Clare GAA discussion thread

billo.d86

thinkstoomuch1 wrote: »

Absolutely he had to go it' was a dangerous tackle and anything to the face or head has to get red as it must be stamped out

And do you think that Cian Lynch should have been set off in the first 2 mins for hitting POC in the face?

The ref didnt think so and booked him.

On another note why is hawkeye not in Thurles?

It is nearly and integral part of the game now.

Umpires need to be fazed out, and possibly 2 refs.

elastico

billo.d86 wrote: »

I'm not saying the bandage got him sent off Donnellan deserved to go it was wild and reckless swinging like he did. I'm saying going down like a sack of spuds like DO'G did when he wasn't hit as bad as he made out, he was feigning injury IMO. There was contact but it wasn't as bad as was made out.

It was the limerick medical staff who the bandages on, not the paramedics. St.Johns ambulance come on to the field when asked by the teams medical staff.

How do you know he didn't have a cut?

billo.d86

elastico wrote: »

How do you know he didn't have a cut?

Through the magic of sight!

niallo27

elastico wrote: »

How do you know he didn't have a cut?

He looked alright after the game when he was interviewed.

niallo27

I have enough of Davy and his **** after matches chasing refs. He is turning the country against us. With the talent he has to his disposal and he can't even beat a very average Limerick side is he out of his dept.

marco_polo

billo.d86 wrote: »

And do you think that Cian Lynch should have been set off in the first 2 mins for hitting POC in the face?

The ref didnt think so and booked him.

On another note why is hawkeye not in Thurles?

It is nearly and integral part of the game now.

Umpires need to be fazed out, and possibly 2 refs.

Hawkeye has been installed in Thurles and yesterday was originally targeted as its first game but they seem to have hit a few calibration issues or something like that causing a delay. Should be up and running for later games

dixiefly

Davey Fitz going on that everyone had written Clare off before the game.

Who is everyone here? I thought that it was rated to be a very much 50 50 game. The bould Davey would have spouted the same cr@p win, lose or draw.

Wonder were the two results a bit bitter sweet for Davy O'Halloran? Wins with the footballers while the hurlers lose a tight game.

Mountainlad

dixiefly wrote: »

Davey Fitz going on that everyone had written Clare off before the game.

Who is everyone here? I thought that it was rated to be a very much 50 50 game. The bould Davey would have spouted the same cr@p win, lose or draw.

Wonder were the two results a bit bitter sweet for Davy O'Halloran? Wins with the footballers while the hurlers lose a tight game.

And they were beaten as well so the comment from him doesn't even make sense.

thinkstoomuch1

dixiefly wrote: »

Davey Fitz going on that everyone had written Clare off before the game.

Who is everyone here? I thought that it was rated to be a very much 50 50 game. The bould Davey would have spouted the same cr@p win, lose or draw.

Wonder were the two results a bit bitter sweet for Davy O'Halloran? Wins with the footballers while the hurlers lose a tight game.

Football win well if that makes halloran think he's got redemption fair enough but clsre footballers won't win even munster yet hurlers lot more potential
O connell coming back and all other players backing Davy doesn't look too good on halloran be honest

Mountainlad

thinkstoomuch1 wrote: »

Football win well if that makes halloran think he's got redemption fair enough but clsre footballers won't win even munster yet hurlers lot more potential
O connell coming back and all other players backing Davy doesn't look too good on halloran be honest

They won't win Munster hurling either so I suppose much of a muchness.

dixiefly

Mountainlad wrote: »

And they were beaten as well so the comment from him doesn't even make sense.

Clare 0-15 - 0-13 Limerick

thinkstoomuch1

Mountainlad wrote: »

They won't win Munster hurling either so I suppose much of a muchness.

You surely see the point he's no hope with football and they know that themselves hurling is different

dixiefly

thinkstoomuch1 wrote: »

Football win well if that makes halloran think he's got redemption fair enough but clsre footballers won't win even munster yet hurlers lot more potential
O connell coming back and all other players backing Davy doesn't look too good on halloran be honest

All the other players backing Davy? Did they or were they given an ultimatum to agree to the statement or walk?

Anyway, I find it hard not to believe the following. You could say water under the bridge but it is relevant considering the fact that it was another loss at the wekend.

On Friday it was revealed that following a disciplinary issue involving a small number of the Clare panel both Davy O’Halloran and Nicky O’Connell had left the squad. It’s now been revealed that the duo refused to fulfil their three weeks of punishment which they say isolated them from and humiliated them in front of their team-mates. They did so when they realised that a senior member of the squad was exempt from similar sanctions despite what they considered a more serious breach. This was not confirmed by the Clare management team.
Davy O’Halloran says that he was not allowed access to the team changing rooms, forced to tog out separately, he was prevented from wearing the panel’s gear to training, he was unable to be involved in matches or travel to them, no dialogue was allowed with other team mates at sessions and he was made to train alone in a corner of the pitch doing intensive physical work.

Mountainlad

thinkstoomuch1 wrote: »

You surely see the point he's no hope with football and they know that themselves hurling is different

Tell that to Podge and Cathal Mac too. Surely a more telling sign that theyd go play a sport where they don't have many realistic chances of silverware than play for him though I know to be fair with Podge his father is in charge.

Warper

In regards of our chances of winning the All-Ireland, yesterday was no disaster at all imo. Think that regards winning in Sept it actually helps us. We can now get players back and start getting the our best players on the pitch.

Problem is Davy at this stage. He doesnt seem to have the faith in the players to go out man to man and win. He is dedicated to the sweeper system and by playing defensively. We have the most attack orientated squad in Ireland and i feel he is selling them short by handing the initiative to our opponents by taking away one of our attackers. The sweeper is a great tactic but not in every single match. It is too predictable to play against.

Another thing is his histrionics which is obviously feeding through to the players. He needs to came the fcuk down as we are getting crucified by officials some legit others not. Either way we need to clamp down on the free count as these are giveaway scores given the quality of free-takers. Red cards must be stamped out.

We have the most talented bunch of players in Ireland, they need to be able to express themselves and trusted. We need guidance not a feeling of injustice after every match. Go on the Banner

thinkstoomuch1

dixiefly wrote: »

All the other players backing Davy? Did they or were they given an ultimatum to agree to the statement or walk?

Anyway, I find it hard not to believe the following. You could say water under the bridge but it is relevant considering the fact that it was another loss at the wekend.

On Friday it was revealed that following a disciplinary issue involving a small number of the Clare panel both Davy O’Halloran and Nicky O’Connell had left the squad. It’s now been revealed that the duo refused to fulfil their three weeks of punishment which they say isolated them from and humiliated them in front of their team-mates. They did so when they realised that a senior member of the squad was exempt from similar sanctions despite what they considered a more serious breach. This was not confirmed by the Clare management team.
Davy O’Halloran says that he was not allowed access to the team changing rooms, forced to tog out separately, he was prevented from wearing the panel’s gear to training, he was unable to be involved in matches or travel to them, no dialogue was allowed with other team mates at sessions and he was made to train alone in a corner of the pitch doing intensive physical work.

All you have posted really is story from when it ist broke out
To answer were the players forced to sign statement no no no no absolutely not and Liam sheedy Said it Saturday
Colm galvin Shane o donnell Colin Ryan all have said Davy was fair they accept the rules and nick o connell came back and apologies and then Davy played him Sunday

All your doing is with many posters have done regards the story from day one in belive one voice and seem say oh players are just agreeing for the sake of it When these boys are adults and if they didn't like what was going on would say it
People suggesting players are just agreeing for the sake of it is imo saying their weak characters but there not imo
Jamsie o Connor and of course louganne and daly backed him
I always ask the same question regards the two boys leaving what evidence bar one player is there things were very strict under Davy now I don't mean what so and so claims to know or hear I'm on bout real evidence made to the public and it's none
Davy halloran may had some points but no one else backed him and Nicky done a u turn so one man doesn't prove anything and innocent until proven guilty imo
Give me one other player who backs halloran or indeed others and you will find so far none exists
If others backed halloran I'd belive him but they haven't

irishleeds

Has there been any word on Tony Kelly's injury. I was a bit away from it but it looked like his knee to me. But talking to others they reckoned it was cramp. Does anyone know?

Clareman

irishleeds wrote: »

Has there been any word on Tony Kelly's injury. I was a bit away from it but it looked like his knee to me. But talking to others they reckoned it was cramp. Does anyone know?

Ankle ligaments by the look of things, was going for an MRI yesterday, haven't heard any results yet.

Clareman

I tried writing about the match yesterday but I was too annoyed so I figured I'd watch it again last night, I was even more annoyed afterwards so I figured I'd wait until this morning.

I'll start with the officials, I thought they were extremely poor for both sides, a couple of clear decisions were just wrong (side line and 65) and there was needless confusion for the free in the second half, the "goal" umpire on the Clare goal in the second half had a shocker. I thought our sending off was a clear sending off, he hit him twice ffs, and anyone that questions yerman for going down, HE WAS HIT TWICE, I would say the helmet cut the top of his head but they were able to stitch it in the dressing room. The Limerick sending off was (strangely) the winning of the game for Limerick, I'll get to that later, but it wasn't a sending off, if that was a sending off then Cian Lynch should have been sent off after a minute, Browne also should have been booked twice. I have no idea how in a half with so many subs, a delay for a sub coming on and a sending off the officials could decide on just 1 minute extra time

I thought Limerick played a very smart game, they reacted to anything that was happening in front of them, always had a spare man and ran at the Clare backs which forced them to foul. If I could be a bit negative about them, I thought Dowling's free taking was a bit hit and miss, he missed 3 very scorable frees, if (I know if ands or buts) he had gotten those Limerick would have been a lot more comfortable at the end. Limerick's defenders were very disciplined and didn't get caught ball watching and followed their man.

Onto Clare, I thought Kelly did well in goals, because of the way Clare were playing he was pucking the ball into areas rather than to players, for the goal I think his defender could have done better, the back should never go into the square. Full back line, I thought O'Donovan was poor, David Mc was good, besides the goal I don't think the Clare goal was ever really in threat, but they did concede a goal and the soft frees being conceded out the field negated the chances for goals.
Half back line was extremely congested, intentionally so, there were a lot of soft frees conceded. Midfield was dominated by Limerick and I don't think Donnellan was playing well before he was sent off. The forwards were struggling with being outnumbered, I thought Colin Ryan played very well and was out man of the match, I thought Conlon did well as well. Tony Kelly tried hard but was double marked for most of the game. I thought Golden, Reidy and O'Connor were poor.

The subs, oooh, the subs, Cunningham showed what a class act he is, how is wasn't started I don't know, the guy is class, O'Donovan wasn't having a good day at the office, how he was left of until 15 minutes left when Morey would have been the ideal player to mark Lynch I don't know. Honan coming on with a couple of minutes to go, I don't know what the purpose for that was, Nicky for Kelly was injury forced. Finally Bobby Duggan, let me say that I think that Bobby Duggan is a class act and has amazing potential, but he had a nightmare on Sunday, could be said that you can't allow for that, but in recent Clare Cup games he has been poor as well.

The Clare tactics. It's clear to me that our management feel the need to try something new every game, the whole "line up the middle and scatter" nullified the fact that our forwards are all great skilful hurlers and thrive in a 1 on 1 situation, having them all tight together allowed Limerick's faster backs go for the ball while the others covered. Shane O'Donnell was clearly playing under instructions not to go for his own score, I don't think he looked at the goals for the whole first half. When we were a man down we went to a man marking setup with a 2 man full forward line, this was probably out best period of the game, when we went back to 14 on 14 we went back to a sweeper setup, this was ridiculous, we didn't need to adjust anything, let Limerick adjust their game.

The Clare management, if the referee has to come over to warn you about your behaviour you are going too far, I could give the benefit of the doubt if it's an isolated incident, but questioning every decision that's being made (or not made) while chasing the ref down the corridor at half time is not going to endear you to the ref, the ref is a neutral and is there to enforce the rules, but he's also a human, p1ssing him off is not the way to get decisions your way.
I thought the substitutions were very strange, half time when you're turning around to play with the wind and are after losing a mid-fielder is surely the time to bring on a sub. A few positions we were clearly struggling, especially with O'Donovan, leaving him on for nearly an hour was an oversight. Bobby Duggan, it just didn't go for him, hopefully he'll come back stronger in the next game. As I said Nickey O'Connell for Tony Kelly was injury forced, but I would have thought the game was perfect for Nicky to come on earlier around the half forward line to mop up lose ball or to contest the puck outs.

The Clare discipline, again we play a match and get a player sent off softly, I have no problem with fellas getting themselves sent off, these things happen in every sport, but don't do it stupidly, Donnellan is the captain and should be leading by example, he struck twice, once you could say was spur of the moment or whatever, but to go back for seconds just shows a complete lack of discipline. Our last 4 sending offs were all soft, Podge for grabbing the face mask, Browne for constant fouling, Bugler for a dig and Donnellan for a strike, add in Bugler's attempted kick against Dublin and you have 5 pointless, costly sending offs that should have been avoided. If all the stuff in the papers in the past few months have shown anything it's that discipline is important to the management team, surely these sending offs are as bad as being out on a Friday night in February, I wonder if the players involved with get any kind of punishment?

Finally, the Clare manager, the interview after the game was all "I" & "My" and he seemed intent on being confrontational, the whole "I won't be drawn" thing, you weren't being drawn, his whole body language of looking down and rocking himself was extremely odd, if he conducted himself like that in a business meeting he wouldn't be long told where to go, conducting yourself like that in front of the national media when you're representing your county is a disgrace in my opinion, once more he is trying to make the whole thing about himself and how everyone is out to get him. He also seemed intent to make it clear that he's not going anywhere, considering his father was there in the middle of everything I don't think he will be going anywhere.

MfMan

Clareman wrote: »

The Clare tactics. It's clear to me that our management feel the need to try something new every game, the whole "line up the middle and scatter" nullified the fact that our forwards are all great skilful hurlers and thrive in a 1 on 1 situation, having them all tight together allowed Limerick's faster backs go for the ball while the others covered. Shane O'Donnell was clearly playing under instructions not to go for his own score, I don't think he looked at the goals for the whole first half. When we were a man down we went to a man marking setup with a 2 man full forward line, this was probably out best period of the game, when we went back to 14 on 14 we went back to a sweeper setup, this was ridiculous, we didn't need to adjust anything, let Limerick adjust their game.

Actually thought that also. For all the ball he showed for and won, I don't think he tried too often to get inside his man or take him on fully. Bit disappointing in that regard, albeit it was his first start since replay '13.

Deise_2012

Clareman well said, I agree with absolutely everything you said. It must be so frustrating for ye. I'm dreading the day ye get the u21 managers in charge. But with Davy's father to protect him, I can't see it happening anytime soon. Thank god :P

keeponhurling

MfMan wrote: »

Actually thought that also. For all the ball he showed for and won, I don't think he tried too often to get inside his man or take him on fully. Bit disappointing in that regard, albeit it was his first start since replay '13.

Do you really think Davy would tell his full-forward to not go for his own score, or not to look at the posts?

The attack didn't function all that badly, an improvement from the league - Reidy, O'Donnell, Kelly, Ryan and Conlon all scoring from play, as well as Cunningham off the bench..

Clareman

keeponhurling wrote: »

Do you really think Davy would tell his full-forward to not go for his own score, or not to look at the posts?

Because of the success of the whole Kelly/O'Donnell thing against Kilkenny I wouldn't have been surprised if he wasn't told to pass the ball once he had attracted a couple of defenders, in the first half there was 1 passage of play where he could have taken his point a couple of times but kept on trying to pick out a man.

Mountainlad

Critical and all as Ive been of Davy, I think O Donnell should be encouraged to try and find someone running towards goal if he's winning possession. Did to great effect for Cunningham's goal. A player attacking the goal is in a better position to score anyway. This would be much better realized, however, with a 3 man full forward line and with Cunningham starting and obviously McGrath coming back.

I have no doubt those 3 in full would give ye the best full forward line in the Country.

Clareman

Full forward line of Cunningham, Honan & O'Donnell with a half forward line of Conlon, Kelly & Ryan would give any team problems, no need for anything fancy or smart, just let them play, you've McGrath to come on as a sub them to shake things up a bit.

2 years ago we started the sweeper cause we were leaking goals and something had to be done, we've a decent enough full back line now, I really can't see the need to try to be smart, just let them out to play the game that they can play.

Cheese Wagstaff

Clareman wrote: »

Full forward line of Cunningham, Honan & O'Donnell with a half forward line of Conlon, Kelly & Ryan would give any team problems, no need for anything fancy or smart, just let them play, you've McGrath to come on as a sub them to shake things up a bit.

2 years ago we started the sweeper cause we were leaking goals and something had to be done, we've a decent enough full back line now, I really can't see the need to try to be smart, just let them out to play the game that they can play.

I'm sorry, but Conor McGrath starts every time. We'd take your hand off to have him in Limerick. After Kelly, he's your best forward. Just my opinion.

Clareman

Cheese Wagstaff wrote: »

I'm sorry, but Conor McGrath starts every time. We'd take your hand off to have him in Limerick. After Kelly, he's your best forward. Just my opinion.

Normally I'd agree, in fact I'd nearly go as far as to put him starting before O'Donnell, I'm getting frustrated here just thinking of the gifted players were are so lucky to have only to have the skill being removed from them, we don't have to do any kind of weird tactics or selections. Have a target full forward like Honan, he's a handful for any full back and will make sure that there's space in front of him, have the rest of the forwards in roaming roles looking for the ball/space, puck outs just have to be down on top of Conlon or Ryan to break to allow the other contest for the breaking ball. If Honan is having 1 of his off days just taking him off and replace him with 1 of the lads you've left off and have 6 roaming forwards.

2 years ago our backs were dodgier than a dodgy thing on dodgy day, this was mainly cause they were inexperienced at senior level, now they've 2 more years, we don't have to sacrifice a forward to play a sweeper, with the forwards we have the opposition would need to lose a play a sweeper to stop us flooding forward.

Cheese Wagstaff

Clareman wrote: »

Normally I'd agree, in fact I'd nearly go as far as to put him starting before O'Donnell, I'm getting frustrated here just thinking of the gifted players were are so lucky to have only to have the skill being removed from them, we don't have to do any kind of weird tactics or selections. Have a target full forward like Honan, he's a handful for any full back and will make sure that there's space in front of him, have the rest of the forwards in roaming roles looking for the ball/space, puck outs just have to be down on top of Conlon or Ryan to break to allow the other contest for the breaking ball. If Honan is having 1 of his off days just taking him off and replace him with 1 of the lads you've left off and have 6 roaming forwards.

2 years ago our backs were dodgier than a dodgy thing on dodgy day, this was mainly cause they were inexperienced at senior level, now they've 2 more years, we don't have to sacrifice a forward to play a sweeper, with the forwards we have the opposition would need to lose a play a sweeper to stop us flooding forward.

It's really an embarrassment of riches that ye have at the moment in fairness. It's frightening in fact. If you could pull it together and have a more normal game plan, the sky would truly be the limit.

Clareman

Cheese Wagstaff wrote: »

It's really an embarrassment of riches that ye have at the moment in fairness. It's frightening in fact. If you could pull it together and have a more normal game plan, the sky would truly be the limit.

Don't forget that all these riches are without players that aren't available for different reasons, some of which are the management's fault.

citykat

Clareman wrote: »

Normally I'd agree, in fact I'd nearly go as far as to put him starting before O'Donnell, I'm getting frustrated here just thinking of the gifted players were are so lucky to have only to have the skill being removed from them, we don't have to do any kind of weird tactics or selections. Have a target full forward like Honan, he's a handful for any full back and will make sure that there's space in front of him, have the rest of the forwards in roaming roles looking for the ball/space, puck outs just have to be down on top of Conlon or Ryan to break to allow the other contest for the breaking ball. If Honan is having 1 of his off days just taking him off and replace him with 1 of the lads you've left off and have 6 roaming forwards.

2 years ago our backs were dodgier than a dodgy thing on dodgy day, this was mainly cause they were inexperienced at senior level, now they've 2 more years, we don't have to sacrifice a forward to play a sweeper, with the forwards we have the opposition would need to lose a play a sweeper to stop us flooding forward.

Watching the game again today, O'Donnell was the best Clare player on the pitch. Not many forwards can make Paul Murphy (x2) & Richie McCarthy look like mugs. He'd be my first name on the Clare team sheet.
I think he should have run at McCarthy more yesterday. The few times he did he had him at 6s & 7s. I was surprised that McCarthy was left on him for the entire game.