LA porn stars forced to wear condoms

brendansmith

http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/6277084/LA-porn-stars-forced-to-wear-condoms

This is the worst news Ive heard in a while.
Luckily there is already so much footage that I could never get through it anyway.

Temptamperu

Theres been a law for years for them to wear condoms. Directors dont like them because people dont want to see a johnny on a dude... but whos looking at the dude

4zn76tysfajdxp

Temptamperu wrote: »

Theres been a law for years for them to wear condoms. Directors dont like them because people dont want to see a johnny on a dude... but whos looking at the dude

You kind of have to with some of the close ups they use.

later12

What's this porn you speak of?

Temptamperu

Ava Moldy Griddle wrote: »

You kind of have to with some of the close ups they use.

ahh the difference between looking and seeing :pac:

KeithAFC

That would be an ecumenical matter.

efb

And the problem is...?

membersonly

Seems like a law that should have in place well before now? Like 1990 maybe?

admiralofthefleet

they need to ban ugly women from blueys next

John Doe1

This is disgraceful, back to good old fashioned german bestiality porn it is:)

biko

I'm just watching it for the music anyway.

Boom-shacka-lack-dun-dun-pow!

Uriel.

I am guessing the money shots are gonna be a little less dramatic now

Hercule Poirot

I thought they all started wearing them coz some porn star fella was found to be HIV positive a few years back, obviously a temporary measure..

MagicSean

Fap Fail

MrStuffins

Uriel. wrote: »

I am guessing the money shots are gonna be a little less dramatic now

Surely this term is used with irony these days considering nobody in their right mind would pay money for porn these days.

stupidusername

i've seen lots of porn where they're wearing condoms I thought most of them did.

Uriel.

MrStuffins wrote: »

Uriel. wrote: »

I am guessing the money shots are gonna be a little less dramatic now

Surely this term is used with irony these days considering nobody in their right mind would pay money for porn these days.

Hmm possibly.but then people didnt pay for that specific scene on its own

Any alternative "modern" name to suggest?

MrStuffins

Uriel. wrote: »

Hmm possibly.but then people didnt pay for that specific scene on its own

Any alternative "modern" name to suggest?

The transferance of a sexually transmitted infection shot?

Uriel.

stupidusername wrote: »

i've seen lots of porn where they're wearing condoms I thought most of them did.

Depends on the source i guess.
Some porn stars in N. America haven diagnosed wkth HIV in recent years after a female star picked it up in South America (i think) and passed it on during anal sex back in the north whilr filming. Struck a bit of fear in the mainstream porn industry.

Uriel.

MrStuffins wrote: »

Uriel. wrote: »

Hmm possibly.but then people didnt pay for that specific scene on its own

Any alternative "modern" name to suggest?

The transferance of a sexually transmitted infection shot?

Very catchy but not sure of its accuracy

alphanine

Uriel. wrote: »

I am guessing the money shots are gonna be a little less dramatic now

A certain Peter North begs to differ.....

seanybiker

bukkakke will never be the same again

mikom

stupidusername wrote: »

i've seen lots of porn where they're wearing condoms I thought most of them did.

Where do you watch your porn............. in the back seat of a De Lorean.

Love the classics myself.

Uriel.

Uriel. wrote: »

Hmm possibly.but then people didnt pay for that specific scene on its own

Any alternative "modern" name to suggest?

The down load?

longhalloween

Nothing screams ' I have AIDS' more than a pornstar wearing a condom.

MrStuffins

Uriel. wrote: »

Very catchy but not sure of its accuracy

I don't think the guy's aim is any of my concern.

stupidusername

mikom wrote: »

Where do you watch your porn............. in the back seat of a De Lorean.

Love the classics myself.

actually it has been a while since I watching anything with a penis in it, but not that long. But then....it would probably have been amateur anyway, so that'd explain it.

mikom

Uriel. wrote: »

Hmm possibly.but then people didnt pay for that specific scene on its own

Any alternative "modern" name to suggest?

The levy shot.
Renamed by Enda Kenny.

"Whoa, watch out, the levee is about to break"........... splosh.

bfocusd

I think it will cause a lot of teenage lads and girls to be more mature and sensible about safe sex. If the media they are watching is promoting it then hopefully they will follow the lead.

The only thing ive to wonder though is if they are going to be wearing it for sex, there is not much point unless it's being used as appropriate in oral too, and hopefully the nasty scenes of it being finished on the womans face are removed too, its going to make it less graphic, which is also good I think as lads sometimes see that as sexual reality.
he'd get a punch/bite in the balls if he tried to degrade me like that, I'd just have to hope he wasn't into s n m.

MrStuffins

bfocusd wrote: »

I think it will cause a lot of teenage lads and girls to be more mature and sensible about safe sex. If the media they are watching is promoting it then hopefully they will follow the lead.

Yeah, those drug-addicted, bad life-choice making, daddies never loved them, technical prostitutes need to remember they're role models too

mikom

bfocusd wrote: »

he'd get a punch/bite in the balls if he tried to degrade me like that, I'd just have to hope he wasn't into s n m.

oh baby.

GLaDOS

I'm surprised it wasn't in place already

later12

bfocusd wrote: »

I think it will cause a lot of teenage lads and girls to be more mature and sensible about safe sex. If the media they are watching is promoting it then hopefully they will follow the lead.

Oh I don't think that's true.

The benefit is surely for the actors... participants... themselves.

Lets face it, sex without a condom feels better. That's generally why couples do it unless they are trying to conceive. It isn't likely to change by porn stars wearing condoms, but I do think it's for the best.

Doing porn is fine, but feeling pressured to shoot porn without protection, I think we should be very careful about that and i'm glad if the story about the legislation is true.

KeithAFC

bfocusd wrote: »

I think it will cause a lot of teenage lads and girls to be more mature and sensible about safe sex. If the media they are watching is promoting it then hopefully they will follow the lead.

The only thing ive to wonder though is if they are going to be wearing it for sex, there is not much point unless it's being used as appropriate in oral too, and hopefully the nasty scenes of it being finished on the womans face are removed too, its going to make it less graphic, which is also good I think as lads sometimes see that as sexual reality.
he'd get a punch/bite in the balls if he tried to degrade me like that, I'd just have to hope he wasn't into s n m.

So you want him to finish on the breasts?

bryaner

bfocusd wrote: »

I think it will cause a lot of teenage lads and girls to be more mature and sensible about safe sex. If the media they are watching is promoting it then hopefully they will follow the lead.

The only thing ive to wonder though is if they are going to be wearing it for sex, there is not much point unless it's being used as appropriate in oral too, and hopefully the nasty scenes of it being finished on the womans face are removed too, its going to make it less graphic, which is also good I think as lads sometimes see that as sexual reality.
he'd get a punch/bite in the balls if he tried to degrade me like that, I'd just have to hope he wasn't into s n m.

Oops there was me thinking all women liked getting blasted in the face..

stupidusername

later10 wrote: »

Oh I don't think that's true.

The benefit is surely for the actors... participants... themselves.

you really think the reason they don't wear condoms is so the actors have better sex?

bfocusd

KeithAFC wrote: »

bfocusd wrote: »

I think it will cause a lot of teenage lads and girls to be more mature and sensible about safe sex. If the media they are watching is promoting it then hopefully they will follow the lead.

The only thing ive to wonder though is if they are going to be wearing it for sex, there is not much point unless it's being used as appropriate in oral too, and hopefully the nasty scenes of it being finished on the womans face are removed too, its going to make it less graphic, which is also good I think as lads sometimes see that as sexual reality.
he'd get a punch/bite in the balls if he tried to degrade me like that, I'd just have to hope he wasn't into s n m.

So you want him to finish on the breasts?

Why not, Would you like to wipe sperm out of your eye!? I just think the way it's shown in porn is most of the time very degrading for the woman.. Fair enough if it gets you off but it wouldn't be my preference, especially if it was a surprise.

MrStuffins

stupidusername wrote: »

you really think the reason they don't wear condoms is so the actors have better sex?

D'oh!!!

pablomakaveli

Guess we wont be seeing anymore creampies then.:(

mikom

bfocusd wrote: »

Would you like to wipe sperm out of your eye!?

I'd say there say there are a few dudes in here that have.

KeithAFC

bfocusd wrote: »

Why not, Would you like to wipe sperm out of your eye!? I just think the way it's shown in porn is most of the time very degrading for the woman.. Fair enough if it gets you off but it wouldn't be my preference, especially if it was a surprise.

Then close the eyes and just enjoy it? I don't see the big deal.

MrStuffins

bfocusd wrote: »

Fair enough if it gets you off but it wouldn't be my preference, especially if it was a surprise.

That'll teach you that next time your dad asks what you want for Xmas you won't say "Surprise me"!

mikom

KeithAFC wrote: »

Then close the eyes and just enjoy it? I don't see the big deal.

Well you wouldn't with your eyes closed...

KeithAFC

mikom wrote: »

Well you wouldn't with your eyes closed...

Doesn't have to be visual.

bfocusd

later10 wrote: »

bfocusd wrote: »

I think it will cause a lot of teenage lads and girls to be more mature and sensible about safe sex. If the media they are watching is promoting it then hopefully they will follow the lead.

Oh I don't think that's true.

The benefit is surely for the actors... participants... themselves.

Lets face it, porn without a condom feels better. That's generally why couples do it unless they are trying to conceive. It isn't likely to change by porn stars wearing condoms, but I do think it's for the best.

Doing porn is fine, but feeling pressured to shoot porn without protection, I think we should be very careful about that and i'm glad if the story about the legislation is true.

I agree completely, of course they are going to benefit from it. But do you not think there will be higher rates and a demand for movies without condoms, not all porn comes from LA.

but from knowing lads who see porn as how sex really is, they seem let down when your not singing like a soprano, it creates a false expectation and they dont realise the risks involved and it is better without, but if the lad/girl has several short term partners and the odd time gets it without a condom, we all know the chances of them having a screen done is nothing compared to the porn stars sexual health.

Im just trying to say hopefully this will also encourage safe sex and maybe in the long run it could help reduce the high birth rate for teens.

Minstrel27

On Dorcel TV they all wear condoms.

MrStuffins

bfocusd wrote: »

Im just trying to say hopefully this will also encourage safe sex and maybe in the long run it could help reduce the high birth rate for teens.

Seriously, i'm not sure you've thought this through.

Lads who see dudes wearing johnnies are not gonna all of a sudden want to use one.

Porn stars are not footballers. Johnnies are not Nikes (although, i'm surprised they haven't launched condoms yet).

it doesn't work like that!

later12

stupidusername wrote: »

you really think the reason they don't wear condoms is so the actors have better sex?

Oops, I meant sex without condoms is better, and that's why couples do it.

Feisar

MrStuffins wrote: »

Seriously, i'm not sure you've thought this through.

Lads who see dudes wearing johnnies are not gonna all of a sudden want to use one.

Porn stars are not footballers. Johnnies are not Nikes (although, i'm surprised they haven't launched condoms yet).

it doesn't work like that!

They already have the slogan.

Nike. Just do it.

MrStuffins

Feisar wrote: »

They already have the slogan.

Nike. Just do it.

Let's just hope they don't design the condom on their logo!

Feisar

Surely Health and Safety in the workplace laws cover this?