Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New penalty point offences

«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 550 ✭✭✭zinzan


    By faulty light I would hope they mean a damaged or water filled unit. Can't really expect someone who is driving to notice if their taillight bulb has blown during a trip. However there are a ridiculous number of people driving about repeatedly with blown bulbs or no brake lights who obviously never check.. Not sure how that issue could be fairly addressed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,825 ✭✭✭Neilw


    zinzan wrote: »
    By faulty light I would hope they mean a damaged or water filled unit. Can't really expect someone who is driving to notice if their taillight bulb has blown during a trip. However there are a ridiculous number of people driving about repeatedly with blown bulbs or no brake lights who obviously never check.. Not sure how that issue could be fairly addressed.

    If you carry a spare bulb and are stopped you should get the chance to change it otherwise get the penalty point.

    Agree on the amount of people driving round with lights out the whole time. If you're too thick to turn on lights at dusk or poor conditions/fog there should be either a fine or points for that too.

    Still, these offenses have to be enforced in the first place which I can't see happening.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,844 ✭✭✭Jimdagym


    Neilw wrote: »
    If you carry a spare bulb and are stopped you should get the chance to change it otherwise get the penalty point.

    Agree on the amount of people driving round with lights out the whole time. If you're too thick to turn on lights at dusk or poor conditions/fog there should be either a fine or points for that too.

    Still, these offenses have to be enforced in the first place which I can't see happening.

    That doesn't really cover it. You need to remove the light units on a focus to change a bulb. The battery has to come out for the front passenger side.
    Impractical, but a "produce the car to your Garda station to show the bulb was changed within a week" would be a much fairer route to take.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,825 ✭✭✭Neilw


    Jimdagym wrote: »
    That doesn't really cover it. You need to remove the light units on a focus to change a bulb. The battery has to come out for the front passenger side.
    Impractical, but a "produce the car to your Garda station to show the bulb was changed within a week" would be a much fairer route to take.

    Or that yes, but at least give the person a chance to fix it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,875 ✭✭✭✭MugMugs


    Neilw wrote: »
    zinzan wrote: »
    By faulty light I would hope they mean a damaged or water filled unit. Can't really expect someone who is driving to notice if their taillight bulb has blown during a trip. However there are a ridiculous number of people driving about repeatedly with blown bulbs or no brake lights who obviously never check.. Not sure how that issue could be fairly addressed.

    If you carry a spare bulb and are stopped you should get the chance to change it otherwise get the penalty point.

    Agree on the amount of people driving round with lights out the whole time. If you're too thick to turn on lights at dusk or poor conditions/fog there should be either a fine or points for that too.

    Still, these offenses have to be enforced in the first place which I can't see happening.

    Try change a front bulb on a Megane there buddy :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,722 ✭✭✭Thud


    it think it there's a penalty point at stake people will check their lights more ofter, it's not that hard to do, you might need someone to check brakelights but no excuse for not checking dips


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,385 ✭✭✭Jemmy


    drivers who do not have a good view through their windscreen will also be penalised

    Eh are they going to be ergonomically assessing all drivers?! :p
    and for motorcyclists who do not wear a crash helmet.

    Was this not enforced already?!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,464 ✭✭✭furtzy


    Jemmy wrote: »
    Eh are they going to be ergonomically assessing all drivers?! There is not fair way of enforcing this either.


    Think they mean the drivers who don't bother de-icing or clearing their windscreens before they drive off. Also the boy racers with the huge TRD type windscreen stickers

    Theres zero enforcement of the current offences so don't know why they are bothering


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,863 ✭✭✭RobAMerc


    this is nonsense as there is 0 enforcement here anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,385 ✭✭✭Jemmy


    furtzy wrote: »
    Think they mean the drivers who don't bother de-icing or clearing their windscreens before they drive off. Also the boy racers with the huge TRD type windscreen stickers

    Theres zero enforcement of the current offences so don't know why they are bothering

    So it'll be a seasonal penalty! The system over here is a joke anyway, bringing in new penalties but noone out enforcing them because of cutbacks.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,464 ✭✭✭furtzy


    Jemmy wrote: »
    So it'll be a seasonal penalty! The system over here is a joke anyway, bringing in new penalties but noone out enforcing them because of cutbacks.

    Ah now remember " A boy racer is not just for Christmas"!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭shawnee


    MugMugs wrote: »
    Try change a front bulb on a Megane there buddy :)

    Good point , try doing it in the dark with two Garda Siochana looking at you.... changing a bulb certainly ain't what it used to be , changing a light bulb in the modern megane, bmw or indeed any modern car can be quite tricky:p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 736 ✭✭✭BuzzFish




  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 23,254 ✭✭✭✭beertons


    They can't find the tax and nct dodgers, and i never see guards out at night any more. Good luck them trying to make extra money out of it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 428 ✭✭vetstu


    Jemmy wrote: »
    Quote:
    drivers who do not have a good view through their windscreen will also be penalised
    !

    That one is to do with tinted front windows, so it says in the indo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,385 ✭✭✭Jemmy


    vetstu wrote: »
    That one is to do with tinted front windows, so it says in the indo.

    Yea guessed thanks, was only trying to make a funny!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    "tightening up seat belt laws for children in commercials"

    I can't think of any commercial reason why a child should be in a commercial anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    MugMugs wrote: »
    Try change a front bulb on a Megane there buddy :)

    Exactly! Some of the new Renaults are nearly an hours labour at the Dealer to change bulbs. The wheel has to come off, wheel arch liner too. That's not a side of the road fix.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,144 ✭✭✭✭Cicero


    Two or more bulbs gone maybe...or in conjunction with something else- i.e. bulb gone AND no tax...but one bulb gone to get penalty points?

    That's fierce unfair IMO...I know it would be impractical to "report to local Garda station" with light fixed to avoid penalty points but there has to be some leaway for motorists with just one light gone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,990 ✭✭✭JustAddWater


    Cicero wrote: »
    Two or more bulbs gone maybe...or in conjunction with something else- i.e. bulb gone AND no tax...but one bulb gone to get penalty points?

    That's fierce unfair IMO...I know it would be impractical to "report to local Garda station" with light fixed to avoid penalty points but there has to be some leaway for motorists with just one light gone.

    I'd agree if it were the odd one or 2 cars here and there but the amount with dodgy lights is blatently obvious and downright disgraceful. They can't ALL be blown mid-trip Get yer lazy arses down to halfords and if that's still to much for you, they'll even fit it for you I am sick to death of drivers behind me over compensating by using full beams


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,016 ✭✭✭lomb


    RobAMerc wrote: »
    this is nonsense as there is 0 enforcement here anyway.

    I keep telling my brother to NCT his car, its 3 years overdue:rolleyes:
    He gets stopped by the cops occasionally, they check his tax and sometimes his tyres(he always makes sure his tyres are good in any case) and send him on his way. Never mention anything about an NCT.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,144 ✭✭✭✭Cicero


    I'd agree if it were the odd one or 2 cars here and there but the amount with dodgy lights is blatently obvious and downright disgraceful. They can't ALL be blown mid-trip Get yer lazy arses down to halfords and if that's still to much for you, they'll even fit it for you I am sick to death of drivers behind me over compensating by using full beams

    Yes...there are a lot out there...but my rational is simple...if one light is gone and all else is in order..tax, nct, insurance, tyres etc,- then likelihood is, that motorist looks after their car and will see to that light urgently..cars that have multiple lights gone is a reasonable indication that the car is not roadworthy in other respects also


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,957 ✭✭✭Dots1982


    Tweeting Leo Vadakhar about the stupidity of the blown bulb issue may be a good start for anyone against it


  • Posts: 24,713 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    corktina wrote: »
    "tightening up seat belt laws for children in commercials"

    I can't think of any commercial reason why a child should be in a commercial anyway.

    What about non commercial reasons like dropping them to school etc.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,129 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    What about non commercial reasons like dropping them to school etc.
    Non commercial vehicles require higher rates of motor tax and VRT not to mention that the insurance may not cover a commercial in non-commercial activities. Dropping brats off at school is not a commercial reason. However, it is probably put in place to allow farmers drop theirs off at school.

    How does one define a "good view through their windscreen" - this reminds me of the NCT idiots and their idea of measuring the orange-ness of indicators!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,357 ✭✭✭snappieT


    RSA spokesman Brian Farrell said: "It is a case of once bitter, twice shy.
    Not sure that's idiot RSA or yet another Indo error, but somebody is definitely an idiot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,786 ✭✭✭slimjimmc


    MugMugs wrote: »
    Try change a front bulb on a Megane there buddy :)
    I have, plenty of times, 10 minutes max on the MeganeII.
    Not comfortable, not easy, a lot of fumbling around but definitely doable and (despite popular myth) does not require tools of any kind or removing wheels. Driver side easier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    slimjimmc wrote: »
    I have, plenty of times, 10 minutes max on the MeganeII.
    Not comfortable, not easy, a lot of fumbling around but definitely doable and does not require tools of any kind (despite popular myth). Driver side easier.

    I think they're referring to the new models which require quite a lot of labour to even get at the light, let alone change the bulb.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,683 ✭✭✭✭Owen


    You should try it on the Smart though! There's a small panel you can open, and if you have the hands of a child you can spend about 20 minutes fiddling with the lights with no ability to see what you're doing. It's like being a teenager again down the back of a disco trying to hit third base using the force to figure out what's what! Most of the time I end up just taking the whole front of the car off - 10 bolts, and the front and wings come off as a single piece.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 716 ✭✭✭phil1nj


    Dots1982 wrote: »
    Tweeting Leo Vadakhar about the stupidity of the blown bulb issue may be a good start for anyone against it

    I agree 100% with this. I left work the other day with 2 working headlights, only one was working by the time I got home (I noticed the change in lighting when pulling in to the drive). Do these new rules mean that I could have been liable for a penalty point if stopped despite my car having a valid NCT, being taxed, insured and otherwise roadworthy?

    Luckily enough I can change my own bulbs with a minimum of hassle (05 Passat) but this sounds like a change that needs futher explanation by the good minister.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,844 ✭✭✭Jimdagym


    slimjimmc wrote: »
    I have, plenty of times, 10 minutes max on the MeganeII.
    Not comfortable, not easy, a lot of fumbling around but definitely doable and (despite popular myth) does not require tools of any kind or removing wheels. Driver side easier.

    If it is taking you 10 minutes to change a bulb on a megane II, it would take you most of winter to change one on a megane III or IV.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,432 ✭✭✭mcwhirter


    vetstu wrote: »
    http://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/report-govt-mulling-new-penalty-point-offences-533979.html

    16 new offences planned, including one point on the spot for a faulty light.
    That should have been in the first round of them anyway? Leo is also thinking about increasing points for speeding and using the phone.
    Bit unfair for on the spot fine for a faulty light. I've been stopped in britain before for this and they give you 14 days to get sorted and you need to bring a stamped form to the police station from a garage to prove light has been fixed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,835 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    I am all for road safety and keeping speed and dangerous driving down BUT these measures are only for generating fines to help the economy. They cannot be serious about these measure and safety while they are running down the Garda Traffic Corps at the same time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,844 ✭✭✭Jimdagym


    mcwhirter wrote: »
    Bit unfair for on the spot fine for a faulty light. I've been stopped in britain before for this and they give you 14 days to get sorted and you need to bring a stamped form to the police station from a garage to prove light has been fixed.

    Can you fix the bulb yourself nd just get the garage to stamp a form? Does the garage charge for the stamp?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,432 ✭✭✭mcwhirter


    Jimdagym wrote: »
    Can you fix the bulb yourself nd just get the garage to stamp a form? Does the garage charge for the stamp?

    I'd say that is possible, and just get them to check it works. I was only charged 2 quid!, most garages should do it for nothing as it only takes seconds.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,129 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Jimdagym wrote: »
    Can you fix the bulb yourself nd just get the garage to stamp a form? Does the garage charge for the stamp?
    Before you start getting worried, maybe wait and see what exactly the proposed rule exactly will be


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,106 ✭✭✭✭TestTransmission


    kbannon wrote: »
    Before you start getting worried, maybe wait and see what exactly the proposed rule exactly will be
    I think this is the best idea


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,542 ✭✭✭Pataman


    corktina wrote: »
    "tightening up seat belt laws for children in commercials"

    Kids will have to wear seatbelts on TV??:eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,844 ✭✭✭Jimdagym


    kbannon wrote: »
    Before you start getting worried, maybe wait and see what exactly the proposed rule exactly will be

    Lol, not worried, just curious how that system worked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 433 ✭✭puppetmaster


    I agree that they shouldn't give an on the spot fine for a light that has just blown on the journey, But lets be honest whats the lightlyhood of being stopped within the hour of your bulb blowing? you should have to produce the car at a Garda station.

    There are a huge amount of cars going around with one headlight, I counted 9 in town the other day on a 5 minute drive to the shop and back. It is also much more dangerous to be travelling at night on a road @ 100kph with one headlamp working Wheather the reduction in your visability or the reduction in your car being visable its Asking for trouble. And many people dont see it as a priority to change it. There is no penalty for doing this, yet someone who has been a month late in paying the Government €500+ on their tax will get fined and if left longer could face confiscation of the vehicle. How is this focused on safety?

    Im far from a supporter of making up nanny laws to create revenue, But some are blatently obvious.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,154 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    Just seen a car this evening with 2 bright lights, on the offside. Nearside was totally dark.

    They should just make in compulsory to carry spare bulbs. Get stopped with a light out and no spare, penalty points. If your carrying bulbs get a 4 day producer at a Garda station of your choice, 2 weeks is too long for cyclops cars

    The EU should make it law that a bulb can be changed at the side of a road, their quick enough to meddle with stuff that has no benefit to the motoring public this would be of benefit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,467 ✭✭✭jimmynokia


    Scraping the barrell here to create cash
    I heard on the new there will be a dirty window fine ffs wake up leo,and as for the bulbs they can go any time cop, the fcuk on varadkar


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,445 ✭✭✭Absurdum


    This is the usual bull****, be seen to be doing something rather than addressing the chronic lack of enforcement of basic road safety laws.

    Regarding the headlight thing, how about if someone is stopped, the incident is logged by the Garda and if they are stopped again with the same light not working within a certain period (say 72 hours?), they receive a fine and/or a point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,289 ✭✭✭bigroad


    There is a lot of cars ,van, and jeeps with blown indicator bulbs.for some reason front and back on the same side seem to blow at the same time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,244 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Owen wrote: »
    I think they're referring to the new models which require quite a lot of labour to even get at the light, let alone change the bulb.

    Nope. The Megane II is the one that started all this nonsense of peopel reckoning it take an hour and half the car has to come apart. Hence that 5th gear video with the AA "expert".

    It's a fiddly job yes, but nothign that cant be done as described by SlimmJimc.

    Jimdagym wrote: »
    If it is taking you 10 minutes to change a bulb on a megane II, it would take you most of winter to change one on a megane III or IV.

    A Megane IV? We are already assuming it will take ages in a future car?:)

    Absurdum wrote: »
    Regarding the headlight thing, how about if someone is stopped, the incident is logged by the Garda and if they are stopped again with the same light not working within a certain period (say 72 hours?), they receive a fine and/or a point.

    72 days maybe, but the chances of anyone being stopped for a blown light once at any time are slim. Nevermind twice in 72 hours.

    jimmynokia wrote: »
    and as for the bulbs they can go any time cop, the fcuk on varadkar

    and if you keep spares in the car you can fix them anytime.

    Why is the attitude here always one to give out. Why not just have a solution ready and it will never affect you. Not to mention the added bonus (a bonus in Ireland rather than an accepable norm) of having all your lights working.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,222 ✭✭✭robbie_998


    faulty lightbulb ?

    hello fiat punto :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,070 ✭✭✭ScouseMouse


    corktina wrote: »
    "tightening up seat belt laws for children in commercials"

    I can't think of any commercial reason why a child should be in a commercial anyway.

    I sometimes take my 8 year old to work with me in my commercial. There's one.

    Anyone know what they are getting at on this one about children in commercials?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 67 ✭✭SAHMOM


    Jimdagym wrote: »
    That doesn't really cover it. You need to remove the light units on a focus to change a bulb. The battery has to come out for the front passenger side.
    Impractical, but a "produce the car to your Garda station to show the bulb was changed within a week" would be a much fairer route to take.
    So agree with above....for small things like bulbs blown while on a trip when you mightn't have noticed there should be a time period to correct it....Am I right on saying you'll also get points if your windscreen isn't clean???? My water ran out today and didn't get a chance to fill it till I got home!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22 scotty1


    Jemmy;Eh are they going to be ergonomically assessing all drivers?! :p



    Was this not enforced already?

    I have great respect for the bigger bike owners of which I had one myself a long time ago they take great pride in their machines and keep within the law its some of the smaller powered ones who need some road manners I will include pedal power also. So Jemmy I hope you are correct on this one.:(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,076 ✭✭✭maxer68


    I can't see why so many people were getting worked up on this today.

    Gardai are human. If you have manners, are decent, and your car is in good nick, they will ahrdly give you a ticket for one bronken light if you assure them you'll fix it next day.

    If you are pig ignorant, don't give a toss and your car is already in bits, then they should give you points as you are a danger to other road users.

    Also, the reason why there are so few checkpoints these days is becasue over 140 garda traffic cars are fitted with technology that reads 5 number plates a second and gives them immediate info on insurance, tax & nct.

    As a good few people just before Rathcoole found out yesterday morning in a blitz on the N7 - load of cars & vans towed away leaving motorists standing.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement