Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Has the Manchurian Candidate become a reality?
Options
-
03-06-2010 7:15pm#1
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
TalkieWalkie wrote: »My thoughts are with the families of the victims.
An English Columbine. I put it down to mind control. The next move will be to disarm the public. People will be asked to hand over their weapons. Gun licensing will become much tighter for the public, while police will probably carry more arms.
Edit, just heard on the news... "should the licensing laws be changed ?"
Over there amongst other places along time ago.
If you feel these are a case of Manchurian pattern,the best place to start.Would be to look at the people who were killed.Who they are why it may be that one person would be needed to be assassinated, and rest just to create smoke screen.
I do think its possible that government agencies would commit such a crime,murdering others to make it look like a random person who went off his head.
R.I.P condolences to all their families and friends.Very sad
0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
I just wanted to know if you were basing all mind control and everything i said and hinted at with a fictional movie intitled the manchurian candidate.Yeah because a film about jessica fletcher using her kid as the assasin of her husbands presidental candidtate is insane.
Believe it or not sometimes things happen in movies that actually happen in reality.Sometimes they are based on true stories and fictionalised.
When i used the manchurian candidate example it was more for an aid or point of reference.An idea of what can be done with mind control.
I do not for example think a woman similar to this jessica fletcher and a child have gone through that exact scenario to kill a presidential candidate in real life.Im dissapointed you couldactually missunderstand me to that level its almost idiotic in itself if im being bluntly honest here.It nearly would insult me but it takes alot more
You must know i was using that as an example.And i tried to reaffirm this by referring others to another post on how exactly this technique is carried out on a human being in a studio setting.
I have also mentioned the Robert Kennnedy assassination i thought in this thread, i should not need to mention it again to bring home the reality of what im talking about.And to show i dont just mean a movie when i talk about manchurian candidate..i actually mean what that represents...aka what is popularised..through hollywood as a... manchurian candidate.
Maybe i am being too harsh and you really did take me literrally i know people who do that and if so im sorry if i come across bluntly in some parts.As it appears you look to be either taking me literally on the manchurian thing and connecting it only with a fictional movie or you have some other intention i dont understand yet but would be interested to know.0 -
-
-
-
-
I just wanted to know if you were basing all mind control and everything i said and hinted at with a fictional movie intitled the manchurian candidate.
Believe it or not sometimes things happen in movies that actually happen in reality.Sometimes they are based on true stories and fictionalised.
Which is why the Core, 2012, The Day After Tomorrow, and Independence Day are all actually based on true events.
When i used the manchurian candidate example it was more for an aid or point of reference.An idea of what can be done with mind control.
Or it's a far fetched imaginative fictional leap of what can actually be achievedI do not for example think a woman similar to this jessica fletcher and a child have gone through that exact scenario to kill a presidential candidate in real life.Im dissapointed you couldactually missunderstand me to that level its almost idiotic in itself if im being bluntly honest here.It nearly would insult me but it takes alot more
No I was ridiculing you. You must have missed that subtext.You must know i was using that as an example.And i tried to reaffirm this by referring others to another post on how exactly this technique is carried out on a human being in a studio setting.
Studio setting? whut?I have also mentioned the Robert Kennnedy assassination i thought in this thread,
People try to read a deeper meaning into everything. RFK's assassination is a classic example. It's seems impossible to some people that an idiot like Sirhan Bishara Sirhan could have been capable of killing Kennedy. But before RFK's death presidential candidates didn't receive a secret service detail.
For example the venerable BBC corespondent Alistair Cook happened to be in the corridor when it happened.The Ambassador, a venerable hotel, miles away on Wiltshire Boulevard, was the Kennedy headquarters and that was the place to be. We took off and in the long driveway, lined up behind hundreds of cars containing all those sensible people who love a winner.
At last we got into the hotel lobbies and a tumult of singing, dancing, music and cheering. Guards and cops blocked the entrance to the ballroom and the passport and the birth certificate and, I believe, a personal recommendation from Senator Kennedy, could not have got you in. My own general press credentials were quite useless, and screaming at each other through the din of all those happy people, my companion and I decided the whole safari had been a mistake and we'd go home.
We turned and started down the corridor. On our left, about forty or fifty feet along, was another door and a pack of people trying and failing to get through it. There was a guard, and a young Kennedy staff man turning down everybody. The Kennedy man suddenly shouted over the bobbing heads "Mr. Cooke, come on, you can get in here."
So we were sandwiched or folded in through the mob and emerged as from a chute into an open place. A cool, almost empty room, a small private dining room of the hotel. It was fitted up as a small extra press room, and there were about half a dozen women telegraph operators, two newsmen I knew and half a dozen others, a radio man untangling cables and a photographer, and one or two middle aged women and a fat girl in a Kennedy straw hat, a young reporter in a beard, and I suppose his girl.
It was a perfect way through to the ballroom, for in between was a serving pantry that led through a passage right into the ballroom. "You don't want to get in there" - a friend of mine said - "it's - it's murder in there, and when Bobby gets through his speech, Pierro - Salinger - has promised us he'll come through into this room and talk with us" the Senator, that is. It was an unbelievable break, so we sat down and we had a drink and heard the telegraph girls tapping out copy and tried to hear the T.V. set in a corner that was turned up to an unbearable decibel level.
A few minutes later the commentators gave way to the ballroom scene and Bobby was up there with his ecstatic wife. And he was thanking everybody and saying things must change, and so on too Chicago. It was about eighteen minutes after midnight.
A few of us strolled over to the swinging doors that gave on to the pantry - they had no glass peepholes, but we'd soon hear the pleasant bustle of his coming through as the waiters and the coloured chef in his high hat, and a bus boy or two, waited to see him.
There was suddenly a banging repetition, of a sound that - I don't know how to describe - not at all like shots, like somebody dropping a rack of trays. Half a dozen of us were startled enough to charge through the door, and it had just happened. It was a narrow lane he had come through for there were long steam tables and somebody'd stacked up against them these trellis fences with artificial leaves stuck on 'em, that they use to fence the dance band off from the floor.
The only light was the blue light of three fluorescent tubes slotted in the ceiling. But it was a howling jungle of cries and obscenities and flying limbs and two enormous men - Roosevelt Greer, the football player, and Rafer Johnson I guess, the Olympic champion, piling on to a pair of blue jeans.
There was a head on the floor, streaming blood and somebody put a Kennedy boater under it and the blood trickled down like chocolate sauce on an ice cake. There were flash lights by now and the button eyes of Ethel Kennedy turned to cinders. She was slapping a young man and he was saying "Listen lady, I'm hurt too" - and down on the greasy floor was a huddle of clothes and staring out of it the face of Bobby Kennedy, like the stone face of a child, lying on a cathedral tomb.
I had and have no idea of the time of all this, or even of the event itself, for when I pattered back into the creamy, green genteel dining room I heard somebody cry "Kennedy - shot" and heard a girl moan "No, no, not again" - and my companion was fingering a cigarette package like a paralytic.
A dark woman nearby suddenly bounded to a table and beat it, and howled like a wolf, "Stinking country, no, no, no, no" - and another woman attacked the shadow of the placid T.V. commentators, who'd not yet got the news.
And then a minute maybe, or an hour later or a day, the cops and the burly Johnson shot through the swinging doors with their bundle, of the black curly head and the jeans, and I recall the tight, small behind and the limp head and a face totally dazed.
Well, the next morning when I saw and heard the Pope in his gentle, faltering English, I still could not believe that he was talking about this squalid, appalling scene in a hotel pantry, that I'd been a part of and would always be a part of.i should not need to mention it again to bring home the reality of what im talking about.And to show i dont just mean a movie when i talk about manchurian candidate..i actually mean what that represents...aka what is popularised..through hollywood as a... manchurian candidate.
Maybe i am being too harsh and you really did take me literrally i know people who do that and if so im sorry if i come across bluntly in some parts.As it appears you look to be either taking me literally on the manchurian thing and connecting it only with a fictional movie or you have some other intention i dont understand yet but would be interested to know.
As the above shows, people develop conspiracy theories about killing sprees because they lack the capacity to full comprehend the mindset of someone who wants to murder dozens of people. They want to find an encompassing theory that explains these horrific actions. There isn't one. It was an act of madness. These things happen. Accept it. Don't try to rationalise it and find a scape goat. These killing sprees are acts of madness by madmen.0 -
-
Advertisement
-
Advertisement