Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Manny Pacquiao: The Most Overrated Fighter of All Time

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,549 ✭✭✭✭cowzerp


    consultech wrote: »
    Muhammad Ali is the most over-rated fighter of all time, tbh.


    He beat, Joe Frazier, George Foreman, Ken Norton, Leon Spinks, Sonny Liston, Floyd Patterson and more decent opposition not even mentioned and beat 3 of the 5 opponents who he lost too in the rematch, The only 2 he did not rematch and beat where Berbick and Holmes in his last 2 fights when he was suffering from Alzheimers and finished in a boxing sense..

    He is the greatest and saying he is overrated is madness!!!

    Rush Boxing club and Rush Martial Arts head coach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,933 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    cowzerp wrote: »
    He beat, Joe Frazier, George Foreman, Ken Norton, Leon Spinks, Sonny Liston, Floyd Patterson and more decent opposition not even mentioned and beat 3 of the 5 opponents who he lost too in the rematch, The only 2 he did not rematch and beat where Berbick and Holmes in his last 2 fights when he was suffering from Alzheimers and finished in a boxing sense..

    He is the greatest and saying he is overrated is madness!!!
    Paul, Parkinsons. Don't let Ali hear you mix them up;)
    The greatest p4p, not only heavyweight, IMO.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 38 kevinhug


    cowzerp wrote: »
    He beat, Joe Frazier, George Foreman, Ken Norton, Leon Spinks, Sonny Liston, Floyd Patterson and more decent opposition not even mentioned and beat 3 of the 5 opponents who he lost too in the rematch, The only 2 he did not rematch and beat where Berbick and Holmes in his last 2 fights when he was suffering from Alzheimers and finished in a boxing sense..

    He is the greatest and saying he is overrated is madness!!!

    I think he was being sarcastic? lol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,549 ✭✭✭✭cowzerp


    kevinhug wrote: »
    I think he was being sarcastic? lol

    He was'nt or if he was he used no exclamation marks, no funny comment or nothing to make me believe he was..

    LOL!

    Rush Boxing club and Rush Martial Arts head coach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,044 ✭✭✭Big Ears


    cowzerp wrote: »
    He beat, Joe Frazier, George Foreman, Ken Norton, Leon Spinks, Sonny Liston, Floyd Patterson and more decent opposition not even mentioned and beat 3 of the 5 opponents who he lost too in the rematch, The only 2 he did not rematch and beat where Berbick and Holmes in his last 2 fights when he was suffering from Alzheimers and finished in a boxing sense..

    He is the greatest and saying he is overrated is madness!!!

    Most felt Norton beat him in two of their 3 fights, and Ali was very lucky not to be 1-2 against Joe Frazier as he was ready to quit on his stool before the final round in Manilla as Frazier's corner pulled him out.
    Had those results gone the other way history would look at him very differently.
    Not to try and bring Ali down, but I'm just pointing out how any man's record can be scrutinised no matter how good.
    You could also add things in like how an average fighter in Cooper floored him and had him out on his feet.


    My only problem with some people in how they view Ali is that he's put on a pedestal and not treated like other boxers, where you can't criticise him in the same way. Many ignore the fact that a lot of the time he wasn't so glamorous 'floating like a butterfly and stinging like a bee', he spoiled a lot and held other fighters behind the head with one hand for most of his career.
    Despite his elusive defence, his low hands meant he ate more left hooks in his career than needed to, hence the Banks, Cooper and Frazier knockdowns.


    If people are going to criticise Pacquiao for something other than their beliefs he's on drugs, then they should apply the same criticisms to Muhammed Ali, Joe Louis, Sugar Ray Leonard, Floyd Mayweather, Sugar Ray Robinson and even Jim Rock. Standards should be kept the same for everyone and not let people away with something because they're constantly referred to as 'The Greatest' etc

    From that point of view I think Ali is one of the most overrated fighters ever.
    Not because he wasn't great, he was. He's one of the greatest fighters and Heavyweights ever and I've no problem with people who call him the greatest Heavyweight ever even if I'm not sure myself. But the fact he's almost untouchable in terms of criticism and that many won't even think or allow themselves to look at his weaknesses mean he's overrated. The fact that many people just regard him as the greatest fighter ever without allowing any question of it means he's overrated to some degree, even as amazing as he was.


    Pacquiao's record is amazing aswell, and up there with pretty much anyone.
    Beating Clottey will be a good addition to it too.

    Mayweather has beaten Sharmba Mitchell, Zab Judah, Carlos Baldomir, Ricky Hatton and Juan Manuel Marquez at Welterweight.

    Pacquiao has beaten De La Hoya, Miguel Cotto and now has the opportunity to beat Joshua Clottey. Now De La Hoya was drained so you can scratch that if you wish but Cotto and Clottey are better Welterweights than all of the guys on Floyd's list.

    Question if the guy is on drugs if you wish, but the guys record is amazing imo, the same way Ray Leonard's is, the same way Ali's is and the same way Louis' is. Jim Rock.........well Jim may need a few more big wins to get to that level but who knows :D


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,956 ✭✭✭consultech


    ^^^ +1

    Cowzerp, Walshbb - You're both learned enough to know the points Im gonna make in criticism of Ali (pretty much as above), so I wont bother wasting our time.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 470 ✭✭Joe Musashi


    kryogen wrote: »
    the OP knows his stuff.............when it comes to copy and pasting anyway!

    thats about it though, ridiculous article, where did it come from OP?

    I googled a piece of it and it comes from bleacherreport. :rolleyes:

    http://bleacherreport.com/users/120094-lord-hughey-windsor-sanchez


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 118 ✭✭bamboozler


    Big Ears wrote: »
    Most felt Norton beat him in two of their 3 fights, and Ali was very lucky not to be 1-2 against Joe Frazier as he was ready to quit on his stool before the final round in Manilla as Frazier's corner pulled him out.
    Had those results gone the other way history would look at him very differently.
    Not to try and bring Ali down, but I'm just pointing out how any man's record can be scrutinised no matter how good.
    You could also add things in like how an average fighter in Cooper floored him and had him out on his feet.


    My only problem with some people in how they view Ali is that he's put on a pedestal and not treated like other boxers, where you can't criticise him in the same way. Many ignore the fact that a lot of the time he wasn't so glamorous 'floating like a butterfly and stinging like a bee', he spoiled a lot and held other fighters behind the head with one hand for most of his career.
    Despite his elusive defence, his low hands meant he ate more left hooks in his career than needed to, hence the Banks, Cooper and Frazier knockdowns.


    If people are going to criticise Pacquiao for something other than their beliefs he's on drugs, then they should apply the same criticisms to Muhammed Ali, Joe Louis, Sugar Ray Leonard, Floyd Mayweather, Sugar Ray Robinson and even Jim Rock. Standards should be kept the same for everyone and not let people away with something because they're constantly referred to as 'The Greatest' etc

    From that point of view I think Ali is one of the most overrated fighters ever.
    Not because he wasn't great, he was. He's one of the greatest fighters and Heavyweights ever and I've no problem with people who call him the greatest Heavyweight ever even if I'm not sure myself. But the fact he's almost untouchable in terms of criticism and that many won't even think or allow themselves to look at his weaknesses mean he's overrated. The fact that many people just regard him as the greatest fighter ever without allowing any question of it means he's overrated to some degree, even as amazing as he was.


    Pacquiao's record is amazing aswell, and up there with pretty much anyone.
    Beating Clottey will be a good addition to it too.

    Mayweather has beaten Sharmba Mitchell, Zab Judah, Carlos Baldomir, Ricky Hatton and Juan Manuel Marquez at Welterweight.

    Pacquiao has beaten De La Hoya, Miguel Cotto and now has the opportunity to beat Joshua Clottey. Now De La Hoya was drained so you can scratch that if you wish but Cotto and Clottey are better Welterweights than all of the guys on Floyd's list.

    Question if the guy is on drugs if you wish, but the guys record is amazing imo, the same way Ray Leonard's is, the same way Ali's is and the same way Louis' is. Jim Rock.........well Jim may need a few more big wins to get to that level but who knows :D


    i agree you cant seem to question ali without being attacked but i am especially biased cos i hate racists like ali.

    but prob was best fighter ever but if you wanted to talk rubbish like the original poster said bout pacman. you could call him a cheat cos of what his corner did against cooper and go even as far to believe foreman very late admittting that he was ?drugged? before the rumble in the jungle, and another bout a deflated glove vs frazier. (by the way i dont actually believe these are ali cheating as glove icident was his corner and others bull like the first post).

    i think pacman is a top fighter but would not be suprised bout the drug thing after all jones and mosley were both definitely on drugs so who knows how many top fighters have been


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,872 ✭✭✭strobe


    Its BS, I'm sick of all the band wagoners who have all of a sudden jumped on this Manny Pacquiao Hype train, Notice how he changed so much from the Marquez fight to the Diaz fight?

    So then you think he was clean for Barrera, Morrales, Marquez ect and started using in between JMMII and Diaz? How much he changed? He went up 5lbs, I don't think I can think of a modern fighter that's struggled to go up 5 lbs. Did he look far better against Diaz than he did against JMM? Yes, but he was fighting Diaz after fighting JMM. Who wouldn't look like a far better fighter?

    The bottom line is the greatest improvement he has exhibbited in recent years is how he fights, his tactics and how he approaches fights, his footwork and the fact he doesn't just charge in without thinking about it as he did consistantly in his earlier career. He was always a heavy hitter and his hand speed was always lightning quick, that didn't improve over night, it was always there and it improved gradually over his career as he grew older towards his peak and bigger with age and better training.

    The number one proof people point to to suggest he's on something is that he's shot up threw the weights and continued winning, seeming to improve as he went up.

    Well heres a fact that can't be disputed: At the age of 16 Pacquiao was weighing in at 106 lbs, by the age of 31 he was fighting and winning at 144. Impressive? Yes. Theres another fighter that was tipping the scales at 106 as a 16 year old kid. He also went up through the weights getting better and better as he went, his power increasing as he moved up and put on the extra muscle without it seeming to affect his speed at all. By the age of 31 he was weighing in at 150 and miraculously seeming perfectly comfortable.

    Care to hazzard a guess at the name of the second fighter Richie?

    I'm not saying I'm 100% that MP isn't on something, he might be, the way the testing is run in boxing every single fighter around might be on something. I'm just saying there is no more evidence to suggest that Pacquiao is on something than there is for every fighter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 118 ✭✭bamboozler


    strobe wrote: »

    Care to hazzard a guess at the name of the second fighter Richie?


    if richie doesnt guess please tell me cos thats annoying one. thought it mite be one of two boxers and both i checked didnt match and seems like should be obvious


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭digsy32


    bamboozler wrote: »
    if richie doesnt guess please tell me cos thats annoying one. thought it mite be one of two boxers and both i checked didnt match and seems like should be obvious

    That would be Mayweather.

    First post is drivel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 118 ✭✭bamboozler


    digsy32 wrote: »
    That would be Mayweather.

    First post is drivel.


    i thought mayweather and he was one of the two i checked but that would mean he put on 2 stone in 2 years and thought that was maybe bit much for someone so young just going professional


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,041 ✭✭✭colly10


    kryogen wrote: »
    thats about it though, ridiculous article, where did it come from OP?

    Written by Lord Hughey Windsor-Sanchez (I wouldn't blame him, the chap looks a bit senile). Heres the article -

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/336353-manny-pacquiao-the-most-overrated-fighter-of-all-time

    I can't believe that anyone would call the OP a troll for posting "his" opinion (albeit with a big smiley face beside it)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,872 ✭✭✭strobe


    bamboozler wrote: »
    i thought mayweather and he was one of the two i checked but that would mean he put on 2 stone in 2 years and thought that was maybe bit much for someone so young just going professional

    One would think so wouldn't they? That seems a huge amount for anyone to put on in two years. The only possible explanation? PED's. Or maybe he ate a sh1t load and trained like a motherfukker. Floyd fought at light feather at 16 years of age. Weighed in at 106. Obviously the only explanation is he was pumping a pharmacy into himself. So in summary, Pac's on HGH, PBF is on steroids, and every other fighter from Lewis to Del ya Hoya are suspect. Either everyone that hasn't given blood samples every four days for two months before every fight is a drug cheat regardless of wether anything was ever presented to show that. Or everyone is innocent until proven guilty. You can't pick and choose individuals. It's either A or B.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35 pikeman99


    Pacquiao is an unbelievable fighter. He has own titles in 8 weight classes. The Marquez fights were all close but I wouldn't go as far to say that Marquez was robbed. Cotto was a tough oponent for pacman and he destroyed him. Pacquiao agreed to Mayweathers blood and urine testing the second time round and he also agreed to a smaller purse but still mayweather refused to fight him. Pacquiao was robbed by the decision in the first bradley fight but went on to beat him clearly. Mayweather was ducking pacquiao. Pacquiao wanted the fight, he has never ducked anyone and has always fought the best fighter available to him. He was very unlucky to be ko'd by Marquez the fourth time round, pacman had busted up jmms nose and had hit him with some hard punches, pacman was very sloppy to go in at Marquez the way he did. Mosley was beaten easily by pacman, mosley didn't knock pacman down he pushed him.
    So pacquiao was injured during training before the mayweather fight but thought it was only small and that it had gone away but he reinjured it in the fourth round. It may have looked to many that mayweather won the fight easily and that he landed more punches but the compubox stats have been proven wrong. After close examination of the fight it has been proven that the fight was a lot closer than it may have seemed to many. Some big boxing names and some other celebrities have contradicted the decision claiming they thought pacquiao won the fight, mosley, Holyfield, many more. I thought pacman had done enough to win the fight too. Mayweather didn't do much.
    Read up on the new punch stats and they will reveal that the fight should have been scored a lot closer maybe even to pacman.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,428 ✭✭✭Talib Fiasco


    ^Manny is that you?


Advertisement