New Anti-Rape device - RapeAxe

Tigger

OutlawPete wrote: »

Yes.

Once he is not endangering the victims life.



No.

outlaw pete you used to be cool
/respect

--LOS--

Zillah wrote: »

Killing a rapist is justified if it prevents or interrupts the rape.

biko wrote: »

If I was a woman in South Africa I'd like to have one of these. While my attacker was wincing with pain it'd give me some time to run slash his bloody neck.

Zillah wrote: »

if a woman has a chance to kill her attacker during a rape I say good on ya girl, you're very brave and I'm proud of you.

Toss the corpse in a ditch.

Tigger wrote: »

punishment for rape should be execution
killing someone who is trying to rape you is justifiable self defence in my opinion
if someome tried to rape me they'd be pretty dead, i can't see why i should be in trouble for that

Censorsh!t wrote: »

If I was being raped, I'd sure as hell try kill the person, or at very least cause some serious damage to them.

Good god to all of that ^^^

All of that^^^ is what the problem is, intently killing someone for attempted rape or rape, not death which results from self defence, that's self defence in the eyes of the law mind.

Tigger

--LOS-- wrote: »

Good god to all of that ^^^

All of that^^^ is what the problem is, intently killing someone for attempted rape or rape, not death which results from self defence, that's self defence in the eyes of the law mind.

what would you have me do?
if someone hits me i hit back
rape is a pretty hard hit
they started it so how is itmy fault if i finish them

4zn76tysfajdxp

Rape is, like, really bad. I think it should be illegal.

Censorsh!t

NO it's too harsh a punishment.

--LOS-- wrote: »

Good god to all of that ^^^

All of that^^^ is what the problem is, intently killing someone for attempted rape or rape, not death which results from self defence, that's self defence in the eyes of the law mind.

Yes, I'm saying that if I were in that situation, I would want to kill them. Firstly because, well, they are raping me, secondly, because no matter what the situation was, I would feel my life is potentially in danger (yes, even if it's me saying 'no' to a boyfriend- people who rape arent to be trusted with my life!).
That is how I would feel in that moment.
However, looking at it with full reasoning, sure, they don't deserve to be killed, but if I were to kill them in trying to get them off me, then that's their fault. ( I did also say something like this in my post earlier)

4zn76tysfajdxp

*Cough*

we'llallhavetea_old

NO it's too harsh a punishment.

*sniggers*

Bonito

NO it's too harsh a punishment.

People who voted "No. It's too harsh a punishment."

Shame on all of you.

--LOS--,
banquo,
Bigdeadlydave,
Chillaxe,
CianRyan,
daysleeper,
Don Keypunch,
donfers,
fizzynicenice,
force majeure,
Head_Hunter,
ibarelycare,
Irish_polizei,
Iwasfrozen,
jam_mac_jam,
Jev/N,
KamiKazi,
Minstrel27,
muboop1,
nm,
Pace2008,
parasite,
Ping Chow Chi,
rgt320q,
Ruu,
SlasherMcGurk,
stealthyspeeder,
the_syco,
Truley,
vinylmesh.

I'm honestly shocked at a couple of those..... I just hope you happened to click the wrong button?

we'llallhavetea_old

NO it's too harsh a punishment.

you're hardcore bonny! name and shame on thread

Bonito

NO it's too harsh a punishment.

Do you think I should embold the font?

Clemon

NO it's too harsh a punishment.

Anyone who said no should imagine what they would feel like if their sister or mother or even themselves where raped.

OutlawPete

Bonito wrote: »

Do you think I should embold the font?

I think you should print it out, enlarge it to six feet, laminate it and bring to the Beers and shame them all.

Thank God I didn't vote

Bonito

NO it's too harsh a punishment.

OutlawPete wrote: »

I think you should print it out, enlarge it to six feet, laminate it and bring to the Beers and shame them all.

Thank God I didn't vote

Some people don't realise polls are public 'til;

*click*

"Shiiiiiiiiiiiiiit it's a public poll"

http://www.nooooooooooooooo.com/

we'llallhavetea_old

NO it's too harsh a punishment.

Bonito wrote: »

Do you think I should embold the font?

oh abso-fcuking-lutely!

OutlawPete wrote: »

I think you should print it out, enlarge it to six feet, laminate it and bring to the Beers and shame them all.

Thank God I didn't vote

*stern voice*

your absence was noted :mad:

4zn76tysfajdxp

OutlawPete wrote: »

Thank God I didn't vote

we'llallhavetea wrote: »

o
*stern voice*

your absence was noted :mad:

Don't forget to wear protection, Pete.

Scarinae

Thaedydal wrote: »

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1906000,00.html

Gender advocates say that the 2006 rape trial of prominent politician Jacob Zuma was incredibly damaging to their cause. Zuma, who was elected President this year, was tried and acquitted of raping an HIV-positive family friend. He told the court that the woman had dressed provocatively, in a traditional wrap-around kanga, and that it was against Zulu culture for a man to leave a sexually aroused woman unsatisfied.

:eek: I'm absolutely horrified by this... Not just the rape accusation, but what he said to the court

Bonito

NO it's too harsh a punishment.

we'llallhavetea wrote: »

oh abso-fcuking-lutely!:p

I'll go one better.

People who voted "No. It's too harsh a punishment."

Shame on all of you.

--LOS--, Male?
banquo, Male.
Bigdeadlydave, Male.
Chillaxe, Male?
CianRyan, Male.
daysleeper, Male?
Don Keypunch, Male?
donfers, Male?
fizzynicenice, Female?
force majeure, Male?
Head_Hunter, Male?
ibarelycare, Female.
Irish_polizei, Male?
Iwasfrozen, Male?
jam_mac_jam, Male?
Jev/N, Female?
KamiKazi, Male?
Minstrel27, Female?
muboop1, Female?
nm, Female?
Pace2008, Male?
parasite, Male?
Ping Chow Chi,Male?
rgt320q, Male?
Ruu, Male?
SlasherMcGurk, Male.
stealthyspeeder, Male.
the_syco, Female?
Truley, Female?
vinylmesh. Male?

I'm honestly shocked at a couple of those..... I just hope you happened to click the wrong button?

--LOS--

Clemon wrote: »

Anyone who said no should imagine what they would feel like if their sister or mother or even themselves where raped.

never thought of that :rolleyes:

Bonito wrote: »

People who voted "No. It's too harsh a punishment."

Shame on all of you.

Sheesh, I know which bunch of voters I'd feel safer around (not the 209 sadists )

Bonito

NO it's too harsh a punishment.

Would you not consider a rapist a sadist?

bronte

NO it's too harsh a punishment.

--LOS-- wrote: »

never thought of that :rolleyes:



Sheesh, I know which bunch of voters I'd feel safer around (not the 209 sadists )

Dude..It's rape...the ultimate act of Sadism.

Fucking hell.

--LOS--

Bonito wrote: »

Would you not consider a rapist a sadist?

I don't think anyone on here supports rapists, ye, obviously they are but then the people who are voting against the punishment are no better than them in a way....an eye for an eye, doesn't solve anything......I'm not getting into this again :mad:

Bonito

NO it's too harsh a punishment.

--LOS-- wrote: »

I don't think anyone on here supports rapists, ye, obviously they are but then the people who are voting against the punishment are no better than them in a way....an eye for an eye, doesn't solve anything......I'm not getting into this again :mad:

If they didn't try rape them then their tackle would be safe.

OutlawPete

bronte wrote: »

Dude..It's rape...the ultimate act of Sadism.

Fucking hell.

She ain't no dude.

4zn76tysfajdxp

Bonito's a girl?

Bonito

NO it's too harsh a punishment.

Luca Alive Tightrope wrote: »

Bonito's a girl?

Shhhhhh

--LOS--

OutlawPete wrote: »

She ain't no dude.

damn you! I like being inconspicuous

bronte

NO it's too harsh a punishment.

Sorry!

hypersquirrel

NO it's too harsh a punishment.

OutlawPete wrote: »

Read my posts fully, thanks.

I did read your post fully.

Secondly, even if you said: "Of course they are in fear of their lives.."

That would imply that you are talking about strangers who rape their victims.

How does the fact that they are afraid for their lives imply that they are talking about strangers.?

Did you know that 98% of rape victims actually know the rapist?

So, how many victims are afraid that their husbands or their boyfriends or even one of their close friends are going to kill them?

That logic only applies if you are trying to say that 98% of husbands/boyfriends will rape a woman. If a woman is being raped by their partner then you can be fairly sure they aren't exactly in a happy loving caring relationship and if my boyfriend raped me I would be afraid for my life.

I wouldn't say too many.

Of course not. Not many men will rape their partner. However if they did then yes that woman would be afraid for her life.

So, to say or imply that ALL rape victims are in fear of there lives is rubbish. The vast majority know they are being raped and that is all.

How on earth do they know that. You are saying that they know the victim is their partner and is therefore not going to kill them. I would say if they knew their boyfriend would rape them in the first place they probably wouldn't be with them.

OutlawPete

hypersquirrel wrote: »

I did read your post fully.

I'm sorry, the debate finished at midnight.

I was decalred the rightful winner.

Took on twenty of you's .. and won ...:p/

we'llallhavetea_old

NO it's too harsh a punishment.

its true hypersquirrel, i seen it.