Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

RFID - VeriChip - Mark of the beast?

  • 17-05-2010 4:40pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,534 ✭✭✭


    I know its been discussed before but just thought I'd spice things up around here :D

    Has anyone any thoughts on the RFID / VeriChip?

    It would seem that as the years roll by people are slowly but surely growing in their acceptance of such technology where it applies to security in the workplace, monitoring of children for safety purposes and for the old and sick in order to be able to keep tabs on them should they be in need of any help. All these applications are really good ideas and would benefit society on the whole. But I feel there is a very dark side to all this, one that is not within mankind's ability to control? I believe that we could be getting primed for acceptance of this technology for general everyday use like shopping, doctor visits, applying for driver's licenses and so on. I see it becoming compulsory due to its effectiveness in securing peace of mind for many in society. It's appeal is in its good applications but what of its bad ones? Will they outweigh the good in the end?

    As a Christian do you think it bares all the hallmarks of the Mark of the Beast described in the Book of Revelation? Is it possible, that should this technology be introduced on a global scale that the prophesy regarding its effect come to pass? That no man can buy or sell unless he has the mark of the beast? It's pretty obvious to me that this will be the natural evolution of this technology after a while should it be accepted en mass.

    i.e. It starts off as a good idea for the monitoruing of children, the sick and prisoners. Then as more and more acceptance is incurred, it is used in the work place for security reasons i.e nobody can steal your ID and use it to gain access to your workplace. It is then adapted by the medical profession and eventually for national security purposes become compulsory, and it tha happens eventually you won't be able to work, drive, travel abroad etc. Then eventually due to the security risk that carrying cash around involves it will eventually become the everyday choice of how to do credit transactions, buy groceries in supermarkets and what not. I have no trouble believing this at all.

    If you don't believe that it is (or will become) the mark of the beast, would you be worried about it anyway? If so, can you explain your reasons please?

    These questions are also directed at the Atheists and Agnostics but your responses should be civil and on stay on topic.

    Personally I believe that if this is not the mark of the beast then it is surely a forerunner to it.

    More on this here


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭lmaopml


    This should be interesting :)

    I guess myself, I always imagined the 'mark of the beast' as something that wouldn't be introduced in a subtle and 'slow' way such as tagging et all for general purposes.......because of the obscurity I guess of the reason why one has decided to be 'tagged'.

    ..I don't know why, but I always imagined it would be more like a clear 'rejection' of the existence of God made purposefully and with a clear intent to do so...

    How that would work though, I have no idea..lol...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,418 ✭✭✭JimiTime


    Don't think its the mark of the beast and would second lmaopml's idea of how the mark would come about. However, I still hate the idea of it. I'm always wary when something is sold to me as security.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    In before the Run_to_da_hills.

    MrP


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,872 ✭✭✭strobe


    There is already 666 in every single barcode. Check it out yourself, the 3 long, thin thickness, double lines at the beginning, middle and end that's on all the barcodes is the symbol for 6. I always thought that was cool, the way revelations talks about no one being able to trade without the number and it's actually there on pretty much anything you buy nowadays. Soon to be on most passports aswell. Turns out Lucifer is anything but subtle.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    strobe wrote: »
    There is already 666 in every single barcode. Check it out yourself, the 3 long, thin thickness, double lines at the beginning, middle and end that's on all the barcodes is the symbol for 6.

    Its not the symbol for 6, it just looks a bit like the symbol for 6, but it has a different meaning.

    Anywhoo, I've always wondered is the mark of the beast actually associated with fear of technology in the Bible, or is that just what people in modern types associate it with? Could the mark of the beast be literally a magical mark, nothing to do with technology? Or is technology referenced in the Bible itself?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,293 ✭✭✭StealthRolex


    strobe wrote: »
    There is already 666 in every single barcode. Check it out yourself, the 3 long, thin thickness, double lines at the beginning, middle and end that's on all the barcodes is the symbol for 6. I always thought that was cool, the way revelations talks about no one being able to trade without the number and it's actually there on pretty much anything you buy nowadays. Soon to be on most passports aswell. Turns out Lucifer is anything but subtle.

    If you believe that you have absolutely no idea of how subtle Satan is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,293 ✭✭✭StealthRolex


    Wicknight wrote: »
    Its not the symbol for 6, it just looks a bit like the symbol for 6, but it has a different meaning.

    Anywhoo, I've always wondered is the mark of the beast actually associated with fear of technology in the Bible, or is that just what people in modern types associate it with? Could the mark of the beast be literally a magical mark, nothing to do with technology? Or is technology referenced in the Bible itself?

    You should try reading the Bible sometime. Where is this "fear of technology" of which you speak?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,293 ✭✭✭StealthRolex


    If you don't believe that it is (or will become) the mark of the beast, would you be worried about it anyway? If so, can you explain your reasons please?

    I don't believe that but I don't care for it either as it is an erosion of civil liberties and it is of no benefit to the host.

    My understanding is that the mark will be used sometime after the general apostasy and those who want it will willingly receive it in large numbers.

    Once the Antichrist is in power he will have no need for subtlety. It will be a simple matter of accept the mark or die.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    As a Christian do you think it bares all the hallmarks of the Mark of the Beast described in the Book of Revelation?

    Nope, not at all.
    MrPudding wrote: »
    In before the Run_to_da_hills.
    MrP

    :pac:
    Wicknight wrote: »
    Anywhoo, I've always wondered is the mark of the beast actually associated with fear of technology in the Bible..

    There's a fear of technology in the Bible? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,418 ✭✭✭JimiTime


    Wicknight wrote: »
    Its not the symbol for 6, it just looks a bit like the symbol for 6, but it has a different meaning.

    Anywhoo, I've always wondered is the mark of the beast actually associated with fear of technology in the Bible, or is that just what people in modern types associate it with? Could the mark of the beast be literally a magical mark, nothing to do with technology? Or is technology referenced in the Bible itself?

    I would say, its just folk speculating. Even the folk that go in for the barcode or RFID conspiracies, don't do it out of 'fear of technology', but rather out of jumping the gun and wanting to know what the mark is. Sure, read it yourself below. Notice the word 'Forced'. Also notice where the mark will be recieved. Also notice it represents the name of the beast OR the number of its name. I certainly see nothing about 'fear of technology', but maybe you were trying to be belittling with that term.

    Then I saw another beast, coming out of the earth. He had two horns like a lamb, but he spoke like a dragon. 12He exercised all the authority of the first beast on his behalf, and made the earth and its inhabitants worship the first beast, whose fatal wound had been healed. 13And he performed great and miraculous signs, even causing fire to come down from heaven to earth in full view of men. 14Because of the signs he was given power to do on behalf of the first beast, he deceived the inhabitants of the earth. He ordered them to set up an image in honor of the beast who was wounded by the sword and yet lived. 15He was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that it could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed. 16He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, 17so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.
    18This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    You should try reading the Bible sometime. Where is this "fear of technology" of which you speak?

    Er, that was my question. :p

    Why does everyone associate the mark of the beast with technology? Is that in the Bible (your some what ironic response would seem to suggest no)?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    Wicknight wrote: »
    Why does everyone associate the mark of the beast with technology?

    Technology was only useful until tin foil was invented ;). After that - all down hill.
    Wicknight wrote: »
    Is that in the Bible (your some what ironic response would seem to suggest no)?

    No. Nothing has ever suggested a fear of technology to me anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    prinz wrote: »
    There's a fear of technology in the Bible? :confused:

    That is what I'm asking.

    The mark of the Beast in modern times is nearly always associated with technology as an excuse to be afraid of it. Oooow, bar code scanners are evil, ooow RFID chips carry the mark of the beast. they are going to be used to round up your children and kill your grand parents (along with Obama-care)

    Is there any actual Biblical support for this, is the mark of the beast associated with technology, or with a fear of technology, in the Bible?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    JimiTime wrote: »
    I certainly see nothing about 'fear of technology'

    Really? It seem in this day and age it is always associated with technology and the dangers of it. Soul Winners post is over flowing with the dangers of technology, and that is before we get into Rfth's views.

    As I thought and prinz seems to confirm, there seems to be zero Biblical bases for this, so I have to wonder about why all the picking on technology.

    Anywhoo, just a pondering.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    Wicknight wrote: »
    The mark of the Beast in modern times is nearly always associated with technology as an excuse to be afraid of it. Oooow, bar code scanners are evil, ooow RFID chips carry the mark of the beast. they are going to be used to round up your children and kill your grand parents (along with Obama-care)

    I think it's just a handy way of trying to rope in a few supporters IMO. Link it to the Beast and you'll get all sort of people to back you up. Like during I think every single referendum on Europe some issue or other has been dragged up solely, as far as I can see to tempt a certain mindset to throw their lot in with those opposing it.
    Wicknight wrote: »
    Is there any actual Biblical support for this, is the mark of the beast associated with technology, or with a fear of technology, in the Bible?

    Not that I can think of anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 438 ✭✭TravelJunkie


    I know its been discussed before but just thought I'd spice things up around here :D

    Has anyone any thoughts on the RFID / VeriChip?

    It would seem that as the years roll by people are slowly but surely growing in their acceptance of such technology where it applies to security in the workplace, monitoring of children for safety purposes and for the old and sick in order to be able to keep tabs on them should they be in need of any help. All these applications are really good ideas and would benefit society on the whole. But I feel there is a very dark side to all this, one that is not within mankind's ability to control? I believe that we could be getting primed for acceptance of this technology for general everyday use like shopping, doctor visits, applying for driver's licenses and so on. I see it becoming compulsory due to its effectiveness in securing peace of mind for many in society. It's appeal is in its good applications but what of its bad ones? Will they outweigh the good in the end?

    As a Christian do you think it bares all the hallmarks of the Mark of the Beast described in the Book of Revelation? Is it possible, that should this technology be introduced on a global scale that the prophesy regarding its effect come to pass? That no man can buy or sell unless he has the mark of the beast? It's pretty obvious to me that this will be the natural evolution of this technology after a while should it be accepted en mass.

    i.e. It starts off as a good idea for the monitoruing of children, the sick and prisoners. Then as more and more acceptance is incurred, it is used in the work place for security reasons i.e nobody can steal your ID and use it to gain access to your workplace. It is then adapted by the medical profession and eventually for national security purposes become compulsory, and it tha happens eventually you won't be able to work, drive, travel abroad etc. Then eventually due to the security risk that carrying cash around involves it will eventually become the everyday choice of how to do credit transactions, buy groceries in supermarkets and what not. I have no trouble believing this at all.

    If you don't believe that it is (or will become) the mark of the beast, would you be worried about it anyway? If so, can you explain your reasons please?

    These questions are also directed at the Atheists and Agnostics but your responses should be civil and on stay on topic.

    Personally I believe that if this is not the mark of the beast then it is surely a forerunner to it.

    More on this here

    I also believe the mark is the microchip. It is in use already in some parts and is on the hand or forehead.

    I feel so strongly about it, that it would be my dying wish for my children never to have it inserted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,418 ✭✭✭JimiTime


    Wicknight wrote: »
    Really? It seem in this day and age it is always associated with technology and the dangers of it.

    I posted the scripture in question, what do you think?
    Soul Winners post is over flowing with the dangers of technology, and that is before we get into Rfth's views.

    Being wary, does not equate to 'afraid of technology'.
    Being ignorant does not equate to 'afraid of technology'.

    There is nothing to suggest that the mark will be technological, nor is there anything to suggest it wont be.
    As I thought and prinz seems to confirm, there seems to be zero Biblical bases for this, so I have to wonder about why all the picking on technology.

    Anywhoo, just a pondering.

    There is biblical basis, Just nothing to say if it will be technological or not. The issue, is that some people assume they 'know' what the mark is, and it happens to be technological. I don't think this is born out of a need to curse technology, but more out of a want to be able to say, 'Thats the mark of the beast'. The fact that their claims are related to technology has little to do with technology, and more to do with the fact that there is nothing else they can say 'resembles' in any way, the mark.

    I would imagine the thought process being a little like the following:

    1. What could possibly be a mark you couldn't trade without etc, and how could you give it to an entire population?

    *Watches TV*
    'Today on beyond 2000'. We have an RFID chip. these can be inserted beneath the skin, and can store all our details. In the future we may never need a credit card, or passport etc etc etc'

    2. 'Thats interesting', *thinks* 'Thats it! Can't trade or move without it. Its the mark!'

    Now the above may have started with barcodes, and they began to realise that it probably wasn't the mark, but with that idea, their focus was diverted to the technological world, so that they keep on eye on every little thing that could be the mark. Some however go further, and declare with certainty that something is the mark.

    At the end of the day, the mark could be technological, or it may not be. The Biblle indicates that there will be a mark FORCED on peoples RIGHT HAND or FOREHEAD. It doesn't speculate as to what this mark actually is.

    the issue is not saying it could be technological, but rather declaring 'Its this or that' with the type of certainty that some folk do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,418 ✭✭✭JimiTime


    I also believe the mark is the microchip. It is in use already in some parts and is on the hand or forehead.
    Where is it used?
    Is it FORCED on people?
    Is it in the RIGHT hand or FOREhead?
    Does it containg the NAME or NUMBER of the name?
    Also, what is the beast and its name, and how does its name convert to 666?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    JimiTime wrote: »
    I posted the scripture in question, what do you think?

    I think the scripture is most likely talking about branding of people with a mark to identify them as property, something that would have been common in Roman times for slaves.
    JimiTime wrote: »
    Being wary, does not equate to 'afraid of technology'.
    Being ignorant does not equate to 'afraid of technology'.

    Agreed, but trying to link the mark to technological advance such as RFID tags and bar codes on the flimsiest of pretense seems to suggest a more general fear of technology, rather than fear of the mark of the beast.

    People seem to find these concepts uncomfortable in of themselves, and then link (again on flimsy pretense) this to Revelations to justify this.

    What has an RFID tag got to do with the number 666 even if it was embedded in your hand?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,418 ✭✭✭JimiTime


    Wicknight wrote: »
    What has an RFID tag got to do with the number 666 even if it was embedded in your hand?

    I don't know, you'd have to ask someone who believes its 'The Mark'.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    I also believe the mark is the microchip. It is in use already in some parts and is on the hand or forehead.

    Can you expand on this?

    Should probably clarify my interest in this, I'm an atheist but I've worked with RFID tags in the past. They are great, they solve a lot of problems from a technical point of view. I get nervous when religions or religious people start making proclamations about certain technologies as being evil or wrong


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,418 ✭✭✭JimiTime


    Wicknight wrote: »
    Can you expand on this?

    Should probably clarify my interest in this, I'm an atheist but I've worked with RFID tags in the past. They are great, they solve a lot of problems from a technical point of view. I get nervous when religions or religious people start making proclamations about certain technologies as being evil or wrong

    Even those who say its 'The Mark' aren't saying the technology is 'evil' etc though are they? Isn't it more about its application? I'm sure they wouldn't have an issue with someone putting an RFID into their prize greyhound, or even family pet etc. Like so much technology, the internet for example, Its amazing, and so useful. However, its also made it so easy to distribute child porn etc etc. I would imagine, its the application of technology rather than the technology itself that these folk take exception to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    I also believe the mark is the microchip. It is in use already in some parts and is on the hand or forehead..

    Or the left hand, or the arms, or the legs etc etc etc.
    Wicknight wrote: »
    I get nervous when religions or religious people start making proclamations about certain technologies as being evil or wrong

    You don't need to be an atheist to feel that way but it equally applies to some non religious people who object to everything as being part of some big global major lizard man conspiracy or the likes. Oh, but despite what I said, fussball IS the devil!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    JimiTime wrote: »
    Even those who say its 'The Mark' aren't saying the technology is 'evil' etc though are they?

    No, more technology is evil so that is probably where the mark will end up. People seem more nervous about the idea of technology tracking than this actually being the mark of the beast

    But you are right, I may be jumping the gun a bit, so I'll wait until either Soul Winner or TravelJunkie expand on what is it about the RFID tags or bar-codes that they are worried about.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    prinz wrote: »
    Or the left hand, or the arms, or the legs etc etc etc.



    You don't need to be an atheist to feel that way but it equally applies to some non religious people who object to everything as being part of some big global major lizard man conspiracy or the likes. Oh, but despite what I said, fussball IS the devil!

    yeah but the lizard people exist, just ask Jim Corr :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭lmaopml


    Wicknight wrote: »
    Can you expand on this?

    Should probably clarify my interest in this, I'm an atheist but I've worked with RFID tags in the past. They are great, they solve a lot of problems from a technical point of view. I get nervous when religions or religious people start making proclamations about certain technologies as being evil or wrong

    Sorry, but this made me pmsl :pac:...I don't blame you being a little tentative Wicknight of some conspiracy theories, even the ones in relation to the Apocalypse, but then they are allowed I guess - we have a whole forum on boards for em :eek: and some are far more menacing and immediate than those derived from the bible imo...

    I think a lot of people believe that many of the events in the Apocalypse have already taken place, remembering John was writing symbolically to the seven churches etc. at the time...and the prominence of Ancient Rome too...

    The number of the devil etc. has inspired some great movies too..lol...along with dante and his visions of hell, they peek our interest in the subject I suppose. I don't know enough to even begin to speculate; in fact I don't anybody really does...

    ...but it has an appeal too....I don't think anybody really knows 'when' or how. For me the over riding message of the bible is to be 'warned' to keep ready because nobody really knows when these symbols will finally make sense to us...and not to dwell on them, but to concentrate on growing in faith...

    Still, the movies were great, and so too is reading up on all the different theories...:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,418 ✭✭✭JimiTime


    Wicknight wrote: »
    No, more technology is evil so that is probably where the mark will end up.

    Sorry, just to clarify. You think these folk think this specific technology is evil in itself? OR are you saying these people think technology as a whole is evil?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,293 ✭✭✭StealthRolex


    Wicknight wrote: »
    That is what I'm asking.

    The mark of the Beast in modern times is nearly always associated with technology as an excuse to be afraid of it. Oooow, bar code scanners are evil, ooow RFID chips carry the mark of the beast. they are going to be used to round up your children and kill your grand parents (along with Obama-care)

    Is there any actual Biblical support for this, is the mark of the beast associated with technology, or with a fear of technology, in the Bible?

    The knowledge of some atheists of Christianity appears to have been informed by some combination of fundamentalist websites and conspiracy websites with a peppering of atheist myths.

    The Bible has nothing to say for or against technology or that the mark of the Beast will be technological. That is not to say that the mark may not ultimately be some form of scanable bar or puzzle code but it says it will be a mark or brand and therefore visible so that appears to exclude embedded chips.

    The bottom line is it will be forced onto people. If you refuse it or avoid it you will not be able to buy or sell legally.

    The choice will be simple and obvious - ally with the Beast or join the Christians.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,293 ✭✭✭StealthRolex


    strobe wrote: »
    There is already 666 in every single barcode. Check it out yourself, the 3 long, thin thickness, double lines at the beginning, middle and end that's on all the barcodes is the symbol for 6. I always thought that was cool, the way revelations talks about no one being able to trade without the number and it's actually there on pretty much anything you buy nowadays. Soon to be on most passports aswell. Turns out Lucifer is anything but subtle.

    And what if the number is 616? What then for the Beastly Barcode ???


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 438 ✭✭TravelJunkie


    You asked me to clarify my position.

    Well, the human identifacation system by microchip (not a techie so can't comment on the technology) is on trial in Australia and parts of the US. This is meeting resistance by various parties, including civil rights, etc.

    Authorities on the subject predict national identity cards and a cashless society via human implanted microchips. But it's not failsafe at the moment.

    My fear, if you call it that, is not of the microchip. But yes, because of the warning in revelation. My interpretation of the mark of the beast 666 is the running of a cashless society, which will evolve... (I remember a time before bar codes by the way).
    from Barcodes into credit cards / chip and pin, then implantations for security reasons.

    Already our bank accounts and passports are chipped (cashless society isn't far fetched).

    a particular country's immigration loves the concept.

    People can go ahead and get these, I won't. It won't happen in my lifetime but if it came to it, I would rather spend time in a kabutz or jail.

    Call me crazy, but I'd rather be safe than sorry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,534 ✭✭✭Soul Winner


    Only Wicknight can derail a thread by building up a strawman like this.

    OP: What are your thoughts on XYZ. Mine is that I believe XYZ is such and such.

    Wicknight: Religious people are afraid of technology because XYZ. Where is the bible support for this?

    :confused:

    Jimi has already answered your questions but let me put it this way: Is there the faintest, slightest possibility that some sort of technology just might need to be employed to administer marks that are to be placed on billions of people around the world so that they can buy and sell? I would say that there is the slightest of possibilities of that yes. How else would you do it? Do I believe that the RFID and Verichip are the actual mark of the beast? No, but I do believe that if the prophecies in the Book of Revelation are correct then this is the kind of technology that will be used when the time comes for people to be given the mark, but that's just my opinion, which I could be wrong about, and until I hear good arguments to make me change my mind I will stick with that thanks.

    But even if this is true, does it mean that the Bible condemns all kinds of technology? No, that is just a strawman that Wicknight is building up in order to derail this thread even though in my OP I first of all highlighted all the positives that this type of technology embraces., i.e. child protection, monitoring of the sick and of prisoners and so on.

    Anyway getting away from what some of us believe the Bible warns against, what about the civil liberties issues surrounding this? Should a 911 type national security event take place somewhere in the world, which would result in having the effect of tightening the compulsory noose for technology like this, would you take the chip without any qualms? Or would you resist it? If so why? And if not why?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    Anyway getting away from what some of us believe the Bible warns against, what about the civil liberties issues surrounding this? Should a 911 type national security event take place somewhere in the world, which would result in having the effect of tightening the compulsory noose for technology like this, would you take the chip without any qualms? Or would you resist it? If so why? And if not why?

    If the chip was my ID, medical history, organ donor preference/next of kin etc then I'd have no problems whatsoever with taking one. I have nothing to hide, I wouldn't feel my civil liberties were in the slightest bit threatened.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,418 ✭✭✭JimiTime


    prinz wrote: »
    If the chip was my ID, medical history, organ donor preference/next of kin etc then I'd have no problems whatsoever with taking one. I have nothing to hide, I wouldn't feel my civil liberties were in the slightest bit threatened.

    TBH, if its to come into being, it will be sold to us as something for our benefit. Convenient etc. Its what is NOT said that I'd be weary of. Also, once it becomes the norm, what additional stuff will be added? As governments change, what will the info be used for? Lets say it has info about your religious convictions, and down the generational line, religion gets banned or something. All in all, I'm wary over its introduction to humans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    JimiTime wrote: »
    Also, once it becomes the norm, what additional stuff will be added? As governments change, what will the info be used for? Lets say it has info about your religious convictions, and down the generational line, religion gets banned or something. All in all, I'm wary over its introduction to humans.

    I remember once somewhere seeing how these kind of arguments have accompanied a whole range of things, for example radios and tvs. They were accused of brining government propaganda into the home and whatnot. Each new thing comes with pros and cons.

    Yes it could be used for evil. For every nefarious way it could be used anyone determined enough to want to use it that way will just find another method.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,418 ✭✭✭JimiTime


    prinz wrote: »
    I remember once somewhere seeing how these kind of arguments have accompanied a whole range of things, for example radios and tvs. They were accused of brining government propaganda into the home and whatnot. Each new thing comes with pros and cons.

    Yes it could be used for evil. For every nefarious way it could be used anyone determined enough to want to use it that way will just find another method.

    Maybe that is the case, thats no arguement for it though. Not to mention the fact that with alot of technology has brought alot of cons due to its abuse. Is it a reason to stop technology? No. However, everything should be taken on its merit. Just because someone was wary of radio, doesn't mean we shouldn't be wary of RFID. I mean lets face it, abuse of the radio etc is one thing, the implications of a possible abuse in RFID would be quite another. As I said, I'd be very wary and would like to know a hell of alot about it before someone sticks one in me. I'd like to add up the pro's and cons of its possible applications. One things for sure though, I wouldn't base it on what its being sold to us as.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭iUseVi


    JimiTime wrote: »
    Maybe that is the case, thats no arguement for it though. Not to mention the fact that with alot of technology has brought alot of cons due to its abuse. Is it a reason to stop technology? No. However, everything should be taken on its merit. Just because someone was wary of radio, doesn't mean we shouldn't be wary of RFID. I mean lets face it, abuse of the radio etc is one thing, the implications of a possible abuse in RFID would be quite another. As I said, I'd be very wary and would like to know a hell of alot about it before someone sticks one in me. I'd like to add up the pro's and cons of its possible applications. One things for sure though, I wouldn't base it on what its being sold to us as.

    No offence Jimi, but you seem to have a "they vs us" mentally going in this post. It's people like Wicknight and me who are involved with the technology and I can assure you I'm not part of any grand conspiracy to "sell it to the masses". :D

    The technology itself is entirely neutral, if you are concerned about private data collection and abuse of such data; I'd focus more on google and facebook et al. :) It's perhaps unfortunate for the conspiracy-minded people that these don't fit biblical prophecies so easily. Because let's face it, the only reason RFID is targeted more than google is that it can be made to fit such prophecies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,293 ✭✭✭StealthRolex


    iUseVi wrote: »
    No offence Jimi, but you seem to have a "they vs us" mentally going in this post. It's people like Wicknight and me who are involved with the technology and I can assure you I'm not part of any grand conspiracy to "sell it to the masses". :D

    Ah, but what if you have been manipulated by your "masters" eh?, eh? :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭iUseVi


    Ah, but what if you have been manipulated by your "masters" eh?, eh? :D

    Yes, also I could be lying! Time for home, better call my black helicopter....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    JimiTime wrote: »
    Sorry, just to clarify. You think these folk think this specific technology is evil in itself? OR are you saying these people think technology as a whole is evil?

    The impression I get is that they think technological advance is evil in of itself, or at least more evil than good.

    But like I said I'll wait and see what the response is.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    :confused:

    No need to be confused, I'm simply trying to understand how we go from a mark on your hand to RFID tags and barcodes.

    I suppose in hind-sight the question could be put as What makes people think that the mark on the hand isn't going to be a mark on your hand?
    Jimi has already answered your questions but let me put it this way: Is there the faintest, slightest possibility that some sort of technology just might need to be employed to administer marks that are to be placed on billions of people around the world so that they can buy and sell? I would say that there is the slightest of possibilities of that yes. How else would you do it?
    An RFID tag is not a mark, that is in fact the point of an RFID tag, it is wireless.

    We have probably already skipped over anything that relate back to Revelations in terms of technology. Presenting your hand so that someone can see a mark on it to allow you to buy stuff is not something that is particularly likely in the future since technology has already advanced passed such a point.

    The safest place to put a RFID take in a human is in the arm or bum, and you simply walk through the scanner, you don't show the tag to anyone or anything.
    But even if this is true, does it mean that the Bible condemns all kinds of technology? No, that is just a strawman that Wicknight is building up in order to derail this thread

    I never claimed the Bible condemned technology, quite the opposite in fact. I had a hunch that the Bible was not talking about being concerned about anything as technologically advanced as a barcode or RFID tag in revelations.

    Which is why I found it confusing that people jump to these technologies as some sort of evidence of what is coming.

    The OP was also asking for atheist opinions and discussing the menice of these technologies in a general sense, so I'm not sure I'm derailing the thread.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,534 ✭✭✭Soul Winner


    OOpps. EDIT: Replied prematurely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,418 ✭✭✭JimiTime


    iUseVi wrote: »
    No offence Jimi, but you seem to have a "they vs us" mentally going in this post.

    No offence taken. I've got me a shield to protect me from taking offence:

    tinfoilhat.jpg
    It's people like Wicknight and me who are involved with the technology and I can assure you I'm not part of any grand conspiracy to "sell it to the masses". :D

    I never mentioned conspiracy, I mentioned the abuse of technology. Do I think Blofeld is somewhere laughing evily as his evil plan comes together? No I don't. Just like I don't think Einstein was thinking of atomic bombs, or internet developers were thinking about spreading child porn.

    Do I trust world powers to be moral and ethical? No. Do I think its 'us and them'. Maybe slightly.
    The technology itself is entirely neutral,

    I know.
    if you are concerned about private data collection and abuse of such data; I'd focus more on google and facebook et al. :)

    Indeed. As I said, If RFID was proposed, I'd want to know a hell of alot about it. I would hope anyone would.
    It's perhaps unfortunate for the conspiracy-minded people that these don't fit biblical prophecies so easily. Because let's face it, the only reason RFID is targeted more than google is that it can be made to fit such prophecies.

    If it 'can' be made to fit such prophecies I'd believe it. At the moment however, it can't fit such prophecies, so its inconsequential. People who shout 'Its The Mark', would likely be saying such things about something else if RFID wasn't about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,534 ✭✭✭Soul Winner


    Wicknight wrote: »
    No need to be confused, I'm simply trying to understand how we go from a mark on your hand to RFID tags and barcodes.

    The key is not so much the mark, rather it is the buying and selling part of the prophecy that gives us the problem. If the prophecy is correct then whatever this mark is will allow people to buy and sell because according to the prophecy we will not be able to buy and sell without it. Now what other candidates do we have that might be able to fulfill this prophecy apart from RFID and VeriChip technology?
    Wicknight wrote: »
    I suppose in hind-sight the question could be put as What makes people think that the mark on the hand isn't going to be a mark on your hand?

    Good question. That is a a roundabout way of asking the same question I asked. Thanks ;)
    Wicknight wrote: »
    An RFID tag is not a mark, that is in fact the point of an RFID tag, it is wireless.

    Well lets see now, the word in Revelation is Charagma which means stamp or scratch or etching. A stamp or branding system used by cattle herders identifies their cattle as belonging to them. Although very basic, they do contain information which can be understood by the use of symbols and letters etc. The information that a chip would contain would significantly surpass that of a simple stamp, but under an X-ray machine this is exactly what a chip would look like.

    In addition to this, the prophecy also tells us that the mark will be IN the hand or IN the forehead it does not say that it will be On the hand or On the forehead specifically. The Greek word is Epi which can be rendered Onto, Over, or Within. So although most of the English translations render it 'On' it is not restricted to that, it can also be rendered 'In' or 'Within'.
    Wicknight wrote: »
    We have probably already skipped over anything that relate back to Revelations in terms of technology. Presenting your hand so that someone can see a mark on it to allow you to buy stuff is not something that is particularly likely in the future since technology has already advanced passed such a point.

    Buying on-line yes but in what way has technology advanced past this point? Aren't we still using credit cards in supermarkets and such? And aren't credit cards more susceptible to theft than a chip located inside your body?
    Wicknight wrote: »
    The safest place to put a RFID take in a human is in the arm or bum, and you simply walk through the scanner, you don't show the tag to anyone or anything.

    What about the people who would like to use this technology for shopping? Wouldn't it be 'handier' (pun intended) in the hand?
    Wicknight wrote: »
    I never claimed the Bible condemned technology, quite the opposite in fact. I had a hunch that the Bible was not talking about being concerned about anything as technologically advanced as a barcode or RFID tag in revelations.

    If you actually have an opinion on what the Bible actual is referring to then I'd love to hear it.
    Wicknight wrote: »
    Which is why I found it confusing that people jump to these technologies as some sort of evidence of what is coming.

    Well if the cap fits...
    Wicknight wrote: »
    The OP was also asking for atheist opinions and discussing the menice of these technologies in a general sense, so I'm not sure I'm derailing the thread.

    But you did try (unintentionally probably) to derail the thread. You immediately jumped into strawannig before you gave your opinion on what was asked in the OP, which is what I welcomed from the Athesists and Agnostics, not strawman arguments.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    The key is not so much the mark, rather it is the buying and selling part of the prophecy that gives us the problem. If the prophecy is correct then whatever this mark is will allow people to buy and sell because according to the prophecy we will not be able to buy and sell without it. Now what other candidates do we have that might be able to fulfill this prophecy apart from RFID and VeriChip technology?

    Well visa card, or cheque or even paper money itself.

    You can't buy and sell anything in this country without access to paper money, and if we aren't concerned about the mark itself and what nature it takes this would seem to be the most obvious.

    If it is the identification aspect then a visa card or cheque identifies you as much as a RFID tag.

    All an RFID tag would be would be quicker implementation of all this. It is an wireless version of what you already do.
    In addition to this, the prophecy also tells us that the mark will be IN the hand or IN the forehead it does not say that it will be On the hand or On the forehead specifically. The Greek word is Epi which can be rendered Onto, Over, or Within. So although most of the English translations render it 'On' it is not restricted to that, it can also be rendered 'In' or 'Within'.

    Again this is where the link to RFID tags breaks down since it seems rather unlikely you would place an RFID tag in your hand. There are plenty of other, better, places to put it.
    Buying on-line yes but in what way has technology advanced past this point? Aren't we still using credit cards in supermarkets and such? And aren't credit cards more susceptible to theft than a chip located inside your body?

    We have already started to move away from RFID to biometrics. There are plenty of things that uniquely identify you without the need of a RFID tag, we just need to advance technology to the point where they can be identified.
    What about the people who would like to use this technology for shopping? Wouldn't it be 'handier' (pun intended) in the hand?

    No. That is the thing I think people aren't understanding here. The RFID scanner will be in the door way to the supermarket. You walk in, pick up what you want, and walk out. As you walk out the RFID tag, in your hand your arm your bum your wallet your belt where-ever, is scanned and your account credited. Even if you put it in your hand you don't need to put your hand anywhere, your hand can be picking your nose as you walk out for all the scanner cares about.

    There is no advantage to putting the RFID tag in your hand. The only reason to implant the tag is to stop you losing it. It can be anywhere.
    If you actually have an opinion on what the Bible actual is referring to then I'd love to hear it.

    I think the Bible is referring to branding like would have been common with slaves in Roman times, a burn mark on the back of the hand to identify the person as he hands over coins to the person selling them goods.
    You immediately jumped into strawannig before you gave your opinion on what was asked in the OP, which is what I welcomed from the Athesists and Agnostics, not strawman arguments.

    I didn't straw man anything, people seemed to misunderstood what I was saying in relation to the Bible, thinking (I'm not sure how) that I was saying the Bible teaches to be weary of technology, when I was actually trying to clarify the exact opposite.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,872 ✭✭✭strobe


    JimiTime wrote: »
    TBH, if its to come into being, it will be sold to us as something for our benefit. Convenient etc. Its what is NOT said that I'd be weary of. Also, once it becomes the norm, what additional stuff will be added? As governments change, what will the info be used for? Lets say it has info about your religious convictions, and down the generational line, religion gets banned or something. All in all, I'm wary over its introduction to humans.

    Don't they already have that exact information already? You have a PSI number and you (presumably) write your religion down on your census form. Or if you don't I'm guessing you go to some type of church somewhere? You probably have a bank account and your address is more than likely known to several organisations, including the state. If a totalitarian regime was to come to power overnight and religion was made illegal tomorow you would be in just as vunerable a position with or without a chip in your hand? Lets face it, if the government had the ability and the will to round up and imprison/murder the countries Christians next Tuesday, a lack of VeriChips in peoples hands would be no obstacle whatsoever.

    I think people underestimate what the state would be capable of right now were things to go suddenly Germany 1930's'ish and vastly overestimate what advantage a chip system would give them. Apart from cutting down slightly on paperwork.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,293 ✭✭✭StealthRolex


    there's more information in a Tescos clubcard file than anything MI5 or the branch has on you.

    Tescos, every little 'elps. but helps who?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    there's more information in a Tescos clubcard file than anything MI5 or the branch has on you.

    Tescos, every little 'elps. but helps who?

    Them obviously. They use the information to track purchasing habits so they know which demographic buys which products and can target them more accurately.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,418 ✭✭✭JimiTime


    strobe wrote: »
    Don't they already have that exact information already? You have a PSI number and you (presumably) write your religion down on your census form. Or if you don't I'm guessing you go to some type of church somewhere? You probably have a bank account and your address is more than likely known to several organisations, including the state. If a totalitarian regime was to come to power overnight and religion was made illegal tomorow you would be in just as vunerable a position with or without a chip in your hand? Lets face it, if the government had the ability and the will to round up and imprison/murder the countries Christians next Tuesday, a lack of VeriChips in peoples hands would be no obstacle whatsoever.

    I think people underestimate what the state would be capable of right now were things to go suddenly Germany 1930's'ish and vastly overestimate what advantage a chip system would give them. Apart from cutting down slightly on paperwork.

    My example was off the cuff, no real thought in it tbh.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,428 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Wicknight wrote: »
    They use the information to track purchasing habits so they know which demographic buys which products and can target them more accurately.
    And to make money from selling your name to marketing companies and outfits doing research into consumer behaviour etc. And to companies which sell companion products to items which you purchase regularly (ie, you start buying nappies, and you find yourself surrounded with offers for baby food).

    Best way to avoid this kind of identity monitoring is not to have a store or loyalty card, to pay with cash at the checkout, and to credit the "loyalty" due to your purchases to the next sap in the queue -- the latter buggers their behavioral analysis good and proper.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    robindch wrote: »
    And to make money from selling your name to marketing companies and outfits doing research into consumer behaviour etc. And to companies which sell companion products to items which you purchase regularly (ie, you start buying nappies, and you find yourself surrounded with offers for baby food).

    Best way to avoid this kind of identity monitoring is not to have a store or loyalty card, to pay with cash at the checkout, and to credit the "loyalty" due to your purchases to the next sap in the queue -- the latter buggers their behavioral analysis good and proper.

    LOL, yeah they don't like that. I've been asked before not to take my friend in the queue's loyalty card, though I don't think they can stop you. Maybe it is in the terms and conditions.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement