Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

My LS430 - Converted to LPG - Review

2456712

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,380 ✭✭✭daRobot


    Matt Simis wrote: »
    Id be all on for such things, but you will face stiff resistance from die hards if you "butcher" a V10 with LPG. :)

    It'll be a fun thread on pistonheads, and a lot of "just wrong" will be spouted :pac: But at the end of the day, it's just an alternative fuel, doesn't harm the car, so why not capitalise on it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭RandomAccess


    Matt Simis wrote: »
    Id be all on for such things, but you will face stiff resistance from die hards if you "butcher" a V10 with LPG. :)

    As long as it didn't affect the V10 bawl, I'd be willing to live with the trade off of starting the car like a super-ser. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,305 ✭✭✭Stallingrad


    Hmm, not convinced by the whole LPG thing, more like RPG...



  • Posts: 2,038 [Deleted User]


    So you really think a knackered pickup in Iran with whatever unknown LPG system is in anyway comparable to the LPG systems we are discussing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,343 ✭✭✭beazee


    Hmm, not convinced...

    Only in Iran


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,305 ✭✭✭Stallingrad


    cisk wrote: »
    So you really think a knackered pickup in Iran with whatever unknown LPG system is in anyway comparable to the LPG systems we are discussing.

    Relax, it was meant in jest. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭Matt Simis


    Lol, funny though.
    Wonder what happened, it didnt "explode" (BLEVE style).. more overpressured to the extreme and designed without a pressure release valve?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,340 ✭✭✭mullingar


    All LPG filling pumps have an exact maximum pumping pressure, and when this is reached during the filling, the receiving tank is full.

    I would say that either
    a) the tank was not an approved LPG tank, could well be an empty metal oil barrel or
    b) trying to fill CNG (>500's bars) into a LPG tank (~8bars)

    I remember reading a German article somewhere where they crash tested many LPG tanks and they found that LPG was actually marginally safer than petrol.


  • Subscribers Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭conzy


    I have been thinking about this for a while.. I'm now 95% certain I'm getting the 325 done in the summer. Straight 6 noise and linear power with < 320d running costs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭Matt Simis


    conzy wrote: »
    I have been thinking about this for a while.. I'm now 95% certain I'm getting the 325 done in the summer. Straight 6 noise and linear power with < 320d running costs

    I was thinking of a 325/330/530i as well for same reasons! I think 32mpg is a possiblility (on petrol) on the 530i manual as my old auto 530i Touring got 28mpg (motorway mixed), makes for a cheap and reasonably high performance car with no turbo or DPF to die.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,796 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    ..........Breaking News...........well, after much prevarication, my brother has sent his 3.0t Petrol Saab into Cork for conversion today, so we'll all have another channel of good info on it by tomorrow.

    His car is a 3 litre V6 petrol Turbo, so the Lexus answers the normally aspirated queries, and we'll have a LPT turbo application to review shortly as well.

    More, as they say, as it comes to hand..... :D




    Oh, and conzy/Matt - if it works out, he might convert his SO's 323Ci as well.

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 79 ✭✭Photoshop


    Does it have to be big 3.0l - 4.3l N/A engines ?

    Smile would come off my face when I see the motor tax bill of 1.5k+ per year.

    Can you convert smaller engines with big power, turbo/n/a, like Focus ST, Mazda MPS, Type R, OPC, GTI etc?

    250bhp OPC on lpg would best of both worlds ( power and motor tax )


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,718 ✭✭✭Matt Simis


    Historically it was associated with large, high power/torque engines as:

    - Motor tax based on CC is a local problem so not really a concern elsewhere. Even hear, yearly fuel costs have now (usually vastly) exceeded yearly tax.
    - Earlier LPG tech had a notable power hit, which was largely absorbed in big engines.
    - NA V8s are comparatively simpler in design, greater in reliability and cheaper to produce than small CC high boost engines, making them better donor candidates.
    - Financially the most gain is had when applied to vehicle with the lowest economy, cost to repay installation is much faster on low MPG vehicles.
    - V8s sound nicer... :p


    But yes, you could put it on anything and its high octane matches turbo applications well, I suspect an Audi 1.8T with a big turbo installed but otherwise fairly stock is good for 300bhp on LPG while retaining most of its naturally good MPG and low tax.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 90 ✭✭sorel


    best thing to do, is catch really good conversion prices. Same conversion in Germany, Holland, France etc will cost double. Wait a year and see "normal" prices...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,796 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    Update on brothers Saab: I got the date wrong, it's next Friday it's being done............ :)

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,568 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    Tank size, at 78L (with an effective fill of 64l), considering the cars consumption was a little too small for me. I actually spoke to the lads in LPGAIN about this, and they're going to swap it out for me with a 95l (fills to 77L), with me just paying the difference in tank costs (50 euro). I though that was very decent of them.
    good point about how people would travel extra 15 minutes if half price petrol was on sale, makes sense to me to get biggest tank possible unless you live very close to them and then just completely fill it each time, saving trips. Most people would get 2-3 weeks on a fill in that case I reckon. I put E30 a week into my 325ci, I dont think with this low spend, Id consider it unless I was spending minimum E50 per week on petrol or had a big v8 etc...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,986 ✭✭✭rocky


    If I do the conversion, 950 euro for 3l I6, it'll take me 1.9 years to recoup the cost at 20l/100km (petrol is 17/100, all city driving)...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,340 ✭✭✭mullingar


    rocky wrote: »
    If I do the conversion, 950 euro for 3l I6, it'll take me 1.9 years to recoup the cost at 20l/100km (petrol is 17/100, all city driving)...

    What mileage are you doing? 5-6k miles/yr?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,986 ✭✭✭rocky


    Estimated less than 6k km


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,796 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    galwaytt wrote: »
    Update on brothers Saab: I got the date wrong, it's next Friday it's being done............ :)

    ...sorry it's been so long, but The Brother :rolleyes: is not exactly boards.ie-literate..... :P

    So, he's been driving it for a week now, and first thoughts are..:
    1. No performance deficit at all. He actually said it was better, but I'm going to put that down to some sort of psychological inverted buyer's remorse....
    2. In v.cold temps, it def prefers starting on petrol, and switches over once temps are up
    3. He's also twigged that running on petrol for a minute before you shut it off (say last spin of the day), makes starting more instantaneous in the following (cold) a.m.....
    4. ....no difference at all in throttle response
    5. And here's the science bit: on petrol, the car was returning 27mpg. Gas consumption on a fill-fill basis has come in at....23.5mpg. That's a 13% drop. As a reminder: this a 3.0 V6 petrol turbo (LPT). That, imho, is the economy most people get from their 2.0 cars...
    6. Here's the wallet-friendly bit: LPG cost him 89c/litre in Cork vs 1.56 for petrol. That's a 43% reduction in the cost of fuel

    Ergo, the conversion so far has proven more-than-worthwhile. At his mileage use, the conversion will be paid for in 6 months.

    He has to bring it back at 1000kms for a check-over and trimming of settings etc, so I hope to have an update a bit further along. I also want to get to drive the thing.

    Seems to me that for anyone where the tax-trap is a killer (aka, luxobarges), LPG is a no-brainer.

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,915 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    No doubt its a no brainer across a whole range of cars however the lack of lpg stations is the killer in alot of areas. You are then into getting your own tank for bulk delivery and the costs add up a bit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,796 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    mickdw wrote: »
    No doubt its a no brainer across a whole range of cars however the lack of lpg stations is the killer in alot of areas. You are then into getting your own tank for bulk delivery and the costs add up a bit.

    I dunno, it's not as hard to find as you'd think: all these installer guys are also supplying gas now as well. You only need to find a reasonably local source and visit it infrequently - unlike petrol where can put in any amount from a €5 to a fill, with gas it's more often just a fill.

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,915 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    In the arse end of mayo, it would be a long shot tbh. I think 60miles would be the nearest to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,340 ✭✭✭mullingar


    @OP,

    Just a question on your filling point.

    If you fit the protective plastic dust/water cap, can you close the fuel flap?

    On this PDF (Pages 36-38), it lists their recommendations of the positioning of that filling point and the use of the protective cap.
    http://www.tomasetto.com/downloadDoc.asp?f=all%5F11%5F1%5FInstallation+Manual+for+AT02+multivalves%2Epdf&id=11&r=2

    Actually that PDF is a full instruction book on installing a LPG tank and multivalve. It also explains extremely well the full list of safety features that these multi-valves have. Its well worth a read.



    I am currently installing an LPG system into my 98 GS300 so I'm sure the existing petrol filling system is very similar to yours, but the fuel flap would not close if I had the protective cap on where you mounted yours so I'm mounting the filling point onto some 4mm steel.

    243577.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,585 ✭✭✭jca


    mullingar wrote: »
    @OP,

    Just a question on your filling point.

    If you fit the protective plastic dust/water cap, can you close the fuel flap?

    On this PDF (Pages 36-38), it lists their recommendations of the positioning of that filling point and the use of the protective cap.
    http://www.tomasetto.com/downloadDoc.asp?f=all%5F11%5F1%5FInstallation+Manual+for+AT02+multivalves%2Epdf&id=11&r=2

    Actually that PDF is a full instruction book on installing a LPG tank and multivalve. It also explains extremely well the full list of safety features that these multi-valves have. Its well worth a read.



    I am currently installing an LPG system into my 98 GS300 so I'm sure the existing petrol filling system is very similar to yours, but the fuel flap would not close if I had the protective cap on where you mounted yours so I'm mounting the filling point onto some 4mm steel.

    243577.jpg
    That looks shocking a real botch job. Will you be able to turn the petrol filler cap when the gas pipe and fitting are in place?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,340 ✭✭✭mullingar


    jca wrote: »
    That looks shocking a real botch job. Will you be able to turn the petrol filler cap when the gas pipe and fitting are in place?

    That is only a test fit for the support for the filling point (note: no bolts), its much much stronger than mounting it onto the cars thin-ish panels to support the weight of the LPG nozzle/hose, you have to let the LPG pumps nozzle/hose dangle out of the car when you are filling.

    I need to dig out a picture of the the finished filling point, much, much nicer and you dont see any of that support bracket.

    And yes, its you can fill either petrol or LPG perfectly, and it closes just fine with the dust-cap on too!

    Edit; Found a picture with the filling adapter already screwed it.

    243676.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,585 ✭✭✭jca


    mullingar wrote: »
    That is only a test fit for the support for the filling point (note: no bolts), its much much stronger than mounting it onto the cars thin-ish panels to support the weight of the LPG nozzle/hose, you have to let the LPG pumps nozzle/hose dangle out of the car when you are filling.

    I need to dig out a picture of the the finished filling point, much, much nicer and you dont see any of that support bracket.

    And yes, its you can fill either petrol or LPG perfectly, and it closes just fine with the dust-cap on too!

    Edit; Found a picture with the filling adapter already screwed it.

    243676.jpg

    It looks very nice indeed. Certainly easier than the old days with the filler hanging from a bracket under the bumper!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,585 ✭✭✭jca


    Myself and my father dabbled with lpg in the late 80's early 90's when it was half the price of petrol. We found it easier to convert the figures to miles per pound rather than mpg. My father had a Renault 18 1.4 TL that had a kit already installed but it wasn't running on the lpg properly. A saturday afternoon replacing all the rotten and perished rubber hoses soon had it running like a top. It ran on gas all year round,never needed to be switched to petrol for starting. There was a noticable drop in power between both fuels being the lowly 1.4. On petrol it was getting 10 miles per pound and getting 15 miles per pound on lpg on town driving. I converted a MK2 Cortina 1300,it was giving 8 miles per pound on petrol and 13 per pound on lpg. Maybe the posters here could give us some miles per pound figures from the two fuels.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,030 ✭✭✭✭Esel
    Not Your Ornery Onager


    Would km per €uro do? Or even miles per €... :)

    Sure you could always calculate the figures from galwaytt's post above.

    Not your ornery onager



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,340 ✭✭✭mullingar


    jca wrote: »
    Myself and my father dabbled with lpg in the late 80's early 90's when it was half the price of petrol. We found it easier to convert the figures to miles per pound rather than mpg. My father had a Renault 18 1.4 TL that had a kit already installed but it wasn't running on the lpg properly. A saturday afternoon replacing all the rotten and perished rubber hoses soon had it running like a top. It ran on gas all year round,never needed to be switched to petrol for starting. There was a noticable drop in power between both fuels being the lowly 1.4. On petrol it was getting 10 miles per pound and getting 15 miles per pound on lpg on town driving. I converted a MK2 Cortina 1300,it was giving 8 miles per pound on petrol and 13 per pound on lpg. Maybe the posters here could give us some miles per pound figures from the two fuels.

    An old 18 with a 1.4, times have certainly changed since then. you must be a late 60's child :)


Advertisement