Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Atheism causes creationism

11819202224

Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,583 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    Newsite wrote: »
    Also, how could you expect anyone who believes in God to pretend to judge Him? Who am I or you to judge our Maker?
    I expect anybody who is serious about questioning the truth of a belief to examine that belief for contradictions. Theology is a farce if you can't or won't turn the spotlight on the less palatable aspects of your faith. You have no problem judging humans, or praising God for the good you attribute to him but when faced with shortcomings that would damn him you refuse to engage.

    This is where you and non-believer differ. We don't hate God - we just look at what he is supposed to be, apply the same judgement he applies to us to him, and he disappears in a puff of logic.
    Newsite wrote: »
    In addition, I've also said that when natural disasters happen, there's no reason to believe they aren't evidence of God's wrath, so that could be an explanation, if you want one.
    An explanation that of course simply leads to a series of other unanswerable questions. Like in what universe is it justifiable to arbitrarily slaughter men women and children?
    Newsite wrote: »
    I'm surprised you're coming out with this again, because we've already gone over this ground, especially in regards to Mr. Pudding's posts? Clearly the world is as broken as it is as a result of man actions and inaction in his rebellion towards God. That is as clear as day. It's also important to note that no-one is 'innocent' - no-one is without sin.
    Man has a lot to answer for. But not everything. Children die of debilitating diseases in every country in the world every day. Man's fault? No - just unlucky DNA, or maybe a mosquito bite.

    And let's not forget [you believe] God made the world.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Newsite


    Dades wrote: »
    I expect anybody who is serious about questioning the truth of a belief to examine that belief for contradictions. Theology is a farce if you can't or won't turn the spotlight on the less palatable aspects of your faith. You have no problem judging humans, or praising God for the good you attribute to him but when faced with shortcomings that would damn him you refuse to engage.

    This is where you and non-believer differ. We don't hate God - we just look at what he is supposed to be, apply the same judgement he applies to us to him, and he disappears in a puff of logic.

    An explanation that of course simply leads to a series of other unanswerable questions. Like in what universe is it justifiable to arbitrarily slaughter men women and children?

    Man has a lot to answer for. But not everything. Children die of debilitating diseases in every country in the world every day. Man's fault? No - just unlucky DNA, or maybe a mosquito bite.

    And let's not forget [you believe] God made the world.

    Is my keyboard switched on? I'm fully engaging with you.

    God is infinitely holy and infinitely just. What you are doing is applying human standards to God's standards.

    As I said, we can't know the full mechanism, for that is impossible - but as I already explained, these things don't 'just occur' without God's involvement - so we can reasonably perceive them as God's wrath on the workers of iniquity, reminding us that He is there, and He will stand by His word in punishing the wicked and saving the righteous.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    MrPudding wrote: »
    You are guilty of something quite a lot of your ilk are guilty of; and that is assuming because to need to believe in a fairytale to get yourself out of bed in the morning that everyone else does. I don't, nor do millions of other people. I appreciate that for whatever reason you need the crutch that is religion, but please do not transfer the need to others.
    +10


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Newsite wrote: »
    As I said, we can't know the full mechanism, for that is impossible
    So you're saying that you're not completely sure you're right?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,583 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    Newsite wrote: »
    God is infinitely holy and infinitely just.
    This is the point. He's clearly not infinitely just. There comes a point why you have to say I'm just not capable worshipping a God that acts in such a monstrous way.
    Newsite wrote: »
    What you are doing is applying human standards to God's standards.
    But doesn't God want us to live according to his standards? Or are there two different standards? One how he wants us to live and another that, by our standards, would put him in the dock at The Hague.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Newsite


    robindch wrote: »
    +10

    I know that's how you'd like it to be, as it fits the comfortable notions you have about people who have faith.

    But the truth is far more plain. I get out of bed just the same way, and far from being a 'crutch', it simply enhances what I do, supports it and guides it.

    The funny thing is, my day-to-day life hasn't changed all that much in practical terms :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭The Mad Hatter


    Newsite wrote: »
    God is infinitely holy and infinitely just. What you are doing is applying human standards to God's standards.

    yes, and he is failing to meet even them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Newsite


    Dades wrote: »
    This is the point. He's clearly not infinitely just. There comes a point why you have to say I'm just not capable worshipping a God that acts in such a monstrous way.

    Again you're using your subjective, relative human standard of 'justice'. He is perfectly just in all his judgments, as He is conforming to what He said He would do.

    Imagine if this happened: God says 'I will punish the unrighteous and save the righteous'. And then some unrepentant murderer doesn't get justice, and someone who is righteous isn't saved. THEN you could say He is isn't infinitely just. But since the opposite is true - and through infinity He is exercising judgment in exactly the terms He laid down, He is being infinitely just.

    What wouldn't be just is if He said, 'ah yeah I know I said that, but I'm going back on what I said now'. A bit like Enda last night - 'we all have to bear the brunt of this economic crisis, but hold on while I give one of my cronies a raise equal to the average industrial wage of Joe Punchclock'.

    That sure doesn't seem fair or just to me. But acting in accordance with the terms you laid out is seen as just and fair in daily life. Sure don't know why you use a different standard for God?
    Dades wrote: »
    But doesn't God want us to live according to his standards? Or are there two different standards? One how he wants us to live and another that, by our standards, would put him in the dock at The Hague.

    God does not have standards that we hold Him to account on. His standard is described above - infinite mercy, infinite justice. He has standards for us, which also - funnily enough - correspond very closely to what even the most secular of people would hold as their own values. Don't murder, don't fool around with someone else's wife, don't steal, etc...values which God laid down and humankind copied, because both parties know that they are what's best for us and in our own interests - even we would admit that ourselves.


  • Moderators Posts: 52,023 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    Newsite wrote: »
    I know that's how you'd like it to be, as it fits the comfortable notions you have about people who have faith.

    But the truth is far more plain. I get out of bed just the same way, and far from being a 'crutch', it simply enhances what I do, supports it and guides it.

    The funny thing is, my day-to-day life hasn't changed all that much in practical terms :)

    like a crutch ;)

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Newsite


    koth wrote: »
    like a crutch ;)

    Nope, fraid not. Although I know it would suit you to think so ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,583 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    Newsite wrote: »
    Again you're using your subjective, relative human standard of 'justice'. He is perfectly just in all his judgments, as He is conforming to what He said He would do.

    Imagine if this happened: God says 'I will punish the unrighteous and save the righteous'. And then some unrepentant murderer doesn't get justice, and someone who is righteous isn't saved. THEN you could say He is isn't infinitely just. But since the opposite is true - and through infinity He is exercising judgment in exactly the terms He laid down, He is being infinitely just.
    But hold on, this isn't how God acts at all. Murderers and rapists and thieves get away without justice every minute of every day. And every minute of every day innocents fall victim to these people, or die of other preventable circumstances like drought.

    The only people on this earth punishing the unrighteous are the humans that stand up to those other humans who commit these crimes. God appears silent and/or impotent to offer any justice except, as you imply, occasionally killing thousands of people in a natural disaster. (Why Kamaichi instead of say, Mogadishu?)

    Newsite wrote: »
    God does not have standards that we hold Him to account on. His standard is described above - infinite mercy, infinite justice.
    More like infinite apathy, impotence, or detachment.

    So God doesn't meet the standards you ascribe to him, or the standards he supplied to us. Hardly deserving of worship.


  • Moderators Posts: 52,023 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    Newsite wrote: »
    Nope, fraid not. Although I know it would suit you to think so ;)

    It actually is, a crutch enhances, supports and guides a persons ability to walk with its aid.

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    Newsite wrote: »
    Pretty simple really - we have free will to do good or wrong.

    No, I have free will to do good or wrong within the physical bounds God allows.

    I can choose hit you in the face. I can't choose to fly up to the moon, pick it up and throw it at you.

    Amazingly, shockingly even, I still retain free will despite this being physically impossible.
    Newsite wrote: »
    That free will can take the form of gathering riches and seizing power, as it relates to this discussion. If you believe there's a pressing reason for an African dictator to walk on water, sure haven't seen one yet!
    There is a pressing reason for Africans to be physically unable to stare to death.

    That would not remove their free will, any more than not walking on water has removed your free will.
    Newsite wrote: »
    The principal cause of starvation and other suffering is man's inhumanity to man - exerted through free will. Stopping African dictators from doing what they do (e.g. gathering riches and power to subjugate their people) would impede free will.

    No it wouldn't, no more than stopping you having laser eyes impeded your free will. God could make people immune to starvation or dehydration, it would not effect free will.

    God could make people immune to stabbing, bullets, fire, drowning or other forms of physical harm, it would not effect free will.

    It is really very simple, you are simply choosing to ignore this fact because you don't like the consequences, you don't like having to face up to the fact that if God exists these terrible things happen because he wants them to happen.

    Makes you glad he doesn't exist, doesn't it. The alternative is far more frightening, a malevolent deity who allows and causes suffering for no reason.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Newsite - when you refer to 'Christianity' can you please define exactly what you mean?

    For many years now I have lectured history students on the Reformation - and although I try and avoid theological discussions as I do not teach theology and my students can come from many (or no) religious backgrounds, it is necessary to do a doctrinal compare/contrast to demonstrate what the Reformation was about.
    One of the things that is obvious is that there are many different groups that consider themselves Christian. Equally obviously nearly all of these group consider themselves the only true Christians, all base their doctrine on the Bible - yet all have radically different interpretations making the use of the catch-all term Christian problematic to say the least. In fact - there are very few area of common belief. The main ones being - there is one God, he is the God of the Bible (a.k.a Jehovah or Yahwah), Jesus was the son of God (this is where Christianity broke from Judaism) sent to Earth to 'save' mankind, the Bible is the word of God, God made the world.

    From this point on things begin to diverge significantly.

    Some of the main points being:

    Roman Catholicism :
    Free Will, Transubstantiation, Papal Infallibility, doctrinal precedence of equal value to Scripture, concept of a State of Grace earned by good works, access to God through anointed Intercessors only (priests etc), anointed Intercessors may (provided the confessor is truly sorry) intercede on their behalf with God and arrange forgiveness for sins.

    Lutheranism :
    Grace Alone: A person is saved by God's Grace - this is a gift from God and cannot be earned by good works (2) Faith Alone: All one needs is Faith. No particular rituals, appointing, Sacraments etc - just Faith. Scripture Alone: The canonical books of the Bible are the only authority, there is no place for doctrinal precedence. Lutherans utterly rejected the concept of Free Will, the need for anointed Intercessors, the concept of Transubstantiation, Papal authority and stated there were only two (some do say three) Sacraments, Absolution for sins via Confession and penance.

    Calvinism (am including Anglicanism here as doctrinally it is based on Calvinism but has borrowed much from Catholicism - Elizabeth I's great religious compromise religion, Presbyterianism is also a derivative of Calvinism developed by Calvin's Scottish student John Knox).
    Pre-determinism - whether one is 'saved' or not is determined before birth - there is absolutely nothing that can be done to change this. All of life should be based only on what was contained in the Scriptures - including Biblical punishments for 'crimes'. The Bible was the Law. No priests, all ministers equal and all must preach. No religious rituals. No intercessions whatsoever with God (pointless really since the whole heaven/hell thing was pre-determined). No Free Will.

    So, the 3 main Christian religions cannot agree - now factor in The Society of Friends, The Church of the Latter Day Saints, The Baptists, Methodists etc etc etc....

    So - my question is - when you say Christian - what exactly do you mean by that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    Newsite wrote: »
    Again you're using your subjective, relative human standard of 'justice'. He is perfectly just in all his judgments, as He is conforming to what He said He would do.

    He is "perfectly just" according to your subjective, relative human standard of justice ;)
    Newsite wrote: »
    But acting in accordance with the terms you laid out is seen as just and fair in daily life.

    According to your subjective relative human standard of 'justice'
    Newsite wrote: »
    God does not have standards that we hold Him to account on. His standard is described above - infinite mercy, infinite justice. He has standards for us, which also - funnily enough - correspond very closely to what even the most secular of people would hold as their own values.

    Er, except that is nonsense. The whole point is that if you look at what God actually does you find he is anything but just by human standards, making people suffer for no reason, executing people at the drop of a hat for things you wouldn't even go to jail for these days, punishing people with eternal suffering for the sins they carry out in this finite life.

    You wish that away by saying that we can't judge God, and then turn around and say you judge God to be infinitely just based on your notions of justice. Which smacks more of your messed up notions of justice than anything else.
    Newsite wrote: »
    Don't murder, don't fool around with someone else's wife, don't steal, etc...

    Execute your wife if she is not a virgin on your wedding day, kill all the men women and children of any city you take over, stone homosexuals to death, stone people to death for working on the Sabbath

    Let me guess, we can't understand why God commanded all those things so we can't judge them. :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    Chet Zar wrote: »
    Again, I have to ask the question - is my keyboard switched on?

    I already said that not only does God let these things happen - He presides over them. As I said, do you think that God is there going 'woah, what just happened...oh ok, I'll let that go'. We have every reason to believe that natural disasters may be God's wrath as punishment for man's iniquity.

    So, the only conclusion I can draw from you accusing me of not facing up to the fact you highlight, is that you must have missed the last couple of pages of this thread.

    You said God lets these things happen in order to allow humans free will, that if he prevented these things happening it would interfere with free will.

    We have established that not allowing these things to happen would not remove free will, since there are lots of things that are prevented by God's decisions on how the physical world will operate, and yet we still have free will.

    So your argument is bogus.

    So do you now agree that this is the case?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Newsite


    Zombrex wrote: »
    He is "perfectly just" according to your subjective, relative human standard of justice ;)



    According to your subjective relative human standard of 'justice'



    Er, except that is nonsense. The whole point is that if you look at what God actually does you find he is anything but just by human standards, making people suffer for no reason, executing people at the drop of a hat for things you wouldn't even go to jail for these days, punishing people with eternal suffering for the sins they carry out in this finite life.

    You wish that away by saying that we can't judge God, and then turn around and say you judge God to be infinitely just based on your notions of justice. Which smacks more of your messed up notions of justice than anything else.



    Execute your wife if she is not a virgin on your wedding day, kill all the men women and children of any city you take over, stone homosexuals to death, stone people to death for working on the Sabbath

    Let me guess, we can't understand why God commanded all those things so we can't judge them. :rolleyes:
    Zombrex wrote: »
    He is "perfectly just" according to your subjective, relative human standard of justice ;)

    How? How?

    He is just according to the central theme of His book, the Bible, where He says He will 'shew His wrath' on those workers of iniquity? So where's the relativity?
    Zombrex wrote: »
    Er, except that is nonsense. The whole point is that if you look at what God actually does you find he is anything but just by human standards, making people suffer for no reason, executing people at the drop of a hat for things you wouldn't even go to jail for these days, punishing people with eternal suffering for the sins they carry out in this finite life.

    Er, if it seems like nonsense, it's because you are again twisting my words! I never said that God is just by human standards! I said He is 'infinitely just' in his judgments. He lays out the terms of play, and then follows through with His judgments as described.

    If you re-read, what I actually said was that His standards happen to closely correlate with secular human standards.
    Zombrex wrote: »
    You wish that away by saying that we can't judge God, and then turn around and say you judge God to be infinitely just based on your notions of justice. Which smacks more of your messed up notions of justice than anything else.

    I don't judge God. As with everything else, I simply point to the words of the Bible, where He lays out the terms. Not my interpretation, just the plain words that anyone can read, including yourself, who appear to be well versed on Scripture. So they are not my notions.
    Zombrex wrote: »
    Execute your wife if she is not a virgin on your wedding day, kill all the men women and children of any city you take over, stone homosexuals to death, stone people to death for working on the Sabbath

    Let me guess, we can't understand why God commanded all those things so we can't judge them. :rolleyes:

    Rolling your eyes doesn't mean you are right, and I am oh so wrong ;) It just highlights the fact that when you tiresomely bang on about Old Testament law (which btw was absolved when Christ came on earth - He came to free us from the Law) - it just reinforces and highlights your prejudices, rather than adding anything to the discussion.

    Face it - your distaste is down to the fact that you can't bear the notion of a a God who is perfect and just in following through on His word - maybe due to the fact that for someone living by their own standard, everything is relative and how dare anyone subject me to any standard which doesn't fit in with what I want to do and how I feel.

    Would you not also be up in arms over murderers who get off scot-free in court? Or would you 'relativise' that way as well?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    Newsite wrote: »
    How? How?

    He is just according to the central theme of His book, the Bible, where He says He will 'shew His wrath' on those workers of iniquity? So where's the relativity?


    Lol, your argument is that God is infinitely just because he says he is?

    Er, he could be lying, you understand that right?

    Let me guess, you judge that he isn't ... :rolleyes:
    Newsite wrote: »
    Er, if it seems like nonsense, it's because you are again twisting my words! I never said that God is just by human standards! I said He is 'infinitely just' in his judgments. He lays out the terms of play, and then follows through with His judgments as described.

    And you claimed that this makes him just.
    Newsite wrote: »
    If you re-read, what I actually said was that His standards happen to closely correlate with secular human standards.
    Except they don't, as already documented. Saying oh well that was just the Old Testament that doesn't count is a non-answer. It is still the commandments of God. Your 'just' God ordered these things. You can ignore that all you like, it is still what is written in your Bible no matter how much you don't like that.
    Newsite wrote: »
    I don't judge God. As with everything else, I simply point to the words of the Bible, where He lays out the terms. Not my interpretation, just the plain words that anyone can read, including yourself, who appear to be well versed on Scripture. So they are not my notions.

    They are your notions that saying you are just makes you just, or holding to what you said you would do makes you just.
    Newsite wrote: »
    Rolling your eyes doesn't mean you are right, and I am oh so wrong ;) It just highlights the fact that when you tiresomely bang on about Old Testament law (which btw was absolved when Christ came on earth - He came to free us from the Law)

    The law was spoken by God. It is his law. If it is unjust he is unjust, a point you conveniently ignore.
    Newsite wrote: »
    Face it - your distaste is down to the fact that you can't bear the notion of a a God who is perfect and just in following through on His word

    I can't bear the notion of someone telling me a god who commands that women be executed if they are not virgins on their wedding night, or commands that homosexuals be stoned to death, is 'perfect'

    You have quite a stupid notion of what perfect means.
    Newsite wrote: »
    - maybe due to the fact that for someone living by their own standard, everything is relative and how dare anyone subject me to any standard which doesn't fit in with what I want to do and how I feel.

    My notion doesn't involve stoning people to death for the most trivial of things, so yes excuse me for not thinking your god is all that great
    Newsite wrote: »
    Would you not also be up in arms over murderers who get off scot-free in court? Or would you 'relativise' that way as well?

    Murderers? Try women who are raped in a town. Yes your 'perfect' God said that they should be executed by stoning because will they should have called out shouldn't they?

    The 'perfection' is just over following from these passages Newsite :rolleyes:


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Newsite wrote: »
    He has standards for us, which also - funnily enough - correspond very closely to what even the most secular of people would hold as their own values. Don't murder, don't fool around with someone else's wife, don't steal, etc...
    And one of the "etc" rules here on boards.ie is Thou Shalt Not Sock-Puppet.

    Your account "Ch3t Z@r" -- an interesting nick for somebody who claims to be christian -- has been banned from A+A, and it may receive a sitewide ban shortly. Several other suspicious accounts exist and each of these will be investigated too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Newsite


    robindch wrote: »
    And one of the "etc" rules here on boards.ie is Thou Shalt Not Sock-Puppet.

    Your account "Ch3t Z@r" -- an interesting nick for somebody who claims to be christian -- has been banned from A+A, and it may receive a sitewide ban shortly. Several other suspicious accounts exist and each of these will be investigated too.

    I am not deceiving anyone. I have more than one account for various reasons, none of which are any of your business :) Plus it is not an offence to have multiple accounts on boards, far as I know.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators Posts: 52,023 ✭✭✭✭Delirium


    Newsite wrote: »
    I am not deceiving anyone. I have two accounts for various reasons, none of which are any of your business :) Plus it is not an offence to have multiple account on boards.

    No doubt you have been looking for a reason to silence me, and it will suit you to do so. But I'm sure it will be seen for what it is ;)

    The people in charge said over a year ago that multiple accounts aren't allowed unless approved by the Admins/Comm Manager.

    If you can read this, you're too close!



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Newsite


    koth wrote: »

    Fair enough - I was actually operating under the principal that it was fine to have more than one account, as explained by a mod last year. That was the understanding I was operating under.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Newsite wrote: »
    Fair enough [...] That was the understanding I was operating under.
    The topic's been passed up to senior managers and no doubt you'll hear back from them in due course.

    You can rest assured, though, that your case will be dealt with fairly, and not with the "infinite justice" of the savage, retributive kind documented ad meam nauseam in the bible :)


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Newsite, again you're ignoring my point.

    Why didn't God destroy the Nazi regime with supernatural explosions like her did with Sodom and Gomorrah? Why did he have to send millions of troops to die?
    Why didn't he send any destruction to end the Soviet regime?

    What did Sodom and Gomorrah do that was so much worse than these guys?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,583 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    Multiple accounts can be sanctioned under certain circumstances, but never to be used in the same forum and certainly not the same thread.

    At any rate this was clearly a mistake, but at least you still have your primary A&A username with which to post.

    Nothing to see here. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Newsite


    robindch wrote: »
    The topic's been passed up to senior managers and no doubt you'll hear back from them in due course.

    You can rest assured, though, that your case will be dealt with fairly, and not with the "infinite justice" of the savage, retributive kind documented ad meam nauseam in the bible :)

    Fairly - in the sense that the terms of use are laid out by management, and that everyone is treated in accordance with those terms? ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,522 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Newsite wrote: »
    Fairly - in the sense that the terms of use are laid out by management, and that everyone is treated in accordance with those terms? ;)

    Yes. The real benefit though, is we can actually talk to the management and get a response. They don't ask us to kill our loved ones as a test. Their site and how it works is not in conflict with everything we know about science and how the universe works. And we can ask the management why they do things, rather than watch them do things and think to ourselves "The Boards.ie Management works in mysterious ways"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 31,967 ✭✭✭✭Sarky


    Wait... So I've been sacrificing all those fatted calves to Beruthiel for nothing?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Newsite


    Penn wrote: »
    Yes. The real benefit though, is we can actually talk to the management and get a response. They don't ask us to kill our loved ones as a test. Their site and how it works is not in conflict with everything we know about science and how the universe works. And we can ask the management why they do things, rather than watch them do things and think to ourselves "The Boards.ie Management works in mysterious ways"

    Your assertion would be valid if you put moral man on the same level as God, who created you, the universe, and everything in it, and who exists infinitely through space and time.

    Which, even to an atheist, might seem unreasonable :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭Sonics2k


    What Newsite is basically saying is "Only God can judge me"


Advertisement