Which sex is better at multitasking?

OutlawPete

Just reading an article there in Cosmopolitan (what of it? :mad:) that debates which sex is better at multitasking.

I myself believe wimminz be useless at such things and it's time this myth was once and for all put to bed.

Women are useless at multitasking as far as I'm concerned.

The confuse 'trying' to do lots of thing at once, with doing lots of things of things at once 'well'.

Try to talk to a women when she's cooking a meal and she'll bite your head off, they even turn the radio off when trying to park.

The offside rule is a prime example, too many people moving to fast confuse the ladies and their brains cease to function, bless

I feel men be better at multitasking, what says you?

Source

/what have I done

Both the same

Women obviously. Sure can't we do our make up and drive at the same time

KevinVonSpiel

I (mis)read this first as: Which sex is better than multitasking?

genericguy

Deleted User wrote: »

Women obviously. Sure can't we do our make up and drive at the same time

no, you can't. in fact you can't drive at all.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wT7zM8XgXQ

biko

Both the same

I envision this thread as a few digs at women driving or running a company or causing accidents.
Two bans for misogyny and lock before 100 posts.
We'll see.

Btw, there is no offside rule in real sports.

OutlawPete

Women

biko wrote: »

I read this as "boys rock, girls are stoopid".

You read it right so

alwaysadub

Both the same

Women.
I can do plenty of good things at the same time!
And i know what offside is :pac:

itsallaboutheL

Definately Doggy Style...

I can watch TV, surf the net, eat, write, play guitar

and all from the comfort of a ladies naughty parts

genericguy

KevinVonSpiel wrote: »

Which sex is better than multitasking.

oral?

Minstrel27

Both the same

Hasn't it already been proven that women can multitask better?

Latchy

OutlawPete wrote: »

Women are useless at multitasking as far as I'm concerned.

The confuse 'trying' to do lots of thing at once, with doing lots of things of things at once 'well'

Yes giving much thought to one task at a time and doing it well to a satisfactory finish, rather than trying to to 5 things at once ' very badly ' ...except filthy sex of course :pac:

Try to talk to a women when she's cooking a meal and she'll bite your head off, they even turn the radio off when trying to park.

Ohhhhh ..dont go there ....:eek:

/what have I done

You've ....We've gone there

Giselle

Deleted User wrote: »

Women obviously. Sure can't we do our make up and drive at the same time

While talking on the phone and critiquing the driving of everyone else.:)

GavRedKing

Women

Men.

We can facepalm, put our foot in our mouths and open up a can a worms all in one post :pac:

OutlawPete

Women

alwaysadub wrote: »

Women.
I can do plenty of good things at the same time!
And i know what offside is :pac:

Ah, but your just one woman

I have meant quite a few who can too.

Overall though, men are natural multitaskers.

The myth that women are better at multitasking needs to end .. :mad:

genericguy

Both the same

genericguy wrote: »

no, you can't. in fact you can't drive at all.

I can't see you tube in work. So I'm going to assume the worst.

Anyway, who on earth turns off their radio to park? I don't believe that for a second!!!

And the offside rule, sure that's easy :rolleyes:
Attacking player must be behind a defending player when a pass is made
new rule: only applies if the attacking player is interfering with play.

So there. :P

Doyler92

Multitasking - I can drink while having sex if that's any good to you.

Overheal

Women

How many Wimmin Drummers do we know? Im not saying I have a knack for it but its a pretty male dominated instrument.

OutlawPete

Women

biko wrote: »

I envision this thread as a few digs at women driving or running a company or causing accidents.

Why must there be any "digs" at women?

Women are free to post and their views as well as men.

Chances are they'll prove me wrong, no problem with that.

It's a lighthearted thread about Multitasking, no reason it shouldn't stay so.

Abi

OutlawPete wrote: »

Just reading an article there in Cosmopolitan (what of it? :mad:) that debates which sex is better at multitasking.

I myself believe wimminz be useless at such things and it's time this myth was once and for all put to bed.

Women are useless at multitasking as far as I'm concerned.

The confuse 'trying' to do lots of thing at once, with doing lots of things of things at once 'well'.

Try to talk to a women when she's cooking a meal and she'll bite your head off, they even turn the radio off when trying to park.

The offside rule is a prime example, too many people moving to fast confuse the ladies and their brains cease to function, bless

I feel men be better at multitasking, what says you?

Source

/what have I done

I see you're wearing the auld troll cologne today Pete :pac:

I've voted for both, just to piss you off like =P

landsleaving

Deleted User wrote: »

And the offside rule, sure that's easy :rolleyes:
Attacking player must be behind a defending player when a pass is made
new rule: only applies if the attacking player is interfering with play.

So there. :P

I see you can quote wikipedia while you read threads on boards.

+1 for the ladies

matrim

Deleted User wrote: »

I can't see you tube in work. So I'm going to assume the worst.

Anyway, who on earth turns off their radio to park? I don't believe that for a second!!!

And the offside rule, sure that's easy :rolleyes:
Attacking player must be behind a defending player when a pass is made
new rule: only applies if the attacking player is interfering with play.

So there. :P

Close but not quite correct. The Attacking player must be behind either 2 defenders or the ball

Latchy

Doyler92 wrote: »

Multitasking - I can drive while having sex if that's any good to you.

Mobile blow jobs are facking awesome

Overheal wrote: »

How many Wimmin Drummers do we know? Im not saying I have a knack for it but its a pretty male dominated instrument.

Ya one from the Corrs and the Bangles spring to mind ..quite a few rock chick drummers

I haz to run to shops now ...:pac:

OutlawPete

Women

Abitar wrote: »

I see you're wearing the auld troll cologne today Pete :pac:

I've voted for both, just to piss you off like =P

You can start the: "Who can read maps better.. " thread

Oh and men do ask for directions

landsleaving

Both the same

landsleaving wrote: »

I see you can quote wikipedia while you read threads on boards.

+1 for the ladies

Actually, this is the way wikipedia explain it. Which would go alot towards explaining why it would confuzzle the cleverest of heads!

A player is in an offside position if he is in his opponents' half of the field and is nearer to his opponents' goal line than both the ball and the next to last opponent.

The 2005 edition of the Laws of the Game included a new International Football Association Board decision that stated being "nearer to an opponent's goal line" meant that "any part of his head, body or feet is nearer to his opponents' goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent. The arms are not included in this definition."[1] This is taken to mean that any part of the attacking player named in this decision has to be past the part of the second-last defender closest to his goal line (excluding the arms) and past the part of the ball closest to the defenders' goal line.

It is not necessary that the goalkeeper be one of the last two opponents. It should be noted that any attacker that is even with or behind the ball is not in an offside position and may never be sanctioned for an offside offense. Regardless of position, there is no offside offense if a player receives the ball directly from a goal kick, corner kick, or throw-in.

IFAB has clarified in the 2009-2010 Laws of the Game that a player temporarily off the field of play is considered to be ON the boundary line at the point that he crossed over the boundary line.[2]

itsallaboutheL

OutlawPete wrote: »

You can start the: "Who can read maps better.. " thread

Oh and men do ask for directions

I once missed the red cow roundabout on the way to Cork, and decided if i just kept driving a general southerly direction i'd end up there eventually...

5 hours later i was in killkenny

Hank_Jones

Totally misread that title, can you have sex while multitasking?

I don't know, I'll give it a try...

landsleaving

*Ignores large quoted passage*

PAH! Offside rule is simple luv. Only a woman would get confused by that. (To be read in the voice of Ray Winstone.)

Glenster

Multitask all you want, you'll never be taoiseach or finance minister.

Girls are prettier though. So......

Kasabian

Girls are way better at multi tasking , way, way , way better

Wazdakka

Women probably..

They must have evolved that way by now.

All that washing, cleaning, ironing, hoovering, cooking etc.., (that they as a gender are expected to do for the obviously superior men in their life's) must really take up the day.
With all that, and the whole having to make themselves physically desirable and willing to submit at a moments notice to any sexual request made by the man in the relationship...

Multitasking is almost a necessity really.

If women couldn't do it, they would have virtually no time at all to look after the kids or admire the lovely polished underside of the workforce glass ceiling that we gave them.

quicklickpaddy

Women

Wazdakka wrote: »

Women probably..

They must have evolved that way by now.

All that washing, cleaning, ironing, hoovering, cooking etc.., (that they as a gender are expected to do for the obviously superior men in their life's) must really take up the day.
With all that, and the whole having to make themselves physically desirable and willing to submit at a moments notice to any sexual request made by the man in the relationship...

Multitasking is almost a necessity really.

If women couldn't do it, they would have virtually no time at all to look after the kids or admire the lovely polished underside of the workforce glass ceiling that we gave them.

Uh oh....

Latchy

Deleted User wrote: »

Actually, this is the way wikipedia explain it. Which would go alot towards explaining why it would confuzzle the cleverest of heads!

Simpler explanation - 4 ,5 guys (defenders ) simultaneously run out of box at sign of approaching opposition (foreward) who haz his eye on the incoming ball and needs to either slightly be behind , or in line with the defenders while obtaining said ball to proceed to stick ball into net :pac:

I watch and love womens football

Gummy Panda

Unix

quicklickpaddy

Women

Latchy wrote: »

Simpler explanation - 4 ,5 guys (defenders ) simultaneously run out of box at sign of approaching opposition (foreward) who haz his eye on the ball and needs to be behind , or in line with the defenders while obtaining said ball

.... That's just wrong?

jokettle

Both the same

My boyfriend's awful at multitaking but won't admit it. He just can't cope if more than one source of information is directed at him. So, I play games with this to amuse myself

Last week he was reading a text and I began to weave a yarn about teeny little pixies dancing on the tip of his nose. He put his phone away, asked "so what we were talking about?" and when i mentioned pixies, he assumed I meant the band.

Bless his little cotton socks

Abi

OutlawPete wrote: »

You can start the: "Who can read maps better.. " thread

Oh and men do ask for directions

Pff. I'm not opening that can o' worms :pac:

itsallaboutheL wrote: »

I once missed the red cow roundabout on the way to Cork, and decided if i just kept driving a general southerly direction i'd end up there eventually...

5 hours later i was in killkenny

I've done this a few times



I dunno. I think it entirely depends on what the tasks involved are, and the type of person they are - organised / disorganised.

My mom is a legend around the kitchen, she'd be cooking dinner and putting on washes etc all at the same time - all while we were running around her feet. I, on the other hand would burn the clothes and wash the dinner


But once you can multi-task in the sack, the rest will fall into place :pac:

OutlawPete

Women

Wazdakka wrote: »

Women probably..

They must have evolved that way by now.

All that washing, cleaning, ironing, hoovering, cooking etc.., (that they as a gender are expected to do for the obviously superior men in their life's) must really take up the day.
With all that, and the whole having to make themselves physically desirable and willing to submit at a moments notice to any sexual request made by the man in the relationship...

Multitasking is almost a necessity really.

If women couldn't do it, they would have virtually no time at all to look after the kids or admire the lovely polished underside of the workforce glass ceiling that we gave them.

My God.

Do you really believe all that?

alwaysadub

Both the same

Glenster wrote: »

Multitask all you want, you'll never be taoiseach or finance minister.

Girls are prettier though. So......

No,but we can be President.

Much less work to do :pac:

Kintarō Hattori

Honest answer.... who cares? I really wish we could stop this one up thing that always happens. The sooner we learn to all just get along the better.

KevinVonSpiel

Kintarō Hattori wrote: »

Honest answer.... who cares? I really wish we could stop this one up thing that always happens. The sooner we learn to all just get along the better.

So, you're saying that we're all stupid & you know best? Is that it?

Wazdakka

OutlawPete wrote: »

My God.

Do you really believe all that?

Ok.. I know I don't post in AH quite as much as you*
But I would have thought that .....

*Then again who does..

Ugh.. I'm really not arsed..

Yes I do Pete.. I really believe all of that.

:rolleyes:

Boom_Bap

i once boiled water and made a boiled egg at the same time, i like to call it extreme multi-tasking.

I also like to spell multi-tasking with a hyphen, this last statement has absolutely nothing to do with this thread

OutlawPete

Women

Kintarō Hattori wrote: »

Honest answer.... who cares? I really wish we could stop this one up thing that always happens. The sooner we learn to all just get along the better.

Well, maybe we could if women would stop saying that they can multitask better.

Men didn't start this, twas the wimminz and their fancy studies

Now they are winning this Poll, so prehaps they were right.

Damn them.

m5ex9oqjawdg2i

Orgy sex

ytpe2r5bxkn0c1

Both the same

Much as I hate to admit it, research after research has shown that Women are by far better at multitasking.

alwaysadub

Both the same

OutlawPete wrote: »

Well, maybe we could if women would stop saying that they can multitask better.

Men didn't start this, twas the wimminz and their fancy studies

Now they are winning this Poll, so prehaps they were right.

Damn them.

Yeah,poll isn't going quite the way you'd hoped is it :pac:

landsleaving

OutlawPete wrote: »

Well, maybe we could if women would stop saying that they can multitask better.

Men didn't start this, twas the wimminz and their fancy studies

Now they are winning this Poll, so prehaps they were right.

Damn them.

It's because they can vote and read at the same time. We'll catch up.

Oh... wait.

Latchy

quicklickpaddy wrote: »

.... That's just wrong?

which part ? explain plze

Glenster

Let's settle this once and for all, Men can only run one multinational corporation or lead one political party at a time but women can talk on the phone and watch tv simultaneously without serious problems.

I suppose women win.

Latchy

Abitar wrote: »

But once you can multi-task in the sack, the rest will fall into place :pac:

Now that's a task that both sexs can excel at .... some better than others :pac:

Gummy Panda

Abitar wrote: »

But once you can multi-task in the sack, the rest will fall into place :pac:

Is that keeping the ryhme of the thrusting while kissing her neck and sticking a finger up her bum?