Cheater's. Who is to blame????

rochey84

Hi guys and girls,

I've come across this before, but lets call this situation John and Mary, John and Mary are together 10 years when Mary goes off and sleeps with a randomer named Tom.

John finds out about it and goes off after Tom to kick 7 shades of the brown stuff out of him.

The reverse also applies, John goes off and sleeps with a randomer named Sarah, Mary finds out about it and goes after Sarah and rips her hair out.

Here is my problem with the above scenarios:
Tom and Sarah are single at the time, it is not their responsibility to make sure that John and Mary remain faithful to each other that responsibility lies with John and Mary.
The single people are free to sleep with whoever they want as long as it is consensual, even if the single people know that the others aren't single it doesn't make them the worst person in the situation, (it doesn't make them angels) but they aren't villians!

So I suppose my question is this why blame the single people (Tom and Sarah) its your partners responsibility to stay faithful isn't it?

what do you guys all think?

P.s. all the above people do not exisit and I'm sure if they did, Mary would blast John with piss and vice versa!

AnonoBoy

Can we find a way to blame 'de immigrents' in this situation perhaps?

_feedback_

Important question:

Mary and Sarah . . .

Who is the hottest?

mikemac

Did Tom and Sarah fail to spot the wedding rings?

Tom is a homewrecker and Sarah is a shameless hussy
They deserve each other

Kiith

You cheated on your girlfriend/boyfriend. It's your fault.

OutlawPete

Mary's a bitch.

The cheating spouse is always the one to blame, ALWAYS!

wobbles-grogan

"Mam, I have a friend, his name is.......mick. And mick threw a stone at the window in the school, but mick's friend......mark got blamed. But now mick feels really bad, do you think mick should own up?"

"Yes, that would be a delightful thing to do"

"Mam, I threw the stone."

Saila

as long as its not a biggamist who married 5 times with not '1 divorce youre winning

mathie

rochey84 wrote: »

what do you guys all think?

Hypothetically, Tom and Sarah are the innocent parties.

In actuality, you're a 27 year old wife-banger.

Azureus

Sarah is a hussy, but John would be getting his ass kicked by moi!

krudler

Mary cheats on Tom with Sarah


awwwww yeahhhh :cool:

Micky Dolenz

Is the answer 42?

Ruu_Old

Shortly after, Tom, Mary, Sarah and John had been had sex with and then shot by Trent. "Haha!", said Trent.



/miss padraiggg

Spunge

I don't think simple logic applies to something as emotional as that.

Also Mary could be a total bitch

Penn

I remember when Channel4 did a documentary about Tiger Woods cheating, they interviewed one of the girls and asked "Did you know he was married?". She replied "The question is, did HE know he was married?"

Then the cameraman blasted her with cum cos she was hot

hondasam

Did John sleep with Tom

mikemac

Sounds like a weekly episode of Ros na Rún

i71jskz5xu42pb

rochey84 wrote: »

what do you guys all think?

Are you suggesting that John should have kicked 7 shades of the brown stuff out of Mary?

rochey84

John, Mary, Tom and Sarah, are NOT real people in this situation it is hypotethical and for the person that called me a 27 year old wife banger I'd hate to upset ya but I'm a 26 (at least for another month and a bit) year old gay man so I ain't banging anyone's wife!!!!

Micky Dolenz

rochey84 wrote: »

John, Mary, Tom and Sarah, are NOT real people in this situation it is hypotethical and for the person that called me a 27 year old wife banger I'd hate to upset ya but I'm a 26 (at least for another month and a bit) year old gay man so I ain't banging anyone's wife!!!!

Anyone's husband then?

mathie

rochey84 wrote: »

John, Mary, Tom and Sarah, are NOT real people in this situation it is hypotethical and for the person that called me a 27 year old wife banger I'd hate to upset ya but I'm a 26 (at least for another month and a bit) year old gay man so I ain't banging anyone's wife!!!!

Maybe she looks like Ronnie Corbett?

hondasam

rochey84 wrote: »

John, Mary, Tom and Sarah, are NOT real people in this situation it is hypotethical and for the person that called me a 27 year old wife banger I'd hate to upset ya but I'm a 26 (at least for another month and a bit) year old gay man so I ain't banging anyone's wife!!!!

John did sleep with Tom, I knew it

Orando Broom

rochey84 wrote: »

Hi guys and girls,

I've come across this before, but lets call this situation John and Mary, John and Mary are together 10 years when Mary goes off and sleeps with a randomer named Tom.

John finds out about it and goes off after Tom to kick 7 shades of the brown stuff out of him.

The reverse also applies, John goes off and sleeps with a randomer named Sarah, Mary finds out about it and goes after Sarah and rips her hair out.

Here is my problem with the above scenarios:
Tom and Sarah are single at the time, it is not their responsibility to make sure that John and Mary remain faithful to each other that responsibility lies with John and Mary.
The single people are free to sleep with whoever they want as long as it is consensual, even if the single people know that the others aren't single it doesn't make them the worst person in the situation, (it doesn't make them angels) but they aren't villians!

So I suppose my question is this why blame the single people (Tom and Sarah) its your partners responsibility to stay faithful isn't it?

what do you guys all think?

P.s. all the above people do not exisit and I'm sure if they did, Mary would blast John with piss and vice versa!

Kill whichever of them is the public servant.

Chickaroo

I bet Ann & Barry feel really left out

hondasam

If John slept with Tom, Did Mary and Sarah sleep together

phill106

I think the fault is with the cheaters spouse. Obviously not enough sexy time.

rochey84

Micky Dolenz wrote: »

Anyone's husband then?

I genuinly haven't cheated on or with anyone in recent times and I don't plan to either, but this is something I've seen throughout my life and I never quite understood it, the person who is activly cheating on their partner gets away with it and the single person gets vilivied (bad spelling I know!)

thebigbiffo

rochey84 wrote: »

I genuinly haven't cheated on or with anyone in recent times and I don't plan to either, but this is something I've seen throughout my life and I never quite understood it, the person who is activly cheating on their partner gets away with it and the single person gets vilivied (bad spelling I know!)

normally, if the single person is indeed vilified, the person cheated on either conciously or sub-conciously wants to stay with the man/woman who cheated so they naturally project their rage onto the singleton.

that's the way i see it.

unless singleton actually knew the person being cheated on - i would blast singlton with piss if that was the case because they are as complicit then.

RobbieTheRobber

rochey84 wrote: »

John, Mary, Tom and Sarah, are NOT real people in this situation it is hypotethical and for the person that called me a 27 year old wife banger I'd hate to upset ya but I'm a 26 (at least for another month and a bit) year old gay man so I ain't banging anyone's wife!!!!

Well then in your case tom and john should just own to being gay get divorced and have a nice civil partnership.

This will of course leave mary and sarah free to make their move into the adult film industry!

The end!

yupyup7up

they seem happy enough to me
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2168/2071709966_acf8d7bf2d.jpg

StupidLikeAFox

rochey84 wrote: »

John, Mary, Tom and Sarah, are NOT real people in this situation it is hypotethical and for the person that called me a 27 year old wife banger I'd hate to upset ya but I'm a 26 (at least for another month and a bit) year old gay man so I ain't banging anyone's wife!!!!

Men are allowed be wives now too y'know

thebigbiffo

where's the aristocrtas joke gone?

i seriously hope it hasn't been deleted. censorship like that has no place on the internet and shame on any mod who took part. nazis.

hondasam

rochey84 wrote: »

I genuinly haven't cheated on or with anyone in recent times and I don't plan to either, but this is something I've seen throughout my life and I never quite understood it, the person who is activly cheating on their partner gets away with it and the single person gets vilivied (bad spelling I know!)

It looks like you cheated with a married man and he stayed with his wife.

fakearms123

thebigbiffo wrote: »

where's the aristocrtas joke gone?

i seriously hope it hasn't been deleted. censorship like that has no place on the internet and shame on any mod who took part. nazis.

It seems as though my artistic talents will go unnoticed once again.

hondasam

thebigbiffo wrote: »

where's the aristocrtas joke gone?

i seriously hope it hasn't been deleted. censorship like that has no place on the internet and shame on any mod who took part. nazis.

I nearly puked reading it :eek:

rochey84

hondasam wrote: »

It looks like you cheated with a married man and he stayed with his wife.

Nah as a rule I don't get involved with people who are in relationships, (mainly for the reason mentioned above, I'd be blamed) but I defo stay away from married men!!!!!

rochey84

fakearms123 wrote: »

It seems as though my artistic talents will go unnoticed once again.

It was a little bit random to be honest and I didn't quite follow it!

thebigbiffo

hondasam wrote: »

I nearly puked reading it :eek:

the whole point is to make it as outrageous as possible.

i think deleting it and all posts related to it was a bad call. mods should not be the guardians of taste and decency.

hondasam

rochey84 wrote: »

Nah as a rule I don't get involved with people who are in relationships, (mainly for the reason mentioned above, I'd be blamed) but I defo stay away from married men!!!!!

In your example Mary is wrong but it never is that simple. Everyone has to take some blame including the single person.

hondasam

thebigbiffo wrote: »

the whole point is to make it as outrageous as possible.

i think deleting it and all posts related to it was a bad call. mods should not be the guardians of taste and decency.

I think it was a bit graphic TBH, I could not read all of it. There is a place for it I'm sure but it should come with a warning.

fakearms123

Which mod has disrupted my post and waken me from my slumber? Show your face street peasant, hath a man no freedom of speech is this realm?

whatsamsn

- If mary cheated on john.
Mary is the one to blame. Pack her bags or back your own and get away from her. Relationship is over.

- if John cheated on Mary.
John is the one to blame. Pack his bags or back your own and get away from him. Relationship is over.


In this case both Sarah and Tom are randomers - Lets be honest, 99.9% of the time a single person wont care if another is married or in a relationship once sex is on the cards. The world we live in.

thebigbiffo

fakearms123 wrote: »

It seems as though my artistic talents will go unnoticed once again.

John, Mary, Tom and Sarah stepped into a Broadway agents office.

"we've come for an audition" say John.

"I'm fully stocked up on family acts here" says the agent

"you haven't seen anything like this" says John "take a look and we'll go if you dont like it"

"ok" says the agent"

John takes a large cylindrical flask out from underneath his greatcoat. Mary produces a foldable table. Tom take out the china cups and Sarah the saucers. They all sit around and have a nice cup of tea, discuss the local economy, weather, the upcoming royal weddding and have an all round jolly good time.

"wow, that was something" says the agent. "what you call that act"

"The Aristocrats" they all chime in together.

"i was being sarcastic" says the agent. "get the f'uck out of my office"

*edited version so as not to envoke the wrath of the taste police mods

Micky Dolenz

fakearms123 wrote: »

Which mod has disrupted my post and waken me from my slumber? Show your face street peasant, hath a man no freedom of speech is this realm?

Nope, start a blog :P

thebigbiffo

hondasam wrote: »

I think it was a bit graphic TBH, I could not read all of it. There is a place for it I'm sure but it should come with a warning.

plenty of people couldn't read all of Lolita, American Psycho etc either...doesn't mean they should be censored. you stopped reading, as anyone who didn't like the content would - just because one person's palette isn't up to it should give any individual the right to delete it.

especially given 'the aristocrats' as a form joke is a standard among almost any comedian.

hondasam

thebigbiffo wrote: »

plenty of people couldn't read all of Lolita, American Psycho etc either...doesn't mean they should be censored. you stopped reading, as anyone who didn't like the content would - just because one person's palette isn't up to it should give any individual the right to delete it.

especially given 'the aristocrats' as a form joke is a standard among almost any comedian.

what ever if you have a problem with Micky pm him.

thebigbiffo

Micky Dolenz wrote: »

Nope, start a blog :P

boooooooooooooo

mickey...i am dissapoint

thebigbiffo

hondasam wrote: »

what ever if you have a problem with Micky pm him.

yeah 'whatever'....dur

fakearms123

Micky Dolenz wrote: »

Nope, start a blog :P

Do you at least have a copy saved of that joke or have you completely removed it from boards? its not lying around in a boards recycling bin by any chance?

Humans eh!

Won't somebody please...

Think of the children!
:pac:

Gordon Gecko

I think it varies from case to case but that blaming foreigners is a far better blanket solution.