The Disclosure Project?

iPlop

Right, I'm trying to find out if this thing is real or something else.

The first point is that this that the disclosure project was initially set up by Laurence Rockefeller which make me a little suspicious.Some part of this disclosure project is most likely for their own ends.

The official invitation to discuss UFOs privately came in an August 4, 1993 letter from Rockefeller to Gibbons. The informal roundtable discussion was to be held September 13-15, 1993 at Rockefeller’s JY Ranch in the Teton Forest near Jackson Hole Wyoming. Along with representatives from Gibbons office, Richard Farley, Rockefeller, Henry Diamond, Dr. Scott Jones, Dr. John Mack, Dr. Bruce Maccabee, Dr. Leo Sprinkle, Linda Moulton Howe, Dr. Steven Greer, and Keith Thompson attended.

source

The second point is that the Rockefeller's have "apparently" had experience with a fake alien invasion in 1938

It has been suggested War of the Worlds thewas a psychological warfare experiment. In the 1999 documentary, Masters of the Universe: The Secret Birth of the Federal Reserve, writer Daniel Hopsicker claims the Rockefeller Foundation funded the broadcast, studied the panic, and compiled a report available to a few. A variation has the Radio Project and the Rockefeller Foundation as conspirators.[8] In a theatrical trailer for his film F For Fake, Welles joked about such theories, jesting that the broadcast indeed "had secret sponsors".
While Mercury Theatre had no sponsor, CBS and the Rockefeller Foundation were contracting the leading crowd psychology researchers of the time; CBS had Edward Bernays, the Rockefeller Foundation had Ivy Lee. With the involvement of Frank Stanton in the Radio Project and his position in the CBS research department, it is possible the "creative curiosity" of Orson Welles came from conversations within these business circles. A detailed documentary on these circles and the ideas behind social manipulation was made by the BBC, called The Century of the Self.
There has been continued speculation the panic generated by War of the Worlds inspired officials to cover up unidentified flying object evidence, avoiding a similar panic. U.S. Air Force Captain Edward J. Ruppelt,[9] the first head of UFO investigatory Project Blue Book wrote, "The [U.S. government's] UFO files are full of references to the near mass panic of October 30, 1938, when Orson Welles presented his now famous The War of the Worlds broadcast."

source


The third point is,Dr Carol Rosin ,Heavily involved with the disclosure project has been working on the "Space Treaty of 2011" with former Apollo astronaut, Edgar Mitchell.She talks of different species in space and how they don't abduct people anymore.

She claims People in high places have information about all this.She also claims that she and others connected with the disclosure project had a 1 hour meeting with some ET's about this "peace treaty"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KECtbiTcPU

Now given the involvement the ruling class have with the disclosure project ,I'm gonna bet some species of "aliens" will not agree to this treaty, if you know what I mean!!;).And what happens next? Well I have my own ideas, but I'm saying nothing at the moment.The annoying thing is, she is the very woman that warned everyone in 2001 about the "last card" that would be played by governments to fool the public about the threat the ET's will pose to us.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-wsBFSsCbI

The treaty is below



source

Treaty


I think the Disclosure Project is a front for something else ,what do you guy's think?

Monty Burnz

Just as a starting point, 'Doctor' Carol Rosin is nothing of the sort.

She received a Bachelor of Science from the University of Delaware and an Honorary Doctorate in Humanities from Archbishop Soloman Gbadebo, Nigeria.

So she has no Phd, just a bachelor's degree in science. Now, that wouldn't normally bother me at all, or damage her credibility in any way, but the fact that she is pretending to have a PhD based on an 'honorary doctorate' from some Nigerian archbishop - that's not good.

So famous in fact is this archbishop (since when were they given the authority to award honarary doctorates, anyhow?) that 95% of the Google results for him seem to relate to Dr. Carol Rosin (or to give her her full academic title, Carol Rosin).

So for me, she has very little credibility for a start. I'm not sure how this will affect this particular CT, but let's see how it plays out.

Talk E

I think the disclosure project might be run up to project bluebeam. People think disclosure is coming soon, but actually it has come and gone. The media seem to pounce on ufo stories now, where they used to avoid and ridicule them. The masses, for about 20 years now, are being prepared for the reality of aliens existance and the possibility they might be malevolent.

Michio Kaku and Stephen Hawkin have been mouthing about this a lot recently.

Before they can pull off a false flag alien attack on us, we need to believe in alien existance first, or we'll just assume it's a government attack. imo :pac:

Monty Burnz

Talk E wrote: »

Before they can pull off a false flag alien attack on us, we need to believe in alien existance first, or we'll just assume it's a government attack. imo :pac:

We'll have to win the 'war on drugs' and the 'war on terror' first... :pac:

Talk E

Monty Burnz wrote: »

We'll have to win the 'war on drugs' and the 'war on terror' first... :pac:

The wars against the masses, you mean.

iPlop

Monty Burnz wrote: »

Just as a starting point, 'Doctor' Carol Rosin is nothing of the sort.

So she has no Phd, just a bachelor's degree in science.

Yeah Monty, but she's pushing the alien agenda outlined by the disclosure project very seriously ,and in 2001 she was warning of the "last card" governments would play.So what has changed her attitude since then?

She is taken seriously along with Dr Greer. Who made her see the light? ,Why and what for?

I am suspicious about all this I have to say, it's co-ordinated, Movies, kids cartoons, alien sweets my kids buy, everything has an alien theme these days.

Only the TPTB could get that kind of penetration into society.

Talk E

I'm to stupid to type much so I'll just post a video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0OrT-8gXMs

espinolman

The disclosure project is deception :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLMCmPOLoxs

Monty Burnz

espinolman wrote: »

The disclosure project is deception :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLMCmPOLoxs

That video is funny.

The fourth dimension is the MENTAL dimension!

No it isn't. :rolleyes:

Talk E

espinolman wrote: »

The disclosure project is deception :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLMCmPOLoxs

"I have concluded that, the aliens are demons."

Talk E

Monty Burnz wrote: »

That video is funny.
No it isn't. :rolleyes:

Hilarious post :pac:

Talk E

espinolman wrote: »

The disclosure project is deception :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLMCmPOLoxs

Were all playing our part in disclosure. None of us probably could handle the full truth if we got it.

espinolman

Monty Burnz wrote: »

No it isn't. :rolleyes:

Everything is in your mind , all dimentions , physical objects , energy , space , time and universes are mental phenomenon .

Monty Burnz

espinolman wrote: »

Everything is in your mind , all dimentions , physical objects , energy , space , time and universes are mental phenomenon .

So the guy is wrong either way? If you are right (...) then he should have said 'the fourth dimension is a mental dimension. Just like everything else.'

GarlicBread

I think the thrust from the disclosure project and associates is the best way to go. They are trying to cut through the fear based programming we have been bombarded with over that last 50 years or so. They know damn well that the biggest threat is from ourselves going into space with weapons. Once that happens its game over.

If you pay attention to the mainstream alien movies you can see the different agendas being played out. For a long time it was all us vs them and invasions and horror stories. More recently a split has emerged where some directors are moving away from the fear.

Examples. Peter Jackson's District 9 shows humans as the bad guys. James Camaron's Avatar tells the same story, which is interesting because its shows an idealogical pull away from the classic bad alien theme. To a lesser extent, Transformers, produced by Spielberg, has a few eye openers in it aswell.

Regardless of this, you can still see the fear based agenda continuing. The recent Battle for LA is a good example. Also, that other one that came out last year that was completely terrible, it was only a CGI fest with zero story, I cant remember the name of it, Glow or somthing. These types of programs are conditioning for the military industrial complex, whos aim is to have humanity expand out into space with a military mindset.

RGDATA!

GarlicBread wrote: »

If you pay attention to the mainstream alien movies you can see the different agendas being played out. For a long time it was all us vs them and invasions and horror stories. More recently a split has emerged where some directors are moving away from the fear.

what about Close Encounters, E.T.?

FREETV

Who can't or couldn't handle the truth? If a hideous looking creature jumped out in front of you unexpectedly or fired a plasma beam weapon at a person then maybe one would have a heart attack and be in fear but if we knew in advance of the existence of other wordly creatures and their existence and some of their agendas, their reason for visiting this earth then the vast majority would and will be able to cope! If our very existence were threatened then our adrenalin and survival instinct would kick in. I am ready and always was for any kind of impending disasters or disclosure of any kind. The body will die regardless at some point in the future. Immortality for the human race would be nice if it was possible and life continued to forever evolve for us all and continue to excite. Maybe someone out there holds that secret? There is no need or point in anyone panicing. Stay steadfast.

iPlop

FREETV wrote: »

Who can't or couldn't handle the truth?

Yeah but is there any truth in it at all? ,or are we being led down the garden path by governments and billionaires for some other plan?

iPlop

First the MOD, then the FBI and now the NSA have released their UFO files

http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/declass/ufo/index.shtml


I haven't read any of them yet so I don't know what's in them.Co-ordinated to say the least.

GarlicBread

RGDATA! wrote: »

what about Close Encounters, E.T.?

They are both great movies , i suppose spielberg cant make his mind up.

GarlicBread

FREETV wrote: »

Who can't or couldn't handle the truth?

Go find out what or what is close to the truth first, then come back and say that again .

Sure the public could handle that ufos are real, most already know that. Explaining to the public the real truth of the matter is a different story.

What if there are mulitple et races with different agendas? What if there is some sort of a war going on between different groups of them and us? What if certain elements of humanity have allied with certain ets? What if key institutions/governments/agencies have been compromised? What if some of them use us as a resource? What if we dont own our own planet? What if we have our own breakaway civilization colonizing other nearby planets? What if some of them are not from space but from here? What if some of them are from a different dimension and can pop in and out of our reality? What if our perception of reality is not even close to what we thought?

It would be nice if it was just some aliens poping by to say hello, but it dosent look like that is anywhere close to the truth. Disclosure is going to be some seriously dirty business.

iPlop

GarlicBread wrote: »

Go find out what or what is close to the truth first, then come back and say that again .

Sure the public could handle that ufos are real, most already know that. Explaining to the public the real truth of the matter is a different story.

What if there are mulitple et races with different agendas? What if there is some sort of a war going on between different groups of them and us? What if certain elements of humanity have allied with certain ets? What if key institutions/governments/agencies have been compromised? What if some of them use us as a resource? What if we dont own our own planet? What if we have our own breakaway civilization colonizing other nearby planets? What if some of them are not from space but from here? What if some of them are from a different dimension and can pop in and out of our reality? What if our perception of reality is not even close to what we thought?

It would be nice if it was just some aliens poping by to say hello, but it dosent look like that is anywhere close to the truth. Disclosure is going to be some seriously dirty business.

That's my take on it anyway.

GarlicBread

The Incredible Fridge wrote: »

First the MOD, then the FBI and now the NSA have released their UFO files

http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/declass/ufo/index.shtml


I haven't read any of them yet so I don't know what's in them.Co-ordinated to say the least.

The NSA files released show that they have been trying to decipher alien messages. Its proof that alien civilization exists out there somwhere, altho, its only a drip drip of useless information designed to undo years of lies. The real deal is not out there at all, its here in front of us.

Priori

GarlicBread wrote:

Peter Jackson's District 9 shows humans as the bad guys.

Perhaps a minor point here (and not 'Peter Jackson didn't direct/write it) , but simplifying the themes of films which feature extra-terrestrials in any shape or form, and doing so in such an either/or fashion, IMO detracts from the soundness of your arguments.

iPlop

SETI shuts down? due to budget cuts, alien search halted, 3 days after the NSA releases their UFO documents.:)

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=13461307

RGDATA!

GarlicBread wrote: »

They are both great movies , i suppose spielberg cant make his mind up.

both 25+ plus old, blockbuster movies which don't present alien contact as something to fear which seemed at odds with your idea that that is a signficant recent development in hollywood

adam500

There is something strange about that Steven Greer guy. Anybody see his interview with Project Camelot, he pretty much stated that all ET's are benevolent, that statement is completely irresponsible to state, especially from someone in the position of Steven Greer. He seems to have gone a bit quiet lately in the alternative news community, anybody have an update on him?.

GarlicBread

adam500 wrote: »

There is something strange about that Steven Greer guy. Anybody see his interview with Project Camelot, he pretty much stated that all ET's are benevolent, that statement is completely irresponsible to state, especially from someone in the position of Steven Greer. He seems to have gone a bit quiet lately in the alternative news community, anybody have an update on him?.

Theres a divide in ufology/exopolitics regarding what the big picture is. Some say all ETs all good guys and we are the bad guys, others say the same spectrum of good/evil is found in the universe aswell as earth.

This is mainly to do with abductions. Both sides of the divide accept that abductees are telling the truth, but they disagree about whos doing it. One school of thought (mainly from disclosure project and the other official fact based researchers and witnesses), say that its the military industrial complex doing it to give the ETs a bad name.

The other school of thought believes that it is indeed negative ETs who are involved, and that they are manipulating the disclosure movement to make themselves look benevolent. Or that many in the field are intentionally ignoring the abduction issue for some reason or another. Those of this belief will be highly suspicious of Greer in particular.

Both sides work in tandum for a mutually beneficial disclosure, but somtimes they really have a go at eachother. That is what you are witnessing in Greer's camelot interview. They are outright hostile to him, to the extent that it even becomes ridiculous. Their worst interview which could/should have been their best.

Maybe project camelot are disinfo and are attacking Greer because he has dealt huge irreversible blows to the coverup and even threatened its very existence with the disclosure project in 2001? Greer also threatens the influence of the military industrial complex A.D (after disclosure). If it turned out that the ETs were good guys/peaceful then the MIC would not be able to expand into space and would go into decline without any wars or threats.

Or maybe Greer is a trojan horse of the reptilian shapeshifting variety .

Priori

GarlicBread wrote:

A.D (after disclosure)

Does the impact of the Disclosure Project really warrant such an inflated 'before and after' signification? It's just that, having watched it myself, I was rather shocked that such an event could have happened 10 years ago with such minimal mainstream impact (AFAIK, of course).

I'm genuinely interested in how it was received, and how soon (or otherwise) the publicity it did achieve died down.

Jeboa Safari

Priori wrote: »

Does the impact of the Disclosure Project really warrant such an inflated 'before and after' signification? It's just that, having watched it myself, I was rather shocked that such an event could have happened 10 years ago with such minimal mainstream impact (AFAIK, of course).

I'm genuinely interested in how it was received, and how soon (or otherwise) the publicity it did achieve died down.

I'd be interested to know too. I put it into google news search but it didn't return much:
http://news.google.ie/archivesearch?hl=en&biw=1280&bih=709&q=disclosure+project&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ncl=dC-xKymN7dDZWaM&ei=AK-9TYuIJoyJhQfwptC2BQ&sa=X&oi=news_result&ct=more-results&resnum=1&ved=0CC0QqgIwAA

Doesn't seem to have been taken too seriously though reading the articles. Would be interesting to see if it was on any tv news reports

namloc1980

Priori wrote: »

Does the impact of the Disclosure Project really warrant such an inflated 'before and after' signification? It's just that, having watched it myself, I was rather shocked that such an event could have happened 10 years ago with such minimal mainstream impact (AFAIK, of course).

I'm genuinely interested in how it was received, and how soon (or otherwise) the publicity it did achieve died down.

The thing is the Disclosure Project didn't produce any hard physical evidence of ET's etc. It was just a bunch of stories.

Priori

namloc1980 wrote:

The thing is the Disclosure Project didn't produce any hard physical evidence of ET's etc. It was just a bunch of stories.

I appreciate that point, but deeming it 'just a bunch of stories' seems a little inappropriate in this context, considering the supposed reputations of those giving testimony. Normally, collected anecdotes are from witnesses scattered far and wide, differing widely in terms of credibility.

Assuming it's not some big orchestrated fraud (and if you know the best evidence to support such a viewpoint, please do show me, as I'm more than open to this), then it's really a case of; how many 'credible' testimonies does it take to reach breaking point?

I guess when something so critical is at stake - whether extraterrestrial intelligences are currently visiting this planet - I admit it is reasonable to demand the most exacting standards of evidence. But demanding that something 'physical' be shown before one takes it seriously - this would seem a little dismissive (I'm not attributing this viewpoint to you namloc1980). Surely one takes it more than seriously if hard physical evidence is given; in that case, I assume one accepts it as 'truth'.

Just my thoughts.

iPlop

Priori wrote: »

I appreciate that point, but deeming it 'just a bunch of stories' seems a little inappropriate in this context, considering the supposed reputations of those giving testimony. Normally, collected anecdotes are from witnesses scattered far and wide, differing widely in terms of credibility.

Assuming it's not some big orchestrated fraud (and if you know the best evidence to support such a viewpoint, please do show me, as I'm more than open to this), then it's really a case of; how many 'credible' testimonies does it take to reach breaking point?

I guess when something so critical is at stake - whether extraterrestrial intelligences are currently visiting this planet - I admit it is reasonable to demand the most exacting standards of evidence. But demanding that something 'physical' be shown before one takes it seriously - this would seem a little dismissive (I'm not attributing this viewpoint to you namloc1980). Surely one takes it more than seriously if hard physical evidence is given; in that case, I assume one accepts it as 'truth'.

Just my thoughts.

See the first post in this thread for that theory.

namloc1980

Priori wrote: »

I appreciate that point, but deeming it 'just a bunch of stories' seems a little inappropriate in this context, considering the supposed reputations of those giving testimony. Normally, collected anecdotes are from witnesses scattered far and wide, differing widely in terms of credibility.

Assuming it's not some big orchestrated fraud (and if you know the best evidence to support such a viewpoint, please do show me, as I'm more than open to this), then it's really a case of; how many 'credible' testimonies does it take to reach breaking point?

I guess when something so critical is at stake - whether extraterrestrial intelligences are currently visiting this planet - I admit it is reasonable to demand the most exacting standards of evidence. But demanding that something 'physical' be shown before one takes it seriously - this would seem a little dismissive (I'm not attributing this viewpoint to you namloc1980). Surely one takes it more than seriously if hard physical evidence is given; in that case, I assume one accepts it as 'truth'.

Just my thoughts.

Fair enough but why should we take these peoples word as gospel. Many of them are of military background. Is it possible that they were sent to do a job and to make stuff up about aliens to distract from secret military projects etc.?

I think it is very reasonable to demand physical evidence before taking these stories seriously. One of the key witnesses in the Disclosure Project is completely unreliable and unbelievable.

Priori

To be honest, the very slight impact that this 'Disclosure' has had in the intervening 10 years is (of its own accord) practically sufficient proof for me that it couldn't really be what it claims to be. That, I admit, is a fuzzy-ish way of looking at it; but it's only an initial gut reaction.

If it is a fraud, then it is nonetheless a very intriguing fraud.

namloc1980 wrote:

Is it possible that they were sent to do a job and to make stuff up about aliens to distract from secret military projects etc.?

My next thought exactly. Very much a possibility.

It's infuriating if the possibility just mentioned is the case. Especially considering how 'sincere' the witnesses seemed. If they weren't sincere, then they are a disgraceful, shameless lot altogether.

Priori

Just in case readers of this thread find this of interest (although I'm assuming you probably know of this already):

Dr. Steven Greer - Before He Was Famous

And a profile Greer apparently set up on a homosexual dating site was dug up by someone at 'Project Camelot' to discredit him, on the pretext that:

His ethics and values are open to question.

Source

He is also claimed to be suppressing 'Free Energy'. To be honest, his detractors often seem as quack-like as he himself comes across. Digging up such personal information perhaps says more about them that it does about him.

But from my own experience, I remember, some time ago now, leafing through 'Hidden Truth: Forbidden Knowledge'; I was over in London at the time staying with a friend who owned the book. I was struck by how excessively egotistical, self-promoting and racey it all seemed. This review actually sums up quite well how I reacted myself.

GarlicBread

namloc1980 wrote: »

Is it possible that they were sent to do a job and to make stuff up about aliens to distract from secret military projects etc.?

I think it is very reasonable to demand physical evidence before taking these stories seriously. One of the key witnesses in the Disclosure Project is completely unreliable and unbelievable.

The disclosure project and many others actually admit that most if not many ufos are indeed man made from back engineering or otherwise. Its highly unlikely they are doing a cover story for the military, never before has so much information and evidence been divulged about the military's ufo projects than until disclosure project spilled the beans. They have plenty of witnesses from the various corperations who are supposedly producing these vehicles.

I dont take disclosure project fully at face value by the way, its just with all the evidence over the last 60 years or so, circumstantial or otherwise, and then with disclosure project on top of it, it looks like there is indeed somthing going on.

Bear in mind that there has also been another disclosure project since the one in 2001, it was done with a different crowd and was covered by the mainstream media, in fact it was live on CNN. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jUU4Z8QdHI&feature=related
A whole load of even more credible people, all saying the same thing.

The judicial system of the western world is based primarily off witness testimony, yet, when it comes to ufos + ets its just not good enough? Looks as though planet earth is in denial to me.

iPlop

US astronomers launch search for alien life on 86 planets.

The giant dish began this week pointing toward each of the 86 planets -- culled from a list of 1,235 possible planets identified by NASA's Kepler space telescope -- and will gather 24 hours of data on each one.
"It's not absolutely certain that all of these stars have habitable planetary systems, but they're very good places to look for ET," said University of California at Berkeley graduate student Andrew Siemion.

The mission is part of the SETI project, which stands for Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence, launched in the mid 1980s.
Last month the SETI Institute announced it was shuttering a major part of its efforts -- a 50 million dollar project with 42 telescope dishes known as the Allen Telescope Array (ATA) -- due to a five million dollar budget shortfall.
ATA began in 2007 and was operated in partnership by the UC Berkeley Radio Astronomy Lab, which has hosted several generations of such experiments. It was funded by the SETI Institute and the National Science Foundation (NSF).
With ATA's dishes in hibernation for now, astronomers hope the powerful Green Bank Telescope, a previous incarnation of which was felled in a windstorm in 1988, will provide targeted information about potential life-supporting planets.

"Our search employs the largest fully steerable radio telescope on the planet, and the most sensitive radio telescope in the world capable of undertaking a SETI search of this kind," Siemion told AFP.
"We will be looking at a much wider range of frequencies and signal types than has ever been possible before," he added, describing the instrumentation as "at the very cutting edge of radio astronomy technology."
The surface of the telescope is 100 by 110 meters and it can record nearly one gigabyte of data per second, Siemion said.

The 17 million pound (7.7 million kilogram) telescope became operational in 2000 and is a project of the NSF's National Radio Astronomy Observatory.
"We've picked out the planets with nice temperatures -- between zero and 100 degrees Celsius -- because they are a lot more likely to harbor life," said physicist Dan Werthimer.
Werthimer heads a three-decade long SETI project in Puerto Rico, home of the world's largest radio telescope, Arecibo. However that project could not observe the same area of the northern sky as the Green Bank telescope, he said.

"With Arecibo, we focus on stars like our Sun, hoping that they have planets around them that emit intelligent signals," Werthimer said in a statement.
"But we've never had a list of planets like this before."
The Green Bank Telescope can scan 300 times the range of frequencies that Arecibo could, meaning that it can collect the same amount of data in one day that Arecibo could in one year.
The project will likely take about a year to complete, and will be helped by a team of one million at-home astronomers, known as SETI@home users, who will help process the data on personal computers.

So the US is officially searching for aliens and one year they'll tell the world if they found them or not.I think we know what the answer is going to be.:pac:

Colibri

So many once-classified files have been released from all sorts of governmental agencies all across the world, so many sightings as of late, so much discussion and more widespread media coverage - events seem to be building up to something in my opinion.

Do you think a UFO disclosure will happen in your lifetime?

jackiebaron

GarlicBread wrote: »

I think the thrust from the disclosure project and associates is the best way to go. They are trying to cut through the fear based programming we have been bombarded with over that last 50 years or so. They know damn well that the biggest threat is from ourselves going into space with weapons. Once that happens its game over.

If you pay attention to the mainstream alien movies you can see the different agendas being played out. For a long time it was all us vs them and invasions and horror stories. More recently a split has emerged where some directors are moving away from the fear.

Examples. Peter Jackson's District 9 shows humans as the bad guys. James Camaron's Avatar tells the same story, which is interesting because its shows an idealogical pull away from the classic bad alien theme. To a lesser extent, Transformers, produced by Spielberg, has a few eye openers in it aswell.

Regardless of this, you can still see the fear based agenda continuing. The recent Battle for LA is a good example. Also, that other one that came out last year that was completely terrible, it was only a CGI fest with zero story, I cant remember the name of it, Glow or somthing. These types of programs are conditioning for the military industrial complex, whos aim is to have humanity expand out into space with a military mindset.

Garlic, what's the point of expanding into space with a military mindset? It's completely impractical. It takes 2 years just to get to our closest sister planet. What kind of a craft would you need that could grow 4 years worth of food to sustain a human on such a voyage (assuming that he/she is going to come back)? Beyond that, the planets have no surface. They are balls of gas that would take some 10 or 15 years to reach and even then you couldn't land anywhere. Yeah, you can take some lasers into Earth orbit but that's pretty much it. They'd just be used to whack someone back on Earth.
Alien shït is retarded.

iPlop

jackiebaron wrote: »

Alien shït is retarded.

So retarded that it's being shoved down everyones neck these days ,did you read the start of the thread?

iPlop

A new book that is being released soon was written by two scientists that worked in the military industrial complex and NASA, tells us how to defend earth if Aliens attack:pac:

Product Description
What if there really are aliens and they do attack? Read what two scientists reveal in this “how-to” survival manual for the space age.
Alien invasion. Unlikely? As unlikely as Pearl Harbor?

The extinction of the dinosaurs? A meteor strike that levels whole forests in Siberia? You get the drift. Some events produce such a massive setback to life, the Earth and to humanity that we must understand and prepare for them, even if the chances are low that they’ll come about. In fact, it will be criminal and abrogation of our duty to future generations if we do not get ready! But where to begin?

Drs. Travis S. Taylor and Bob Boan have the answers. Both are experienced scientists, physicists with expertise in both defense and military signal intelligence and experience working with both the Department of Defense and NASA. These are intellectual heavyweights who have a clear idea of the possibilities of alien contact, the calculations of whether or not that contact will be friendly…and what to do if it’s not.

Amazon.com

I wonder who's asking all these people to write books and push this alien agenda so much?

hooradiation

Sink The Banana wrote: »

A new book that is being released soon was written by two scientists that worked in the military industrial complex and NASA, tells us how to defend earth if Aliens attack:pac:






Amazon.com

I wonder who's asking all these people to write books and push this alien agenda so much?

Book publishers.
in order to make money, before you ask.

iPlop

hooradiation wrote: »

Book publishers.
in order to make money, before you ask.

Yes but these two guys were the two scientists that were in the National Geographic series, when Aliens attack so it's being shoved down peoples throats ,whatever the motive, it's not just about book sales, theres something else.

Jeboa Safari

Sink The Banana wrote: »

Yes but these two guys were the two scientists that were in the National Geographic series, when Aliens attack so it's being shoved down peoples throats ,whatever the motive, it's not just about book sales, theres something else.

peoples demand for it?

iPlop

Jeboa Safari wrote: »

peoples demand for it?

Disclosure or false flag?

Jeboa Safari

Sink The Banana wrote: »

Disclosure or false flag?

I would love if there was a disclosure, wouldn't bet on it though. The alien false flag theory is complete nonsense imo.

iPlop

Jeboa Safari wrote: »

I would love if there was a disclosure, wouldn't bet on it though. The alien false flag theory is complete nonsense imo.

I bet it's all about monetary gain at some level, probably why the Rockefellers set it up in '93

Talk E

Jeboa Safari wrote: »

I would love if there was a disclosure, wouldn't bet on it though. The alien false flag theory is complete nonsense imo.

Big surprise there Jeboa. You always keep us guessing. :pac:

Jeboa Safari

Talk E wrote: »

Big surprise there Jeboa. You always keep us guessing. :pac:

btw, should we still be on alert for the imminent attack?

Talk E

Jeboa Safari wrote: »

btw, should we still be on alert for the imminent attack?

I'm always alert. You'll be the first to pee your panties when it all kicks off :pac:

You'll be like... "Talkie mate, what's happening ? what shall we do ?" :pac: