Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Why was Peter Sutherland given a platform on the RTE news?

135678

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭Welease


    This discussion was about Suds. Then you introduced Begg. We must be all in favour of Begg if we are against Sudds.

    Maybe Begg should resign if he failed in his duty as a director of the central bank.

    That doesn't mean Suds is any less of a hyprocrite.

    On that we can agree... Suds is a hypocrite.. but his message is still correct..
    and just because the OP doesn't like him doesn't make the message invalid..

    We are broke.. broke beyond belief.. and cuts.. huge cuts will have to be made.. 5% here and 5% there won't make a dent.. we need major cuts everywhere.. It's has to be painful for everyone


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,461 ✭✭✭liammur


    Welease wrote: »
    Keep it up.. your just proving my point that people in this country are unwilling to accept the depth of cuts that need to be made... :)


    I wouldn't blame a lot of PS workers to be unwilling to accept these cuts.
    We need far more leadership from the government first, i.e. Lenihan's decision to exclude top civil servants from the PS pay cuts made an absolute mockery of everything.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 408 ✭✭blue_steel


    Welease wrote: »
    Really? Have you been to the public sector jobs page?

    http://www.publicjobs.ie/publicjobs/en/getDyna.do?name=In_Progress_Campaigns


    Did you even read that link? Mostly temp positions. Of course staff considered indispensable are being replaced? Unless the next time you ring 999 you fancy getting an engaged tone I think that reasonable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 408 ✭✭blue_steel


    Welease wrote: »
    On that we can agree... Suds is a hypocrite..

    So after 5 pages you agree he's a hypocrite? Thank you. My point is made.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭Welease


    We are the most passive population in Europe in relation to cutbacks. "We are not the Irish, we will resist".

    There is a recruitment embargo. If a hospital needs staff or a primary school needs a teacher they can write to the department of finance and get special permission but it is difficult and numbers are being reduced.

    People are being hired.. Dont try and claim otherwise.. And people who have no role or reason to be employed are being kept in employment while front line temp staff are being removed.
    I have come to terms with the reality. The govt had the unions over a barrell they implemented the best deal they could from their point of view. You could cut public sector pay by another 20% but there would be a wave of defaults on mortgages, the banks would be in trouble again, people would jack in the job and emigrate, and it wouldn't be possible to implement reform.

    Thats not a purely PS problem.. we should own the banks by now.. wages will have to be cut to remain competitive, but the government does need to do something with the banks to either extend mortgage terms or otherwise to ease the pain. Shifting the problem arounds doesn't solve the problem.. agreed.
    The total cost of the bank bailout is half our national income. That is what is really sinking us. But you keep going on about the evil public sector. Here is what Morgan Kelly had to say about the deficit and the bank bailout:

    And the cost of the PS is also half our national income, as is social welfare... the bank bailout is short term.. those other costs are long term, and need to be addressed..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭Welease


    liammur wrote: »
    I wouldn't blame a lot of PS workers to be unwilling to accept these cuts.
    We need far more leadership from the government first, i.e. Lenihan's decision to exclude top civil servants from the PS pay cuts made an absolute mockery of everything.

    And thats the point... look at our defecit.. it they (and everyone not just the PS) are unwilling to accept cuts.. then how do we balance the books?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭Welease


    blue_steel wrote: »
    So after 5 pages you agree he's a hypocrite? Thank you. My point is made.


    The point
    >

    Your head


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 595 ✭✭✭George Orwell 1982


    Welease wrote: »
    We are broke.. broke beyond belief.. and cuts.. huge cuts will have to be made.. 5% here and 5% there won't make a dent.. we need major cuts everywhere.. It's has to be painful for everyone

    Thats exactly the point we are making: its not going to painful for everyone. It won't be painful for Suds and his mates.

    What Suds is saying is that bondholders who invested in **** hole enterprises like anglo Irish should get their money back in full + interest and that in order for Ireland to sustain that level of debt and interest payments we are going to have to take paycuts and cutbacks in healthcare, education and other public services.

    You are suggesting we make huge cuts. Like what? Take ten billion out of the economy in a single year? As it is the cutbacks are causing our domestic economy to shrink further leading to a higher debt/GDP/GNP ratio. The govt is trying to steer a delicate course: reduce the deficit by a reasonable amount without doing too much violence to the domestic economy. However, obviously you know best.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,461 ✭✭✭liammur


    Thats exactly the point we are making: its not going to painful for everyone. It won't be painful for Suds and his mates.

    What Suds is saying is that bondholders who invested in **** hole enterprises like anglo Irish should get their money back in full + interest and that in order for Ireland to sustain that level of debt and interest payments we are going to have to take paycuts and cutbacks in healthcare, education and other public services.

    You are suggesting we make huge cuts. Like what? Take ten billion out of the economy in a single year? As it is the cutbacks are causing our domestic economy to shrink further leading to a higher debt/GDP/GNP ratio. The govt is trying to steer a delicate course: reduce the deficit by a reasonable about without doing too much violence to the domestic economy. However, obviously you know best.

    How many pensions will bertie ahern receive, we can start our huge cuts there. Professors in universities, tds and judges should also be high up on the agenda.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭Welease


    blue_steel wrote: »
    Did you even read that link? Mostly temp positions. Of course staff considered indispensable are being replaced? Unless the next time you ring 999 you fancy getting an engaged tone I think that reasonable.

    Really.. mostly.. only one seems to be listed as temp..

    Let's recap your offensive position... (my emphasis)
    blue_steel wrote: »
    Stop pulling figures out of your ass.
    Nobody has been hired on a premanent basis in the public sector since Jan 2009. FACT. Deal with it. Get over it. Look for another scapegoat to blame for the mess your greedy fatcat mates created.
    "I heard it on the news" - I really hope you got rich out of the celtic tiger mate, because if you didn't you are the worst kind of Uncle Tom imaginable.

    Maybe you should (respectfully) stop claiming I am pulling figures out of my ass, when actually permanent people have been hired, and continue to be hired.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 595 ✭✭✭George Orwell 1982


    Welease wrote: »
    And thats the point... look at our defecit.. it they (and everyone not just the PS) are unwilling to accept cuts.. then how do we balance the books?

    Where are you getting this? All over Ireland people are taking cuts with barely a hint of resistance. The public sector has taken paycuts. Social welfare has been cut. Taxes have been increased. Services are being reduced or stopped altogether. And there is no end in sight. No money is being spent to create jobs. People have to emigrate.

    And all the while there is barely a hint of resistance compared with what you would get in any other European country.

    Could you please come back to reality?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭Welease


    Thats exactly the point we are making: its not going to painful for everyone. It won't be painful for Suds and his mates.

    What Suds is saying is that bondholders who invested in **** hole enterprises like anglo Irish should get their money back in full + interest and that in order for Ireland to sustain that level of debt and interest payments we are going to have to take paycuts and cutbacks in healthcare, education and other public services.

    Em no.. they are getting their money back.. that became a fact when Leni decided to guarantee everything.. thats old news.. Suds talking about it now should not be news to anyone.. It;s not up for debate...
    You are suggesting we make huge cuts. Like what? Take ten billion out of the economy in a single year? As it is the cutbacks are causing our domestic economy to shrink further leading to a higher debt/GDP/GNP ratio. The govt is trying to steer a delicate course: reduce the deficit by a reasonable amount without doing too much violence to the domestic economy. However, obviously you know best.

    Do you think making small cuts will fix the problem?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,461 ✭✭✭liammur


    Welease wrote: »
    And thats the point... look at our defecit.. it they (and everyone not just the PS) are unwilling to accept cuts.. then how do we balance the books?

    That is correct. But take a private sector situation, if management don't seem concerned about a situation, workers certainly won't be.

    So far, this government has not convinced me that they give a hoot about the hole the country is in. If they don't give a hoot, the public won't.
    Lenihan lets the higher paid civil servants off is an example of this indifference. Bertie ahern entitled to a state merc is another as well as his numerous pensions, the expenses scandal etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭Welease


    Where are you getting this? All over Ireland people are taking cuts with barely a hint of resistance. The public sector has taken paycuts. Social welfare has been cut. Taxes have been increased. Services are being reduced or stopped altogether. And there is no end in sight. No money is being spent to create jobs. People have to emigrate.

    And all the while there is barely a hint of resistance compared with what you would get in any other European country.

    Could you please come back to reality?

    what are you talking about? those cuts.. have still left us with a defecit of 20b...

    Is there an alternative reality where we make no further cuts and the defecit disappears?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭Welease


    liammur wrote: »
    That is correct. But take a private sector situation, if management don't seem concerned about a situation, workers certainly won't be.

    So far, this government has not convinced me that they give a hoot about the hole the country is in. If they don't give a hoot, the public won't.
    Lenihan lets the higher paid civil servants off is an example of this indifference. Bertie ahern entitled to a state merc is another as well as his numerous pensions, the expenses scandal etc

    Absolutely.. but they didnt give a hoot about the bubble, and they didn;t seem to give a hoot about the problems..

    but that doesn't eradicate the simple fact.. our tax take is a fraction of our expenditure.. to the tune of 20b..

    It doesnt surprise me that the government has their heads in the sand.. the people who voted them in have their heads in the sand..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,461 ✭✭✭liammur


    Welease wrote: »
    Absolutely.. but they didnt give a hoot about the bubble, and they didn;t seem to give a hoot about the problems..

    but that doesn't eradicate the simple fact.. our tax take is a fraction of our expenditure.. to the tune of 20b..

    It doesnt surprise me that the government has their heads in the sand.. the people who voted them in have their heads in the sand..

    They gave a hoot about the bubble alright. They set themselves up as millionaires on the back of it. Bertie the 3rd highest leader in the world !! It would be funny if not so serious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 408 ✭✭blue_steel


    Welease wrote: »
    Maybe you should (respectfully) stop claiming I am pulling figures out of my ass, when actually permanent people have been hired, and continue to be hired.

    Maybe you should apply for one if you think it's such a great gig. I am speaking from experience when I tell you that where I work (a ps local authority) nobody has been hired in two years. And out of my dept of 25 people all temp staff (12!) have been let go. These are real people with kids who are suffering. Not smarmy Bilderberg group s**ts like your mate suds.
    And these cuts in jobs mean that services are no longer provided. Because management (also on very nice incomes) don't really give a s**t if the streets aren't cleaned in Cabra. When it comes to cuts they'll cut services not their own pay.
    Now you can spout all the deficit garbage you want but at the end of the day the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Are you paying your GP less that two years ago? No! Everyone is not sharing the pain. And if you argue they are, then nail you colours to the mast and tell us what you've done. Otherwise get off your soapbox.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 595 ✭✭✭George Orwell 1982


    Welease wrote: »
    what are you talking about? those cuts.. have still left us with a defecit of 20b...

    Is there an alternative reality where we make no further cuts and the defecit disappears?

    You can't seem to grasp the point that making cutbacks in Govt expenditure deflates the domestic economy which means less tax revenue and a higher debt/GDP/GNP ratio. That is exactly what is happening and its why the govt. has to steer a delicate course reducing the deficit gradually over time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,461 ✭✭✭liammur


    blue_steel wrote: »
    Maybe you should apply for one if you think it's such a great gig. I am speaking from experience when I tell you that where I work (a ps local authority) nobody has been hired in two years. And out of my dept of 25 people all temp staff (12!) have been let go. These are real people with kids who are suffering. Not smarmy Bilderberg group s**ts like your mate suds.
    And these cuts in jobs mean that services are no longer provided. Because management (also on very nice incomes) don't really give a s**t if the streets aren't cleaned in Cabra. When it comes to cuts they'll cut services not their own pay.
    Now you can spout all the deficit garbage you want but at the end of the day the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Are you paying your GP less that two years ago? No! Everyone is not sharing the pain. And if you argue they are, then nail you colours to the mast and tell us what you've done. Otherwise get off your soapbox.

    A lot of what you say is true, but without doubt, more cuts have to come in the PS, welfare and pensions in my opinion. Taxes will also need to be increased. I would also like to see projects like the metro scrapped.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭Welease


    blue_steel wrote: »
    Maybe you should apply for one if you think it's such a great gig. I am speaking from experience when I tell you that where I work (a ps local authority) nobody has been hired in two years. And out of my dept of 25 people all temp staff (12!) have been let go. These are real people with kids who are suffering. Not smarmy Bilderberg group s**ts like your mate suds.
    And these cuts in jobs mean that services are no longer provided. Because management (also on very nice incomes) don't really give a s**t if the streets aren't cleaned in Cabra. When it comes to cuts they'll cut services not their own pay.

    FACT people are being hired.. deal with it.. Don't claim FACTS that everyone knows are untrue..
    If you want to discuss the Cp agreement, then those (12!) people were private sector employees contracted to the PS.. and the reason they went instead of the swathes of middle management who are unnecessary in the HSE, is because you and your unions have the CP agreement which meant you continued to be untouchable, so those (12) had to go.. dont blame Suds because you got what you wanted..
    blue_steel wrote: »
    Now you can spout all the deficit garbage you want but at the end of the day the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Are you paying you GP less that two years ago? Everyone is not sharing the pain. And if you argue they are then nail you colours to the mast and tell us what you've done. Otherwise get off your soapbox.

    Yes the defecit is garbage :confused: ...Keep up the denial.. it will all just disappear...
    Where did I claim that everyone is sharing the pain? I don't think we have even started to share the pain..


    Meanwhile people like me (who fyi are not bankers, friends of bankers or any other pathetic insult you choose to throw because you lack the capacity to discuss like an adult) will deal with the reality of the situation and continue to work hard and pay our way and whatever is necessary to ensure our children have a future..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭Welease


    You can't seem to grasp the point that making cutbacks in Govt expenditure deflates the domestic economy which means less tax revenue and a higher debt/GDP/GNP ratio. That is exactly what is happening and its why the govt. has to steer a delicate course reducing the deficit gradually over time.

    I can very much grasp that fact, but you also need to understand that continuing to borrow at punitative rates to employ those in the PS who are unneccesary does more harm to the country than good.
    There also needs to be a shift in attitude, borrowing money to be wasted in budgets, quangos, FAS follies is screwing this country.. and paying off those who failed spectacularilty in PS roles needs to be cut out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 408 ✭✭blue_steel


    liammur wrote: »
    A lot of what you say is true, but without doubt, more cuts have to come in the PS, welfare and pensions in my opinion. Taxes will also need to be increased. I would also like to see projects like the metro scrapped.

    Sadly I agree. But I though everyone had to play their part. I live across the road from a gp. Don't get me wrong he's a lovely fella but in the last two years he has taken the income levy.(1 -3% of icome).
    In the same period I've had the income levy (1 -3%), the pension levy (7%) [and btw I would opt out of my amazing ps pension if I could but alas it's compulsary] and the ps pay cut (7%).
    Now where is the fairness in that? He has two 10 reg BMWs in the drive, I've a clapped out golf :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭Welease


    blue_steel wrote: »
    [and btw I would opt out of my amazing ps pension if I could but alas it's compulsary]

    Why? (serious questions, because that is about the worst financial decision I have ever heard anyone make)..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 595 ✭✭✭George Orwell 1982


    Welease wrote: »
    Yes the defecit is garbage :confused: ...Keep up the denial.. it will all just disappear...
    Where did I claim that everyone is sharing the pain? I don't think we have even started to share the pain..


    Meanwhile people like me (who fyi are not bankers, friends of bankers or any other pathetic insult you choose to throw because you lack the capacity to discuss like an adult) will deal with the reality of the situation and continue to work hard and pay our way and whatever is necessary to ensure our children have a future..

    No one is denying the deficit needs to be reduced. No one. The govt is talking about taking 3bn maybe 4bn out of the economy in the next budget. Are you suggesting the govt wipe out the deficit over night? Do you know anything about how an economy works. Shrinking govt. expenditure when the economy is depressed leads to more unemployment, falling tax revenue and further shrinkage of the economy. That is what is happening and it is why the govt has to be careful not to take so much money out of the economy that everything collapses. As it is we are on an unsustainable course. More and more mortgages are falling into arrears, the problems with the banks keep getting worse, the economy is still contracting, unemployment is rising. Tax revenues are falling so the deficit is not being reduced. Most of our efforts have been self defeating. And what do you want? Even more cuts.

    The govt is doing everything it can to reduce the deficit without destroying the domestic economy completely.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,461 ✭✭✭liammur


    blue_steel wrote: »
    Sadly I agree. But I though everyone had to play their part. I live across the road from a gp. Don't get me wrong he's a lovely fella but in the last two years he has taken the income levy.(1 -3% of icome).
    In the same period I've had the income levy (1 -3%), the pension levy (7%) [and btw I would opt out of my amazing ps pension if I could but alas it's compulsary] and the ps pay cut (7%).
    Now where is the fairness in that? He has two 10 reg BMWs in the drive, I've a clapped out golf :)

    Well first off, he's probably far more skilled than you, so your comparison isn't a very good one.

    However, I do feel that people like that GP should be taking more of a hit. In fact, many wealthy individuals are paying no taxes at all through tax avoidance schemes. So it is far too simplictic for someone to shout 'hit the public sector harder'. Maybe hit those up highest harder for starters.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,461 ✭✭✭liammur


    Welease wrote: »
    Why? (serious questions, because that is about the worst financial decision I have ever heard anyone make)..

    I'm not so sure. It all depends on his age. I seriously doubt PS workers will get anything like they are being promised in the future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭Welease


    No one is denying the deficit needs to be reduced. No one. The govt is talking about taking 3bn maybe 4bn out of the economy in the next budget. Are you suggesting the govt wipe out the deficit over night? Do you know anything about how an economy works. Shrinking govt. expenditure when the economy is depressed leads to more unemployment, falling tax revenue and further shrinkage of the economy. That is what is happening and it is why the govt has to be careful not to take so much money out of the economy that everything collapses. As it is we are on an unsustainable course. More and more mortgages are falling into arrears, the problems with the banks keep getting worse, the economy is still contracting, unemployment is rising. Tax revenues are falling so the deficit is not being reduced. Most of our efforts have been self defeating. And what do you want? Even more cuts.

    The govt is doing everything it can to reduce the deficit without destroying the domestic economy completely.

    I never suggested we wipe out the defecit in one year.. lets at least argue what I have said :)

    No it's not a simple situation, noone in their right mind believes it is.. but we need to continue to push harsh measure through..

    If we look at previous comments (and by no means are the PS alone in having to deal with the problem).. but pretending that pay is static while increments in place is utter bollox.. if they are being paid more.. then lets admit they are being paid and factor it in.. thats the problem with Ireland.. utter denial about everything.. and that was what I took as the main point of Suds and others musings.. stop the denial.. this will be painful..

    When the numbers of '10 cars being sold increases.. then you need to wonder.. the pain hasn't quiet set in yet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭Welease


    liammur wrote: »
    I'm not so sure. It all depends on his age. I seriously doubt PS workers will get anything like they are being promised in the future.

    Well.. anyone who wants out of a DB pension (at 7%) and claims to understand finance/economics is suspect (with respect) ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 408 ✭✭blue_steel


    Welease wrote: »
    Why? (serious questions, because that is about the worst financial decision I have ever heard anyone make)..

    It's very simple. I don't believe in pensions. By the time I retire i will have paid 156k into my pension. I will receive a one off payment of 41k and a yearly payment just under 7k a year after that. That means that if I live till 81.5 yrs I will break even. Life expectancy for my age group is around 77. I'm losing money by paying into a pension and I'd rather have control over my own finances.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭Welease


    blue_steel wrote: »
    It's very simple. I don't believe in pensions. By the time I retire i will have paid 156k into my pension. I will receive a one off payment of 41k and a yearly payment just under 7k a year after that. That means that if I live till 81.5 yrs I will break even. Life expectancy for my age group is around 77. I'm losing money by paying into a pension and I'd rather have control over my own finances.

    Don't you get 50% at 40 years? (plus lump sum)..


Advertisement