Lesbian Prison Gangs Waiting To Get Hands On Lindsay Lohan

zimovain

Cracking headline!!(not a daily mail article, just as bad though)



Inmates of the jail where Lindsay Lohan is set to spend up to 90 days have warned of gangs out to attack the starlet, saying "everyone will want a piece of her",

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2010/07/13/lesbian-prison-gangs-waiting-hands-lindsay-lohan-report-says/

Dartz

Hopefully they use a camera.

El Guapo!

Dartz wrote: »

Hopefully they use a camera.

To beat her to death with...

Scuid Mhór

i was going to say, 'i am not a fan of lindsay lohan but that's not even remotely funny'. then i realised the link directed me to fox news and the thread lost all credibility.

Melion

And because of this she wont see the inside of a cell.

drunkmonkey

Sweet, they'll make a movie about this yet!

She's going to be so hot as Linda Lovelace when she gets out of Jail.

pablomakaveli

Lesbian prison gangs.

I think we have a title for a porn movie right there.

Stercus Accidit

Fox news eh?

story is bullsh1t

ScumLord

pablomakaveli wrote: »

Lesbian prison gangs.

I think we have a title for a porn movie right there.

I'd be very surprised if that name wasn't already in use.

KittyeeTrix

Sure doesn't she have a girlfriend already so what's the biggie???

Not like she'd be unused to a little lesbian action

fluffyorganic1

fluffyorganic1 wrote: »

Sure doesn't she have a girlfriend already so what's the biggie???

Not like she'd be unused to a little lesbian action

Wtf? I guess if she had a boyfriend it would be ok for her to be gangraped?


Anyway, since it's Faux News...

Einhard

Giant Squid wrote: »

i was going to say, 'i am not a fan of lindsay lohan but that's not even remotely funny'. then i realised the link directed me to fox news and the thread lost all credibility.

Stercus Accidit wrote: »

Fox news eh?

story is bullsh1t

The news reporting arm of Fox TV is actually quite reliable and generally balanced, and this would be clear to anyone who actually watches their bulletins, but then when have the facts ever stopped people from jumping on their favourite bandwagon? It's Fox's opinion shows, the likes of Hannity and Glen Beck, that trade in political bias and peddle misinformation.

Biggins

Meh!
She is being put into a section that is used for "stars". Thats means that she will be kept away from the majority of the normal mob.
There is as much chance of her being ganged up on in there as there is a chance of me kissing Mary Harney!

Another point to ponder:

Lindsay Lohan may soon be on her way to prison, but her legal woes are turning into her biggest pay-day in years. Bids for the troubled starlet's pre- and post-prison interview are now coming in at over $500,000. Major TV networks -- which technically don't pay for interviews but often get around that by paying for pictures -- are putting in bids by joining forces with weekly magazines to score the big jailhouse chat....
...A source told Page Six, "The irony is Lindsay is in demand. The bidding is over $500,000 for the rights to the pre-jail interview, the prison diary and the first chat when she is released. "But Lindsay is still convinced she'll get a reduced term -- even if she has to go to rehab afterwards for longer. She has spoken to a number of lawyers over the weekend."

Source: http://www.idontlikeyouinthatway.com/2010/07/lindsay-is-worth-more-in-jail.html

ejmaztec

pablomakaveli wrote: »

Lesbian prison gangs.

I think we have a title for a porn movie right there.

Mel Gibson will write the script and direct it. "The girl in the ripped pyjamas"

KittyeeTrix

bluewolf wrote: »

Wtf? I guess if she had a boyfriend it would be ok for her to be gangraped?


Anyway, since it's Faux News...

Twas a joke and only a joke!!!:D
Thought this was AH.......
Fuppin' hell:o

mikom

zimovain wrote: »

Lesbian Prison Gangs Waiting To Get Hands On Lindsay Lohan

Lindsay remaining tight lipped on this claim

Roomic Cube

fluffyorganic1 wrote: »

Twas a joke and only a joke!!!:D
Thought this was AH.......
Fuppin' hell:o

she could use a good dose of rape

Biggins

Roomic Cube wrote: »

she could use a good dose of rape

AH or not, I don't consider that funny or witty. Just crass.
No one deserves that treatment.

KittyeeTrix

Roomic Cube wrote: »

she could use a good dose of rape

Oh no you didn't........:eek:

Fluffy exits quickly before the inevitable backlash!!:pac:

zimovain

fluffyorganic1 wrote: »

Oh no you didn't........:eek:

Fluffy exits quickly before the inevitable backlash!!:pac:

+1:D

Howard the Duck

Hmmm i didn't even know there could be lesbian rape...what does that involved? forced licking?

I'm sure she'll be grand they'll probably all want to develop deep meaningful 90 day relationships so she can send them comfortable shoes when she gets out.

Roomic Cube

Biggins wrote: »

AH or not, I don't consider that funny or witty. Just crass.
No one deserves that treatment.

oh tis in jest, i'd never seriously want anyone to be raped

cock robin

She might not be raped. Lezzies are a romantic bunch at heart. I would imagine chocolates and flowers and a candle lit cell. Then a good rough shag with an imaginary cock.

dr.bollocko

Einhard wrote: »

The news reporting arm of Fox TV is actually quite reliable and generally balanced, and this would be clear to anyone who actually watches their bulletins, but then when have the facts ever stopped people from jumping on their favourite bandwagon? It's Fox's opinion shows, the likes of Hannity and Glen Beck, that trade in political bias and peddle misinformation.

Those aren't facts. Those are your opinions. Which many people disagree with. So as yet the fact that Fox news is balanced and reliable has not been established and is a pretty hard case to argue that the facts are getting in the way of people bashing a news station with obvious political leanings and a fine history of dubious reporting. Tbh.

Biggins

dr.bollocko wrote: »

Those aren't facts. Those are your opinions. Which many people disagree with. So as yet the fact that Fox news is balanced and reliable has not been established and is a pretty hard case to argue that the facts are getting in the way of people bashing a news station with obvious political leanings and a fine history of dubious reporting. Tbh.

I have to agree. Fox News record as being impartial and/or sticking to actual facts is open to question for some time now.
Honestly, to a lot of folk they have become a still running (sad) joke now.

Stercus Accidit

Einhard wrote: »

The news reporting arm of Fox TV is actually quite reliable and generally balanced, and this would be clear to anyone who actually watches their bulletins, but then when have the facts ever stopped people from jumping on their favourite bandwagon? It's Fox's opinion shows, the likes of Hannity and Glen Beck, that trade in political bias and peddle misinformation.

Facts me arse, I've seen plenty of Fox news videos, I have never subjected myself to Beck or his ilk in my life. Suffice it to say the hysterical right leanings of Fox lead me to disagree, and this is a very sturdy comfortable bandwagon I've hopped on, I like it. Hows the aloof rhetoric wagon going for ye?

Roomic Cube

I heard of fox blatantly fabricating storys to drill up interest or discussion

Stercus Accidit

Roomic Cube wrote: »

I heard of fox blatantly fabricating storys to drill up interest or discussion

That post is a blatant fabrication to drill up interest and discussion! :pac:


In all seriousness though, journalism is dead.

easyeason3

SERIOUS QUESTION:

Is there any newspaper/ programme/ channel that can be trusted or is half realistic in their reporting?

Roomic Cube

easyeason3 wrote: »

SERIOUS QUESTION:

Is there any newspaper/ programme/ channel that can be trusted or is half realistic in their reporting?

I'd like to see frankie boyle and charlie brooker present a news show, they'd tell it like it is

Stercus Accidit

easyeason3 wrote: »

SERIOUS QUESTION:

Is there any newspaper/ programme/ channel that can be trusted or is half realistic in their reporting?

I tend to read many sources on any issue before reaching an opinion, but in reality you may never know the full truth if it isn't the truth that sits well with government or editorial policy.

I do find theregister.co.uk to be very good though, odd in that it is a tech and IT oriented site, but it has great coverage of UK government policy and the erosion of freedoms there in many areas of life, it is UK based after all. No news media is above hyperbole, but some can be more credible than others.

Sea Sharp

easyeason3 wrote: »

SERIOUS QUESTION:

Is there any newspaper/ programme/ channel that can be trusted or is half realistic in their reporting?

The BBC are still quite reputable.

easyeason3

Roomic Cube wrote: »

I'd like to see frankie boyle and charlie brooker present a news show, they'd tell it like it is

He's a ginger. No one would pay attention.

Scarydoll

easyeason3 wrote: »

He's a ginger. No one would pay attention.

:eek:

Le King

That sounds absolutely absurd

easyeason3

Scarydoll wrote: »

:eek:

stovelid

Sounds like she'd better LiLo when she gets in there?

brianthebard

easyeason3 wrote: »

SERIOUS QUESTION:

Is there any newspaper/ programme/ channel that can be trusted or is half realistic in their reporting?

the daily show?

pickarooney

What is Lindsay Lohan exactly?

bonerm

Anyone ever see that movie Mean Girls? I found it practically pornographic (in a good way).

Royal Irish

pablomakaveli wrote: »

Lesbian prison gangs.

I think we have a title for a porn movie right there.

That title has already been used. There is a Lesbian prison gangs 1,2,3 and 4. So am told anyway

Thomas828

That's the sort of garbage you'd expect to read in the "Daily Sport". Fox News: Fair & Balanced!

mike65

This is thread of the day for the topic title. How does one send in a nomination?

CokaColumbo

I wonder if the link to this "news" story was from MSNBC's website would there be a similar condemnation of the news station for its pro-democrat, left-wing reporting? I wonder.... no actually, I don't.

Profiler

pickarooney wrote: »

What is Lindsay Lohan exactly?

A Disney character gone rogue.

an image that broke free of it's script writers and now has more time on it's hands than it knows what to do with.

as we all know... the Devil makes work for idle hands

brendansmith

They are no doubt eager to get their hands on her succulent cooter.

Capt'n Midnight

GaNjaHaN wrote: »

The BBC are still quite reputable.

Nah they lost a lot of their reputation for impartiality during the Falklands war. They are commercial. They saw what happened to Granada.

They are and Channel 4 are still streets ahead of the other UK broadcasters though.



Hopefully she'll put on a few pounds with prison food.


oh yeah , and learn valuable lessons and reintergrate into society and all that.

JGEP

I don't know but hopefully there'll be plenty of scissorsing

mike65

Falklands 1982

Granada?

You mean Death on the Rock I presume, that was Thames in 1988.

The BBC coverage of the Falklands was beyond reproach, the Tories hated it.

Shogun Puca

Just to come back on topic for a bit; why do people hate Lindsay Lohan?

Did I miss some horrendous atrocity committed by the young actress or is everyone just jumping on the bandwagon?

And did this bandwagon originate from Fox or TMZ?

She just seems to be your avergae twenty-something girl who happens to have/had a few quid?!

genericguy

Shogun Puca wrote: »

She just seems to be your avergae twenty-something girl who happens to have/had a few quid?!

nah, she's a spoilt rich cnut who persistently re-offends and clearly thinks laws don't apply to her.