Dwarf Star

robtri

Emkay wrote: »

Known to me personally? No, but the following information is in the public domain.

Robert S Harrington viewed planet X from New Zealand in the early 90's. Harrington was Supervising Astronomer for the US Naval Observatory. He informed NASA what he had found, but died suddenly, apparently of a previously undiagnosed cancer, before he could return home and publicise his discovery that Planet X was indeed inbound into our solar system! He had been looking for Planet X for some dozen years.

It is relevant to the subject of Planet X that NASA falsely stated in their obituary that Harrington had late in his career become "skeptical" about Planet X. Harrington's colleague in the search for Planet X, retracted any statements he himself had previously made, and was henceforward silent on the subject.

Harrington was interviewed in conversation with Sitchin in 1990. They were in total agreement as to where Planet X would be found, and had each, without any collaboration with the other, drawn its elliptical orbit. Sitchin, of course, knew a great deal about the tenth planet, or Planet X, through his scholarly work deciphering the ancient Sumerian tablets.

Before Harrington actually found the precise location of Planet X, a report was published in the Washington Post on Fri Dec 30 1983, that "A heavenly body, possibly as large as the giant planet Jupiter and possibly so close to Earth that it could be part of this solar system, has been found in the direction of the constellation Orion by an orbiting telescope aboard the US Infrared Astronomical Satellite. "

So Planet X was viewed by IRAS a decade or more before its precise location was confirmed by Harrington, who, conveniently for NASA, then died.

when they talked about planet x.... where they not speculating about the tenth planet of the solar system???
Nasa already confirmed its exsistence and dont hide it...
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/29jul_planetx.htm

Emkay

robtri wrote: »

when they talked about planet x.... where they not speculating about the tenth planet of the solar system???
Nasa already confirmed its exsistence and dont hide it...
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/29jul_planetx.htm

NASA stands for Never A Straight Answer.

The IRAS telescope first sighted Planet X before they publicly announced it in 1983. X =ten, i.e the tenth planet, known about and described by the Sumerians long, long ago. Perhaps the IRAS sighting was what prompted Ronnie Reagan to cosily tell us all that if we faced a threat from outside our world, we could all get along just fine!

At any rate, the link you have posted does not seem to be describing the tenth planet discovered some 3 decades ago, but a much more recent 'discovery', if that indeed is what it is.

Incidentally, chemtrail planes regularly draw an X in the sky. Check it out, please, on you tube, where you will find dozens and hundreds and even thousands of X's in chemtrail videos from all round the world.

beyosoco

namloc1980 wrote: »

Red flares???? Your interpretation of those images as a planet/star or something is so full of conjecture and false logic. Your interpretation neglects the rest of the people on the planet who have eyes and can see these things, if they existed. It totally ignores the fact that no amateur astronomer has reported seeing such a thing. And let's face it if it were as big as you suggest the entire planet should be able to see it. Conclusion. Camera anomaly

And my interpretation is that you find it very difficult to trust what your brain says that your own eyes are seeing. Conclusion: Should have gone to specsavers.

ps: Over to you, no doubt you'll want the last word.

robtri

Emkay wrote: »

NASA stands for Never A Straight Answer.

The IRAS telescope first sighted Planet X before they publicly announced it in 1983. X =ten, i.e the tenth planet, known about and described by the Sumerians long, long ago. Perhaps the IRAS sighting was what prompted Ronnie Reagan to cosily tell us all that if we faced a threat from outside our world, we could all get along just fine!

At any rate, the link you have posted does not seem to be describing the tenth planet discovered some 3 decades ago, but a much more recent 'discovery', if that indeed is what it is.

Incidentally, chemtrail planes regularly draw an X in the sky. Check it out, please, on you tube, where you will find dozens and hundreds and even thousands of X's in chemtrail videos from all round the world.

it describes the tenth planet in our solar system next after pluto....

believe it or not normal plaens travel across each others parts as they go from sirport to airport.. nad their contrails will produce an x.....
nothing weird or exciting about that.... they follow flight paths.. just like cars follow roads... and many roads make x's

namloc1980

beyosoco wrote: »

And my interpretation is that you find it very difficult to trust what your brain says that your own eyes are seeing. Conclusion: Should have gone to specsavers.

ps: Over to you, no doubt you'll want the last word.

Maybe you should open your eyes and your mind. You are excluding all other possible explanations because you are determined to believe that this is a planet/star no matter what. You can't explain why other people can't see this (especially if it is so big), why astronomers have missed this apparently massive object or how it manages to move so fast? Your interpretation fails on so many levels I'm afraid. And to top it off you refuse to post the rest of your alleged 'images' of this object. :pac:

Kepti

Emkay wrote: »

NASA stands for Never A Straight Answer.

The IRAS telescope first sighted Planet X before they publicly announced it in 1983. X =ten, i.e the tenth planet, known about and described by the Sumerians long, long ago. Perhaps the IRAS sighting was what prompted Ronnie Reagan to cosily tell us all that if we faced a threat from outside our world, we could all get along just fine!

At any rate, the link you have posted does not seem to be describing the tenth planet discovered some 3 decades ago, but a much more recent 'discovery', if that indeed is what it is.

Incidentally, chemtrail planes regularly draw an X in the sky. Check it out, please, on you tube, where you will find dozens and hundreds and even thousands of X's in chemtrail videos from all round the world.

NASA stands for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. You seem to be misinformed sir.

Could you show us some of these esoteric Sumerian texts which describe Planet X? I've asked a few different people now for these. They seem reluctant to post them for some reason.

Kepti

robtri wrote: »

it describes the tenth planet in our solar system next after pluto....

believe it or not normal plaens travel across each others parts as they go from sirport to airport.. nad their contrails will produce an x.....
nothing weird or exciting about that.... they follow flight paths.. just like cars follow roads... and many roads make x's

I like to call them sky-kisses.

beyosoco

namloc1980 wrote: »

Maybe you should open your eyes and your mind. You are excluding all other possible explanations because you are determined to believe that this is a planet/star no matter what. You can't explain why other people can't see this (especially if it is so big), why astronomers have missed this apparently massive object or how it manages to move so fast? Your interpretation fails on so many levels I'm afraid. And to top it off you refuse to post the rest of your alleged 'images' of this object. :pac:

I knew you'd manage the last word, well done, and in spite of others saying the photographs are not doctored in any way whatsoever you still won't see what is. You win, I give up, I throw the towel in and give way to a superior intellect who can not only tell me what I am not seeing but at the same time not see what he is seeing.

Captain Chaos

The thing is supposedly in a steady x thousands of years elipitical orbit acording to you and it can move that fast across the sky in that time of a few seconds, and that its moving randomly all the time yet still in a massively elongated orbit. The laws of physics do not allow for that in nature unless it's a giant spaceship from the future or something daft like that. A thing that size moving that fast would cause chaos on almost all the planets in the solar system and even the sun's orbit, if it really is a dwarf star because of the mass they do have.

Come on, try and be realistic here.

Kepti

beyosoco wrote: »

I knew you'd manage the last word, well done, and in spite of others saying the photographs are not doctored in any way whatsoever you still won't see what is. You win, I give up, I throw the towel in and give way to a superior intellect who can not only tell me what I am not seeing but at the same time not see what he is seeing.

I said that in my opinion the images weren't doctored. It's dishonest of you to use that to try to prop up your argument while ignoring every other alternative explanation.

robtri

namloc1980 wrote: »

Maybe you should open your eyes and your mind. You are excluding all other possible explanations because you are determined to believe that this is a planet/star no matter what. You can't explain why other people can't see this (especially if it is so big), why astronomers have missed this apparently massive object or how it manages to move so fast? Your interpretation fails on so many levels I'm afraid. And to top it off you refuse to post the rest of your alleged 'images' of this object. :pac:

not that i support this, but we missed the tenth planet for many many a years despite many people looking into the sky...
but thats because space is so vast and out vision is so limited...

but in defence of not supporting this, if its a star, burning bright... in our solar system, there is no way we could miss it no matter how fast it moves... and no chemtrailing would cover it up....

namloc1980

Emkay wrote: »

The IRAS telescope first sighted Planet X before they publicly announced it in 1983. X =ten, i.e the tenth planet, known about and described by the Sumerians long, long ago. Perhaps the IRAS sighting was what prompted Ronnie Reagan to cosily tell us all that if we faced a threat from outside our world, we could all get along just fine!

Of course never let the truth get in the way of a good CT. The reality is that the IRAS was the first space based infrared observatory and like anything new it returned interesting data, not least some new previously unknown infrared sources. When the IRAS team announced their findings they said they didn't know what the infrared sources were without further study, but they could be anything from a planet in the outer solar system to a distant galaxy. Of course the CTers and the press picked up on the planet part and ignored the rest of the findings. No surprise there! :rolleyes:

Emkay

Kepti wrote: »

I like to call them sky-kisses.

I find that truly bizarre. Jesus -please find out about chemtrails and what these persistent contrails - if you prefer to call them that - contain. www.carnicom.com is a good place to start. Kiss of death they might be, but certainly they are not rooted in affection.

namloc1980

beyosoco wrote: »

I knew you'd manage the last word, well done, and in spite of others saying the photographs are not doctored in any way whatsoever you still won't see what is. You win, I give up, I throw the towel in and give way to a superior intellect who can not only tell me what I am not seeing but at the same time not see what he is seeing.

LOL you can't even answer simple questions! :pac: The images may not be doctored but that doesn't mean they show what you think it is. Seriously if you just think about it: no one else can see it/astronomers can't see it/it travels at incredible speed? Come on, be realistic.

beyosoco

Kepti wrote: »

I said that in my opinion the images weren't doctored. It's dishonest of you to use that to try to prop up your argument while ignoring every other alternative explanation.

Nothing has been ignored, sorry if I have embarrassed you by referencing you, thought that was legal on these forums, no propping up necessary thanks.

beyosoco

namloc1980 wrote: »

LOL you can't even answer simple questions! :pac: The images may not be doctored but that doesn't mean they show what you think it is. Seriously if you just think about it: no one else can see it/astronomers can't see it/it travels at incredible speed? Come on, be realistic.

You win, I give up, I throw the towel in (second time), I can't answer a simple question. You are completely right and I totally agree with everything you say. Is that good enough for you? Sorry forgot to say that I am also totally unrealistic. Hmmmmmm:D
,

Emkay

namloc1980 wrote: »

Of course never let the truth get in the way of a good CT. The reality is that the IRAS was the first space based infrared observatory and like anything new it returned interesting data, not least some new previously unknown infrared sources. When the IRAS team announced their findings they said they didn't know what the infrared sources were without further study, but they could be anything from a planet in the outer solar system to a distant galaxy. Of course the CTers and the press picked up on the planet part and ignored the rest of the findings. No surprise there! :rolleyes:

You are choosing to ignore a good part of what I posted.

Robert Harrington devoted more than a decade to finding the exact location and having found the planet, Planet X, he met an untimely end. He was not a backyard astronomer, nor was he promoting any theory, conspiracy or otherwise.

The conspiracy behind this thread is surely that the truth of this planet's existence, and more importantly its path in our solar system, has been hidden from us, by and large, for nearly three decades now, while those in power have been steadily building their underground hidyholes and setting up seed banks, deep, deep underground. Do you really think Bill Gates likes gardening? He has another agenda entirely, as do all his ilk.

Emkay

robtri wrote: »

it describes the tenth planet in our solar system next after pluto....

believe it or not normal plaens travel across each others parts as they go from sirport to airport.. nad their contrails will produce an x.....
nothing weird or exciting about that.... they follow flight paths.. just like cars follow roads... and many roads make x's

Of course regular aircraft follow flightpaths. But their contrails do not persist for hours, do not alter the sky, do not spread and morph into false cloud-type formations, do not obscure the sun. Contrails dissipate quite quickly whatever the atmospheric conditions.

Contrails do not persist; chemtrails do. And chemplanes regularly draw X's in the sky over Ireland. Look at youtube.

Please visit www.carnicom.com, or www.bariumblues.com

Kepti

Emkay wrote: »

I find that truly bizarre. Jesus -please find out about chemtrails and what these persistent contrails - if you prefer to call them that - contain. www.carnicom.com is a good place to start. Kiss of death they might be, but certainly they are not rooted in affection.

Why would they be watching us if not to protect us?

beyosoco wrote: »

Nothing has been ignored, sorry if I have embarrassed you by referencing you, thought that was legal on these forums, no propping up necessary thanks.

You didn't embarrass me. Of course you're allowed to quote me, that's not what I take issue with.

Again, just because the image shows no sign of being doctored doesn't mean that you can rule out every other reasonable explanation. Eliminating one possible explanation does not automatically make yours right.

espinolman

namloc1980 wrote: »

That's not true. Bodies that are off the ecliptic can be seen just as easily as objects that are on the ecliptic place.

They only see what they are looking for ,most people have never heard of planet x .

namloc1980

Emkay wrote: »

You are choosing to ignore a good part of what I posted.

Robert Harrington devoted more than a decade to finding the exact location and having found the planet, Planet X, he met an untimely end. He was not a backyard astronomer, nor was he promoting any theory, conspiracy or otherwise.

The conspiracy behind this thread is surely that the truth of this planet's existence, and more importantly its path in our solar system, has been hidden from us, by and large, for nearly three decades now, while those in power have been steadily building their underground hidyholes and setting up seed banks, deep, deep underground. Do you really think Bill Gates likes gardening? He has another agenda entirely, as do all his ilk.

Really??? Can you point us to a source where Mr. Harrington actually discovered this so called Planet X please?

The rest of your post is full of conjecture and paranoia.

Emkay

Kepti wrote: »

NASA stands for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. You seem to be misinformed sir.

Could you show us some of these esoteric Sumerian texts which describe Planet X? I've asked a few different people now for these. They seem reluctant to post them for some reason.

Be a bit difficult to post Sumerian texts for they are 'written in stone' as it were!

They are very ancient clay tablets inscribed with an ancient language and pictures in relief. Many are held in the vaults of the British Museum, and more in Iraq and Iran too, I believe.

If you want to know more about the Sumerians, read Z. Sitchin's many works, or google Sumer, Sumeria, Sumerian etc. There is a website where you can read the texts in translation, of course. Or you could trawl through youtube's many videos on the subject - there are some good ones among the dross.

Only a handful of scholars around the world are proficient in the language and can decipher the writings. It is said there are still many hundreds of tablets awaiting translation.

Emkay

namloc1980 wrote: »

Really??? Can you point us to a source where Mr. Harrington actually discovered this so called Planet X please?

The rest of your post is full of conjecture and paranoia.

Namecalling Namloc.

Unnecessary and surely against the rules for you to be so derogatory.

It is pointless trying to converse with you.

beyosoco

Kepti wrote: »

Why would they be watching us if not to protect us?



You didn't embarrass me. Of course you're allowed to quote me, that's not what I take issue with.

Again, just because the image shows no sign of being doctored doesn't mean that you can rule out every other reasonable explanation. Eliminating one possible explanation does not automatically make yours right.

And the reasonable explanations for the series of images of what appear to be planets in our inner solar system are?

namloc1980

Emkay wrote: »

Namecalling Namloc.

Unnecessary and surely against the rules for you to be so derogatory.

It is pointless trying to converse with you.

No namecalling. Maybe you didn't read the post? And can't answer a question? Oh well :rolleyes:

Truthrevolution

Emkay wrote: »

Be a bit difficult to post Sumerian texts for they are 'written in stone' as it were!

They are very ancient clay tablets inscribed with an ancient language and pictures in relief. Many are held in the vaults of the British Museum, and more in Iraq and Iran too, I believe.

If you want to know more about the Sumerians, read Z. Sitchin's many works, or google Sumer, Sumeria, Sumerian etc. There is a website where you can read the texts in translation, of course. Or you could trawl through youtube's many videos on the subject - there are some good ones among the dross.

Only a handful of scholars around the world are proficient in the language and can decipher the writings. It is said there are still many hundreds of tablets awaiting translation.

Just out of interest, would you be able to give us a brief description of what some of these Sumerian texts are actually saying, if its no trouble of course......

namloc1980

beyosoco wrote: »

And the reasonable explanations for the series of images of what appear to be planets in our inner solar system are?

It fails on the basis that the entire planet Earth has somehow missed this planet (which would be enormous based on your image)! You still can't explain why 6 billion people have failed to see this?

fontanalis

beyosoco wrote: »

And the reasonable explanations for the series of images of what appear to be planets in our inner solar system are?

So there's more than one, so planet or star?

beyosoco

namloc1980 wrote: »

It fails on the basis that the entire planet Earth has somehow missed this planet (which would be enormous based on your image)! You still can't explain why 6 billion people have failed to see this?

You win, I give up (third time), I find it totally impossible to deal with your logic and reasoning.

namloc1980

beyosoco wrote: »

You win, I give up (third time), I find it totally impossible to deal with your logic and reasoning.

That was easy :pac::pac: