If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)

Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Unpopular Opinions.

acidskiffle · 2011-11-15 04:44:39

Probably been done before but without getting too extreme,do you have any opinions most people you know seem to disagree with? I happen to think Bono is a sound lad. Mod note: last time a thread like this was made a lot of people were banned. If your opinion is too extreme you probably shouldn't post it.

Options

Comments

Options
#1652 14-12-2011 2:50pm
girlonfire

Closed Accounts Posts: 337 ✭✭

Join Date: June 2010

Posts: 321

Christmas is s****e

0
Options
#1653 14-12-2011 3:02pm
stupidusername

Closed Accounts Posts: 14,762 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: August 2008

Posts: 14614

Deus Ex Machina wrote: »

I think the "LET'S ALL LAUGH AT PEOPLE WITH DEPRESSION" thread is monumentally annoying.

What's annoying you about it?

0
Options
#1654 14-12-2011 3:19pm
Kanoe

Closed Accounts Posts: 1,522 ✭✭✭

Join Date: March 2008

Posts: 1501

W123-80's wrote: »

I also think she was never hot back in the day, nor did she have a nice ass back in the day.

I agree she's not my idea of beautiful but disagree on the ass part. That vid for can't get you out of my head, kinda made me realise I might be just a bit gay.

0
Options
#1655 14-12-2011 3:49pm
W123-80's

Registered Users Posts: 2,075 ✭✭✭

Join Date: July 2008

Posts: 1987

Kanoe wrote: »

I agree she's not my idea of beautiful but disagree on the ass part. That vid for can't get you out of my head, kinda made me realise I might be just a bit gay.

Nah, can't agree. Could never understand the hype. I assume you are on about the video with the hot pants.

But I expect I am in the minority with that opinion hence I've posted it here..!

I've seen better bums walking down grafton street on a Sat afternoon.

0
Options
#1656 14-12-2011 4:13pm
Kanoe

Closed Accounts Posts: 1,522 ✭✭✭

Join Date: March 2008

Posts: 1501

W123-80's wrote: »

Nah, can't agree. Could never understand the hype. I assume you are on about the video with the hot pants.

But I expect I am in the minority with that opinion hence I've posted it here..!

I've seen better bums walking down grafton street on a Sat afternoon.

it was that see through catsuit/thing (in around 1.25 and 1.58ish especially..arse there) and the shiny shiny dress and also, all the other girls dancing around in formation at the start.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yuB3AQlKsc

0
Advertisement
Options
#1657 14-12-2011 6:19pm
Chuck Stone

Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: March 2011

Posts: 12833

smegmar wrote: »

I very willingly accept. Current "Generation 3.5 nuclear reactors, using Thorium only have Plutonium-238 as a waste product. 238 is not radioactive and actually quite valuable. I could sell that stuff to NASA. While I'm mining Thorium I'll pull up Neodymium, That's needed to make windmills. So your windfarms can buy it from me, seems like a good investment, cheers.

HA Science fail on your part.

Please educate yourself on nuclear technology before you bash it.

Check out these links which happen to be quite some time before your criticism of me.

My post on Thorium as a fuel source

My understanding that thorium is much safer.

And finally!

Chuck Stone wrote: »

I'd be far more comfortable with a Thorium reactor nearby than a traditional uranium reactor because as TAC says they pretty much negate the nuclear fallout accident.

Now here's a tip for you.

When you think someone doesn't know something you are aware of write it as a question so you don't end up looking smug and foolish.

0
Options
#1658 14-12-2011 6:42pm
Jimoslimos

Registered Users Posts: 4,930 ✭✭✭

Join Date: August 2006

Posts: 4912

Kanoe wrote: »

it was that see through catsuit/thing (in around 1.25 and 1.58ish especially..arse there) and the shiny shiny dress and also, all the other girls dancing around in formation at the start.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yuB3AQlKsc

Nah, good but her arse in the spinning around vid is better - check from 0:15-0:18

0
Options
#1659 14-12-2011 8:03pm
Omackeral

Registered Users Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: January 2011

Posts: 32252

I think Sile Seoige is far hotter than Grainne Seoige.

0
Options
#1660 14-12-2011 8:07pm
Batsy

Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,341 ✭✭✭

Join Date: April 2011

Posts: 1318

Chuck Stone wrote: »

I think proponents of nuclear power who get their wishes granted for nuke-power stations to be built should be required to invest in it as a private individual and should be required to keep their fair share of the waste in their own shed for ten thousand years.

We need to invest in more nuclear power stations. They are the best form of power generation in today's world.

A great example of how useless wind turbines are is the fact that one of them was blown down in Ardrossan, North Ayrshire during the recent windy weather. It seems that that particular wind turbine couldn't cope with a bit of wind.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/12/08/article-2071633-0F1B4D7000000578-392_964x642.jpg

By looking at the picture, I reckon it would have made a particularly good fan heater, though.

0
Options
#1661 14-12-2011 8:48pm
Chuck Stone

Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: March 2011

Posts: 12833

Batsy wrote: »

We need to invest in more nuclear power stations. They are the best form of power generation in today's world.

There are arguments for and against. I think the arguments against are more convincing than the arguments for so I'm against traditional nuclear until convinced otherwise.

0
Advertisement
Options
#1662 14-12-2011 9:21pm
flanders1979

Closed Accounts Posts: 638 ✭✭✭

Join Date: December 2009

Posts: 637

Jimoslimos wrote: »

Nah, good but her arse in the spinning around vid is better - check from 0:15-0:18

better than porn.

0
Options
#1663 14-12-2011 9:34pm
Napper Hawkins

Registered Users Posts: 1,903 ✭✭✭

Join Date: October 2009

Posts: 1898

flanders1979 wrote: »

better than porn.

You must look at some ****ty porn!

0
Options
#1664 14-12-2011 9:34pm
Micky Dolenz

Registered Users Posts: 44,080 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: September 2008

Posts: 42536

Napper Hawkins wrote: »

You must look at some ****ty porn!

Porn is for ****.

0
Options
#1665 14-12-2011 9:35pm
Napper Hawkins

Registered Users Posts: 1,903 ✭✭✭

Join Date: October 2009

Posts: 1898

Micky Dolenz wrote: »

Porn is for ****.

I can live with it.

0
Options
#1666 14-12-2011 9:46pm
HEADHUNTER1980

Registered Users Posts: 7 ✭

Join Date: October 2010

Posts: 6

I THINK PUBLIC SECTOR WORKERS SHOULD FULLY PAY FOR THEIR OWN PENSIONS

0
Options
#1667 14-12-2011 10:23pm
pragmatic1

Registered Users Posts: 5,573 ✭✭✭

Join Date: August 2010

Posts: 5462

Indian food is overrated. Chinese, Italian, kebabs and even chippers are better.

0
Options
#1668 14-12-2011 11:07pm
Mike 1972

Closed Accounts Posts: 8,018 ✭✭✭

Join Date: April 2003

Posts: 7868

Seanchai wrote: »

Political point received clearly.

Title of thread seemingly missed ?

Must try harder !

Lady Chuckles wrote: »

I love the Angelus
I think it's cute.

Maybe they should bring out a DVD ?

Micky Dolenz wrote: »

Porn is for ****.

Isint that the whole point

0
Options
#1669 14-12-2011 11:32pm
pragmatic1

Registered Users Posts: 5,573 ✭✭✭

Join Date: August 2010

Posts: 5462

Nordies are friendlier than the rest of us and they have better manners.

0
Options
#1670 15-12-2011 12:52am
wonderfulname

Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2010

Posts: 3862

Batsy wrote: »

We need to invest in more nuclear power stations. They are the best form of power generation in today's world.

A great example of how useless wind turbines are is the fact that one of them was blown down in Ardrossan, North Ayrshire during the recent windy weather. It seems that that particular wind turbine couldn't cope with a bit of wind.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/12/08/article-2071633-0F1B4D7000000578-392_964x642.jpg

By looking at the picture, I reckon it would have made a particularly good fan heater, though.

Really? There are real arguments against wind energy, but that one is like saying you once saw a story about a car crash in the paper so you'll never go near a car again.

0
Options
#1671 15-12-2011 1:05am
Kanoe

Closed Accounts Posts: 1,522 ✭✭✭

Join Date: March 2008

Posts: 1501

Jimoslimos wrote: »

Nah, good but her arse in the spinning around vid is better - check from 0:15-0:18

I think it was the thigh slapping bit in the other one that did it. I think I'm a thigh person. Or a verging on S&M person. :pac: (no it's definitely the thighs)
either way that's way more Kylie than anyone should ever have to listen to in one day

0
Advertisement
Options
#1672 15-12-2011 1:06am
Ricardo G

Registered Users Posts: 1,308 ✭✭✭

Join Date: February 2010

Posts: 1250

Timberland boots are for scumbags

0
Options
#1673 15-12-2011 1:15am
DEFTLEFTHAND

Registered Users Posts: 16,500 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: August 2010

Posts: 16281

Mickey D is a little leprechaun man who fooled us all into thinking that the Presidency actually means anything.

0
Options
#1674 15-12-2011 1:17am
seanybiker

Closed Accounts Posts: 10,898 ✭✭✭✭

Join Date: March 2004

Posts: 10766

DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: »

Mickey D is a little leprechaun man who fooled us all into thinking that the Presidency actually means anything.

Mickey dolenz is president?

0
Options
#1675 15-12-2011 1:19am
7Sins

Closed Accounts Posts: 526 ✭✭✭

Join Date: April 2011

Posts: 496

Gays shouldn't be allowed adopt, it's not rocket science like, you put two queers together...can they reproduce? No. Tough sh*t like.

0
Options
#1676 15-12-2011 1:24am
pragmatic1

Registered Users Posts: 5,573 ✭✭✭

Join Date: August 2010

Posts: 5462

7Sins wrote: »

Gays shouldn't be allowed adopt, it's not rocket science like, you put two queers together...can they reproduce? No. Tough sh*t like.

Then by that logic people who are infertile shouldnt be allowed to adopt either. You're right, its far from rocket science.

0
Options
#1677 15-12-2011 1:31am
7Sins

Closed Accounts Posts: 526 ✭✭✭

Join Date: April 2011

Posts: 496

pragmatic1 wrote: »

7Sins wrote: »

Gays shouldn't be allowed adopt, it's not rocket science like, you put two queers together...can they reproduce? No. Tough sh*t like.

Then by that logic people who are infertile shouldnt be allowed to adopt either. You're right, its far from rocket science.

That's not the point, man + woman = babies. Man + man = no babies.

0
Options
#1678 15-12-2011 1:39am
wonderfulname

Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2010

Posts: 3862

7Sins wrote: »

That's not the point, man + woman = babies. Man + man = no babies.

I refer you to my earlier post:

wonderfulname wrote: »

No, I mean ignorant as in unaware of the facts, there are no cons involved in gay adoption.

Like I said, you should read up on it. Luckily I always have a report* or two to hand

If you're going to persist that your "opinion" holds any merit it should be based on something.

*pre civil partnership but definitely worth a read for you, especially the case studies

When you actually have any idea of the facts surrounding gay adoption then yeah, its not at all rocket science, but the obvious conclusion is the exact opposite to yours.

0
Options
#1679 15-12-2011 1:48am
7Sins

Closed Accounts Posts: 526 ✭✭✭

Join Date: April 2011

Posts: 496

wonderfulname wrote: »

7Sins wrote: »

That's not the point, man + woman = babies. Man + man = no babies.

I refer you to my earlier post:

wonderfulname wrote: »

No, I mean ignorant as in unaware of the facts, there are no cons involved in gay adoption.

Like I said, you should read up on it. Luckily I always have a report* or two to hand

If you're going to persist that your "opinion" holds any merit it should be based on something.

[SIZE="1"]*pre civil partnership but definitely worth a read for you, especially the case studies[/SIZE]

When you actually have any idea of the facts surrounding gay adoption then yeah, its not at all rocket science, but the obvious conclusion is the exact opposite to yours.

I don't have a problem with gay marraige or civil partnership. I just don't see any reason why they should be allowed adopt. You'll need more than two pdfs to change my mind cos I'm very stubborn and narrow minded.

0
Options
#1680 15-12-2011 2:04am
wonderfulname

Registered Users Posts: 3,943 ✭✭✭

Join Date: June 2010

Posts: 3862

7Sins wrote: »

I don't have a problem with gay marraige or civil partnership. I just don't see any reason why they should be allowed adopt. You'll need more than two pdfs to change my mind cos I'm very stubborn and narrow minded.

You do realise that full marriage rights include adoption right? You could actually look at the pdfs before you decide it's not enough for you.

0
Advertisement
Options
#1681 15-12-2011 2:07am
Paparazzo

Closed Accounts Posts: 7,398 ✭✭✭

Join Date: January 2006

Posts: 7301

Every Chinese takeaway in the country is the same - shìte.
Chipper are the same. If you think your local chipper is a "great chipper", you're wrong. It's the same as every chipper in the country

0

This discussion has been closed.