Animals, Plants and the Weather, Natures Signs :MOD note 121

Kippure

Animals can sense changes in there immediate enviroment, like earthquakes and tsunami,s. As for long range forecasting using nature, there are many folklore sayings which help the farmering community which work in nature. Nature does show signs of weather to come. But how far ahead and what the outcome can be, is unknown....

Pangea

mcriot29 wrote: »

Its very intresting stuff esp if he does not use models or pdo etc just going by nature etc iknow im the early 1900s the farmers seem to predict snow etc well before it came a great grandfather of mine was said to be very good

He just an old man using old weather signs, theres no way hes looking at models
Well only time I remember when he got wrong was last St.Patricks he was calling for a white St. Patrick day, it did get cold but it never snowed. I don't claim that he was accurate every other time but from what I remember he was usally correct.
Hes just going on animal behaviour and what he thinks their behaviour signify. He said himself on the 2fm broadcast that he doesn't take any credit for his forecasts, its the people that went before him who passed down the methods.

Last winter before the snow came here, I heard a fox behind my house, I never heard one before, it was barking. A very strange call it has indeed.

I thought it was interesting when he said 13 moons in the year is a very bad sign, its an old saying that the year would be very unsettled if there is 13 moons in the year. There was 2 in July.
Funny line from him when he was asking about the odds of a white Christmas he said , keep your money in your pocket and spend it on a glass.
Also he said 2 days before the big tsunami the animals went to the mountains.
Theres a programme on him on TG4 10th December.
I cant recall the particular signs but I suppose that is all in his book. Which I would like to get sometime.

Ill give that program a look. He has fascinated me for a long time.

Cheers

Pangea

Interesting article on animals behaviour before the 2004 tsunami
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/45jack_files/03files/Tsunami_Can_Animals_Sense_Disasters.html

Caff Caff

snow ghost wrote: »

mcriot29,

I've heard him talk about foxs' behaviour and farm animals and I have to admit I have witnessed similar behaviour and the exact weather happening shortly afterwards.

i talked about all of this in previous posts here. signs in nature. plants, animals, insects etc

BEASTERLY

Kippure wrote: »

Animals can sense changes in there immediate enviroment, like earthquakes and tsunami,s. As for long range forecasting using nature, there are many folklore sayings which help the farmering community which work in nature. Nature does show signs of weather to come. But how far ahead and what the outcome can be is unknown....

Examples and scientific evidence to back that up please?!

Personally I call bull**** on it tbh!

Kippure

BEASTERLY wrote: »

Examples and scientific evidence to back that up please?!

Personally I call bull**** on it tbh!

Ok.

How animals predict the weather


Animals sense the movements in air pressure that precede all weather changes. Watch the animals around you and see if you notice changes in their behaviour with various types of weather. Humans have used animal behaviour to predict weather and storms for centuries. Right before a rain, insect-eating birds, such as swallows, have a tendency to fly much lower to the ground, and bees and butterflies seem to disappear from the flowerbeds they usually visit.


Air pressure


Changing weather means changing air pressure. Decreasing air pressure indicates the approach of a low-pressure area, which often brings clouds and precipitation. Increasing air pressure often means that a high-pressure area is approaching, bringing a fine and clear day. A barometer measures air pressure and is a well-known instrument to predict weather.
There are also nature signs of changing air pressure that can be used to forecast weather. For example, on a fine and clear day, the smoke from the campfire rises steadily. If it starts swirling and descending, the air pressure decreases and bad weather will be expected.


Clouds


Ability to accurately read cloud formations is important when you want to understand how to predict weather. Clouds are classified into different types, according to height and shape. Not all clouds bring rain; some are signs of fine weather.

During a fine day, the clouds are white, the higher the finer. Storm clouds are generally black, low, and massed in large clusters. If wet weather is approaching, the cloud will form a greyish veil. This means it is time to take shelter.


Red Sky


A red sky at either dusk or dawn is one of the most beautiful natural signs you can use to predict the weather. At dusk, a red sky indicates that the next day will probably be a dry and fine day. This is due to the sun shining through dust particles being pushed ahead of a high-pressure system bringing in dry air. A red sky at dawn often means that an approaching low-pressure system is bringing in a lot of moisture in the air. This is a fair indication that a storm is approaching.

BEASTERLY

Kippure wrote: »

Ok.

How animals predict the weather


Animals sense the movements in air pressure that precede all weather changes. Watch the animals around you and see if you notice changes in their behaviour with various types of weather. Humans have used animal behaviour to predict weather and storms for centuries. Right before a rain, insect-eating birds, such as swallows, have a tendency to fly much lower to the ground, and bees and butterflies seem to disappear from the flowerbeds they usually visit.


Air pressure


Changing weather means changing air pressure. Decreasing air pressure indicates the approach of a low-pressure area, which often brings clouds and precipitation. Increasing air pressure often means that a high-pressure area is approaching, bringing a fine and clear day. A barometer measures air pressure and is a well-known instrument to predict weather.
There are also nature signs of changing air pressure that can be used to forecast weather. For example, on a fine and clear day, the smoke from the campfire rises steadily. If it starts swirling and descending, the air pressure decreases and bad weather will be expected.


Clouds


Ability to accurately read cloud formations is important when you want to understand how to predict weather. Clouds are classified into different types, according to height and shape. Not all clouds bring rain; some are signs of fine weather.

During a fine day, the clouds are white, the higher the finer. Storm clouds are generally black, low, and massed in large clusters. If wet weather is approaching, the cloud will form a greyish veil. This means it is time to take shelter.


Red Sky


A red sky at either dusk or dawn is one of the most beautiful natural signs you can use to predict the weather. At dusk, a red sky indicates that the next day will probably be a dry and fine day. This is due to the sun shining through dust particles being pushed ahead of a high-pressure system bringing in dry air. A red sky at dawn often means that an approaching low-pressure system is bringing in a lot of moisture in the air. This is a fair indication that a storm is approaching.

Maybe you should read through that. It says that animals can sense real time changes with the ability the guess what might be coming in few hours time at most! Your point was that they could be used for long range forecasting!

Pangea

Beasterly is asking for scientific evidence on a very non scientific approach to weather forecasting. Who knows how animals know what's coming, there are many things in this world man can't explain.

edit:
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/45jack_files/03files/Tsunami_Can_Animals_Sense_Disasters.html
"No one knows how some animals sense earthquakes coming. Perhaps they pick up subtle sounds or vibrations in the earth; maybe they respond to subterranean gases released prior to earthquakes, or react to changes in the Earth’s electrical field. They may also sense in advance what is about to happen in a way that lies beyond current scientific understanding, through some kind of presentiment. "
Read the article for more.

Kippure

BEASTERLY wrote: »

Maybe you should read through that. It says that animals can sense real time changes with the ability the guess what might be coming in few hours time at most! Your point was that they could be used for long range forecasting!

I did read it. And the first sentance of my post was "Animals can sense changes in there immediate enviroment". And thats what it says my next post.

I made two points one for now casting and one for long range. Maybe i should have given the example below which aims to predict long range conditions.

Onion skins very thin
Mild winter coming in;
Onion skins thick and tough
Coming winter cold and rough

This verse, and so many others like it, attempts to predict long-range conditions. These predictions have stood the test of time only because they rely on selective memory: people remember when they have predicted correctly and forget when predictions don't hold.

One possible factor which could provide these predictions with a thin edge of credibility is that there is some degree of consistency in weather from year to year.


As for a more scientific veiw the saying "red sky at night" holds through imo.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ja4j4ltnRw

maw368

They way I see it is like this;

If nature provides signs of long term weather then great but it is still of little use as the weather is forever changing so what nature senses today may be different to what they sense tomorrow as the weather is effected by many many variables. So due to the constant change, even if they do sense it in advance the changeable characteristics means they will always be changing their behaviour and therefore only provide us with short term signs. I suppose the senses are sufficient for nature to avoid weather by a narrow margin. After all animals often get caught out just like us; one example being the BBC documentary on Yellowstone national park in winter. The Bison couldn't sense the weather well enough and got caught in worse conditions than expected, which means they were not able to survive and had to attempt a dangerous, last minute attempt at reaching warmer climate (a hot spring). But inevitably, not all animals made it alive. Surely this shows that animals do not have the ability to sense the weather long termm otherwise they would have senses the weather coming and left in advance; as apparently they know the warmer safe haven and they always go there when temperatures get low enough to make it necessary. I'm assuming the weather hinted at manageable conditions but the weather was influenced by one of many variables that caused a change so quickly that the animals did not have the time to react.

However there is evidence that nature does sense short term changes, even people can but these days we have no reason to be in tune; in the same was a person who loses the use of their hands, eyes or ears often find they can improve other senses.

Su Campu

I totally agree here that yes, animals can pick up signs of impending events, but only on a very short timescale. There may be natural signals happening before an earthquake that they can pick up and that we just can't, but to say foxes or frogs or plants can tell what weather will like between 2 and 5 months ahead is pure and utter rubbish, and I challenge anybody to post evidence of such. Those examples posted above are purely on a short timescale, and prove nothing about a seasonal forecast.

I think I'll be waiting quite a while for this evidence, so while I wait......:cool:

maw368

I'm not certain but I believe the onion skin theory has been accepted as a false 'old wives tale'. Studies shown it not to be consistent or true. I am not a fan of old wives tales as there are many that are not true.

However I do like science and science often runs into people with logic issues. People often think that because something follows something else in seemingly chronological order, so frequently that it must be the cause. That is not always true and results in many old wives tales. Like cold weather and rain can make you catch a cold. Like someone stated above, that peoples memories are not great so they remember when things worked but not when they didn't.

Not that I am against the idea of there being natural signs but as I explained previously, the weather changes to much that an onion would be constantly having to change the thickness of its skin and I'm not sure that is possible. Many respected scientists believe and studies suggested recently that the sun has more influence on our temperatur than many people first believed. So onions would have to be able to sense the future solar flare levels on the sun, could they accuratly sense that, I'm not sure.

But evolutuion is far older, wiser and more experienced than man and has created pretty amazing things that are well adapted so who knows.

Discodog

The comparison between earthquakes & weather doesn't stack up. Many earthquakes/tsunami are preceded by seismic activity. Where wildlife is thought to predict earthquakes they only do so over a short time period.

Animals such as the weather loach & some leeches do react to atmospheric pressure but that is a long way from predicting weather.

It would be a huge evolutionary benefit for an animal to predict weather. So the fact that they haven't evolved such skill is a sure sign that it is impossible. Nature reflects the past & not the future.

Pangea

Su Campu wrote: »

I totally agree here that yes, animals can pick up signs of impending events, but only on a very short timescale. There may be natural signals happening before an earthquake that they can pick up and that we just can't, but to say foxes or frogs or plants can tell what weather will like between 2 and 5 months ahead is pure and utter rubbish, and I challenge anybody to post evidence of such. Those examples posted above are purely on a short timescale, and prove nothing about a seasonal forecast.

I think I'll be waiting quite a while for this evidence, so while I wait......:cool:
]

I would agree that it would be more of a short term thing. I don't think they can pick up weather signs in 5 months in advance. Mr.Postman might disagree with us there though.
Many people observed strange goings on with animals and nature last winter before the big freeze.
These observations are noted but cant be proven scientifically.
So this all boils down to whether u think the observations are just a complete freak coincidence or that they actually showed some sign of the weather coming.

snow ghost

BEASTERLY wrote: »

Examples and scientific evidence to back that up please?!

Personally I call bull**** on it tbh!

"Running before the storm: blacktip sharks respond to falling barometric pressure associated with Tropical Storm Gabrielle"

M. R. Heupel, C. A. Simpfendorfer, R. E. Hueter

Journal of Fish Biology

Volume 63, Issue 5, pages 1357–1363, November 2003

Su Campu

It's a bit like people saying they can predict thunderstorms from the headaches they get due to the change in air pressure. What does that mean? The pressure falls occuring as a strong windstorm approach are several times greater than those of an approaching thunderstorm, and yet people don't feel anything then. Or when you drive down the road, for every 8 metres rise or fall there is a 1 millibar change in pressure, so do people get headaches every time they climb a hill? Of course not. So there's another example of how wrong we can be in explaining something unusual.

Anyway, I digress, let's get back on topic!!

Kippure

Lets call it the Onion Theory.

That for some reason that its husk grows thicker because of impending cold or its husk is thiner becasue its going to be warmer so it doesnt need that much protection in the ground.....?

Maybe by some sort of magnetic outburst from the sun ( Solar Flares ) that it effects its growing pattern....

So that when the sun has more sunspots theres increased Magnetic outbursts towards the earth so the weather is more mobile ( low pressure )..

And when the sun in a more dorment phase less magnetic outbursts towards the earth so more stable colder weather (High Pressure)...

Su Campu

snow ghost wrote: »

"Running before the storm: blacktip sharks respond to falling barometric pressure associated with Tropical Storm Gabrielle"

M. R. Heupel, C. A. Simpfendorfer, R. E. Hueter

Journal of Fish Biology

Volume 63, Issue 5, pages 1357–1363, November 2003

A small population of juvenile (<1 year old) blacktip sharks Carcharhinus limbatus responded to the approach of a tropical storm by moving to deeper water. Examination of meterological variables suggested that the movement of the blacktip sharks was triggered by a drop in barometric pressure associated with the approach of the storm. This response was consistent for all the fish being studied, and all blacktip sharks returned to the shallow nursery area after the storm's passage, suggesting that this was an innate behaviour.

Or it could be that, given a sharks acute senses, and the fact that sound travels four times faster in water, they could hear the distant sound of rough seas? A more realistic explanation in my opinion.

Kippure

pistolpetes11 wrote: »

So whats the weather doing then ?

I,ll have to buy some irish onions to find out...:)

pistolpetes11

Well starting this thread cause all the debate about the post man and what animals sense is clogging up the winter thread , personally Im more of a believer in science and have not an interest what the animals think !

Might be an idea to hold such a debate in here !

bb1234567

ha saw this thread coming:D

snow ghost

Seems that a lot of paradigms are being challenged here about animal instincts and the weather.

We must consider that we are members of the animal kingdom and most of us are less dependent on the prevailing weather conditions for our survival than most animals.

If a salmon can swim thousands of miles across the Atlantic to the very river it was spawned in, I can believe that many animals have senses more sensitive and elaborate than the human mind can appreciate at present.

If it is a toss up as to who people should have listened to regarding the hurricane in Southern England in 1987, people should have perhaps listened to the fish in the sea more than Michael Fish.

Su Campu

Kippure wrote: »

Lets call it the Onion Theory.

That for some reason that its husk grows thicker because of impending cold or its husk is thiner becasue its going to be warmer so it doesnt need that much protection in the ground.....?

Maybe by some sort of magnetic outburst from the sun ( Solar Flares ) that it effects its growing pattern....

So that when the sun has more sunspots theres increased Magnetic outbursts towards the earth so the weather is more mobile ( low pressure )..

And when the sun in a more dorment phase less magnetic outbursts towards the earth so more stable colder weather (High Pressure)...

Low pressure where though? Low pressure here means there's high pressure somewhere else, so overall nothing's changed.

pistolpetes11

Maybe Su might clean up the winter thread and lob some of the debate in here ,

Logged in and seen a load of posts and was thinking something must have clicked only to read a couple of old wife's tales :mad:

Su Campu

snow ghost wrote: »

Seems that a lot of paradigms are being challenged here about animal instincts and the weather.

We must consider that we are members of the animal kingdom and most of us are less dependent on the prevailing weather conditions for our survival than most animals.

If a salmon can swim thousands of miles across the Atlantic to the very river it was spawned in, I can believe that many animals have senses more sensitive and elaborate than the human mind can appreciate at present.

If it is a toss up as to who people should have listened to regarding the hurricane in Southern England in 1987, people should have perhaps listened to the fish in the sea more than Michael Fish.

What hurricane? There was no hurricane in England in 1987. Do we have to go through the whole misquoting argument again? There was a fierce windstorm alright, which the models had forecast heading further south than it did. It's a popular thing though to still insist on misquoting him, leaving out the rest of what he actually said, i.e. "but it is going to get mighty windy though...".

pistolpetes11

snow ghost wrote: »

Seems that a lot of paradigms are being challenged here about animal instincts and the weather.

We must consider that we are members of the animal kingdom and most of us are less dependent on the prevailing weather conditions for our survival than most animals.

If a salmon can swim thousands of miles across the Atlantic to the very river it was spawned in, I can believe that many animals have senses more sensitive and elaborate than the human mind can appreciate at present.

If it is a toss up as to who people should have listened to regarding the hurricane in Southern England in 1987, people should have perhaps listened to the fish in the sea more than Michael Fish.

Any chance of throwing this debate in here folks ???

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=75793110#post75793110

Pangea

Someone was asking about signs earlier
Here is a page for it
http://www.finnvalley.ie/glenfin/weather/creatures.html
Note

The Fox-

On Winter evenings when the fox is heard crying in the distance a heavy fall of snow is forthcoming.

Thats exactly what I heard before the big snowfall last winter

snow ghost

Su Campu wrote: »

Or it could be that, given a sharks acute senses, and the fact that sound travels four times faster in water, they could hear the distant sound of rough seas? A more realistic explanation in my opinion.

If you ask anyone who does much angling Su they'll probably tell you that barometric pressure certainly affects fishing and the behaviour of the fish.

Many fish and sharks thrive in rougher seas as it creates a food frennzy as smaller fish and shell fish are basically knocked out or thrown against rocks leaving a feast for predators.

Su Campu

Pangea wrote: »

I would agree that it would be more of a short term thing. I don't think they can pick up weather signs in 5 months in advance. Mr.Postman might disagree with us there though.
Many people observed strange goings on with animals and nature last winter before the big freeze.
These observations are noted but cant be proven scientifically.
So this all boils down to whether u think the observations are just a complete freak coincidence or that they actually showed some sign of the weather coming.

I wonder. Did they note them as strange at the time, or since, now that they've started hearing about the postman, etc. These things probably happen every year and no big deal is made of them.

Pangea

Su Campu wrote: »

I wonder. Did they note them as strange at the time, or since, now that they've started hearing about the postman, etc. These things probably happen every year and no big deal is made of them.

I did note it as strange as I never heard a fox cry before, never mind so close to the house like that. I remember many people on the forum here noted their pets acting strangely before the snow came too.

Su Campu

Pangea wrote: »

I did note it as strange as I never heard a fox cry before, never mind so close to the house like that. I remember many people on the forum here noted their pets acting strangely before the snow came too.

I wonder did people think the same in 2000, or 1982, or the 60s, or 1947. Probably not.....

snow ghost

Su Campu wrote: »

I wonder did people think the same in 2000, or 1982, or the 60s, or 1947. Probably not.....

Su, believe me the old folks - down this way at least - would have thought much the same and they still do.

I hear such stuff all the time. It is a tradition that has been passed down.

Pangea

Su Campu wrote: »

What hurricane? There was no hurricane in England in 1987. Do we have to go through the whole misquoting argument again? There was a fierce windstorm alright, which the models had forecast heading further south than it did. It's a popular thing though to still insist on misquoting him, leaving out the rest of what he actually said, i.e. "but it is going to get mighty windy though...".

Its widely noted that he underplayed the storm with that phrase. The storm did have hurricane force winds. Worst storm in 300 years

Su Campu wrote: »

I wonder did people think the same in 2000, or 1982, or the 60s, or 1947. Probably not.....

Whether they did or not is down to their observational skills, maybe they did note them but didn't attribute it to the particular snow events. Bet your hat that Mr.Postman did though in 2000 as he would be looking out for these things.
If they are happening every year how come we havent seen any strange activity this november like last November? Animals werent preparing for a big freeze thats why.

Kippure

Su Campu wrote: »

Low pressure where though? Low pressure here means there's high pressure somewhere else, so overall nothing's changed.

Low pressure here in ireland. So the thickness of the husk would be thinner due to Mild south westerlies for example. High pressure some where else would mean thicker husk, so maybe colder weather. There is a logic to it....:rolleyes:

How did i end up starting this thread... LMAO:D:D:P

goat2

Kippure wrote: »

I,ll have to buy some irish onions to find out...:)

i get onions from my neighbour and last year they had thin skins, we had a bad winter, and again this year they have thin skins, so that theory is out the window

delw

bb1234567 wrote: »

ha saw this thread coming:D

:eek: are you an animal?did you sense it?

Totofan99

Pangea wrote: »

Someone was asking about signs earlier
Here is a page for it
http://www.finnvalley.ie/glenfin/weather/creatures.html
Note

The Fox-

On Winter evenings when the fox is heard crying in the distance a heavy fall of snow is forthcoming.

Thats exactly what I heard before the big snowfall last winter

I wouldn't take any notice of that to be honest... It would be a fairly regular occurance to hear a fox crying on a Winter's evening....

Pangea

Totofan99 wrote: »

I wouldn't take any notice of that to be honest... It would be a fairly regular occurance to hear a fox crying on a Winter's evening....

Everyone has their opinion but I can tell you its not a regular occurrence here, I never heard it before.

Totofan99

Pangea wrote: »

Everyone has their opinion but I can tell you its not a regular occurrence here, I never heard it before.

Absolutely... And everyone's entitled to their opinion.... But, at least where I live it is a regular occurence. And if you didn't know what a fox sounds like, it could be fairly terrifying!!:D

Pangea

Totofan99 wrote: »

Absolutely... And everyone's entitled to their opinion.... But, at least where I live it is a regular occurence. And if you didn't know what a fox sounds like, it could be fairly terrifying!!:D

For sure , it is a very frightening sound, thought it was a woman wailing in the woods :eek:

martic

I'm curious as to the figures of people that believe that animals can predict the weather and people who think its complete BS, my question is, the people that don't believe they can predict weather, are they predominantly from urban areas and don't have the same daily experience with wild animals.

BEASTERLY

Kippure wrote: »

Lets call it the Onion Theory.

That for some reason that its husk grows thicker because of impending cold or its husk is thiner becasue its going to be warmer so it doesnt need that much protection in the ground.....?

Maybe by some sort of magnetic outburst from the sun ( Solar Flares ) that it effects its growing pattern....

So that when the sun has more sunspots theres increased Magnetic outbursts towards the earth so the weather is more mobile ( low pressure )..

And when the sun in a more dorment phase less magnetic outbursts towards the earth so more stable colder weather (High Pressure)...

Yes but this is VERY loose connection. Sunspot activity is only one of thousands of factors influencing a winter. It would be like meteorologists forecasting when the only observations they have is humidity values.

Su Campu

And why should that rule conveniently apply to just Ireland and not say the mid Atlantic? Why are we the chosen ones?

Derfil

Pangea

Also he said 2 days before the big tsunami the animals went to the mountains.

---

Which tsunami was this? Probably the "Boxing Day" tsunami in the Pacific so how does he even know the animals made for the mountains, only he heard it in a documentary. And it wasn't 2 days before, it was only after the earth shook. This only proves the animals felt the earth move and were frightened by it not that they could forecast a tsunami.

Coles

Two words can be used to describe many of these forecasting methods - 'Selective Memory'. That's not to say that there isn't truth in many of them, but most should be taken with more than a pinch of salt.

I've heard (and repeated -of course) one particular forecasting method, and I'd be interested in hearing any opinions on it...

"Frog spawn that has been laid in deep water indicates a dry spell of weather."

Su Campu

Coles wrote: »

Two words can be used to describe many of these forecasting methods - 'Selective Memory'. That's not to say that there isn't truth in many of them, but most should be taken with more than a pinch of salt.

I've heard (and repeated -of course) one particular forecasting method, and I'd be interested in hearing any opinions on it...

"Frog spawn that has been laid in deep water indicates a dry spell of weather."

Indicates a dry spell of weather IS TO COME or IS OCCURING? I think that if a dry spell is occuring then there is likely to be a lack of fresh water, with extra algae growth in the upper layers of the pond or wherever. This could be a signal that the frogs can pick up, and it might push them to spawn deeper. But as regards predicting a future dry spell? Not so sure about that one....

Pangea

Derfil wrote: »

Pangea

Also he said 2 days before the big tsunami the animals went to the mountains.

---

Which tsunami was this? Probably the "Boxing Day" tsunami in the Pacific so how does he even know the animals made for the mountains, only he heard it in a documentary. And it wasn't 2 days before, it was only after the earth shook. This only proves the animals felt the earth move and were frightened by it not that they could forecast a tsunami.

Heres a link to that covers the tsunami, it doesn't mention the time line like mr.postman did though.

Theres a bit in it about the seattle earthquake, it said animals were freaking out 12 hours before the quake, if they moved because of the the earth shaking then why didn't the humans notice it with all their Seismometers and gadgets.
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/45jack_files/03files/Tsunami_Can_Animals_Sense_Disasters.html

this quote from the above link sums up what I was trying to say, its about the st.stephens day tsunami.
"How did they know? The usual speculation is that the animals picked up tremors caused by the under-sea earthquake. This explanation seems to me unconvincing. There would have been tremors all over South East Asia, not just in the afflicted coastal areas. And if animals can predict earthquake-related disasters by sensing slight tremors, why can’t seismologists do so? "

Many Scientists do think that animals have some sort of six sense about these things.
"With very few exceptions, the ability of animals to anticipate disasters has been ignored by Western scientists, who dismiss stories of animal anticipations as anecdotal or superstitious. By contrast, since the 1970s, in earthquake-prone areas of China, the authorities have encouraged people to report unusual animal behaviour, and Chinese scientists have an impressive track record in predicting earthquakes. In several cases they issued warnings that enabled cities to be evacuated hours before devastating earthquakes struck, saving tens of thousands of lives. "

Another interesting link here http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,143737,00.html

gbee

When a postman doth lift a plant pot
and find a frog beneath
Garden Centers everywhere doth lose customers
who are afraid of a little sleet

thetonynator

The dog was eating grass yesterday, which traditionally is a sign that theres bad weather to come . . .but may also be a sign that the dog has less than average intelligence. :P

Caff Caff

thetonynator wrote: »

The dog was eating grass yesterday, which traditionally is a sign that theres bad weather to come . . .but may also be a sign that the dog has less than average intelligence. :P

It is actually a sign that your dog needs roughage and is possibly unwell. The grass will help if the dog has an upset stomach.