Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

The Real Reason for NATO Attacking Libya ?

1…192021222325»

Comments

  • #722
    bob50
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 535 ✭✭✭bob50


    To call it "Iraq War" i think is wrong it was an invasion The yanks & brits called it a war


  • #723
    davoxx
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,539 ✭✭✭davoxx


    studiorat wrote: »
    dude, Mathaba.net has been Gadaffi's personal fanclub since it was founded by Adam King aka Louis Szondy. It hosts Gadaffi's Green book on the site ffs, though you probably know that already.
    mate, Mathaba.net is a news site, end of ... if you've an issues with the facts as the are presented, you can dispute them.

    otherwise, buddy, it is wrong to assume that the countries news channel is a personal fan club without any evidence to back it up ...

    i thought i made that clear in my discussion with the person who failed to back up his claim over this ...


  • #724
    davoxx
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,539 ✭✭✭davoxx


    Jeboa Safari wrote: »
    rolleyes.gif
    You know what else is interesting, when it looked like Gaddafi was doing deals with the west, the cters were against him. You yourself authored a threadcalling him a freemason and saying he was sending a false flag aid ship to Gaza, another thread cites him pushing for the United States of Africa as part of the nwo plan. Yet plans for a united African currency are grounds for invasion according to the op here. Same on other ct sites, goes from villain to hero as soon as the west is against him.
    huh?? what are you on about? how is that relevant to the thread?
    Jeboa Safari wrote: »
    Deliberately misrepresenting what I said, I actually don't know how any straight thinking person could come to the conclusions you've just drawn and miss the point by such a wide mark.
    i disagree, i represented what you said. show me other wise ...
    tbh i actually don't know how any straight thinking person could come to the conclusions you've just drawn ...
    Jeboa Safari wrote: »
    Its a weak and stupid argument, and you're really clutching at straws to justify your belief that the US controls the UN
    well if it weak and stupid, then you should have not bother countering it, right?
    Jeboa Safari wrote: »
    The 'source' you gave is a Gaddafi propaganda piece. Look at any major media reports from the time, its not that hard.
    ahh this nonsense again, yeah "propaganda by gaddafi" seems to be the generic excuse ... when did it change from fox was right to everything else is propaganda ...


  • #725
    davoxx
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,539 ✭✭✭davoxx


    Di0genes wrote: »
    You need links to have it proven to you that 80% of Tripoli wasn't in loyalist Gaddaffi hands in mid october and you have the audacity to suggest I don't know what I'm talking about?
    still nothing to support your cliam ... hmmm

    Di0genes wrote: »
    And I have. Next you'll be demanding proof the that official website of http://www.korea-dpr.com/ isn't propaganda.
    well if you have proof that it is you should present it, rather than trying to guess what i'll be doing next ...
    Di0genes wrote: »
    Thats your opinion you are however wrong.
    that is you opinion, you are however wrong.
    Di0genes wrote: »
    You are wrong when you say http://www.mathaba.net/ isn't a propaganda site. Theres no ambiguity here.
    that is you opinion, you are however wrong.
    have you presented anything to back up your incorrect assumptions?
    no? ... well that answers that quite clearly ...
    Di0genes wrote: »
    No its not theft. Its now in the hands of the Libyan people.
    that is you opinion, you are however wrong.


  • #726
    Jeboa Safari
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,202 ✭✭✭Jeboa Safari


    davoxx wrote: »
    huh?? what are you on about? how is that relevant to the thread?


    i disagree, i represented what you said. show me other wise ...
    tbh i actually don't know how any straight thinking person could come to the conclusions you've just drawn ...


    well if it weak and stupid, then you should have not bother countering it, right?


    ahh this nonsense again, yeah "propaganda by gaddafi" seems to be the generic excuse ... when did it change from fox was right to everything else is propaganda ...

    yeah yeah, you represented it with your own slant, as well as bringing in nonsense that I didn't say.

    reply to bb's tripe is as relevant to the thread as his post.

    you want me to provide proof that the US didn't get its wires tangled in controlling its UN puppet? :rolleyes:

    where did anyone say fox is right and everything else is propaganda? You're spinning or making up stuff, again. :eek:

    ...


  • Advertisement
  • #727
    davoxx
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,539 ✭✭✭davoxx


    Jeboa Safari wrote: »
    yeah yeah, you represented it with your own slant, as well as bringing in nonsense that I didn't say.

    reply to bb's tripe is as relevant to the thread as his post.

    you want me to provide proof that the US didn't get its wires tangled in controlling its UN puppet? :rolleyes:

    where did anyone say fox is right and everything else is propaganda? You're spinning or making up stuff, again. eek.gif

    ...
    yeah yeah, you interpreted it your own slant, as well as saying nonsense that you claim i misrepresented you with.

    if it's so obvious you should be able to back it up, :rolleyes:

    i never said that anyone said it, you're spinning or making up stuff, again. eek.gif


Advertisement