Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Raw 07/02 *Spoilers*

Options
13

Comments

  • Options
    #62
    starviewadams
    Registered Users Posts: 6,116 ✭✭✭starviewadams


    The promo vid could just be Truth yelling ''whats up'' and King shouting ''puppies'' for 2mins and 50 seconds!


  • Options
    #63
    Degag
    Registered Users Posts: 9,960 ✭✭✭Degag


    Ridley wrote: »
    I think we all want R-Truth vs Lawler for the WWE title at WM27.
    Yup, in a 60 minute ironman match.


  • Options
    #64
    Exclamation Marc
    Registered Users Posts: 11,710 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Degag wrote: »
    Yup, in a 60 minute ironman match.

    60 minute inferno ironman match in the KENNEL FROM HELL!!!!!


  • Options
    #65
    POSSY
    Registered Users Posts: 778 ✭✭✭POSSY


    60 minute inferno ironman match inside a Hell in the Cell cage


  • Options
    #66
    Exclamation Marc
    Registered Users Posts: 11,710 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    POSSY wrote: »
    60 minute inferno ironman match inside a Hell in the Cell cage

    Forget the hell in a cell, lets make it the most dangerous match in history....


    The KENNELL from HELL........


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #67
    StoneColdFan
    Registered Users Posts: 576 ✭✭✭StoneColdFan


    POSSY wrote: »
    60 minute inferno ironman match inside a Hell in the Cell cage

    :eek: you stole my idea :pac:


  • Options
    #68
    Alex Kidd
    Closed Accounts Posts: 137 ✭✭Alex Kidd


    Morrison could not have bumped from that kick any better.


  • Options
    #69
    Exclamation Marc
    Registered Users Posts: 11,710 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    99.9% of WWE's fan base have no knowledge of Andy Kaufman, or recollection of Bret Harts mother.


  • Options
    #70
    POSSY
    Registered Users Posts: 778 ✭✭✭POSSY


    Might suggest throwing the coach in as a special guest ref just to make it extra special... I mean what WM needs is the coach :pac:


  • Options
    #71
    Exclamation Marc
    Registered Users Posts: 11,710 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    "Poop"

    I am actually watching a kids show....


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #72
    TheBantam
    Registered Users Posts: 229 ✭✭TheBantam


    Lawler is so cringeworthy. It's embarrassing listening to him.


  • Options
    #73
    How Soon Is Now
    Registered Users Posts: 13,109 ✭✭✭✭How Soon Is Now


    FireballPitcher wrote: »
    "Poop"

    I am actually watching a kids show....

    Only noticed that now :P


  • Options
    #74
    Alex Kidd
    Closed Accounts Posts: 137 ✭✭Alex Kidd


    Can Alex Riley not go one week without making a mistake? He has to be on thin ice.


  • Options
    #75
    Exclamation Marc
    Registered Users Posts: 11,710 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Alex Kidd wrote: »
    Can Alex Riley not go one week without making a mistake? He has to be on thin ice.

    Alex Riley v Batista - Wrestlemania - Botch on a pole match!


  • Options
    #76
    Degag
    Registered Users Posts: 9,960 ✭✭✭Degag


    TheBantam wrote: »
    Lawler is so cringeworthy. It's embarrassing listening to him.

    Supremely good on the mic though
    Alex Kidd wrote: »
    Can Alex Riley not go one week without making a mistake? He has to be on thin ice.
    Again, good on the mic, has the look, think Vince likes him too.


  • Options
    #77
    Rjd2
    Registered Users Posts: 12,061 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    Degag wrote: »
    Supremely good on the mic though



    And really over as well.


  • Options
    #78
    Alex Kidd
    Closed Accounts Posts: 137 ✭✭Alex Kidd


    Degag wrote: »
    Again, good on the mic, has the look, think Vince likes him too.

    Vince has to like him, no other explanation for how he's still in a prominent position despite his DUI, eliminating himself from the Rumble and the verbal mess ups.


  • Options
    #79
    Tom1991
    Registered Users Posts: 455 ✭✭Tom1991


    have to say i like Dibiase's ring work wish he wasnt buried every week


  • Options
    #80
    Degag
    Registered Users Posts: 9,960 ✭✭✭Degag


    If Sheamus is going to be burried by Henry.... i'll be worried.


  • Options
    #81
    How Soon Is Now
    Registered Users Posts: 13,109 ✭✭✭✭How Soon Is Now


    Cm Punk probley set up the whole Henry said this thing so that Seamus would say things to make him come out.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #82
    Exclamation Marc
    Registered Users Posts: 11,710 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    DiBiase constantly getting buried is such a shame. Put him in Nexus or something as the money man or something.

    Such a good talent being wasted.


  • Options
    #83
    Degag
    Registered Users Posts: 9,960 ✭✭✭Degag


    I enjoyed that!


  • Options
    #84
    Alex Kidd
    Closed Accounts Posts: 137 ✭✭Alex Kidd


    Sick of Vickie Guerrero, people say she is the top heel currently but where's the good in that? You can't build a PPV selling feud around her so why is so much time dedicated to her?


  • Options
    #85
    How Soon Is Now
    Registered Users Posts: 13,109 ✭✭✭✭How Soon Is Now


    Not bad promo by Cena least best ive seen him in a while.


  • Options
    #86
    Tom1991
    Registered Users Posts: 455 ✭✭Tom1991


    iv a feeling r truth is getting secerely caned backstage


  • Options
    #87
    Exclamation Marc
    Registered Users Posts: 11,710 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    This "21 / 2 / 11" ad really is baffling.

    If it really is The Undertaker, they'd almost get more coverage if they advertised it was him, by maybe playing the gongs into the arena with whoever he is going after.

    It's kind of baffling that after years of him "returning" quite explicitly and obviously, its a strange tactic to try and build up suspense of "who is it?" this time.


  • Options
    #88
    DOC09UNAM
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,305 ✭✭✭DOC09UNAM


    FireballPitcher wrote: »
    This "21 / 2 / 11" ad really is baffling.

    If it really is The Undertaker, they'd almost get more coverage if they advertised it was him, by maybe playing the gongs into the arena with whoever he is going after.

    It's kind of baffling that after years of him "returning" quite explicitly and obviously, its a strange tactic to try and build up suspense of "who is it?" this time.

    It's probably done so everyone is expecting taker, and it'll be someone else... Although unlikely, in the end its probably goin to be taker :(


  • Options
    #89
    Alex Kidd
    Closed Accounts Posts: 137 ✭✭Alex Kidd


    FireballPitcher wrote: »
    This "21 / 2 / 11" ad really is baffling.

    If it really is The Undertaker, they'd almost get more coverage if they advertised it was him, by maybe playing the gongs into the arena with whoever he is going after.

    It's kind of baffling that after years of him "returning" quite explicitly and obviously, its a strange tactic to try and build up suspense of "who is it?" this time.

    I think because he's left and returned so often over the years, the lights out/gongs has been done to death. At least this way it leaves us thinking it could be someone else and so we'll tune in to find out for sure.


  • Options
    #90
    Exclamation Marc
    Registered Users Posts: 11,710 ✭✭✭✭Exclamation Marc


    Yeah you're probably both right that it will be him. And Alex Kidd you're right about it being severely overdone.

    I guess this just means we'll all be slightly disappointed that its "only the Undertaker" come Monday week.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #91
    Degag
    Registered Users Posts: 9,960 ✭✭✭Degag


    FireballPitcher wrote: »
    This "21 / 2 / 11" ad really is baffling.

    If it really is The Undertaker, they'd almost get more coverage if they advertised it was him, by maybe playing the gongs into the arena with whoever he is going after.

    It's kind of baffling that after years of him "returning" quite explicitly and obviously, its a strange tactic to try and build up suspense of "who is it?" this time.
    I really think that it's because he's returning as the ABA, or a different character of some sort.


Advertisement