Paid to be on boards

working fool

I worked for a company who get a lot of stick here "most of it justified " I've noticed lately that a lot of the office staff are allowed on boards even though using the Internet at work is banned .
When I asked one of the girls about this she told me that they were
" encouraged " to counteract any bad publicity .
Any thoughts ???

Guill

working fool wrote: »

I work for a company who get a lot of stick here "most of it justified " I've noticed lately that a lot of the office staff are alloud on boards even though using the Internet at work is banned .
When I asked one of the girls about this she told me that they where
" encouraged " to counteract any bad publicity .
Any thoughts ???

If Humans were a 1/2 foot tall could we use cats as Horses?

Daniel S

Guill wrote: »

If Humans were a 1/2 foot tall could we use cats as Horses?

/thread.

o1s1n

Guill wrote: »

If Humans were a 1/2 foot tall could we use cats as Horses?

Meowst definitely.

Stercus Accidit

Guill wrote: »

If Humans were a 1/2 foot tall could we use cats as Horses?

No, for the same reason we can't use tigers as horses.

working fool

Guill wrote: »

working fool wrote: »

I work for a company who get a lot of stick here "most of it justified " I've noticed lately that a lot of the office staff are alloud on boards even though using the Internet at work is banned .
When I asked one of the girls about this she told me that they where
" encouraged " to counteract any bad publicity .
Any thoughts ???

If Humans were a 1/2 foot tall could we use cats as Horses?

Wouldent there tails get run over by the carts there pulling ???
Or maybe you where referring to Manx cats ?
Either way thanks for that helpful input

Coriolanus

Ryanair?

Annasopra

working fool wrote: »

I work for a company who get a lot of stick here "most of it justified " I've noticed lately that a lot of the office staff are alloud on boards even though using the Internet at work is banned .
When I asked one of the girls about this she told me that they where
" encouraged " to counteract any bad publicity .
Any thoughts ???

now the mods can check your IP address against known spammers

sensibleken

Of course youd have an obediency problem

"ok cat. forward!....or lie down under the radiator thats good too"

Guill

Stercus Accidit wrote: »

No, for the same reason we can't use tigers as horses.

Eh? HeMan?

working fool

mango salsa wrote: »

working fool wrote: »

I work for a company who get a lot of stick here "most of it justified " I've noticed lately that a lot of the office staff are alloud on boards even though using the Internet at work is banned .
When I asked one of the girls about this she told me that they where
" encouraged " to counteract any bad publicity .
Any thoughts ???

now the mods can check your IP address against known spammers

Cheak away ?
I'm just interested what people think about this .

theteal

Ryanair, 3 or pc world?

working fool

Nevore wrote: »

Ryanair?

I'm not gonna name them
But the attitude to there customers would be similar

DaveNoCheese

Guill wrote: »

If Humans were a 1/2 foot tall could we use cats as Horses?

If humans were 20 foot tall, could we use hippos as ponies?

sensibleken

DaveNoCheese wrote: »

If humans were 20 foot tall, could we use hippos as ponies?

if you want to put a hippos jaw, that can cut a man in half, between your legs go ahead budzer

DaveNoCheese

sensibleken wrote: »

if you want to put a hippos jaw, that can cut a man in half, between your legs go ahead budzer

Ah yes but if we're 20 foot tall, we can control said hippo!

Besides, if we were 1/2 foot tall, I think cats would use us as a play toy :eek:

Dravokivich

DaveNoCheese wrote: »

Ah yes but if we're 20 foot tall, we can control said hippo!

Besides, if we were 1/2 foot tall, I think cats would use us as a play toy :eek:

Cats use us as playthings now as it is already. :mad:

Splendour

theteal wrote: »

Ryanair, 3 or pc world?

According to this thread http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=75171276 I reckon it has to be 3.

Gophur

working fool wrote: »

Nevore wrote: »

Ryanair?

I'm not gonna name them
But the attitude to there customers would be similar

I hope their spelling is better than yours?

working fool

Gophur wrote: »

working fool wrote: »

Nevore wrote: »

Ryanair?

I'm not gonna name them
But the attitude to there customers would be similar

I hope their spelling is better than yours?

I trying to fly a plane here

hairybowsie

i prefer aldi. Wrong muppet you thread

Boards.ie: Neil

i do not get paid to be on boards at work.

no fair!

If Humans were a 1/2 foot tall could we use cats as Horses?[/Quote]
Best reply ever

Mr Benevolent

Boards.ie: Neil wrote: »

i do not get paid to be on boards at work.

no fair!

No, you have it much worse

working fool

Boards.ie: Neil wrote: »

i do not get paid to be on boards at work.

no fair!

If its any comfort to you there getting a 20% pay cut next month

Gophur

working fool wrote: »

If its any comfort to you there getting a 20% pay cut next month

See this post? This is the kind of thing that drives me bananas.

Did you mean, "If it's any comfort there, .< > getting a 20% pay cut next month" (with someone, not mentioned, getting a pay cut)

or

"If it's any comfort, they're (nameless) getting a pay curt next month"?


If you're (not "your) using the written word to communicate, then get it right, eh? Otherwise you end up looking like the subjects of the Facebook-status thread.


No doubt great ire will be directed because of this!

Liam Byrne

working fool wrote: »

Boards.ie: Neil wrote: »

i do not get paid to be on boards at work.

no fair!

If its any comfort to you there getting a 20% pay cut next month

Where getting ?

I hope that's not representative of your company's customer service - something brought to your attention and you almost immediately repeat the error ?

danniemcq

Stercus Accidit wrote: »

No, for the same reason we can't use tigers as horses.

Guill wrote: »

Eh? HeMan?

also i'd ride cheetara if that counts...

working fool

Gophur wrote: »

working fool wrote: »

If its any comfort to you there getting a 20% pay cut next month

See this post? This is the kind of thing that drives me bananas.

Did you mean, "If it's any comfort there, .< > getting a 20% pay cut next month" (with someone, not mentioned, getting a pay cut)

or

"If it's any comfort, they're (nameless) getting a pay curt next month"?


If you're (not "your) using the written word to communicate, then get it right, eh? Otherwise you end up looking like the subjects of the Facebook-status thread.


No doubt great ire will be directed because of this!

Sorry I lost the run of myself there
As most answers to this where midget people or cat related

Guill

working fool wrote: »

she told me that they where
" encouraged " to counteract any bad publicity .
Any thoughts ???

Where again?

where where where

imme

why did I waste my time reading through 2 pages, now 3, of junk. And why am I bothering to type this:mad:

danniemcq

bluewolf wrote: »

where where where

could it be the catholic church?

Free Emma West campaigners?

The Sindo?

in all fairness with the amount companies/people/groups that get slammed on here it could be ANYONE.

gbee

This compliant is nonsense, I've been a happy customer with 3 / PC World / Eircom / Vodafone / O2 / CIE and I've NEVER, EVER, had the experience that the poster is complaining about.

I've never had to use customer support but they have great customer support and really friendly.

Wile E. Coyote

Gophur wrote: »

See this post? This is the kind of thing that drives me bananas.

Did you mean, "If it's any comfort there, .< > getting a 20% pay cut next month" (with someone, not mentioned, getting a pay cut)

or

"If it's any comfort, they're (nameless) getting a pay curt next month"?


If you're (not "your) using the written word to communicate, then get it right, eh? Otherwise you end up looking like the subjects of the Facebook-status thread.


No doubt great ire will be directed because of this!

If your going to correct grammar and spelling on Boards, try not to f*ck it up yourself

working fool

bluewolf wrote: »

where where where

Sorry I suffer a bit from dyslexia .
I missed the bit where my kind aren't alloud to post on AH .
Well police,d all the same

Gophur

Wile E. Coyote wrote: »

If your going to correct grammar and spelling on Boards, try not to f*ck it up yourself

Unlike some others, I have no problem being corrected.

There is a difference, however, between typos and poor syntax/grammar.

gbee

gbee wrote: »

This compliant is nonsense, I've been a happy customer with 3 / PC World / Eircom / Vodafone / O2 / CIE and I've NEVER, EVER, had the experience that the poster is complaining about.

I've never had to use customer support but they have great customer support and really friendly.

U at work ?

Lord Derpington

Splendour wrote: »

According to this thread http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=75171276 I reckon it has to be 3.

And would be he be complaining to three in the "talk to three" thread here if he worked for them?

sensibleken

DaveNoCheese wrote: »

Ah yes but if we're 20 foot tall, we can control said hippo!

Besides, if we were 1/2 foot tall, I think cats would use us as a play toy :eek:

We'd need spikey knees to do that too. We should have spikey knees instead of nipples

gbee

gbee wrote: »

This compliant is nonsense, I've been a happy customer with 3 / PC World / Eircom / Vodafone / O2 / CIE and I've NEVER, EVER, had the experience that the poster is complaining about.

I've never had to use customer support but they have great customer support and really friendly.

Pucker up

danniemcq

Renata Large Range wrote: »

U at work ?

are you gonna ask everyone that?

danniemcq

danniemcq wrote: »

Renata Large Range wrote: »

U at work ?

are you gonna ask everyone that?

No but are U ?

danniemcq

Renata Large Range wrote: »

No but are U ?

Yip

Nothingbetter2d

theteal wrote: »

Ryanair, 3 or pc world?

you could also add Sky, UPC, Eircom, magnet, & BT to that list

DaveNoCheese

sensibleken wrote: »

We'd need spikey knees to do that too. We should have spikey knees instead of nipples

No! Think how wrong boobs would be without nipples, what would we have to twist and pull??

No, just no :eek:

Guill

DaveNoCheese wrote: »

No! Think how wrong boobs would be without nipples, what would we have to twist and pull??

No, just no :eek:

Yea, Blobs more than boobs.

DaveNoCheese

Guill wrote: »

Yea, Blobs more than boobs.

Good heavens :eek:

gbee

Coffee time, did I miss the sandwich trolley?

sensibleken

DaveNoCheese wrote: »

No! Think how wrong boobs would be without nipples, what would we have to twist and pull??

No, just no :eek:

I meant dudes nipples. Women couldnt ride Hippos, think of the scandal!

Guill

Further proof that everything is on the intra-web-net:

Pic