Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Charlie Veitch 911 turnaround (New BBC documentary coming soon)

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭Daithi 1


    meglome wrote: »
    You'll find that people covered their asses so they didn't look bad, i.e. hiding incompetence. That's what I took from what was reported. That does not mean the physics of what happen is wrong, not even close.

    It certainly doesn't confirm the physics either, it puts the whole version of events in question. People have genuine questions and deserve genuine truthful answers.

    And as much as we appreciate you helping CT'rs with their queries about 9/11, you're hardly qualified to do so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,980 ✭✭✭meglome


    Daithi 1 wrote: »
    It certainly doesn't confirm the physics either, it puts the whole version of events in question. People have genuine questions and deserve genuine truthful answers.

    Again I have no issue with the truth. But ever time I look for truth from the CT movement I find a pack of mistruths and lies. What I find amazing is people would choose that over official reports which while perhaps not perfect are generally very accurate.

    The CT movement is like a splatter gun, if you keep firing enough shíte you'll might eventually get something to stick. Or at the very least confuse enough people into believing you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,980 ✭✭✭meglome


    Daithi 1 wrote: »
    It certainly doesn't confirm the physics either, it puts the whole version of events in question. People have genuine questions and deserve genuine truthful answers.

    And as much as we appreciate you helping CT'rs with their queries about 9/11, you're hardly qualified to do so.

    I am trying to help, genuinely. But let's be clear in most cases I don't need to be qualified to take a claim then go and check it with the available evidence. That's how I know for a fact that most of the CT's don't add up, just by doing basic checks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭Daithi 1


    Well your last few posts have been a great help :pac:


Advertisement