Converting classic car to diesel?

Hi, I'm wondering has anybody bought a classic car (Bentley, Merc, rolls royce or maybe a classic American car?) and converted it to a Diesel?

There are lots of nice classic cars going cheap now because they are not economical and there's a few I'd love to have but couldn't run so I'd be interested in knowing if it's feasible to convert it to a newer engine or is it just too big and difficult a job? Also does anybody know anywhere that might specialise in engine conversions?

I know a few places that do Jap imports and can convert engines but it's all just Jap cars.

Thanks for the responses.

LIGHTNING

LIGHTNING wrote: »

You wont get a nice response in here about converting classics to diesel:pac:

Keep the engine that came with the car unless you are transplanting a big honking American V8

Really? That's a shame, I understand the point of 'keep the car as it was produced' but surly there are some logical people on here who want a classic car with modern perks?

carchaeologist

If you want a rattly old dayshel, buy one that had it fitted from new, probably a Mercedes 123 series would fit the bill nicely. If you cant afford the petrol, dont buy the car!

Converting a car that should have a petrol engine to a Diesel ruins it IMO. Plus non turbo diesel engines are fit only for tractors...

Worst case i ever saw was a Jensen Interceptor with a 300D merc diesel nailed into it. I mean, what is that car with that engine? Its not a Jensen Interceptor thats for sure.:rolleyes:

carchaeologist

carchaeologist wrote: »

If you want a rattly old dayshel, buy one that had it fitted from new, probably a Mercedes 123 series would fit the bill nicely. If you cant afford the petrol, dont buy the car!

Converting a car that should have a petrol engine to a Diesel ruins it IMO. Plus non turbo diesel engines are fit only for tractors...

Worst case i ever saw was a Jensen Interceptor with a 300D merc diesel nailed into it. I mean, what is that car with that engine? Its not a Jensen Interceptor thats for sure.:rolleyes:

No modern Diesel's are fine.

Also No I was not talking about an Interseptor, more like

Bentley Turbo R
Cadillec
Dodge Charger
rolls-royce - shadow

Basically a big saloon not a small sporty car.

Daved_XB

niallerrity wrote: »

No modern Diesel's are fine.

Also No I was not talking about an Interseptor, more like

Bentley Turbo R
Cadillec
Dodge Charger
rolls-royce - shadow

Basically a big saloon not a small sporty car.

Dodge Charger.... Dodge Charger.... Please leave now...

What is it with some people in this country & there irrational love of Diesel... I'd normally be the first to say buy what you want & personalise it as you see fit... But big V8 muscle cars are just that big V8 muscle cars & to put a turf burner in one is sacrilege IMHO...

If you want a diesel classic then just go & buy one..

101sean

Rolls Royce has been done using 6.2 GM V8 as used in Hummers.

Good way of completely buggering up a good vehicle IMHO, as for putting a diseasel in a yank muscle car :eek:

You'd need a big diesel which will cost good money to buy, engineer the conversion, retune the autobox (change points will be all wrong), all to still probably do no more that 20mpg. Plus it will sound totally wrong.

V8s rule!

argosy2006

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Pi0DrTOrJ8

Seems like a good idea to me,

http://autohauswerks.com/

Daved_XB

Daved_XB wrote: »

Dodge Charger.... Dodge Charger.... Please leave now...

What is it with some people in this country & there irrational love of Diesel... I'd normally be the first to say buy what you want & personalise it as you see fit... But big V8 muscle cars are just that big V8 muscle cars & to put a turf burner in one is sacrilege IMHO...

If you want a diesel classic then just go & buy one..

I wouldn't know I've never had a Diesel before.....

I don't really care much for the Diesel vs petrol argument.

Also I didn't really post this to get peoples personal opinions on what car and what you should or shouldn't do. Somebody's car is a personal thing, if you want to waist your money on a V8 when you can only drive 60 i'm not going to complain, I'd rather have a car I consider nice which the convenience of a Diesel engine.

That's my opinion and I'm not going to respond to any more stupid comments. I actually don't give a F**k what you think is right or wrong.

Anybody else ever done this or know a company?

Thanks

argosy2006

argosy2006 wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Pi0DrTOrJ8

Seems like a good idea to me,

http://autohauswerks.com/

Yes EXACTLY what I was thinking, Thank you very much!

argosy2006

http://cars.donedeal.ie/for-sale/vintagecars/3220788

http://cars.donedeal.ie/for-sale/vintagecars/3175058

http://cars.donedeal.ie/for-sale/vintagecars/3165675

http://cars.donedeal.ie/for-sale/vintagecars/3043785

Daved_XB

niallerrity wrote: »

I wouldn't know I've never had a Diesel before.....

I don't really care much for the Diesel vs petrol argument.

Also I didn't really post this to get peoples personal opinions on what car and what you should or shouldn't do. Somebody's car is a personal thing, if you want to waist your money on a V8 when you can only drive 60 i'm not going to complain, I'd rather have a car I consider nice which the convenience of a Diesel engine.

That's my opinion and I'm not going to respond to any more stupid comments. I actually don't give a F**k what you think is right or wrong.

Anybody else ever done this or know a company?

Thanks

If you didn't want opinions then why post on an Internet forum?

On a more practicle note... Even with the price difference between the two fuels & the difference in fuel economy between them... If you sat down & did the math of what the conversion would cost you you'll probably find that it will take many many years for this to ever pay a return.

I have four petrol V8's & non of them have any less "convenience" than a diesel has

carchaeologist

niallerrity wrote: »

No modern Diesel's are fine.

Also No I was not talking about an Interseptor, more like

Bentley Turbo R
Cadillec
Dodge Charger
rolls-royce - shadow

Basically a big saloon not a small sporty car.

I was using the Interceptor as an example of how putting a diesel in such a car takes the soul out of it. A Rolls Shadow is meant to run a 6.7 Litre V8 and was designed to run as such, its a great car when in proper tune and running smoothly. To put another engine in it and particularly a diesel engine will take the Rolls Royce out of the car.

I wouldn't know I've never had a Diesel before.....

To own one is the understand. A modern Diesel is a grand thing, but anything made older than about 1990 is a noisy rattly smoky thing. Plus you really neeed a turbo to make any headway at all.

That Bentley, while i totally appriciate the effort gone into it, sounds nasty, not smooth and silent like a Bentley should.

gn3dr

Daved_XB wrote: »

If you didn't want opinions then why post on an Internet forum?

On a more practicle note... Even with the price difference between the two fuels & the difference in fuel economy between them... If you sat down & did the math of what the conversion would cost you you'll probably find that it will take many many years for this to ever pay a return.

I have four petrol V8's & non of them have any less "convenience" than a diesel has

I wouldn't agree with that. I'm converting a XJ12 Jaguar with a Merc 300 turbodiesel engine and the Merc 722.6 autobox. I can assure you I wouldn't have to drive too many miles to work up a significant saving on what it would have cost to drive the V12. You can buy a Merc 300 turbodiesel for small money these days and the engines are powerful and fairly bullet proof. It is a fair amount of work but it's not costly if you can do the work yourself - I'm making it harder for myself by wanting to use the Merc electronics and the gearbox but it could be done much easier.

I'm also not a diesel fan - I've only owned two diesels in the last 25 odd years and those were both in the last 2 years . I'm still a major petrolhead and will always have a few petrol cars as well including other V12's and V8's but times are tough so needs must and all that

Which would you rather see - a big engined petrol car rotting into the ground or worse still crushed, becasue it is too expensive to drive around in or have it converted to diesel so that it will still actually get used and provide enjoyment to someone?

I know I'd rather see the car being reinvente to live on for longer.

Having said all thatI'm definitely not one for sticking a big old soot chucker like something from a Nissan Patrol into a luxury car. If it is going to be done it has to be done with a good diesel engine. (My original choice woul have been a TDV6 from a Jaguar S type to keep it all Jaguar but that would not have been affordable to do)

trevorbrady

jebus, no love for diesels here, even less for diesel conversions!!

I'm 99% through converting my '74 VW camper to diesel. Getting the gearing right in a petrol car to run a diesel engine will be a big problem. Most petrol engines like to rev much higher than most diesel engines so a diesel engine will run out of power at very low vehicle speeds on a petrol gearbox. But you'll get to that point in a hurry, there would be great acceleration and pulling power.

So if considering a conversion, consider a donor gearbox too..

Daved_XB

gn3dr wrote: »

Which would you rather see - a big engined petrol car rotting into the ground or worse still crushed, becasue it is too expensive to drive around in or have it converted to diesel so that it will still actually get used and provide enjoyment to someone?

Well to be honest I don't see the above as the only options.... I know of several people who have many classics that they very very rarely use, but I can assure you that they are not rotting into the ground... they are preserved

Now I'm not normally the biggest fan of people who collect cars as garage ornaments, personally I like to drive mine as often as I can, but that's my passion my hobby... but I'd rather see a Dodge Charger with it's glorious V8 petrol engine stored in a show garage that never moved again than see someone convert it to diesel.. even more so if said conversion meant having to modify the frame or the floor pan to take the new motor/gear box etc

I know that there aren't as many LPG filling stations in this country as there could be... but converting a classic petrol engine to run on LPG is a lot less work & can be easily undone & you keep the soul of the car.. Another option is to replace the old V8 carb with a new modern fuel injection...

I'm sorry OP if I've offended you but classic car people tend to be passionate about their cars & big Muscle cars are my passion & IMHO the big rumbling V8 of said cars is really the heart & soul of them.. it is one of the main reasons that people love them... I love seeing the kick that people at car shows & meets get when I fire mine up & let them hear her roar...

My Challenger with it's 6 Pack carb's gives me 7 to 8 MPG... but as I always tell people I can't calculate how many Smiles Per Gallon the old girl gives... if she was running a Diesel then sure I'd get better MPG... but I'd have f@*k all SPG

bbsrs

The guy just asked if anybody knows where he can get a conversion carried out , its his money and his property he can do as he wishes with it. I personally think its a good route to take , yes a beautiful large engine is beautiful to listen to but if you're not in a position to spend close on 1 euro per mile on petrol why not convert to diesel when you could regularly use your car . A nice BMW 3.0 turbo would be a good engine to use.

kev1.3s

I wouldn't be the greatest fan of converting a classic to diesel especially if it's something that is iconic for the engine that it came with, but it is the op's money to do what he wants with and if converting a classic to diesel will save an otherwise neglected car then so be it. I remember growing up there was a guy who always drove an xjs around here which had a dirty diesel engine in it and everyone around used to say how it was sacrilege to take out the v12 but I didn't see any of these people put there money where there mouth was and run one in the 80's, these cars that I'm talking about would almost certainly have been scrapped without his intervention. Some people care less about the history of a particular model and more about the style so the rumble of a mopar v8 is something that doesn't concern them. But in all fairness can you imagine a Lamborghini countach with a smoggy diesel thumping its way up the autobann.

bbsrs

kev1.3s wrote: »

I wouldn't be the greatest fan of converting a classic to diesel especially if it's something that is iconic for the engine that it came with, but it is the op's money to do what he wants with and if converting a classic to diesel will save an otherwise neglected car then so be it. I remember growing up there was a guy who always drove an xjs around here which had a dirty diesel engine in it and everyone around used to say how it was sacrilege to take out the v12 but I didn't see any of these people put there money where there mouth was and run one in the 80's, these cars that I'm talking about would almost certainly have been scrapped without his intervention. Some people care less about the history of a particular model and more about the style so the rumble of a mopar v8 is something that doesn't concern them. But in all fairness can you imagine a Lamborghini countach with a smoggy diesel thumping its way up the autobann.

Yes a performance sports car with a diesel wouldn't make sense but a motorway cruiser such as a roller or a Bentley would , a modern diesel engine would suit that type of car perfectly.

piston

My understanding is that it pretty straightforward to put the 1.8D engine from an Escort van into old RWD Fords like Cortinas and MK2 Escorts. I knew someone who did it to a MKV Cortina Estate. It was surprisingly refined at idle but the gearing was all wrong.

bbsrs

piston wrote: »

My understanding is that it pretty straightforward to put the 1.8D engine from an Escort van into old RWD Fords like Cortinas and MK2 Escorts. I knew someone who did it to a MKV Cortina Estate. It was surprisingly refined at idle but the gearing was all wrong.

The escort 1.8d was fwd so he probably used a petrol engine rwd gearbox , if you used an rwd engine and gearbox with a suitably geared differential you wouldn't have any gearing issues. There's a guy on e30owners.com putting an e46 330d engine into his e30 and it will be a nice car when complete.

kev1.3s

It would make sense in a unemotional level but does anybody really want a smelly diesel rolls or Bentley, admittedly there is some horrible " wedding car " rollor's out there but a enthusiast wouldn't want much to do with that type of roller either. I'd have less of a problem with an old merc as they were mostly available in diesel but not something thats reputation is built on refinement. But as I said it's not my money!

carchaeologist

If your trying to save money by running a Rolls on a Diesel it's not going to save you from the other Rolls running costs...

bijapos

carchaeologist wrote: »

If your trying to save money by running a Rolls on a Diesel it's not going to save you from the other Rolls running costs...

+1 to that ^.

Rolls, Bentleys etc, they all have big servicing and maintenance costs and a bad one can be a money pit. If you think the fuel bills are big, then you should consider something else that's more manageable financially.

piston

bbsrs wrote: »

The escort 1.8d was fwd so he probably used a petrol engine rwd gearbox , if you used an rwd engine and gearbox with a suitably geared differential you wouldn't have any gearing issues. There's a guy on e30owners.com putting an e46 330d engine into his e30 and it will be a nice car when complete.

He did indeed just bolt the diesel engine directly to the Cortina gearbox. It would be doable conversion but I'm not sure what the highest final drive ratio differential for Cortina was, probably the V6 auto I would guess, but even then it would be probably be too low for a low revving diesel.

S Line

I think that most people here are remembering the 80’s with XJ’s and S-Class’s being fitted with Nissan patrol engines. I doubt that the OP is suggesting that.

You can get a 99 S320 on carzone for € 3500 – donor car money?? and surely once the engine and box are out you could part it out on e-bay to recoup more cash.

I would suggest a CDI engine from a luxobarge as oppose to a 4x4 diesel engine

While I’m not saying this a ‘Sunday morning on your front driveway job’ but with an aftermarket stand alone ECU and some elbow grease it could be made to work??

OP – another option would be a LPG conversion to the existing engine ??

Also I assume you want a classic as a daily drive ?? Maybe just get a bangernomics daily drive and just enjoy the big petrol engine classic as bi-monthly treat??

shawnee

niallerrity wrote: »

Hi, I'm wondering has anybody bought a classic car (Bentley, Merc, rolls royce or maybe a classic American car?) and converted it to a Diesel?

There are lots of nice classic cars going cheap now because they are not economical and there's a few I'd love to have but couldn't run so I'd be interested in knowing if it's feasible to convert it to a newer engine or is it just too big and difficult a job? Also does anybody know anywhere that might specialise in engine conversions?

I know a few places that do Jap imports and can convert engines but it's all just Jap cars.

Thanks for the responses.

Yes I have seen a few classic mercs that have been converted but I haven't been impressed with them. Many seem to have problems with gearchange and most are quite sluggish as the engines used are generally the old type non turbo diesels of the 80s. I could not recommend anyone to do the job but I am sure there are several out there who will. Then again a rattly diesel engine in a Rolls or Bently doesn't really fit the bill of an original classic

macplaxton

I think the OP is just a troll. :rolleyes:

But just in case...

niallerrity wrote: »

Hi, I'm wondering has anybody bought a classic car (Bentley, Merc, rolls royce or maybe a classic American car?) and converted it to vandalised it by putting in a Diesel?

There are lots of nice classic cars [well they look nice from the outside] going cheap now [and I like the idea of nice looking, cheap car] because they are not economical and there's a few I'd love to have but couldn't run [I like the idea of cheap tax, cheap insurance and no NCT, but I want cheap fuel/running costs too] so I'd be interested in knowing if it's feasible to convert it to [desecrate it by putting in] a [historically incorrect] newer engine [as I've no interest or inclination to preserve it as it was made, I just want a cheap set of wheels. Should I need to sell it at a later date, no one will want it as it will have been plundered of it's original engine . So I'll weigh it in when I've run it into the ground because I couldn't put any effort into maintaining the yoke or preserving it] or is it just too big and difficult a job? [will it cost me more time/money than I can afford?] Also does anybody know anywhere that might specialise in engine conversions [butchering cars]?

I know a few places that do Jap imports and can convert engines but it's all just Jap cars. [but I really want to find a butcherer willing to do a Bentley, Merc, Rolls-Royce or maybe a classic American car]

Thanks for the responses.

Seven words: In it for all the wrong reasons.

bbsrs wrote: »

its his money and his property he can do as he wishes with it.

We are but temporary custodians of said historic vehicles.

carchaeologist

^Post of the year.
Thats exactly my point far more eloquently than I could put it.

mamakevf

^^^^Exactly what came to mind when I saw the OP.

All the wrong reasons for sure.
OP,Why dont you just but a Golf Diesel and stick a GTI badge on the back.

gn3dr

Whether the original poster is a troll or not it has shown that there are a fair few closed minded people on here.

If the opinion is that he/she is in it for all the wrong reasons could someone explain to me what the "right" reasons are for driving a classic car??? -I'd better check that I'm in it for the "right" reasons
Maybe I should sell everything if I find out that I'm "wrong" and don't conform

shagman

I have the same criteria for my scimitar as I want to run it as a daily driver. The other solution is the one I'm looking at which is to put a modern petrol engine in. More power, more reliable, more mpg, there's no need to look at turf burners. If you're going from 20mpg to 40mpg surely thats enough and rettain the character of the car rather than hunting out that extra 10-15mpg more and killing it.

piston

Isn't it more important that a car is preserved and used rather than leaving it to rot in a field or sit immaculate but never be seen in someone's garage because nobody can afford the petrol bill? Is it really any different to someone doing other upgrades to make a car more usable in modern conditions, such as fitting disc brakes to a Morris Minor?

People have modified cars to suit their own needs ever since the car was invented. People have fitted whatever parts were available to their cars to keep them on the road if the "correct" part wasn't available or too expensive ever since the car was invented. I would not agree with butchering a genuinely really original low mileage from new car or something that is exceptionally rare, but if a common car needs a lot of work doing to it in the first place, it can't really be described as totally original any more in the first place.

bbsrs

macplaxton wrote: »

I think the OP is just a troll. :rolleyes:

But just in case...

niallerrity wrote: »

Hi, I'm wondering has anybody bought a classic car (Bentley, Merc, rolls royce or maybe a classic American car?) and converted it to vandalised it by putting in a Diesel?

There are lots of nice classic cars [well they look nice from the outside] going cheap now [and I like the idea of nice looking, cheap car] because they are not economical and there's a few I'd love to have but couldn't run [I like the idea of cheap tax, cheap insurance and no NCT, but I want cheap fuel/running costs too] so I'd be interested in knowing if it's feasible to convert it to [desecrate it by putting in] a [historically incorrect] newer engine [as I've no interest or inclination to preserve it as it was made, I just want a cheap set of wheels. Should I need to sell it at a later date, no one will want it as it will have been plundered of it's original engine . So I'll weigh it in when I've run it into the ground because I couldn't put any effort into maintaining the yoke or preserving it] or is it just too big and difficult a job? [will it cost me more time/money than I can afford?] Also does anybody know anywhere that might specialise in engine conversions [butchering cars]?

I know a few places that do Jap imports and can convert engines but it's all just Jap cars. [but I really want to find a butcherer willing to do a Bentley, Merc, Rolls-Royce or maybe a classic American car]

Thanks for the responses.

Seven words: In it for all the wrong reasons.

bbsrs wrote: »

its his money and his property he can do as he wishes with it.

We are but temporary custodians of said historic vehicles.

You may consider yourself a custodian but some of us like to modify and improve to ensure continued frequent use and fun. Like a listed building from the 1700's as long as you keep the appearance and character of the building in keeping with the original its fine to update the plumbing and heating otherwise nobody would want it.

Daved_XB

bbsrs wrote: »

You may consider yourself a custodian but some of us like to modify and improve to ensure continued frequent use and fun. Like a listed building from the 1700's as long as you keep the appearance and character of the building in keeping with the original its fine to update the plumbing and heating otherwise nobody would want it.

Agreed, but in some cases like for example a Dodge Charger like the OP was suggesting the engine IS a major part of that character, so yes upgrade it's brakes, it's suspension, fit aircon, a new 6 stack CD player, leather seats, cruse control.... But don't cut it's heart out

bbsrs

I'd rather a new heart than spendings the rest of my days confined to a museum or being sent to china for recycling.

Daved_XB

Hmmm... But we are nowhere near the point where people are scrapping good Chargers because they can't afford the fuel... In fact we are not even near the point that people are scrapping poor chargers for that reason... So I don't think that if the OP didn't buy a Charger & convert it to diesel that it would end up as paper clips & staplers next week

I think we shall have to agree to disagree on this one so...

bbsrs

Daved_XB wrote: »

Hmmm... But we are nowhere near the point where people are scrapping good Chargers because they can't afford the fuel... In fact we are not even near the point that people are scrapping poor chargers for that reason... So I don't think that if the OP didn't buy a Charger & convert it to diesel that it would end up as paper clips & staplers next week

I think we shall have to agree to disagree on this one so...

I agree with you on chargers anyway as their value and appeal is down to American muscle car Roots of which the low burble on tick over is half the appeal , I also don't think the op would convert a charger to diesel for greater economy as the value he would wipe off the car over savings on juice wouldn't make financial sense ,even if they're isn't a market here for the car there would be in USA and anywhere petrol is cheap.
What I am saying is rather than letting a car rot or be cubed in a crusher why not make it more economical to run in the long term.

Daved_XB

bbsrs wrote: »

I agree with you on chargers anyway as their value and appeal is down to American muscle car Roots of which the low burble on tick over is half the appeal , I also don't think the op would convert a charger to diesel for greater economy as the value he would wipe off the car over savings on juice wouldn't make financial sense ,even if they're isn't a market here for the car there would be in USA and anywhere petrol is cheap.
What I am saying is rather than letting a car rot or be cubed in a crusher why not make it more economical to run in the long term.

Well, the only reason I picked on the Dodge Charger as an example is because it's one of the 4 cars that the OP listed as ones he WAS thinking of....

macplaxton

macplaxton wrote: »

I think the OP is just a troll. :rolleyes:

But just in case...



Seven words: In it for all the wrong reasons.



We are but temporary custodians of said historic vehicles.

where do i begin with what wrong with everything you said?

NOTHING WRONG WITH DIESEL ENGINE, THATS YOUR OPINION BUT I DISAGREE.

They also look lovely on the inside and have a smooth ride, built with quality.

Not looking for a 'cheap car' it's the running cost I don't want, why? because i'm never, ever going to use a V8 or V12 to it's potential so I want something that is more efficient and not burning up excess fuel for NO REASON.

Never thought about the TAX, Insure or NCT. Usually I judge a car based on what I like and what I'm willing to spend, I'd rather fit a modern diesel say from a 520 (example) and if that means paying 600 odd tax a year i'm fine with that.

Actually If i was doing this it would be for MYSELF not to sell on so I couldn't really care if a classic car collector doesn't like it because I'll just laugh that they spend a euro a mile.

It's not 'butchering cars'? It's your opinion on what a classic car should be, thats fine but I said before I don't care. You can go along to your classic car meets and admire standard classic cars thats fine, I'm not going to judge you.

Somebody else mentioned why don't I buy a small golf or something? I have a 2011 fiesta at the moment and I don't like it. I want something with space and comfort. You don't get the same build quality nowadays as you did with high end classic cars, again MY OPINION I don't really care what anybody else thinks.

I really will have to think twice before ever posting anything on this site again, some people just don't read. I DON'T WANT YOUR OPINION SO DO NOT COMMENT YOUR OPINION. It's a shame because some people have been very helpful here but then you get the keyboard warriors who just like to give out about things. IF somebody starts a thread looking to debate a topic thats fine, but if somebody asks a specific question then don't comment if you're just going to give out about it.

Daved_XB

Daved_XB wrote: »

Agreed, but in some cases like for example a Dodge Charger like the OP was suggesting the engine IS a major part of that character, so yes upgrade it's brakes, it's suspension, fit aircon, a new 6 stack CD player, leather seats, cruse control.... But don't cut it's heart out

I agree with you, I really only said a Dodge Charger because It's something I've always wanted but in reality I would probably never do it.

On the other hand I'm really talking about a large saloon.

Daved_XB

Daved_XB wrote: »

Hmmm... But we are nowhere near the point where people are scrapping good Chargers because they can't afford the fuel... In fact we are not even near the point that people are scrapping poor chargers for that reason... So I don't think that if the OP didn't buy a Charger & convert it to diesel that it would end up as paper clips & staplers next week

I think we shall have to agree to disagree on this one so...

There are plenty of cars going to waist because people can't afford to maintain them or run them, end up getting left aside for a few months in the hope of being restored then takes a few years and then by that stage they are nearly rotted away!

kiki

LIGHTNING wrote: »

You wont get a nice response in here about converting classics to diesel:pac:

Keep the engine that came with the car unless you are transplanting a big honking American V8

Think lightning summed it up quiet well. Lot of people here quiet passionate about their hobby, while its your prerogative to do what you wish with your vehicle, many here would be horrified to see a genuine classic car's character changed beyond an acceptable level. Thats not a surprise if you read the posts here regularly - no surprise that some may think your post a troll.

In addition many here would caution about the cost issue and any real return on your investment in buying car, engine/gearbox and fitting same. You mentioned cost as a deciding factor so many of the response relate to costs.
When you consider that many either have already or would spend more on a classic than is economically sensible (example - spending 10k restoration in time and materials on a car worth 4k to end up with a car worth 7k) its no surprise really that you get such a response - A lot of passionate people in here.

From what Ive read here - most people here are welcoming and have an open mind, but you will get their opinions on their hobby and thats OK too.

Good luck on your project btw, Im sure it will be interesting.
Woody

bbsrs

kiki wrote: »

LIGHTNING wrote: »

Think lightning summed it up quiet well. Lot of people here quiet passionate about their hobby

Yes but not just the people who want to keep the car as it left the factory , it takes just as much passion to embark on a restoration plus engine conversion , just because some people don't agree with another's route in modification restoration doesn't give them the right to impose their way of thinking on others or to be little the others endeavours. If we all thought the same it would be a boring world .

kiki

bbsrs wrote: »

kiki wrote: »

Yes but not just the people who want to keep the car as it left the factory , it takes just as much passion to embark on a restoration plus engine conversion , just because some people don't agree with another's route in modification restoration doesn't give them the right to impose their way of thinking on others or to be little the others endeavours. If we all thought the same it would be a boring world .

I agree with that, no one here imposing anything, OP has right to do as he wishes with his own car, but you will get opinions here if you ask, even if you dont directly ask for opinions, i dont agree with them all but they are valid opinions, OP should ignore those he doesnt agree with without getting in a huff and remember -- "Opinions are like A$$holes, everybody has one..."
As for belittling his endevours - I wished him luck on his project - I would certainly like to see how it progresses...

bbsrs

kiki wrote: »

bbsrs wrote: »

kiki wrote: »

Yes but not just the people who want to keep the car as it left the factory , it takes just as much passion to embark on a restoration plus engine conversion , just because some people don't agree with another's route in modification restoration doesn't give them the right to impose their way of thinking on others or to be little the others endeavours. If we all thought the same it would be a boring world .

I agree with that, no one here imposing anything, OP has right to do as he wishes with his own car, but you will get opinions here if you ask, even if you dont directly ask for opinions, i dont agree with them all but they are valid opinions, OP should ignore those he doesnt agree with without getting in a huff and remember -- "Opinions are like A$$holes, everybody has one..."
As for belittling his endevours - I wished him luck on his project - I would certainly like to see how it progresses...

Excuse me if it came across as if I was having a pop at you , I was just giving my thoughts in general. I don't mind people giving their opinion if it starts with "I think...." but people telling others that basically they shouldn't do something because they think it's wrong is unnecessary and unhelpful When talking about a hobby. .

macplaxton

People can and do what they want with their own property. The issue is asking an emotive question to the wrong audience.

There are many types of older vehicle owner, for instance:

• preserver (historically correct, or period correct in spec)
• customiser (ZZ Top wagons and flame/chrome/V8s/velour)
• modifier (drop it (suspension), swap it (engine & wheels, "Retro Riders")
• sausage racer (buys a rare old beast for smashing up)

amongst others and lots of shades of grey in between. Also in every group there will be those that focus on different eras. I don't care much for vehicles approx post 1980, but there are others happy to cherish their Nissan Figaro. Fair play to them.

The customisers/modifiers can do what they like. It doesn't float my boat, so I won't encourage it/endorse it/slap them on the back.

I can't quite get my head round the historic sausage racer though. I can understand trashing end-of-life-vehicles that are comparatively abundant, but trashing last-of-their-kind things I can't. Whilst I can't get my head round it, I'm not going to lose sleep either, as ultimately if I didn't want it to happen, I would of put my money where my mouth is.

Anyway, Lightning put it best. Approaching a group of preservationists (which I think around here the majority are ??) and asking about radical modification of something (in historic building terms, not so much changing the heating/plumbing as merely facade retention) and you're guaranteed to either get a load of angry locals with pitch forks and burning torches chasing you out of the village or being cited for trolling.

Best to ask a question where it's more likely to gain a sympathetic ear, than moan and bellyache about getting opinions and not the answer you want.

In radically altering a vehicle, do beware of:

• cost/hassle of doing the conversion in the first place
• cost/hassle of correcting the registration paperwork/tax
• cost/hassle of obtaining insurance cover / declaring all modifications.
• altering the market value of a vehicle (can be up or usually down).
• finding someone prepared to work on it (if you are not DIYing it) before/during/after that actually knows what they are doing.

cotton

OP, the other option would be to get a classic american car that was built with a diesel engine.

hi5

cotton wrote: »

OP, the other option would be to get a classic american car that was built with a diesel engine.

Just as thirsty and unreliable too:(

cotton

hi5 wrote: »

Just as thirsty and unreliable too:(

With the Caddy being very reliable as an everyday car & doing 34 to the gallon, I'd beg to differ.

ianobrien

OP, there are a few things to be wary of.

Financially, forget it. The resulting car will be worth a lot less than before. Also, when you add up the cost of buying the engine/'box/diff and the fabrication of mounts, prop, exhaust etc you will have to do a lot of mileage to recover the cost.

Driving experience. If you get an old rattly engine it will destroy the driving experience. If you go for a modern diesel, you will have fun wiring the whole lot in.

Fabrication. Basically, if you can't do it yourself, the cost will be prohibitive due to the custom fabrication. The reason for the Jap cars being converted is that there was a diesel one built by the factory, meaning that it's just a case of parts swapping.

Basically OP, if you have to get somebody to do the work, it's not financially sound. Also, any money spent on the car and conversion can be taken as lost as there will be zero market for the resultant car (unless you drop in a twin turbo 3.0 BMW motor and finish to an exceptional standard)

kev1.3s

What about if you were to reverse the argument,
Lets say someone was to buy a lancia flavia which is a 2.0 four cylinders boxer unit and dropping an engine from a wrx impreza into it which requires minimal work this would no doubt enhance the performance but not the the mpg would everybody be so critical?
I personally wouldn't like this myself but I'd find it much more easy to take than the opposite.