David Norris' presidential bid scupperd by Israel

My name is URL

King Mob wrote: »

Not according to the OP.

Oh for the love of Pete..

I said - "The reasons for Israel releasing these letters only now is blatantly obvious in my eyes. What's your thoughts?"

I could have said - "The reasons why Israel would release these letters only now is blatantly obvious in my eyes. What's your thoughts?"

Would it have made a blind bit of difference to you?

If I had have stuck a question mark at the end of the thread title would you have treated the thread any differently?

You're being argumentative and pedantic just for the hell of it. What do you want me to do.. simply admit that I was wrong? Coz, I'm not gonna.

I started the thread in view of what info that was available at the time. ie "letters leaked by Israeli Embassy".

Maybe I could have worded it better, but you'd still be here arguing over semantics and incessantly throwing around accusations of bias & bigotry.

King Mob

My name is URL wrote: »

Oh for the love of Pete..

I said - "The reasons for Israel releasing these letters only now is blatantly obvious in my eyes. What's your thoughts?"

I could have said - "The reasons why Israel would release these letters only now is blatantly obvious in my eyes. What's your thoughts?"

Would it have made a blind bit of difference to you?

If I had have stuck a question mark at the end of the thread title would you have treated the thread any differently?

I might have, assuming you had done that and then not made many follow up statements that made it quite clear that you weren't being speculative.

Penn

Thread Locked.