Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Dash cam saves your ass (no Roundabout stuff please :)

15051535556255

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    I didn't find it funny, just extraordinary and glad to see the bear walk away appearing unharmed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,350 ✭✭✭doolox


    Saw a driver ahead of me merging onto the m50 at 30 kph.
    At the junction of the n4 to M50 southbound.
    I know the engineering of that slip-road does not give you enough time to reach the posted 100kph from the posted 30 kph but doing 30 kph on the inside lane of the m50 is suicide.

    I had to slow down and let a decent gap open up before merging at a considerably faster speed than 30 kph.

    I also had to get out into the middle lane fairly sharpish as the driver of the car ahead was still doing 30 kph!!!

    The driver of that car should have been on the inside merging lane, designed for trucks and slow accelerating vehicles and not on the outside merging lane which is too short for heavies and slow vehicles.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 917 ✭✭✭Páid


    CiniO wrote: »
    TBH I can't really see that funny thing.
    DIESEL TOM wrote: »
    what funny about knocking down a bear :confused:
    gurramok wrote: »
    I didn't find it funny, just extraordinary and glad to see the bear walk away appearing unharmed.
    Funny - as in peculiar, odd, curious or unusual.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,430 ✭✭✭RustyNut


    doolox wrote: »
    The driver of that car should have been on the inside merging lane, designed for trucks and slow accelerating vehicles and not on the outside merging lane which is too short for heavies and slow vehicles.

    What makes you think it's only for trucks and slow vehicles?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,064 ✭✭✭gutteruu


    doolox wrote: »
    Saw a driver ahead of me merging onto the m50 at 30 kph.

    Similar to that happened to me below today. The silver Audi came down the same slip road and passed us all just as I was about to pull into overtaking lane (He was in my blindspot and I very nearly pulled out on front of him). All caused by another old asshole driving "safe"

    Sorry about camera position, but had to record sunshine in case we never see it again.



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 655 ✭✭✭HurtLocker


    gutteruu wrote: »

    This happens way too often.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,986 ✭✭✭rocky


    gutteruu wrote: »
    Similar to that happened to me below today. The silver Audi came down the same slip road and passed us all just as I was about to pull into overtaking lane (He was in my blindspot and I very nearly pulled out on front of him). All caused by another old asshole driving "safe"

    Sorry about camera position, but had to record sunshine in case we never see it again.


    Kaiser in his fancy Audi, tsk tsk :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,064 ✭✭✭gutteruu


    HurtLocker wrote: »
    This happens way too often.

    I guess this is what happens when you make a pensioner who never took a driving test the chairman of the Road Safety Authority!!!:mad::mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 655 ✭✭✭HurtLocker


    gutteruu wrote: »
    I guess this is what happens when you make a pensioner who never took a driving test the chairman of the Road Safety Authority!!!:mad::mad:

    Speaking of pensioners. I saw one today cut someone off on a roundabout. Break on the roundabout.Wait 20 seconds and drive off. Of course after bring a roundabout to a standstill. Was in a prime position. Wish I'd a dashcam.:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,300 ✭✭✭rameire


    gutteruu wrote: »
    Similar to that happened to me below today. The silver Audi came down the same slip road and passed us all just as I was about to pull into overtaking lane (He was in my blindspot and I very nearly pulled out on front of him). All caused by another old asshole driving "safe"

    Sorry about camera position, but had to record sunshine in case we never see it again.


    just wondering if the time stamp on this video is correct,
    so it was 3.30 pm

    scrap that, its not the same car, was just wondering if it was the same car as the one in the crash near athy

    goo.gl/aS05T

    🌞 3.8kwp, 🌞 Clonee, Dub.🌞



  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,620 ✭✭✭✭dr.fuzzenstein


    doolox wrote: »
    Saw a driver ahead of me merging onto the m50 at 30 kph.
    At the junction of the n4 to M50 southbound.
    I know the engineering of that slip-road does not give you enough time to reach the posted 100kph from the posted 30 kph but doing 30 kph on the inside lane of the m50 is suicide.

    I had to slow down and let a decent gap open up before merging at a considerably faster speed than 30 kph.

    I also had to get out into the middle lane fairly sharpish as the driver of the car ahead was still doing 30 kph!!!

    The driver of that car should have been on the inside merging lane, designed for trucks and slow accelerating vehicles and not on the outside merging lane which is too short for heavies and slow vehicles.

    Seriously, only one thing for that.
    Beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeepppppppppppppppp!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    One can only hope they sh*t their pants and decide to take the bus in future.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,223 ✭✭✭Nissan doctor


    More excellent roundabout usage:rolleyes:



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,986 ✭✭✭rocky


    N17 overtaking lane hogger... in a Yaris.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,069 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    rocky wrote: »
    N17 overtaking lane hogger... in a Yaris.


    Lane hogger - possibly yes.

    But what I can see much worse is a tailgater.

    I can't get why some people think that if someone else is braking the rules of the road (lane hogging) it makes them justified to tailgate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,016 ✭✭✭✭vibe666


    CiniO wrote: »
    Lane hogger - possibly yes.

    But what I can see much worse is a tailgater.

    I can't understand why some people think that if someone else is braking the rules of the road (lane hogging) it makes them justified to tailgate.
    I'd agree to a certain extent, but what was he supposed to do? what are any of us supposed to do when someone is hogging the outside lane?

    overtaking on the inside is illegal, flashing them is illegal, tailgating is illegal.

    maybe we should just pull over to the side of the road and write a strongly worded letter to our local TD?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,986 ✭✭✭rocky


    I'm surprised I didn't pass on the left - give me a medal already!

    He wasn't phased by my flashes, continued to overtake the other car at +1km/h


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,069 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    vibe666 wrote: »
    I'd agree to a certain extent, but what was he supposed to do? what are any of us supposed to do when someone is hogging the outside lane?

    overtaking on the inside is illegal, flashing them is illegal, tailgating is illegal.

    maybe we should just pull over to the side of the road and write a strongly worded letter to our local TD?

    Why do you think flashing is illegal?

    In such cases I always flash, but there's no point in tailgating. It's dangerous and might get you in big trouble if person in front decides to brake test you. Completely no point in doing so.
    Just stay away - keep distance and keep flashing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,064 ✭✭✭gutteruu


    CiniO wrote: »
    Why do you think flashing is illegal?

    In such cases I always flash, but there's no point in tailgating. It's dangerous and might get you in big trouble if person in front decides to brake test you. Completely no point in doing so.
    Just stay away - keep distance and keep flashing.

    If it wasn't for tailgating and beeping, I would be unemployed. Flashing works about 50% of the time I find. The rest of the time beeping and tailgating them works great.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    gutteruu wrote: »
    If it wasn't for tailgating and beeping, I would be unemployed. Flashing works about 50% of the time I find. The rest of the time beeping and tailgating them works great.

    Theres no excuse to tailgate. Its the equivalent of standing behind someone in a queue breathing down their neck. Its beyond arrogant. I doubt anyone on this forum has to be somewhere so quickly that the minute it takes to give someone a chance to pull over / complete a manoeuvre will cost them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,064 ✭✭✭gutteruu


    ironclaw wrote: »
    Theres no excuse to tailgate. Its the equivalent of standing behind someone in a queue breathing down their neck. Its beyond arrogant. I doubt anyone on this forum has to be somewhere so quickly that the minute it takes to give someone a chance to pull over / complete a manoeuvre will cost them.

    We can all lie, but most people tailgate. If you don't believe me, look at the M50, M7, M4 at any time. Its part and parcel of driving in Ireland.

    Someone blocking overtaking lane doing 80kph instead of 120kph adds 4 hours onto my day! Thats 20 hours a week spent waiting on idiots. 6.5 months of the year stuck behind them. Say what you want about respecting idiots, but if someone blocked them getting into their house for 4 hours everyday, what would happen. Tailgating is a very gentle form of tough love!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,069 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    gutteruu wrote: »
    We can all lie, but most people tailgate. If you don't believe me, look at the M50, M7, M4 at any time. Its part and parcel of driving in Ireland.

    Someone blocking overtaking lane doing 80kph instead of 120kph adds 4 hours onto my day! Thats 20 hours a week spent waiting on idiots. 6.5 months of the year stuck behind them. Say what you want about respecting idiots, but if someone blocked them getting into their house for 4 hours everyday, what would happen. Tailgating is a very gentle form of tough love!

    Well. So you say that if people weren't blocking overtaking lane, you would save 4 hours a day?????????????? And that's assuming you normally do 80km/h at all times because people are blocking, but because of your gentle form of touch of love which is tailgating, you can keep going 120km/h at all times, and therefore save 4 hours a day.

    That must be the most ridiculous statement in regards tailgating I've ever heard.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,004 ✭✭✭ironclaw


    gutteruu wrote: »
    We can all lie, but most people tailgate. If you don't believe me, look at the M50, M7, M4 at any time. Its part and parcel of driving in Ireland.

    Someone blocking overtaking lane doing 80kph instead of 120kph adds 4 hours onto my day! Thats 20 hours a week spent waiting on idiots. 6.5 months of the year stuck behind them. Say what you want about respecting idiots, but if someone blocked them getting into their house for 4 hours everyday, what would happen. Tailgating is a very gentle form of tough love!

    4 Hours? Care to add some math to that statement?

    The distance from the start of the M11 to Dublin Airport is about 46km. Do that at solid 120km/h and you'll cover the distance in about 22mins. At 100km/h, it will take you 28 mins. And at 80km/h it will take you 35 mins. So the difference is 13 mins provided you get a straight shot run.

    The longest motorway run I'm aware of is from Dublin to Cork (266km, (80km/h = 3hrs 20mins, or 120km/h = 2 hrs 14 mins)), so unless your doing that route multiple times per day, I can't see you wasting 4 hours of your daily commute to slow drivers. And in all that, your assuming your stuck at 80km/h for the entire journey. Which you won't be. You'll be stuck for at most 5 mins.

    What your mistaking is the few seconds of anger versus an actual realisation of how long it takes you to get places and the associated time / speed calculation. Intelligent driving and lane choice is a far great time saver than speed and aggression on Irish roads.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,064 ✭✭✭gutteruu


    CiniO wrote: »
    That must be the most ridiculous statement in regards tailgating I've ever heard.

    Its fairly simple.
    8 hours at 120 kph = 960km
    8 hours at 80 kph = 640km.

    So when I should be home, in reality I still have 320km to go. I'm assuming motorway driving but it was an example to show you the effect and that its not lollipops and rainbows for people stuck behind a$sholes!

    I live in the midlands. Next week, I have to work in Lisburn and wexford. Thats 2 seperate days, constant motorway at what should be a constant 120kph.
    ironclaw wrote: »
    4 Hours? Care to add some math to that statement?

    Intelligent driving and lane choice is a far great time saver than speed and aggression on Irish roads.

    Lane choice for time saving? Your saying undertake? Thats a lot more dangerous in my opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,069 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    gutteruu wrote: »
    Its fairly simple.
    8 hours at 120 kph = 960km
    8 hours at 80 kph = 640km.

    So when I should be home, in reality I still have 320km to go. I'm assuming motorway driving but it was an example to show you the effect and that its not lollipops and rainbows for people stuck behind a$sholes!

    But your example assumes, that you normall travel at 120 at all times, which is impossible except from few odd times at the night. And it's not because of people blocking the overtaking lane, but from congestions in general.

    Also you are assuming that you are being blocked by ones doing 80km/h through all your journey, and you wouldn't go faster even for a second if you didn't tailgate. Then somehow magically tailgating removes all those problem, and you can go 120km/h. This is completely ridiculous statement, which has nothing to do with reality.

    If during those 960km a day you do, there will be one or two occasions when by tailgaiting you will force someone to move left, that will be better than expected. You might save on it few minutes maximum, and you are causing danger.
    Most lane blockers seem to react to flashing lights. And if they don't - they also probably won't react to tailgating.

    Sorry man, but stating that you need tailgate to save 4 hours a day, is completely ridiculous, and I don't believe you believe in it yourself.

    I live in Ballinasloe. Next week, I have to work in Lisburn and wexford. Thats 2 seperate days, constant motorway at what should be a constant 120kph.
    AFAIK From Ballinasloe to Lisburn is not even near 960km. Also Wexford is not that far.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,064 ✭✭✭gutteruu


    Your missing the point. I'll stop using numbers as they are confusing you. Someone blocking a lane holds me up. Simple. If I did as you said and sat back, I would get home a lot later everyday than I usually do. Therefore I choose to ignore their feelings and make them move by tailgating after I try the holding back and flashing for a while. Flashing works about 50% of the time in my opinion and usually just makes them slam on the brakes as they freak out.

    I didn't hear your criticism of the as$holes blocking the lanes yet ????


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,069 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    gutteruu wrote: »
    Your missing the point. I'll stop using numbers as they are confusing you. Someone blocking a lane holds me up. Simple. If I did as you said and sat back, I would get home a lot later everyday than I usually do. Therefore I choose to ignore their feelings and make them move by tailgating after I try the holding back and flashing for a while. Flashing works about 50% of the time in my opinion and usually just makes them slam on the brakes as they freak out.

    I didn't hear your criticism of the as$holes blocking the lanes yet ????

    Because they don't need criticism. They just can't drive. Very little we can do about them.
    But tailgating is the worst idea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,064 ✭✭✭gutteruu


    CiniO wrote: »
    Because they don't need criticism......Very little we can do about them.

    :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 578 ✭✭✭Owenw


    CiniO wrote: »
    Because they don't need criticism. They just can't drive. Very little we can do about them.
    But tailgating is the worst idea.

    Wow


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,313 ✭✭✭Mycroft H


    CiniO wrote: »
    Because they don't need criticism. They just can't drive. Very little we can do about them.
    But tailgating is the worst idea.

    You have a point. Most often these people are such clueless drivers that giving out about them will have no effect. They'll still be ignorant drivers tomorrow and the day after....

    Tailgating is also pig ignorant driving too. Both annoy me as much as the other.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,430 ✭✭✭RustyNut


    CiniO wrote: »
    Because they don't need criticism.

    I don't agree with this, but


    CiniO wrote: »
    Very little we can do about them.
    But tailgating is the worst idea.


    This is the truth.


    A lane hogger is an irritation, a talegater is dangerous.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement