • 23-03-2013 10:20am
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 510 ✭✭✭


    The horrific days of melting poles, massively rising sea levels drowning all coastal cities, worldwide death and mass starvation and every civil servant Partnership maggot, QUANGOmonkey, clueless student, propaganda journalist and assorted arrogant midgets warned that the "consensus" was...



    "I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had.

    Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What are relevant are reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period." - Michael Crichton


Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,203 ✭✭✭sfwcork


    Go on yeah


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,758 ✭✭✭✭TeddyTedson


    Al Gore invented the internet. Don't believe me? Just ask him yourself!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,349 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    Nope, don't remember that at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,351 ✭✭✭Littlehorny


    Al Gore before he went on his "crusade" to save the planet had 5 million in the bank, few years after his crusade - 75 million in the bank!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,376 ✭✭✭Anyone


    Manbearpig


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,708 ✭✭✭✭Mr. CooL ICE


    Don't laugh at the OP. He is serial


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,166 ✭✭✭Fr_Dougal


    The horrific days of melting poles, massively rising sea levels drowning all coastal cities, worldwide death and mass starvation and every civil servant Partnership maggot, QUANGOmonkey, clueless student, propaganda journalist and assorted arrogant midgets warned that the "consensus" was...



    "I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had.

    Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What are relevant are reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period." - Michael Crichton

    So...no opinion of your own then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,839 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    People in glass energy burning houses....


    http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/gorehome.asp


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,758 ✭✭✭✭TeddyTedson


    He is super cereal I'd say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 476 ✭✭Burky126


    Remember When Al Gore Was A Living God

    No.



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    He is super cereal I'd say.

    Theres a certain Crunchy Nuttiness about the OP allright.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 718 ✭✭✭stmol32


    Al Gore before he went on his "crusade" to save the planet had 5 million in the bank, few years after his crusade - 75 million in the bank!

    That's me convinced so, everything he has ever said and everything he has ever done is a lie.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,204 ✭✭✭dodderangler


    He is super cereal I'd say.
    Excelsior!!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 646 ✭✭✭mccarthy37


    I often wondered what would have been the outcome of 9 11 if Al Gore had won the election against George W Bush or would it have happened at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 718 ✭✭✭stmol32


    mccarthy37 wrote: »
    I often wondered what would have been the outcome of 9 11 if Al Gore had won the election against George W Bush or would it have happened at all.

    Then Saddam Hussein would have gotten away with it goddammit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    mccarthy37 wrote: »
    I often wondered what would have been the outcome of 9 11 if Al Gore had won the election against George W Bush or would it have happened at all.

    It would have happened, they probably would have gone into Afghanistan, but not Iraq.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,205 ✭✭✭Benny_Cake




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 646 ✭✭✭mccarthy37


    stmol32 wrote: »
    Then Saddam Hussein would have gotten away with it goddammit.

    Saddam was a monster but don't forget he was once armed by The United States. I don't mourn his passing but NATO have made a bigger sh*thole out of Iraq. Strange how Afghanistan was invaded by NATO forces but Bin Laded was killed in Pakistan. Strange how Pakistan have Nuclear Power. There are a lot of western politician's who have nightmare's about that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 358 ✭✭Joe Hart


    I've been saying its a scam for years and one that has finally been disproved.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2294560/The-great-green-1-The-hard-proof-finally-shows-global-warming-forecasts-costing-billions-WRONG-along.html

    They started calling it climate change when their projections didn't go the way wanted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭mr j tayto


    Nice little earner for the man who was president but then found out he was'nt. Payoff perhaps?;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,578 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    Joe Hart wrote: »
    I've been saying its a scam for years and one that has finally been disproved.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2294560/The-great-green-1-The-hard-proof-finally-shows-global-warming-forecasts-costing-billions-WRONG-along.html

    They started calling it climate change when their projections didn't go the way wanted.

    From the paper that has proven everything gives you cancer?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Joe Hart wrote: »
    They started calling it climate change when their projections didn't go the way wanted.

    No they didn't. Global warming has always been just one aspect of climate change. And whatever about the causes of it; virtually nobody disputes that average global temperatures are rising.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    What puzzles me about Al Gore is that he was in the "second-most-important" position in the world for eight years, with vast resources and influence at his disposal and it was only when the Presidency of the USA was snatched from him (to the surprise of almost everyone) that he began blubbering on about this issue.

    If I were one to blatantly pretend that I'm a psychologist (and I am!) I'd say a bit of his mind broke when he was robbed of almost certain power. You could literally see his brains seeping from his head! Some of the stuff he and his friends came out with about AGW was wildly inflammatory, but that's how you make the big bucks. $70million? Nice work.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 358 ✭✭Joe Hart


    No they didn't. Global warming has always been just one aspect of climate change. And whatever about the causes of it; virtually nobody disputes that average global temperatures are rising.

    I dispute it. They are not rising. Try a trendline out on the most recent data. They are rising over 40 years but not 10 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,522 ✭✭✭✭JRant



    No they didn't. Global warming has always been just one aspect of climate change. And whatever about the causes of it; virtually nobody disputes that average global temperatures are rising.

    There's noone so blind as those that wont see unfortunately.

    Sea temperatures are also on the rise, wait and see what a change in the gulf stream will do to northern Europe.
    We're already experiencing wetter summers due to a shift in the jet stream and this will be small potatoes compared to what a shift in the gulf stream will do.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    I still love this one from Hannity, and you hear people reproduce similar claims on a seasonal basis. Every ****ing winter "Wheres your global warming now, Al Gore?" Ehm ITS ****ING WINTER. And also, They're all idiots, because these have all been record-breaking weather events, hot and cold.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 358 ✭✭Joe Hart


    JRant wrote: »
    There's noone so blind as those that wont see unfortunately.

    Sea temperatures are also on the rise, wait and see what a change in the gulf stream will do to northern Europe.
    We're already experiencing wetter summers due to a shift in the jet stream and this will be small potatoes compared to what a shift in the gulf stream will do.

    I'm lving this retrospective fitting of current weather to "climate change".
    Cold winters the past few years were more evidence. Cold summer was evidence. Hot summer is evidence. You can't win.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Joe Hart wrote: »
    I dispute it. They are not rising. Try a trendline out on the most recent data. They are rising over 40 years but not 10 years.

    The ten warmest years since records began 132-years ago have all occurred since 1998, and the last year that was cooler than average was 1976.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrumental_temperature_record#Warmest_years


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭howtomake


    Er no I don't remember at all when Al Gore was god, was even living in the States during his supposed 'reign' as an evangelist and 2nd in command (although in Dan Quayle was a VP:rolleyes:, look at Biden, so I really don't hold being a VP in a high regard). Once again the Simpsons had it right.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,996 ✭✭✭two wheels good


    Al Gore before he went on his "crusade" to save the planet had 5 million in the bank, few years after his crusade - 75 million in the bank!

    Maybe selling his cable TV channel and making $100m could explain his wealth. You know.. the American dream.
    What are you suggesting exactly?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,996 ✭✭✭two wheels good


    stmol32 wrote: »
    Then Saddam Hussein would have gotten away with it goddammit.

    Gotten away with what? All those WMD? Organising 9/11?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,522 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Joe Hart wrote: »

    I'm lving this retrospective fitting of current weather to "climate change".
    Cold winters the past few years were more evidence. Cold summer was evidence. Hot summer is evidence. You can't win.

    Only if you look at events in a singular manner. Climates around the globe are shifting due to everything being one large interconnected system. Some places are getting warmer while others are getting colder. Hotter spells in the equator and tropics has an adverse effect on weather patterns further north and south. For example, warmer sea temperatures could see a huge change in the oceans currents and considering our weather is almost entirely due to the gulf stream it is a cause for concern.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    The problem with Climate Change is that at the end of the day when all is said and done and the music stops and the fat lady sings and the chips are counted and the cows come home, we are talking about predicting the weather. The current technology allows for accurate predictions up to about 5 days, I think.

    When the scientists and politicians come out and say the weather has nothing to do with the climate it shows the emperor to have no clothes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 718 ✭✭✭stmol32


    Gotten away with what? All those WMD? Organising 9/11?

    Al Gore, if he were president, would have wasted time capturing Bin Laden and rebuilding New York.

    It took a visionary with the analytical mind of George W. Bush to detect the real mastermind behind the plot - Saddam - and the to prove it by saying it really loudly over and over again on the news.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,351 ✭✭✭Littlehorny


    Maybe selling his cable TV channel and making $100m could explain his wealth. You know.. the American dream.
    What are you suggesting exactly?

    I remember hearing about Gore's wealth increase on The Last Word a few years ago so i just done a bit of googling and found that his worth when he was vice president was 1 million and according to an article in the Washington Post since leaving office Gore has gotten involved in green energy companies. The article states that through his powerful resume and contacts he built up while in office these companies have received federal funding. The article also states that Gores personal wealth has increased by 98 million through these companies. My point is this man has made immense amounts of money and when someone has something to gain financially i usually take what they say with a pinch of salt.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement