Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Students will be forced to pay 2,500 reg fees (Indo)

Options
  • 02-11-2010 1:14pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 542 ✭✭✭


    STUDENTS will be forced to pay €2,500 in college registration fees -- a 66pc increase on present levels -- under charges expected to be agreed at a cabinet Budget meeting today.
    This is an increase of €1,000 on the current €1,500 fee.
    The Irish Independent has learnt that the massive increase -- though less than a €3,000 fee that was on the table -- will be rubber-stamped by ministers.

    Also on the cards is a €500 charge for students taking one-, two- and three-year Post Leaving Certificate courses.
    The registration charge hike will come as a huge blow to parents and students already struggling under the weight of pay cuts and other Budget measures and will affect about 70,000 undergraduates.
    A further 65,000 who are on higher education grants will be exempt as will postgraduates who do not pay the charge.
    Grants holders are drawn from lower income, farming and the self-employed categories.

    To qualify for a full grant of €3,250, a student would need to come from a family with an annual 'reckonable' income of less than €41,110. The money is used for non-teaching purposes on areas such as registration, exams, and student services such as careers advice.
    The initial proposal of an increase to €3,000 was strongly opposed by the Green Party, which argued for a lower figure of €2,000. Sources said last night that the Greens would reluctantly accept the €2,500 if other promises in the renewed programme to protect educational services were honoured.

    Last year, the Greens successfully fought off a plan by the then Education Minister Batt O'Keeffe for a graduate contribution towards their education.
    Its education spokesman Paul Gogarty conceded last night that some increase in the registration charge was inevitable, but stressed that the party would not accept tuition fees by the back door. Nor would it accept a "slash and burn" approach to education.


    Tensions

    Taoiseach Brian Cowen denied there were tensions within the Coalition over the Green Party's demands to protect education funding and class sizes.

    Mr Cowen admitted that third-level funding was under discussion ahead of the draconian Budget, but insisted there was "no tension" with Green Party ministers Eamon Ryan and John Gormley.
    Meanwhile, new figures show that the real cost of educating a student varies from €8,000 for an arts undergraduate to €25,000 for the non-clinical years of a medical education. The figures include both teaching and non-teaching costs.

    The increase of €1,000 in the registration charges will offset inevitable cuts in the annual grants to third-level colleges.
    NUI Galway president Prof Jim Browne and UCC president Dr Michael Murphy backed proposals to increase college registration fees.
    Any such increase should be accompanied by systems to support those unable to pay, said Prof Browne, who added that universities favoured a student loan system.

    But political sources said this was not an option at the moment because of the huge start-up costs.

    Cork Institute of Technology president Dr Brendan Murphy said that with the State clearly unable to provide the necessary funding to colleges and institutes, all funding options had to be considered. "If you are going to bring back fees, you can call it a registration charge or just straight fees or whatever," he added.

    The increase is certain to inflame students who are planning a massive protest in Dublin tomorrow. Union of Students in Ireland president Gary Redmond said huge increases in the registration fee would force students to drop out of college and prevent thousands of potential students from entering college in the future.

    "The recession has brought with it a lack of part-time and summer jobs for students. Many students' parents have lost their jobs or suffered reduced incomes, and are likely to be hit by further cuts in the upcoming Budget.
    "It is a simple fact that students and their families will not be able to afford a registration fee hike," he added.

    - John Walshe, Aine Kerr and Ralph Riegel
    Irish Independent

    http://www.independent.ie/national-news/students-will-be-forced-to-pay-euro2500-registration-fees-2403210.html

    Hope they leave it at that for now and hopefully next year. Doesn't sound too bad for those who don't get college for free.


«1345

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 10,246 ✭✭✭✭Riamfada


    Student's parents will be forced to pay 2500 for reg fees I think!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,401 ✭✭✭Royal Irish


    Yet they will still be able to afford to pack out niteclubs on a Thursday night and drink the heads of themselves.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,559 ✭✭✭✭AnonoBoy


    Yet they will still be able to afford to pack out niteclubs on a Thursday night and drink the heads of themselves.

    How dare they?

    The bast*rds.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    The outrage that students have to pay for their own education!:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,602 ✭✭✭token56


    I dont think its actually a bad thing. It might actually make some people question why they are going to college and if the course they are doing is the right one for them. Rather than having Mammy or Daddy pay for them to go and enjoy 3 or 4 years of socializing and a few exams twice a year and get a job completely unrelated to their degree afterwards.

    I know this is a huge generalization but its still an issue which this might help stem.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,324 ✭✭✭mojesius


    Meh... It's still pretty cheap.


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    gurramok wrote: »
    The outrage that students have to pay for their own education!:rolleyes:

    If I had to pay for mine I wouldn't have went tbh.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,949 ✭✭✭The Waltzing Consumer


    and yet, scumbags in prison will get free education.

    Nice deal, don't break the law and pay for college
    Break the law and study to your hearts content for free


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,324 ✭✭✭mojesius


    token56 wrote: »
    I dont think its actually a bad thing. It might actually make some people question why they are going to college and if the course they are doing is the right one for them. Rather than having Mammy or Daddy pay for them to go and enjoy 3 or 4 years of socializing and a few exams twice a year and get a job completely unrelated to their degree afterwards.

    I know this is a huge generalization but its still an issue which this might help stem.

    Indeed. It'll also stop dossers dropping out because they were too hungover/ busy watching Jeremy Kyle to apply themselves.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,246 ✭✭✭✭Riamfada


    RoverJames wrote: »
    If I had to pay for mine I wouldn't have went tbh.

    That would have sucked for you but at this risk of sounding really harsh ... so what does that mean for everyone else?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭Gunsfortoys


    To qualify for a full grant of €3,250, a student would need to come from a family with an annual 'reckonable' income of less than €41,110.

    This is a good thing.

    It is one positive thing that the poorest families can still get a decent education, which is the way it should be.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,256 ✭✭✭c0rk3r


    Riot tomorrow? I'd like to know who leaked this information to the press too


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    and yet, scumbags in prison will get free education.

    Nice deal, don't break the law and pay for college
    Break the law and study to your hearts content for free

    Guess the following are scum too? :eek:
    A further 65,000 who are on higher education grants will be exempt as will postgraduates who do not pay the charge.
    Grants holders are drawn from lower income, farming and the self-employed categories.

    3,000 is not enough to charge for, it should be alot higher. In the UK, you have to pay up to 30kstg for some medical courses. http://www.qmul.ac.uk/international/feesfinance/


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,246 ✭✭✭✭Riamfada


    This is a good thing.

    It is one positive thing that the poorest families can still get a decent education, which is the way it should be.

    Im sure USI will ignore that and state that this increase will keep the poorest students out of college.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭Saila


    mojesius wrote: »
    Indeed. It'll also stop dossers dropping out because they were too hungover/ busy watching Jeremy Kyle to apply themselves.

    thats actually a punishment given by lecturers, like the way you get lines in school off teachers.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,949 ✭✭✭The Waltzing Consumer


    gurramok wrote: »
    Guess the following are scum too? :eek:



    3,000 is not enough to charge for, it should be alot higher. In the UK, you have to pay up to 30kstg for some medical courses. http://www.qmul.ac.uk/international/feesfinance/

    Are you saying criminals in prison are the same as people who get grants? :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    Are you saying criminals in prison are the same as people who get grants? :confused:

    No. You said "and yet, scumbags in prison will get free education.

    Nice deal, don't break the law and pay for college
    Break the law and study to your hearts content for free"

    You clearly have a problem with people getting free education.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,244 ✭✭✭AntiRip


    and yet, scumbags in prison will get free education.

    Nice deal, don't break the law and pay for college
    Break the law and study to your hearts content for free

    So you will have a better chance in an interview with a degree from Mountjoy than UL :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    gurramok wrote: »

    3,000 is not enough to charge for, it should be alot higher. In the UK, you have to pay up to 30kstg for some medical courses. http://www.qmul.ac.uk/international/feesfinance/

    Are you annoyed because you paid fees when you were in college and now you want everyone else to suffer too? Its one thing to agree with increasing the reg fee, its another to glory in it and fervently cry out for more increases on all these threads about university fees.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,949 ✭✭✭The Waltzing Consumer


    gurramok wrote: »
    No. You said "and yet, scumbags in prison will get free education.

    Nice deal, don't break the law and pay for college
    Break the law and study to your hearts content for free"

    You clearly have a problem with people getting free education.

    I have a problem with scumbags in prison getting free education whilst people who have not broken the law get punished with an increase in costs to education or reduction in grants or assistance.

    I would love to see how you read "scumbags in prison" to mean anyone getting free education. Where in the world did you get that?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,949 ✭✭✭The Waltzing Consumer


    AntiRip wrote: »
    So you will have a better chance in an interview with a degree from Mountjoy than UL :D

    Ha, pity you said UL, I love that college! You got the job!


  • Registered Users Posts: 606 ✭✭✭gibson


    everyone seems to be mentioning students going to college for the first time so yes they get free education as in they dont have to pay fees but what about people who are going back to college and trying to start from scratch? not only do they have fees to pay now they'll have this amount as well.

    66% increase is madness!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭Gunsfortoys


    Grimes wrote: »
    Im sure USI will ignore that and state that this increase will keep the poorest students out of college.

    I doubt it. They would have to be morons to oppose this, they are just going to make it worse for everyone involved. The state can no longer afford to give everyone an almost free education. People with wealth should pay more.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    Are you annoyed because you paid fees when you were in college and now you want everyone else to suffer too? Its one thing to agree with increasing the reg fee, its another to glory in it and fervently cry out for more increases on all these threads about university fees.

    No. I was a poor student who did not have to pay fees as thats how the system is set up to help people like me who are intelligent(:D) to get into college without having a cost barrier.
    I have a problem with scumbags in prison getting free education whilst people who have not broken the law get punished with an increase in costs to education or reduction in grants or assistance.

    I would love to see how you read "scumbags in prison" to mean anyone getting free education. Where in the world did you get that?

    They are poor though and thats how the system is set up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,244 ✭✭✭AntiRip


    gibson wrote: »
    everyone seems to be mentioning students going to college for the first time so yes they get free education as in they dont have to pay fees but what about people who are going back to college and trying to start from scratch? not only do they have fees to pay now they'll have this amount as well.

    66% increase is madness!

    Probably this will encourage people to give up their jobs if they do want to go back to college and get btea so effectively free too?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,085 ✭✭✭Xiney


    In fairness, they need to stop pandering to students who don't work hard enough, keep the standard of education high and flunk those that can't keep up. Then whoever's left won't be so much that everyone has to pay.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,949 ✭✭✭The Waltzing Consumer


    gurramok wrote: »
    They are poor though and thats how the system is set up.

    What??:confused:

    How exactly did me saying "scumbags in prison" make you think I meant everyone in prison or not getting free education. What part of "in prison" makes it look like I was talking about everyone not in prison?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭c_man


    A further 65,000 who are on higher education grants will be exempt as will postgraduates who do not pay the charge.

    I suppose if they're bringing in fees in some shape, then this probably is the best way. The poorest in society won't be stopped from pursuing third level.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,783 ✭✭✭maglite


    But USI have already made their signs, with imaginary figures from 5k to 12k.

    What will they do now? Actually it does't matter its not as if they actually had any research or plan.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,905 ✭✭✭✭Handsome Bob


    The only good thing about it is that it might make some students give proper thought to what course they want to do. Paying that kind of money will lead to a lot less half assed decisions I'm sure.

    I just hope the grants system is implemented properly and those who are in genuine need of assistance will indeed get that assistance.


Advertisement