Dwarf Star

studiorat

Most stars observed in the galaxy are not single stars, they have a binary partner (often more). The Sun, as far as we know, is alone, there has never been any observation that our star has a binary partner. However, there are some indications that might point to the possibility of a faint, lightweight companion that has remained secret till now.

Key to this argument is the statistical regularity of mass extinctions on Earth, and its relationship with Oort Cloud objects.


Every 25 million years or so, there appears to be some kind of extinction event on Earth.

Could it be that a stellar partner, called Nemesis, passes closer to the Sun during its orbit, disturbing objects in the Oort cloud? If this is the case, there may be a mechanism for the regularity of comet impacts on Earth, thus causing the statistical regularity of extinctions. Once again, this is a hypothetical argument, but it is based on good science and historical evidence.

Read more: http://www.astroengine.com/?p=4695#ixzz0h1r96yor

Now to suggest that you can take a picture of this is absolute nonsense. With a Capital NON-.

Why? for one thing,hypothetically Nemesis if it does exist is REALLY far away at the moment due in between 13 and 26 million years according to some. Secondly it does not emmit light, at least the kind a your camera would see.

Also, when we go back past the last two mass extinctions, the perodicity of the pattern begins to fall apart.

A quick question: When we're talking about Zionists are we talking about the good ones or the bad ones? I get confused sometimes

beyosoco

Kepti wrote: »

Photographs of what you claimed was PlanetX. It was you who made the connection and the prophecies are a part of that.

Why not just look at the photographs, why waste so much effort trying to disprove something that you haven't even examined the evidence for?

I'm not going to comment on the photographs until you post unedited versions. I don't think that you've doctored them in any significant way, but you should let us drawn our own conclusions for the originals.


There are four images on photobucket , two are originals albeit slightly smaller due to the constraints of the hosting site, two have had brightness and contrast adjustments, that's all.



I only brought it up because it stood out as an example of the danger of doomsday speculation. If you'd like to frame it as my falling into an elaborate and contrived zionist trap, what can I say. You got me Obama.

It stands as an example not of the danger of doomsday speculation but of the dangers of reading contrived material designed to enlist your brain for free in order to achieve a goal.



Would you be so kind as to explain why?

Why would I hypothesise or seek to comment on the figment of someone else's imagination, a story drawn to move the mind in a specific direction and enlist that mind to promulgate an agenda?

beyosoco

fontanalis wrote: »

If you're referring to the bible it's actually the book of revelation, not revelations!

Very sorry for my inaccuracy, I will promise to do better if you will promise to just look at the photographs.

beyosoco

studiorat wrote: »

Most stars observed in the galaxy are not single stars, they have a binary partner (often more). The Sun, as far as we know, is alone, there has never been any observation that our star has a binary partner. However, there are some indications that might point to the possibility of a faint, lightweight companion that has remained secret till now.

Key to this argument is the statistical regularity of mass extinctions on Earth, and its relationship with Oort Cloud objects.


Every 25 million years or so, there appears to be some kind of extinction event on Earth.

Could it be that a stellar partner, called Nemesis, passes closer to the Sun during its orbit, disturbing objects in the Oort cloud? If this is the case, there may be a mechanism for the regularity of comet impacts on Earth, thus causing the statistical regularity of extinctions. Once again, this is a hypothetical argument, but it is based on good science and historical evidence.

Read more: http://www.astroengine.com/?p=4695#ixzz0h1r96yor

Now to suggest that you can take a picture of this is absolute nonsense. With a Capital NON-.

Why? for one thing,hypothetically Nemesis if it does exist is REALLY far away at the moment due in between 13 and 26 million years according to some. Secondly it does not emmit light, at least the kind a your camera would see.

Also, when we go back past the last two mass extinctions, the perodicity of the pattern begins to fall apart.



Instead of calling my work absolute nonsense why don't you just look at the images, WHAT IS IS, AND NOTHING YOU HAVE KNOWN, BEEN TOLD, WORKED OUT, SEEN IN SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS, STUDIED, WRITTEN OR DREAMT CAN CHANGE THAT, WHAT IS IS, LOOK AT THE PHOTOGRAPHS, DOWNLOAD THEM, TEST THEM AS MUCH AS YOU LIKE, CALL ME WHATEVER NAMES YOU WANT BUT..................LOOK AT THE PHOTOGRAPHS...:(

Angus Og

beyosoco wrote: »

How many earth quakes do you need and how long does this freeze have to go on before you will have FELT the effect. Sumatra, Okinawa, Haiti, Chile, Sezhuan, Yellowstone activity?

Earthquakes have always been happening. Tectonic activity is part of earth's cycle. You obviously forget that the more humans there are on earth, the more likely we are to see huge disasters. It has nothing to do with your theory. If people build their homes on fault lines they will get hurt.

The cold is caused by winter. It's been happening for a long time too. Notice that southern hemisphere temps are not being reduced by your star. It just happens to be summer in the south.

beyosoco

fontanalis wrote: »

If you're referring to the bible it's actually the book of revelation, not revelations!

And ...... Number 5?:)

beyosoco

Angus Og wrote: »

Earthquakes have always been happening. Tectonic activity is part of earth's cycle. You obviously forget that the more humans there are on earth, the more likely we are to see huge disasters. It has nothing to do with your theory. If people build their homes on fault lines they will get hurt.

The cold is caused by winter. It's been happening for a long time too. Notice that southern hemisphere temps are not being reduced by your star. It just happens to be summer in the south.

More humans more disasters, are you suggesting more weight on fault lines is the reason? I suppose if you are happy with that then we should end this dialogue now. Good luck

Angus Og

No, and you know well I wasn't. But hey, I'll leave it at that. Good luck to you too.

Truthrevolution

So now that you have passed this information on to us and we know the end is nigh, what do you propose we do now beyosco?

beyosoco

Truthrevolution wrote: »

So now that you have passed this information on to us and we know the end is nigh, what do you propose we do now beyosco?

That is entirely up to you, why should I suggest you do anything.

studiorat

beyosoco wrote: »

Instead of calling my work absolute nonsense why don't you just look at the images, WHAT IS IS, AND NOTHING YOU HAVE KNOWN, BEEN TOLD, WORKED OUT, SEEN IN SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS, STUDIED, WRITTEN OR DREAMT CAN CHANGE THAT, WHAT IS IS, LOOK AT THE PHOTOGRAPHS, DOWNLOAD THEM, TEST THEM AS MUCH AS YOU LIKE, CALL ME WHATEVER NAMES YOU WANT BUT..................LOOK AT THE PHOTOGRAPHS...:(

What names did I call you?

I did look at the pictures. :rolleyes:
It looks like a picture of the sun and the lights diffusion through the clouds to me. As a photographer you should understand such issues like diffusion.

Here's a similar photo you'll see the two suns due to the diffusion from the clouds.

The thread title is dwarf star. And I said if you tried to take a picture of such you couldn't do it with a regular camera. It doesn't emmit light.

Stastically it's not unreasonable to consider a second "twin" to the sun. Suggesting you can take a picture of it is nonsense. That is if you are suggesting it's a second local star.

Truthrevolution

beyosoco wrote: »

That is entirely up to you, why should I suggest you do anything.

Because you said you were posting this information to help people, but you offer very little help, more scaring the life out of people than anything else
Be

beyosoco

Truthrevolution wrote: »

Because you said you were posting this information to help people, but you offer very little help, more scaring the life out of people than anything else
Be

Have I not helped you see what chemtrails are about? Have I not helped you see the truth of our predicament? You were seeking truth on a conspiracy theory section of a forum were you not? Is it only that truth you seek which fits inside your frame of reference, the comfortable kind?
You now seek to blame me for your discovering this uncomfortable truth? My granny used to say "be careful what you pray for".

studiorat

beyosoco wrote: »

You now seek to blame me for your discovering this uncomfortable truth? My granny used to say "be careful what you pray for".

You are giving yourself credit for "discovering" that there are what? Two Suns?

Don't kid yourself you are helping nobody discover anything. With the exception of maybe diffusion.

You are claiming truths. That doesn't mean they are actually true.

Now, why isn't this a case of diffusion?

Truthrevolution

beyosoco wrote: »

Have I not helped you see what chemtrails are about? Have I not helped you see the truth of our predicament? You were seeking truth on a conspiracy theory section of a forum were you not? Is it only that truth you seek which fits inside your frame of reference, the comfortable kind?
You now seek to blame me for your discovering this uncomfortable truth? My granny used to say "be careful what you pray for".

Dont get me wrong i admire what you are trying to do here, but you have fallen for this planet X theory hook, line and sinker.I gotta hand it to you its a really good conspiracy theory (it was after all invented by Nasa and the US government) and even your photos seem very interesting but there is a lot more to this than meets the eye.I suggest you do a little bit of disinfo research as i think you are barking up the wrong tree with this.You seem like a genuine truthseeker but the reality is you got caught up in a wild goose chase.

robtri

Truthrevolution wrote: »

Dont get me wrong i admire what you are trying to do here, but you have fallen for this planet X theory hook, line and sinker.I gotta hand it to you its a really good conspiracy theory (it was after all invented by Nasa and the US government) and even your photos seem very interesting but there is a lot more to this than meets the eye.I suggest you do a little bit of disinfo research as i think you are barking up the wrong tree with this.You seem like a genuine truthseeker but the reality is you got caught up in a wild goose chase.

so why dont you tell us what the real deal is then.. since you know??

studiorat

Truthrevolution wrote: »

but you have fallen for this planet X theory hook, line and sinker.I gotta hand it to you its a really good conspiracy theory (it was after all invented by Nasa and the US government)

Nope, Percival Lowell him of the Mars Canals fame took up the search due to percived discrepencies in the orbits of some of the other planets. Discrepencies that have been found to be due to error. Undiscovered planet theories have been around since the mid 18th C.

Truthrevolution

robtri wrote: »

so why dont you tell us what the real deal is then.. since you know??

"We are on the verge of a global transformation.All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the new world order" - David Rockefeller

Wake up people its just an illuminati guise.By 2012 they are going to try something big in order to advance their depopulation agenda so what bigger than another f**king planet to hit the earth.

SK - But no such planet exists?

NA - hell lets just invent one.

SK - but you cant possibly do that it would go against everything that astrology, science, space exploration etc. has ever told us

NA - Well put a NASA conspiracy cover-up out there that this planet has existed all along and CTers will have a field day, it will spread like wildfire.

Now we know that the US and Russia have weather and ionisphere manipulating weapons at their disposal.These could cause the big earthquakes and tsunamis we are being promised will happen.They probably by that stage will have the equipment to even interpret a planetary shape within our skies.It all seems like the perfect guise to me.

namloc1980

Truthrevolution wrote: »

"We are on the verge of a global transformation.All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the new world order" - David Rockefeller

Wake up people its just an illuminati guise.By 2012 they are going to try something big in order to advance their depopulation agenda so what bigger than another f**king planet to hit the earth.

SK - But no such planet exists?

NA - hell lets just invent one.

SK - but you cant possibly do that it would go against everything that astrology, science, space exploration etc. has ever told us

NA - Well put a NASA conspiracy cover-up out there that this planet has existed all along and CTers will have a field day, it will spread like wildfire.

Now we know that the US and Russia have weather and ionisphere manipulating weapons at their disposal.These could cause the big earthquakes and tsunamis we are being promised will happen.They probably by that stage will have the equipment to even interpret a planetary shape within our skies.It all seems like the perfect guise to me.

Your post is so full of false logic and slippery slope fallacy that I don't know where to start with it but this is absolutely 'Thread of the Year'.

Truthrevolution

studiorat wrote: »

Nope, Percival Lowell him of the Mars Canals fame took up the search due to percived discrepencies in the orbits of some of the other planets. Discrepencies that have been found to be due to error. Undiscovered planet theories have been around since the mid 18th C.

Im talking about the Planet X theory, which hasnt been around that long.

Truthrevolution

namloc1980 wrote: »

Your post is full os so much false logic and slippery slope fallacy that I don't know where to start with it but this is absolutely 'Thread of the Year'.

Minds are like umberellas, they only work when they are open.

namloc1980

Truthrevolution wrote: »

Minds are like umberellas, they only work when they are open.

Really? There's open and then there is just off the wall stuff. Most ppl will be open to most things but when it gets into the realm of a very bad Hollywood sci-fi movie then openess goes out the window

Truthrevolution

namloc1980 wrote: »

Really? There's open and then there is just off the wall stuff. Most ppl will be open to most things but when it gets into the realm of a very bad Hollywood sci-fi movie then openess goes out the window

Unfortunately reality in this life is stranger than fiction.If these dangerous weather manipulating weapons fall into the wrong hands why wouldnt they be used?

mysterious

namloc1980 wrote: »

Really? There's open and then there is just off the wall stuff. Most ppl will be open to most things but when it gets into the realm of a very bad Hollywood sci-fi movie then openess goes out the window

Maybe your been to busy watching "hollywood sci movies" to realise that things that are very out there or very real to assume that things also may happen within this reality just as whacky. The norse spiral was unlike anything people have seen before. It happens in movies. Aliens have invaded our planet in movies, and they have in real life too. Its not actually that out there at all. The brainwashing is the problem whereby people have this blocked mindset that "crazy stuff just happens in movies".

Its why everyone said 9/11 was just like a movie when it happened.

If you were open enough in what Truthevolution made his point on, you would also know that "hollywood" is actually mind control and brainwashing.

Its trying to get you think that what happens in movies stays in movies, and everything else in this world is just normal.

I think most people have copped on to this at this point...... Seriously like.

Whats off the wall?

Who what?

fontanalis

Truthrevolution wrote: »

Minds are like umberellas, they only work when they are open.

"You can open your mind so much your brain falls out"
Carl Sagan

fontanalis

mysterious wrote: »

Maybe your been to busy watching "hollywood sci movies" to realise that things that are very out there or very real to happen within this reality.

If you were open enough in what Truthevolution made his point on, you would also know that "hollywood" is actually mind control and brainwashing.

Its trying to get you think that what happens in movies stays in movies, and everything else in this world is just normal.

I think most people have copped on to this at this point...... Seriously like.

Whats off the wall?

Who what?

Why, when, where?

Truthrevolution

fontanalis wrote: »

"You can open your mind so much your brain falls out"
Carl Sagan

"Modern people rely too heavily on natural science and logical positivism" Carl Jung

mysterious

Most people are not familar with the real story behind the Planet X theory and are only going on whats coming through the back door or what someone has said.


If you look at the star systems in our galaxy you will find they are not just a one star system or a two star system rotating each other. Some stars that are far way are in their orbits and crosses other stars. You have star clusters where a group of stars are connected to each other as a group. As a whole all stars in a rotation axis around the galaxy, and every revolution brings the stars in alignment to the previous and next revolution. You could actually say that stars and comets are going in all direction as they rotate around our galaxy. Some stars of our size orbits between massive stars and acts like a comet to these mass stars. Its just not what people think it is. i could just not nor want to hear the nonsense they are been told in university. eek. Nasa sprout some amount of crap about our actual history of our solar system. in one thousand years time, your solar system will change again. One million years and a planet may move orbit totally. 2 million years and a comet the size of ireland could hit jupiter. Everything is in rotation and revoulution. If you think our planets were formed 4.5 billion years ago and we had 9 planets in the same orbits (Like Nasa said) you may as well believe everything the purple dinosaur says about anything too.... Our sun is in orbit with other stars too, it doesnt mean other stars will come near us, but a star such as Sirius is part of our start cluster and thats what plant X is connected with.

If I get one ounce of smart digs or abuse. I will not discuss this whatsoever and let you all get into this tit for that argument because I'm just not going down that road. To be frank none of you are even near to getting this debunked or even getting anywhere on it

People just think "Planet X" is just a Saturn sized planet on the outer reaches of our kuiper belt. Wrong. Some people say its circling our star system like our planets as our "tenth planet". Wrong. Some people its a new theory. Also wrong.


It seems people are more focused on parading their egos on who knows more about this than the other. What I see is, complete sillyness on both sides. Where one is just trying to prove they are more knowledgable than the other. Its actually quite embarrassing. If you all took a step back and see yourselves talking about a topic your really only basing on by "your beliefs system" In 10 pages all I have seen is one just taking swipes at another and posting jokes, ridicule and jibes at another. There is a very few on this board that are actually discussing this like adults. I have never seen such immaturity and hostility on other forums on the nature of these topics, than i do here. This will have to be brought up again in feedback.

I will not post my information on this, because its just going to cause more antoganisation on this board. And just don't get me started on "astronomy and astronomers on what they say"....:rolleyes: They are only going by what NASA is telling them.

When we are living in a world run by aliens and the universe teeming with life. And people go to college and get a degree in astronomy and they are at the mercy of NASA by only questioning that life may be out there. Good god. My head hurts.

namloc1980

mysterious wrote: »

Maybe your been to busy watching "hollywood sci movies" to realise that things that are very out there or very real to assume that things also may happen within this reality just as whacky. The norse spiral was unlike anything people have seen before. It happens in movies. Aliens have invaded our planet in movies, and they have in real life too. Its not actually that out there at all. The brainwashing is the problem whereby people have this blocked mindset that "crazy stuff just happens in movies".

Its why everyone said 9/11 was just like a movie when it happened.

If you were open enough in what Truthevolution made his point on, you would also know that "hollywood" is actually mind control and brainwashing.

Its trying to get you think that what happens in movies stays in movies, and everything else in this world is just normal.

I think most people have copped on to this at this point...... Seriously like.

Whats off the wall?

Who what?

Thanks for the new age lecture and if you want to believe every made up stuff that some randomer puts up on youtube etc. then off you go. Some of us can actually think for ourselves.

espinolman

mysterious wrote: »

I will not post my information on this, because its just going to cause more antoganisation on this board.

Post it and ignore the antagonisation .