Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Can someone tell me??.... smallbore

  • 25-02-2010 10:50pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭


    ...........................why there doesnt seem to be a Squad never mind Squad training??, and why with the Olympics on our doorstep there is no funding and from what I see no effort to get some shooters there to compete ??:(


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 338 ✭✭intershoot


    What is the structure for the governing bodies in RoI?

    I am sure there is something similar to the North, whereby the equivalent to the NISSU set the squad requirements and training programme. As far as I am aware we have the Shooting Federation, then the NISSU, and then Counties West & Counties East.

    Might be useful to get a contact in some of these layers!! I am sure someone can direct you to the right person.

    :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,711 ✭✭✭fat-tony


    The NTSA is the National Governing Body (NGB) for ISSF rifle and pistol shooting in Ireland. Queries regarding administration of the sport can be directed to them:

    website - www.targetshootingireland.org
    email - secretary@targetshootingireland.org


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 682 ✭✭✭demonloop


    Following the AGM on the 10th October 2009, the following were elected to the NTSA committee:

    President: Liam Crawford

    Vice President: Kealan Symes

    Secretary: Joe Kinane

    Treasurer: Geoff Cooney

    Rifle Coordinator: Michael Madigan

    Airgun Coordinator: Pat O'Hagan

    Pistol Coordinator: Christy Galvin

    Collegiate/Ladies Officer: Emma Lyons

    The following resigned with the thanks of the Members and Committee:

    Mark Dennehy
    David Franklin


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 204 ✭✭xesse


    yea i agree with the idea of competing...
    but you have to qualify first
    and there is no funding too ,which is a joke
    i,d guess the countries that give enough funding so the shooter could shoot full-time will do the best
    FLOYDSTER wrote: »
    ...........................why there doesnt seem to be a Squad never mind Squad training??, and why with the Olympics on our doorstep there is no funding and from what I see no effort to get some shooters there to compete ??:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭FLOYDSTER


    xesse wrote: »
    yea i agree with the idea of competing...
    but you have to qualify first
    and there is no funding too ,which is a joke
    i,d guess the countries that give enough funding so the shooter could shoot full-time will do the best

    Its not even the competing, we dont have a squad at the minute!!:(, its great shooting down at Rathdrum at 25m on the electronic (great facilities and your always made welcome) but were is that going to get us?, we need some 50m shooting.

    Anyone fancy a get together for a day or two for some training??

    Comber is only too happy for us to train there and I'm sure the guys at Fermoy would be up for letting us use the range!!;)

    I know its a bit of travelling for people whatever happens but its better than nothing!;)

    Anyone planning on shooting comps of island this year??


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    FLOYDSTER wrote: »
    Its not even the competing, we dont have a squad at the minute!!:(, its great shooting down at Rathdrum at 25m on the electronic (great facilities and your always made welcome) but were is that going to get us?, we need some 50m shooting.

    Anyone fancy a get together for a day or two for some training??

    Comber is only too happy for us to train there and I'm sure the guys at Fermoy would be up for letting us use the range!!;)

    I know its a bit of travelling for people whatever happens but its better than nothing!;)

    Anyone planning on shooting comps of island this year??

    If I get the PSNI paperwork sorted I'll be up to Comber whenever I get a chance. And planning for the Isle of Man, everything else seems to be off the table now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 sbw


    It always struck me that East Antrim would make the best base for a squad. You have both 10m and 50m in the same complex and the 50m range is sheltered enough to practice the skill of hitting 596+ in good conditions, rather than the skill of hitting 590+ in windy conditions. 9 times out of 10, it's the former skill you need in international competition and, much as I like Comber, it's too windy to use to train up to hitting 596+ regularly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Bananaman


    What sort of range do you need to practice?

    50m Prone?

    There are plenty of those in the Dublin/Wicklow region if you need one, simply a matter of asking.

    B'Man


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭FLOYDSTER


    I havent shot at East Antrim for 6 years+ but I'm not too sure people are shooting 596's there very often!;) At Comber we also have 10m in the same complex along with a kitchen and somewhere to crash upstairs keeping costs down!;)

    There is also the added benefit of some Gehman style boxes which can be set up and used.

    At the end of the day it really doesnt matter where the squad get together as long as there was a squad!;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 sbw


    It's not just a matter of having a range, it has to be the right sort of range, ie a sheltered one. If you can't shooting a 596+ there, then there's no hope on a hindy range. The pressures of shooting a 596+ score will be different to to those of shooting 590+ on a windy day and need to be trained up to.

    Of the ranges in Ireland, EA has the most potential, even if it's not being capitalized on.

    There was a fairly healthy squad going 6 years ago. What happened to that?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    Bananaman wrote: »
    What sort of range do you need to practice?

    50m Prone?

    There are plenty of those in the Dublin/Wicklow region if you need one, simply a matter of asking.

    B'Man

    There's a massive difference between the typical ranges we have up in the Dublin/Wicklow mountains and the sort of range you need to train on to become internationally competitive. for instance, if you look back to the photos we took in the Isle of Man last year and compare them to any of our local ranges, the differences are stark. That's one of the finest ranges in the British Isles, and sbw's home range, lucky sod.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Bananaman


    There's a massive difference between the typical ranges we have .......... and the sort of range you need to train on to become internationally competitive.

    That may be so but you can only practice on what you got. You have to make do with what you have and as far as I know there are plenty of 50m Prone Rifle Ranges and they are not bits of heather 50m from a ditch in the mountains - although at the same time I do not believe many of them have underfloor heating and heated toilet seats either.

    NASRPC run plenty of 50m Prone Sporting Rifle Events throughout the year on a number of ranges. They do the 25m Events in Rathdrum.

    Surely you guys can use the same ones to practice on no?

    Just thought it would be an option rather than not practicing.

    B'Man


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    Bananaman wrote: »
    That may be so but you can only practice on what you got. You have to make do with what you have and as far as I know there are plenty of 50m Prone Rifle Ranges and they are not bits of heather 50m from a ditch in the mountains - although at the same time I do not believe many of them have underfloor heating and heated toilet seats either.

    NASRPC run plenty of 50m Prone Sporting Rifle Events throughout the year on a number of ranges. They do the 25m Events in Rathdrum.

    Surely you guys can use the same ones to practice on no?

    Just thought it would be an option rather than not practicing.

    B'Man

    You do have to make do with what you have, but you don't get a world-class soccer team training in a Superquinn car park either. We do use the same places to train and shoot competitions, but that's not the point. You're training a different skillset. It's similar, but it's not what's needed at the highest level, and to get that, you need the facilities. It's no secret or coincidence that ranges like Sinclair in the Isle of Man produce shooters of exceptional quality compared to those training here. It's a product of several things, but the facilities are really crucial.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Bananaman


    I don't disagree but you're not going to get a facility like that in Ireland unless someone has won the lotto and decides to build one as his 'shangri-la'

    B'Man


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    Bananaman wrote: »
    I don't disagree but you're not going to get a facility like that in Ireland unless someone has won the lotto and decides to build one as his 'shangri-la'

    B'Man

    well that's why people are suggesting East Antrim, as it's pretty nice by all accounts (have yet to make it up there for a match myself, but from those who have been, it's a very good range).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 sbw


    ...but you don't get a world-class soccer team training in a Superquinn car park either...

    Rofl.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 338 ✭✭intershoot


    I happen to know of another range in Tyrone with 10m, 25m, 50m and 100m. It also has Meyton electronic targets which are used regularly for training both at 10m and 50m!!

    the biggest problem is the lack of people wanting to use it, and I think its the main problem the sport faces!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    sbw wrote: »
    There was a fairly healthy squad going 6 years ago. What happened to that?
    It wasn't quite as healthy as people remember, unfortunately. We had a few good shooters at the highish end, but noone coming up through the ranks behind them, no real progression at the high end (you could predict the scores going abroad to within two points for almost all of them) and even FLOYDSTER wasn't shooting with the squad anymore when we finally did what the head coach had been advocating for years and rolled it up in order to train up domestic coaches who would see our shooters more than once every 5-6 weeks and who could help them at the level they needed help at.

    In terms of coaches, the plan worked reasonably well - right now, we now have four ISSF-qualified domestic coaches in Ireland, the most recent of whom is up near FLOYDSTER, the rest of whom are nearer Dublin. We've run a domestic coaching course for the first time ever, and have a large bunch of people from the NTSA and Pony Club clubs who've done the entry-level coaches course, and the next level course is basicly ready to run, but the NCTC accreditation has had the kibosh put on it by the Sports Council in yet another great show of politics from that level of things.

    On the ground though, we've got coaches who've agreed to run as national coaches, and who're qualified to do so; we've got a bunch of instructors who can do basic level coaching in their own clubs and we can train some of them up to be proper club-level coaches; and basicly, all that's needed is manpower to book the hall and set a date and shooters who'll show up.

    It's an ugly thing, but both sides of the admin line are in need of bodies right now - the admin side is being poached by the FCP efforts (which lose you the sport if you don't keep them up); and the shooting side has fallen off as well -- whether in response or on it's own I don't know. zaraba ran a non-squad training weekend there in UCD a while back. Just a get-together-and-train day, something folks were screaming for not long back. IIRC, less than ten shooters showed up on the day. Right now, if we ran a squad day, I'd bet we'd get the same number of people showing up. Whether it's the 2% rule or the lack of knowledge of what the squad was/is/should be, or something else, there's a mindset change that's needed to fix the problem, and it's not going to be a quick fix either. (And it's been like that before, it's a cyclical thing -- for example, FLOYDSTER, how many folks have you got shooting in 10m Air Rifle competitions up there? Last result sheet I saw had only one name and that at a low level. .22's very healthy up there, but it waxes and wanes too.)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 sbw


    intershoot wrote: »
    I happen to know of another range in Tyrone with 10m, 25m, 50m and 100m. It also has Meyton electronic targets which are used regularly for training both at 10m and 50m!!

    the biggest problem is the lack of people wanting to use it, and I think its the main problem the sport faces!

    Dungannon has all that? According to their website, it's still a building site!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭FLOYDSTER


    Sparks wrote: »
    for example, FLOYDSTER, how many folks have you got shooting in 10m Air Rifle competitions up there? Last result sheet I saw had only one name and that at a low level. .22's very healthy up there, but it waxes and wanes too.)

    No idea about air I'm afraid!!;), on the coaches side of things was there not someone sent away on a ISSF coaches course recently??, and was this person trained up to take on the position as National coach?

    I along with others would love to get to a world cup or the likes next year!!

    Just a thought but If the manpower, interest or organisation isnt there to run or compete at selection shoots why not pick several on and off the island as compulsary comps?, there are a lot to choose from eg

    Nationals
    DRC
    Fermoy
    ISSF Comber
    ISSF Downshire
    Dungannon (on electronics)
    I O M
    Scottish GP's :2 or 3 dates available
    ISSF Bisley
    Double English match at Bisley meet
    Appleton (which is a re-entry comp)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    FLOYDSTER wrote: »
    No idea about air I'm afraid!!;), on the coaches side of things was there not someone sent away on a ISSF coaches course recently??, and was this person trained up to take on the position as National coach?
    Yeah, Martin was sent off. But "trained up"? :D C'mon, it was certification, not training, there's not much he'd learn on a class C course :D
    I along with others would love to get to a world cup or the likes next year!!
    You and me both, though I'm a step or three back thanks to work. *mutter*
    Just a thought but If the manpower, interest or organisation isnt there to run or compete at selection shoots why not pick several on and off the island as compulsary comps?
    Because that's how we used to do it and it used to be a popularity contest in all but name, with no idea of how to qualify, no metrics, no scores to hit, no process to get into or be kicked out of the squad, no planning past the very next match (remember how much notice Alan had for Sydney?), no proper coaching or support -- it was a mess.

    Besides, you don't need to run a special match for selection, that's just if there's nothing handy at the time. Using an existing match is much preferable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭FLOYDSTER


    Sparks wrote: »
    Yeah, Martin was sent off. But "trained up"? :D C'mon, it was certification, not training, there's not much he'd learn on a class C course :D
    True , but is it happening?;)
    Sparks wrote: »
    Because that's how we used to do it and it used to be a popularity contest in all but name, with no idea of how to qualify, no metrics, no scores to hit
    A simple MQS or final place or equal score would sort that?, I know there are people who wont be able to afford to travel and even those who can may not be able to afford a world cup if self funding was allowed but we need to have some kind of gauge and need to start somewhere.
    Sparks wrote: »
    (remember how much notice Alan had for Sydney?)
    LOL, YES!! as I had to turn it down to keep my job!!:(
    Sparks wrote: »
    Besides, you don't need to run a special match for selection, that's just if there's nothing handy at the time. Using an existing match is much preferable.
    Yeah but the World Cups are published well in advance so there should be no excuse to either run a qualifying shoot or compete at a selected comp!;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    FLOYDSTER wrote: »
    True , but is it happening?;)
    Eh? He's been and come back and been in the ISSF news already FLOYDSTER!
    A simple MQS or final place or equal score would sort that?
    We've got a better setup now, written up in several places (and more than once in here).
    I know there are people who wont be able to afford to travel and even those who can may not be able to afford a world cup if self funding was allowed but we need to have some kind of gauge and need to start somewhere.
    Yup. But chucking the current system's not the way - applying it more is, but that takes money that isn't there or a policy change on self-funding.
    LOL, YES!! as I had to turn it down to keep my job!!:(
    I remember :( And it wasn't fair on anyone really.
    Yeah but the World Cups are published well in advance so there should be no excuse to either run a qualifying shoot or compete at a selected comp!;)
    Yup. And there's been no problems so far for when teams are being picked. It's the decision about when teams are going, how amny, and where to, that you're actually complaining about.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 204 ✭✭xesse


    jasus lads WTF
    you are moaning of lack of coaches, lack of ranges, lack of a squad
    the best training for you boys is to have a PMA and go to your local range as much as possible and fire thousands of rounds downrange.

    A once a month visit to a top class range will do fook all for you compared to shooting 4-5 times a week at your own range
    but hey you will probably prefer to discuss this point on boards rather than go out and practice:confused::confused::confused:
    my opinion


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 682 ✭✭✭demonloop


    sbw wrote: »
    Dungannon has all that? According to their website, it's still a building site!
    Its about 5 years out of date :D (the website, not the facility;))


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭FLOYDSTER


    xesse wrote: »
    jasus lads WTF
    you are moaning of lack of coaches, lack of ranges, lack of a squad
    the best training for you boys is to have a PMA and go to your local range as much as possible and fire thousands of rounds downrange.

    A once a month visit to a top class range will do fook all for you compared to shooting 4-5 times a week at your own range
    but hey you will probably prefer to discuss this point on boards rather than go out and practice:confused::confused::confused:
    my opinion

    You have the wrong end of the stick!!, People can train in the house 7 days a week if they wish BUT how is that going to get them to the Olympics or Europeans or any other major match??

    If there is no structure to get anyone there what do we do??, and the structure must be there but with other people who have been competing the last 6 years I havent asking about procedures it must be confusing or not common knowledge??

    You might as well draw straws to see who goes!;), and its not just for my benefit I'm asking!, other shooters from Ireland have been complaining but havent got the bottle to ask or dont want to rock the boat!!

    So just to clear things up, how do we get a shooter to a world cup for example?, or is it purely down to lack of funding?;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 sbw


    demonloop wrote: »
    Its about 5 years out of date :D (the website, not the facility;))
    That'll be contributing to why it's not getting sufficient use then. Only a limited number know the facility exists!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 sbw


    FLOYDSTER wrote: »
    I know there are people who wont be able to afford to travel and even those who can may not be able to afford a world cup if self funding was allowed but we need to have some kind of gauge and need to start somewhere.

    Is self-funding not allowed then? That wouldn't seem very sensible.

    All shooters are essentially self-funded. If they attract a subsidy from a funding body, that's a bonus. I don't think I've ever met a shooter who 'breaks-even', as it were. Is self-funding to world cups, therefore, not merely an extension of self-funded training?

    It's the grim reality of shooting that although deep pockets don't guarantee success, success requires deep pockets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    FLOYDSTER wrote: »
    If there is no structure
    But there is one. Has been for two years now.
    the structure must be there but with other people who have been competing the last 6 years I havent asking about procedures it must be confusing or not common knowledge??
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=63600152
    And the reply's an interesting one... :p

    And again here a year earlier:
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=57218298

    And again here:
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=56846091

    You might as well draw straws to see who goes!
    Ah, here now. It's nowhere near that bad. The structure is fine, it's just manpower and money that's needed.
    other shooters from Ireland have been complaining but havent got the bottle to ask or dont want to rock the boat!
    They don't have to ask, it's up in several places in black and white! Granted, after the boards.ie hack, the links in the above post are offline, but this one isn't:
    http://www.wilkinstowntargetshootingclub.org/frequently-asked-questions/general/4-target-shooting/2-how-do-i-shoot-for-ireland.html
    and neither is this one:
    http://www.wilkinstowntargetshootingclub.org/news-mainmenu-2/137-selection-for-international-teams.html
    So just to clear things up, how do we get a shooter to a world cup for example?, or is it purely down to lack of funding?;)
    It's all laid out in those two links above - how we do it, why we do it the way we do it, what you have to do as a shooter.


    And it's up on the NTSA website as well (see 'International Selection' on the right side of the front page):
    http://targetshootingireland.org/component/option,com_docman/task,cat_view/Itemid,88/gid,116/orderby,dmdate_published/


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    sbw wrote: »
    Is self-funding not allowed then? That wouldn't seem very sensible.
    It's not, and the reason goes back a few decades (it precedes me) and had to do with not wanting ISSF shooting to turn into a sport for those who could afford to travel. Personally, I don't really agree with it - I see the merit in the idea, but we've never had enough money to 100% fund anyone, so it was always self-funded to an extent, pragmatically speaking. Until the Sports Council actually focus more on the 'Sport' bit than the 'Council' bit, or until someone wins the lotto, that's not really likely to change, so personally, I'd welcome a policy change on that, but it'd have to be done right. You're into means testing and the like there before you know where you are.

    Not to mention that if you are doing ISSF shooting internationally, there's a metric ton of crap that shooters have to cope with; for example, your whereabouts have to be registered ahead of time for months at a stretch according to the IOC anti-doping rules (which then flow down through the ISSF and NTSA and OCI to the shooter). I think maybe folks (aside from the very small handful who've actually done it themselves) don't really appreciate that side of things.
    I don't think I've ever met a shooter who 'breaks-even', as it were.
    Meet 90% of the medal-winners in ISSF matches and you'll have met someone who earns their living doing ISSF shooting. Allmost all the US ISSF shooters are USAMU; many more are funded by USA Shooting; any of the Finnish, Australian, Italian, French or German shooters are all fully funded; and the same's true of almost every other nation that succeeds in ISSF shooting bar the Chinese and that's more because the concept doesn't really apply to the Chinese shooters as they're virtually slave labour. But between national funding, commercial endorsements and prize money, most of the top shooters are fully funded. I just don't think it's the case for the other 95% of international shooters (but for most of that 95%, there's a fair bit of funding in place, there are virtually no purely self-funded ISSF international shooters that I know of).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 sbw


    Sparks wrote: »
    Until the Sports Council actually focus more on the 'Sport' bit than the 'Council' bit, or until someone wins the lotto, that's not really likely to change, so personally, I'd welcome a policy change on that, but it'd have to be done right.

    So where do the sports council fit in? I would have thought that the ISSF dealt with the NTSA, not the sports council. Thus it would be up to the NTSA who to send and on what level of support.
    Sparks wrote: »
    Meet 90% of the medal-winners in ISSF matches and you'll have met someone who earns their living doing ISSF shooting. Allmost all the US ISSF shooters are USAMU; many more are funded by USA Shooting; any of the Finnish, Australian, Italian, French or German shooters are all fully funded; and the same's true of almost every other nation that succeeds in ISSF shooting bar the Chinese and that's more because the concept doesn't really apply to the Chinese shooters as they're virtually slave labour. But between national funding, commercial endorsements and prize money, most of the top shooters are fully funded. I just don't think it's the case for the other 95% of international shooters (but for most of that 95%, there's a fair bit of funding in place, there are virtually no purely self-funded ISSF international shooters that I know of).

    Fair point. I should have thought about that a bit more before I typed it. But, whilst there are salaried shooters out there, in some cases, they'll have had to slog for years shooting out of their own pocket to get into that position. Whatsmore, the salary will vanish pretty quickly once their scores drop towards the end of their career, so really their salaried spell will be sandwiched (and possibly interspersed) by periods of shooting out of pocket. But you're right that the very top level shooters more than 'break-even'.

    We've digressed a little here. I was just trying to underscore that self-funding is inevitable for most shooters world-wide. Provided an adequate qualifying structure is in place, self-funding to world-cups seems a natural extension of self-funding through training.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    sbw wrote: »
    So where do the sports council fit in? I would have thought that the ISSF dealt with the NTSA, not the sports council. Thus it would be up to the NTSA who to send and on what level of support.
    The ISSF do deal with the NTSA. However, they're not the only ones the NTSA deal with, there's the Irish Sports Council (ISC) and the Olympic Sports Council (OCI). The OCI is the link from the IOC (though the ISSF acts partly in that regard as well), but the ISC is the link to the Irish government and it's where the state funding comes from.
    whilst there are salaried shooters out there, in some cases, they'll have had to slog for years shooting out of their own pocket to get into that position.
    Yes, but they wouldn't have been shooting internationally representing their countries at the time, whereas they would be here. I'm not saying it's a bad idea, just that it's not quite as uncomplicated and string-free as it seems at first glance, no matter which way you decide is the 'right' way.
    We've digressed a little here. I was just trying to underscore that self-funding is inevitable for most shooters world-wide. Provided an adequate qualifying structure is in place, self-funding to world-cups seems a natural extension of self-funding through training.
    It does - but there are things hidden away in there that'll bite you. For example, the money comes into the sport from the ISC, who have a mandate to promote inclusion as well as excellence - if a good shooter can't go to a WCup because he or she can't afford it, it's a problem for the ISC if the NTSA just says "tough, we're self-funded"; but if the NTSA funds one, there are demands to fund all equally, which makes no sense if one shooter is poor and another isn't. (And yes, I've seen those arguments being made by shooters over the years).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 sbw


    Sparks wrote: »
    The ISSF do deal with the NTSA. However, they're not the only ones the NTSA deal with, there's the Irish Sports Council (ISC) and the Olympic Sports Council (OCI). The OCI is the link from the IOC (though the ISSF acts partly in that regard as well), but the ISC is the link to the Irish government and it's where the state funding comes from.
    OK. But, in practice, do you think that the Sports Council would be that vigilant of the details of the NTSA's practices? After all, it has much higher profile sports to concern itself with.
    Sparks wrote: »
    For example, the money comes into the sport from the ISC, who have a mandate to promote inclusion as well as excellence - if a good shooter can't go to a WCup because he or she can't afford it, it's a problem for the ISC if the NTSA just says "tough, we're self-funded"; but if the NTSA funds one, there are demands to fund all equally, which makes no sense if one shooter is poor and another isn't. (And yes, I've seen those arguments being made by shooters over the years).

    Really? I mean, you know what's happening better than I do, but I'd be surprised if that's what the ISC meant by inclusion. In my experience of sports bodies, when they talk about inclusion and excellence, they mean them as two separate things, not to be mixed: inclusion at a grass roots level, excellence at an elite level.

    On the second point, in my experience, most sports bodies would fund people equally, considering that to be the fairest scheme.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 338 ✭✭intershoot


    sbw wrote: »
    That'll be contributing to why it's not getting sufficient use then. Only a limited number know the facility exists!


    I dont think it matters how many people know, or dont know about it. We have all the usual faces from all over Ireland appearing at the competitions, and to be honest anyone who is a regular shooter knows the exact stage the range in Dungannon is at.

    The problem is, everyone wants to piss and moan about facilities this, and funding that....

    In my opinion, to get the sport of its knees the shooters have to take responsibility for the mess it is in. The level of commitment of the shooters needs to improve dramatically....I know the top 5-10% are fully committed.....but its not them that's doing most of the whinging.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    sbw wrote: »
    OK. But, in practice, do you think that the Sports Council would be that vigilant of the details of the NTSA's practices? After all, it has much higher profile sports to concern itself with.
    No, and not for that reason. The Sports Council (and I hear this from other sports, not just "minority" sports) is more politics and less sport, and that's a problem. And it was ever thus, I was warned about this a decade ago and it was as true then as it is today.
    Really?
    Really. The ISC would rather fund grass roots than elite sport unless elite means "photo op for the Minister with some olympic medals" and if that photo op is a few years of proper funding out, then they're not so interested. And they don't quite seem too keen on funding grass roots shooting either because that's not a photo op the Minister wants. But it's not just us, if that makes it easier - I've seen the same complaints coming from the UK, from the US, from half the continent and from further afield. Noone anywhere, it seems, thinks their admin bodies do a good job or that their sport is properly funded and supported. At best, we avoid outright persecution (and that best isn't a common occurance in this country).
    On the second point, in my experience, most sports bodies would fund people equally, considering that to be the fairest scheme.
    When someone on the dole can shoot 595 and is being funded to the same level as a barrister who's shooting the same score, that isn't as fair as you'd think. The problem here is that there are several approaches to this, and all of them have very good supporting arguments both morally and pragmatically. It's not an easy choice to make.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 sbw


    Sparks wrote: »
    When someone on the dole can shoot 595 and is being funded to the same level as a barrister who's shooting the same score, that isn't as fair as you'd think.

    In this outrageously hypothetical example, sports bodies could offer a hardship subsidy to the former, but in a more likely example of two office workers on different salaries, both shooting 595, the same talent should warrent the same subsidy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 sbw


    Floydster, have you considered marrying a Thai bride and shooting for Thailand. It might be easier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭FLOYDSTER


    sbw wrote: »
    Floydster, have you considered marrying a Thai bride and shooting for Thailand. It might be easier.

    Anyone got a number for Ting Tong??:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 204 ✭✭xesse


    you get a shooter to a world cup by practice ,practice,practice
    if i wanted to go to a world cup in pistol i would be practicing now instead of looking at boards
    :D
    FLOYDSTER wrote: »
    You have the wrong end of the stick!!, People can train in the house 7 days a week if they wish BUT how is that going to get them to the Olympics or Europeans or any other major match??

    If there is no structure to get anyone there what do we do??, and the structure must be there but with other people who have been competing the last 6 years I havent asking about procedures it must be confusing or not common knowledge??

    You might as well draw straws to see who goes!;), and its not just for my benefit I'm asking!, other shooters from Ireland have been complaining but havent got the bottle to ask or dont want to rock the boat!!

    So just to clear things up, how do we get a shooter to a world cup for example?, or is it purely down to lack of funding?;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Bananaman


    As far as I remember NTSA had a route to ISC funding when they were a member of the SSAI which is the the route through which all monies from the state are directed to target shooting - bar clay shooting which is obviously not target shooting in the eyes of the state.

    NTSA then left the SSAI - thereby relinquishing any access they had to ISC funding.

    Now - as it turns out - this year there was no funding for Target Shooting through the SSAI so it's a moot point but if the NTSA want access to ISC funding surely they must again seek membership of the SSAI at some point?

    It is not realistic to have the goal of sending people to major international events and not having them fund themselves. In all other shooting disciplines it is the only mechanism by which it has happened.

    On one hand you have Derek Burnett & Co who got a wedge as they were going to the Olympics but that was still a pittance of what was required - they funded themselves or they did not go.

    On the other hand you have people going to Major F-Class, Benchrest, Pistol, etc events many times every year. In order to do that they have to 100% fund themselves.

    It may not be a nice fact but it is still a fact - that taking part in international competition is only available to those that can afford it.
    If you cannot then you need to make the best of what you can get at home.

    The Olympics is a lofty goal but if you must have state funding to do it - nobody will ever go as there is patently no interest within the state in having it happen.

    Does it not make more sense to try to get a better inter club competition season going so people can have more competition and show 'the powers that be' that there is actually a sport worth funding?

    It's great when it gets easier - e.g. the IPSC World Shoot is in Greece next year - it is still 12 days of accommodation, food, drink and ammo - no small outlay - but at least you don't need a mortgage to get there - the previous two were in Bali, Indonesia and Cebu, Philippines - it'll be a while before it's back in Europe again - must remember to start chucking a few more bob into the credit union.

    B'Man


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 204 ✭✭xesse


    yea i agree
    the ISSF in this country is in a bad way at the moment
    in the last 2 yrs i dont think i,ve been in a competition with more than 20 shooters, and to jump from that to a olympic qualifer or a world cup is a bit foolish i think
    we should build the inter-club and national competition up first

    Bananaman wrote: »
    As far as I remember NTSA had a route to ISC funding when they were a member of the SSAI which is the the route through which all monies from the state are directed to target shooting - bar clay shooting which is obviously not target shooting in the eyes of the state.

    NTSA then left the SSAI - thereby relinquishing any access they had to ISC funding.

    Now - as it turns out - this year there was no funding for Target Shooting through the SSAI so it's a moot point but if the NTSA want access to ISC funding surely they must again seek membership of the SSAI at some point?

    It is not realistic to have the goal of sending people to major international events and not having them fund themselves. In all other shooting disciplines it is the only mechanism by which it has happened.

    On one hand you have Derek Burnett & Co who got a wedge as they were going to the Olympics but that was still a pittance of what was required - they funded themselves or they did not go.

    On the other hand you have people going to Major F-Class, Benchrest, Pistol, etc events many times every year. In order to do that they have to 100% fund themselves.

    It may not be a nice fact but it is still a fact - that taking part in international competition is only available to those that can afford it.
    If you cannot then you need to make the best of what you can get at home.

    The Olympics is a lofty goal but if you must have state funding to do it - nobody will ever go as there is patently no interest within the state in having it happen.

    Does it not make more sense to try to get a better inter club competition season going so people can have more competition and show 'the powers that be' that there is actually a sport worth funding?

    It's great when it gets easier - e.g. the IPSC World Shoot is in Greece next year - it is still 12 days of accommodation, food, drink and ammo - no small outlay - but at least you don't need a mortgage to get there - the previous two were in Bali, Indonesia and Cebu, Philippines - it'll be a while before it's back in Europe again - must remember to start chucking a few more bob into the credit union.

    B'Man


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,034 ✭✭✭✭It wasn't me!


    The problem there xesse is numbers. We don't have them. You're not going to get a hundred people turning up to a 50m prone shoot here. It's unfortunate, but we just don't have a pool big enough to do it. The transition is always going to be hard, but that's why we go to matches like Bisley and the Isle of Man Easter Shoot, or the Grad Prix in Plzen or things like that, to smooth it. That's where the real way to progress is, in my opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Bananaman wrote: »
    As far as I remember NTSA had a route to ISC funding when they were a member of the SSAI which is the the route through which all monies from the state are directed to target shooting - bar clay shooting which is obviously not target shooting in the eyes of the state.
    That's not carved in stone and there were several reasons the NTSA shouldn't have been in the SSAI B'man - and if they were in it, the IPSA couldn't join and the ITS couldn't be in it now, so them leaving was a win-win. The only people annoyed seem to have been the ISC, and frankly the ISC are breaking their own rules of non-interference by being annoyed and are being inconsistent in not recognising the NTSA independently because absolutely every single other olympic sport is recognised independently by the ISC to simplify organisational issues (because that way the OCI and ISC talk to the same people instead of the OCI talking to the NTSA and the ISC talking to the SSAI, which throws things out of kilter). Even those sports already catered to elsewhere are recognised independently for the olympic cases - eg. there's a Martial Arts federation the ISC recognises, but they recognise olympic judo and olympic taekwondo seperately (and there are other examples).
    if the NTSA want access to ISC funding surely they must again seek membership of the SSAI at some point?
    Nope, and the NTSA can't join the SSAI unless you want to kick the NTSA out of ISSF or the ITS out of the SSAI.
    It may not be a nice fact but it is still a fact - that taking part in international competition is only available to those that can afford it.
    The problem is that that can be taken to the point where your wallet decides your national team place, not your ability - and at that line, you go from sport to hobby. The NTSA has a long history of not wanting to risk crossing that line, and as much as I think self-funding is going to be necessary, I can completely understand their motive there. I've seen some international matches run on that basis and it makes all your national teams into a joke when it happens, not just for that one event. The national badge isn't something we should let that happen to.

    The other thing to remember here is this - we pay somewhere in the region of €6 million euro per annum into the exchequer in return for no services whatsoever. Looking to get a chunk of that money back in state support for sport (which in turn gives something back to the state in sporting prestige and ministerial photo ops, not to mention increasing sport participation which lowers healthcare costs and fulfils stated policy goals), there's not a damn thing wrong with that. The money came from our pockets, I'd rather it went to sending juniors abroad to the world championships than to lining a ministerial merc's seat....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭FLOYDSTER


    xesse wrote: »
    you get a shooter to a world cup by practice ,practice,practice
    if i wanted to go to a world cup in pistol i would be practicing now instead of looking at boards
    :D

    PMSL!!, so if I practice at my range every day for the next year I will be picked for a world cup??:confused:
    Would I not have to shoot some kind of comps, or go through some kind of selection or prove to someone somewhere I can actually shoot??

    I think I'll cancel my trips to IOM,Plzen,Hanover and Bisley, save all that money and practice at Comber instead!!;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    It's worth noting, by the way, that this shows up in other sports and other countries as well, some with a lot more manpower and money than us. So the fact that we've not cracked it isn't completely heinous...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 204 ✭✭xesse


    from what i believe you olny have to shoot a qualifing score at a selection competition for a match for intershoot or a world cup
    if you were to shoot at a local range 4-5 times a week , you would have a much better chance of really improving rather than travelling to IOM
    never been to comber so couldn,t comment on that range
    FLOYDSTER wrote: »
    PMSL!!, so if I practice at my range every day for the next year I will be picked for a world cup??:confused:
    Would I not have to shoot some kind of comps, or go through some kind of selection or prove to someone somewhere I can actually shoot??

    I think I'll cancel my trips to IOM,Plzen,Hanover and Bisley, save all that money and practice at Comber instead!!;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Bananaman


    Sparks wrote: »
    The problem is that that can be taken to the point where your wallet decides your national team place, not your ability - and at that line, you go from sport to hobby.

    It is not a case that people can buy a place on the national squad but at least you have a pool to choose from - as long as you wait for the exchequer to pay for it you never will.
    Sparks wrote: »
    I've seen some international matches run on that basis and it makes all your national teams into a joke when it happens, not just for that one event. The national badge isn't something we should let that happen to.

    Are you talking about wildcard spots like the Bobsleigh?.
    Sparks wrote: »
    The money came from our pockets, I'd rather it went to sending juniors abroad to the world championships than to lining a ministerial merc's seat....

    You can rather all you like :-).

    B'Man


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Bananaman


    FLOYDSTER wrote: »
    PMSL!!, so if I practice at my range every day for the next year I will be picked for a world cup??:confused:
    Would I not have to shoot some kind of comps, or go through some kind of selection or prove to someone somewhere I can actually shoot??

    I think I'll cancel my trips to IOM,Plzen,Hanover and Bisley, save all that money and practice at Comber instead!!;)

    ISSF as a discipline is lucky that it can be practiced at home - therefore you should do it.
    Sure you may not be able to hold European Championships here but you can have an inter club competition season. Rather than feel down about the costs incolved in travelling abroad to practice or compete why not try to have more competition here. Perhaps you will not manage to get the same scores you can in the IOM or wherever but at least you will know if you are the best in Ireland before you do go to an international.

    Unless you get more support for the sport in more clubs you will never be able to - If there are only 10 or 20 people shooting the sport with only a dozen people taking part in the National Finals how do you ever expect to get the state to fund it. There were over 100 competitors at an NASRPC shoot in Hilltop a couple of weeks back - state funding? Not a sausage.

    Look at IPSC - I'm not sure what the competitor numbers were like at the peak but it was over 100. There were competitions with 70 or so people taking part. We do have the facilities in Ireland to hold major internationals such as the European Championships but we are no longer allowed to practice, never mind hold the competitions.
    Irish people are not just having to travel overseas to practice or compete but are forced to do so.

    Count you blessings and put them to use.

    My 2c.

    B'Man


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 204 ✭✭xesse


    YEA


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Bananaman wrote: »
    It is not a case that people can buy a place on the national squad
    ...today. It was not always so, from what I've been told.
    Are you talking about wildcard spots like the Bobsleigh?
    No, I'm talking about some past international trips. They're almost a decade in the past however, so I'm not going into specifics; but they did damage us (all of us) in the ISC's eyes at the time, not to mention in the eyes of those abroad, hence the depth of feeling towards avoiding such a situation recurring amongst many.
    You can rather all you like :-)
    Indeed, but unless you go looking for it as well, rathering is a rather useless use of time...
    ISSF as a discipline is lucky that it can be practiced at home
    So long as your home is an authorised range...
    (Like I've said before, the criminal justice acts damaged all of us)
    Sure you may not be able to hold European Championships here
    Or in the UK or in any but a handful of international, highly expensive ranges. An ISSF continental championships isn't just one step up from a national championships, any more than the North Atlantic is a small step up from the local swimming pool -- and I don't think too many people ever really get the magnitude of that step :(
    There were over 100 competitors at an NASRPC shoot in Hilltop a couple of weeks back - state funding? Not a sausage.
    Look at IPSC - I'm not sure what the competitor numbers were like at the peak but it was over 100.
    In both cases, though:
    istockphoto_6275809-chalk-and-cheese-happily-shaking-hands.jpg


  • Advertisement
Advertisement