Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Moderator Performance (was Mods not Gods)

  • 29-12-2009 7:43pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 887 ✭✭✭


    So who moderates the Moderators?

    You won't have to search for long in the Helpdesk or Feedback to find complaints about certain Moderators being heavy handed, usually in favor of their own arguments or personal friends. It's not always easy to PM someone if you think they hold a grudge.

    There should be a performance review of Moderators and Administrators every few months, too many complaints and they get the boot. What do you think?
    Post edited by Shield on


«1345

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,555 ✭✭✭✭AckwelFoley


    Podman wrote: »
    There should be a performance review of Moderators and Administrators every few months, too many complaints and they get the boot. What do you think?

    lol.

    I see how that would work


    Dev: "How was your performance last 2 months"?

    Dev: "I was beyond awesome"

    Dev: "I agree! Great! You passed"

    Dev: "Woot! Go me!!"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,522 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    Always happy to hear suggestions and ideas on improving things around here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 270 ✭✭votejohn


    Podman wrote: »
    So who moderates the Moderators?

    You won't have to search for long in the Helpdesk or Feedback to find complaints about certain Moderators being heavy handed, usually in favor of their own arguments or personal friends. It's not always easy to PM someone if you think they hold a grudge.

    There should be a performance review of Moderators and Administrators every few months, too many complaints and they get the boot. What do you think?


    Definitely agree with Podman here, there should be a forum for mod complaints, then the real powers that be could assess the complaints that had been made, and make decisions on it, but mods are definitely being far too extreme these days.


    they seem to be faaaaaaaar too hung up on making sure that everythings beyond PC that there seems to be (IMO) no room for humour!!

    Arguing with a Mod via PM is probably too personal in my opinion, things should be kept public, and perhaps moved to a dispute forum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,555 ✭✭✭✭AckwelFoley


    votejohn wrote: »
    Definitely agree with Podman here, there should be a forum for mod complaints, then the real powers that be could assess the complaints that had been made, and make decisions on it, but mods are definitely being far too extreme these days.


    they seem to be faaaaaaaar too hung up on making sure that everythings beyond PC that there seems to be (IMO) no room for humour!!

    Arguing with a Mod via PM is probably too personal in my opinion, things should be kept public, and perhaps moved to a dispute forum.

    Depends on the forum and the topic been discussed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,243 ✭✭✭✭Jesus Wept


    Podman wrote: »
    So who moderates the Moderators?

    I dunno. Coast Guard?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,044 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    Podman wrote: »
    So who moderates the Moderators?

    The Cat mod and then the admins do.

    Podman wrote: »
    You won't have to search for long in the Helpdesk or Feedback to find complaints about certain Moderators being heavy handed, usually in favor of their own arguments or personal friends. It's not always easy to PM someone if you think they hold a grudge.

    Can you provide links to show this please?
    Podman wrote: »
    There should be a performance review of Moderators and Administrators every few months, too many complaints and they get the boot. What do you think?

    The admins do keep an eye and if a mod is out of line they get spoken to and if needed demodded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,568 ✭✭✭DublinWriter


    Podman wrote: »
    What do you think?
    Their rules, their club. *hic* Now where can I get a decent kebab around here?...


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 25,872 Mod ✭✭✭✭Doctor DooM


    Podman wrote: »
    So who moderates the Moderators?

    You won't have to search for long in the Helpdesk or Feedback to find complaints about certain Moderators being heavy handed, usually in favor of their own arguments or personal friends. It's not always easy to PM someone if you think they hold a grudge.

    There should be a performance review of Moderators and Administrators every few months, too many complaints and they get the boot. What do you think?

    Uh.... so whats to stop people ganging up on a mod and getting them thrown out by just complaining about him?

    Also: Evidence or GTFO.

    Thirdly: If any mod is found abusing their power the admins are not long in talking to them. I have seen it happen.

    Fourthly: If you do not wish to pm a mod the Cmods are their to review the case for the very reason you mention. There's a whole food chain there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,555 ✭✭✭✭AckwelFoley


    Thaedydal wrote: »
    The Cat mod and then the admins do.

    Aye, the Cat mod


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,227 ✭✭✭✭Sparky


    Podman wrote: »
    So who moderates the Moderators?

    First line of contact is a Category moderator. A cat mod in terms of hierarchy is over a moderator and normally holds the position of appointing a moderator when agreements have been met and demodding a mod on Admins decision.
    Podman wrote: »
    You won't have to search for long in the Helpdesk or Feedback to find complaints about certain Moderators being heavy handed, usually in favor of their own arguments or personal friends.
    Of course you wont, its the first 2 places people go to in order to complain, so naturally it wont be hard to find a complaint.
    Podman wrote: »
    It's not always easy to PM someone if you think they hold a grudge.
    You can message a category moderator. There is 2 to each section
    Podman wrote: »
    There should be a performance review of Moderators and Administrators every few months, too many complaints and they get the boot. What do you think?

    Moderators have been demoded in the past for their actions.
    I dont see where you are going by including admins in this?

    However frankly I have noticed that you have created this account from your original chompy account, but you give no reason as to why? Is this so that you can pretend to fight the power and then make an example by trying to get banned?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 484 ✭✭Takk


    Podman wrote: »
    So who moderates the Moderators?

    Bear Patrol.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,713 ✭✭✭✭jor el


    Oh, a bandwagon! Quick, everyone jump on!
    Podman wrote: »
    So who moderates the Moderators?
    The Admins.
    votejohn wrote: »
    Definitely agree with Podman here, there should be a forum for mod complaints,

    Does anyone open their eyes and read anymore? It's called Help Desk. You can also PM an Admin, or the Community Managers, and you can use the Report Post feature - report.gif
    votejohn wrote: »
    they seem to be faaaaaaaar too hung up on making sure that everythings beyond PC that there seems to be (IMO) no room for humour!!

    So, you've had personal interactions with all 800+ mods, in all the forums, and can say that all mods behave exactly the same, and it's never in a fair way? Seriously? You've probably had run ins with one or two, and decided they're all the same humorless robots.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,698 Mod ✭✭✭✭Silverfish


    jor el wrote: »
    Oh, a bandwagon! Quick, everyone jump on!

    emot-bandwagon.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 887 ✭✭✭Podman


    Uh.... so whats to stop people ganging up on a mod and getting them thrown out by just complaining about him?
    Admin, I guess.
    Thaedydal wrote: »
    Can you provide links to show this please?
    Evidence or GTFO.
    These are only some of the people who bothered making a post about their issues.
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055781800
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055781398
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055777850
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055768941
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055777689
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055774390
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055774262
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055773388
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055760673
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055772408
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055201761
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055731203
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055727971
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055756508
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055750408
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055744336
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055739596
    Sparky wrote: »
    However frankly I have noticed that you have created this account from your original chompy account, but you give no reason as to why?
    I didn't think I was obliged to give one.
    But is there a reason you asked me twice as to why I have a second account? (here also)
    Sparky wrote: »
    Is this so that you can pretend to fight the power and then make an example by trying to get banned?
    Why would I try to get banned?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 887 ✭✭✭Podman


    Uh.... so whats to stop people ganging up on a mod and getting them thrown out by just complaining about him?
    I don't think people are that malicious, let alone organized. Any boards people I've spoken to seem to be decent reasonable people.

    If a Mod, Cmod or Admin has picked up lots of complains, it's not without a reason. There is usually something more to it than him being picked on.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 25,872 Mod ✭✭✭✭Doctor DooM


    Podman wrote: »
    I don't think people are that malicious, let alone organized. Any boards people I've spoken to seem to be decent reasonable people.

    If a Mod, Cmod or Admin has picked up lots of complains, it's not without a reason. There is usually something more to it than him being picked on.

    Really?


    Mods are Boards people too. I'm a regular user outside of my forums just like you.

    There's NOT that many complaints, actually. Consider there's about 500 mods, and several thousand posts a day. I think I remember an admin saying about .01% of posts are complained about.

    Also, still waiting for that evidence of mods favouring their friends.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 887 ✭✭✭Podman


    yes really.
    I know Mods are boardsies, I like 99% of boardsies including Mods, etc., that's why I'm here.
    I object to the 1% (or less) who are bullies and can harass or provolk someone because they don't like them, and have the "power", or not, to ban.

    I'm sure anyone who bothers complaining about favoritism has an uphill climb ahead of them, There may be an "evidence" reference in some of those links ...
    Yeah I looked at one or two of them .... Anyway, don't care, you're a re reg.
    ... but to be honest, I don't have the will or the energy to go through them now, especially if it's not going to matter.

    I don't really feel like bandying other people's decisions up and down the thread anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,044 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    Podman wrote: »
    I don't think people are that malicious, let alone organized.

    I have seen it happen, unfortunately.
    Podman wrote: »
    Any boards people I've spoken to seem to be decent reasonable people.

    Glad you have had such a good experience so far on the site, hope it stays that way.
    Podman wrote: »
    If a Mod, Cmod or Admin has picked up lots of complains, it's not without a reason. There is usually something more to it than him being picked on.

    Some times it is and some times it isn't.
    I once had 5 feedback thread complaining about a heap of bans in PI, each one was legit but the people who had posted were new to the site and didn't understand that not all forums are the same and the types of posting which is the norm on other forums was not permitted in PI.

    The perception of a mod can often be very different then how fair their modding actually is and that perception can be easily coloured by a few people with a grudge.

    The post ratio to mod action to complaint is actually very low for a site this large, the number of users and the amount of posts made daily.

    I can understand some people may think there is no smoke with out fire and it can be hard for them to see the other side of the fence but if a mod ever goes rogue once the catmods/admins are made aware action is always taken.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 887 ✭✭✭Podman


    Thaedydal wrote: »
    Some times it is and some times it isn't.
    I once had 5 feedback thread complaining about a heap of bans in PI, each one was legit but the people who had posted were new to the site and didn't understand that not all forums are the same and the types of posting which is the norm on other forums was not permitted in PI.

    The perception of a mod can often be very different then how fair their modding actually is and that perception can be easily coloured by a few people with a grudge.

    The post ratio to mod action to complaint is actually very low for a site this large, the number of users and the amount of posts made daily.

    I can understand some people may think there is no smoke with out fire and it can be hard for them to see the other side of the fence but if a mod ever goes rogue once the catmods/admins are made aware action is always taken.
    I appreciate your frankness, they mustn't have read the forum rules..

    I sympathize with that situation, a Mod's duty is not easy sometimes, I did it for a while in Galway a few years ago, and had to travel at the time.
    I think it depends on other factors too that the Mod should be aware of.. no sleep and 20 cans of red bull is probably not what you need to Mod the "butterflies and daisies" thread. (of course I don't mean you - you, I mean you - whoever, no one in particular)


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 28,552 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    Podman wrote: »
    I don't think people are that malicious, let alone organized.

    Really and you have stuff to show this doesn't happen?

    I've seen it happen in the past to the point where DeVore had to threaten site bans to get people to cop the hell on.

    People can be organised when they want to be and as such they could very easily get organised and make invalid complaints, in my view invalid complaints would be a very serious matter
    Any boards people I've spoken to seem to be decent reasonable people.

    This is like saying all Dublin people are decent and reasonable or all Waterford people or (pick another county or country), it doesn't exist....some are good some are bad; to say that all are good OR all are bad is pointless as it would be very much untrue.

    If a Mod, Cmod or Admin has picked up lots of complains, it's not without a reason. There is usually something more to it than him being picked on.

    Not entirely correct or accurate, some forums are extremely busy and will have more complaints then others and as such more complaints against mods.

    In addition when a mod does enforce the rules some users have a big problem with being told they are wrong when they've breached the site rules/forum charter and as such complain.

    I'm glad you think that the majority of boards users are decent people this is very much a good thing and long may it continue :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Darragh


    Podman wrote: »
    So who moderates the Moderators?

    You won't have to search for long in the Helpdesk or Feedback to find complaints about certain Moderators being heavy handed, usually in favor of their own arguments or personal friends. It's not always easy to PM someone if you think they hold a grudge.

    There should be a performance review of Moderators and Administrators every few months, too many complaints and they get the boot. What do you think?

    Podman, you have (a) experience of being a mod, and (b) obviously a bone of contention about this.

    How do you think the process should work?

    So, user x has been banned from a forum for trolling, let's say. Repeated trolling. he's been warned already, does it again anyways. Comes to Feedback and complains about the moderator who banned him. What, ideally, would happen from there?

    If there's a better process than what we have in place for helping our 550+ volunteer moderators keep their forums clear of spam, nuisance posts and posters and irrelevant, incendiary, unhelpful posts, I'd really appreciate your input of making it happen.

    There are good mods, there are bad mods - same as posters. So, as OP of this thread, what's your feedback on how it should work?

    Cheers

    Darragh


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,661 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    There are what, 700 to 800 mods? Maybe more. its very unfair to brand all mods the same.

    What alot of people dont see happen as part of mod duty is clean up of a forum. Log in to delete spam and reporting it (and God there is a lot of it), merging and moving threads to the appropriate places. Closing threads that need to be closed.
    All of that before bans are even considered.

    Mods dont like having to ban people. There is no pleasure gained from it. Even banning spammers. Its a faceless slap on the wrist to them when you would really like to visit their home and clog their postbox with stink bombs to see how they like it.

    Im sure there are mods who get it wrong sometimes too. We are only human. Ive disagreed with some mods decisions in the past but that doesnt mean that the mod acted in a bullying or unproper fashion.

    But i have to say, i have little sympathy for posters who visit the site to troll and then try to hide behind some pedantic argument as to why they shouldnt be banned. Sometimes trolls are funny. Most of the time they are not. Either way trolling is trolling.

    Id like to think I am a God op but unfortunately Im not. Im more like an angel having to do God's dirty work. :p


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I have the body of a god...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 887 ✭✭✭Podman


    Cabaal wrote: »
    Really and you have stuff to show this doesn't happen?

    I've seen it happen in the past to the point where DeVore had to threaten site bans to get people to cop the hell on.

    Obviously it does happen, as indicated before (like post #20)
    Cabaal wrote: »
    People can be organised when they want to be and as such they could very easily get organised and make invalid complaints, in my view invalid complaints would be a very serious matter

    Invalid complaints are just as bad as an invalid banning, it is abuse.
    I object to the 1% (or less) who are bullies and can harass or provoke someone because they don't like them

    This can apply to all people; users, mods, catmods and admin alike.
    Podman wrote: »
    Any boards people I've spoken to seem to be decent reasonable people.

    I'm talking about maybe 6 or 8 people I've emailed, plus the drama group. How is that like what you are suggesting here?
    Cabaal wrote: »
    This is like saying all Dublin people are decent and reasonable or all Waterford people or (pick another county or country), it doesn't exist....some are good some are bad; to say that all are good OR all are bad is pointless as it would be very much untrue.

    I won't be addressing any more opinions that are only assumed to be mine.

    RopeDrink wrote: »
    I'm never keen on the 'paint all with one brush' impression these threads give off - It's just painful to see the entire title being targetted when in reality people only really have a gripe with specific people, not so much the role in which they are filling.

    It's not about a gripe for me.

    When those specific people are users, the role they fill is only as good as their argument. But when specific users have been given power to modify another user's access to a site, the role they fill is a lot bigger, and that role can be abused without collaboration.

    I understand that it's very rare that a mod will lose the head and go postal, but it has happened and still happens, and as long as it happens here will be threads like this. Once you stop discussion about it, it's the beginning of the end.

    Like I said before, it's only a very small percent that causes all the chaos (in every aspect of society), and stirs the rest of us up; user, poster and mod alike.

    Everyone who makes a post has a responsibility to have some self control, it comes first, and mods have the added responsibility of watching over everyone else's self-control. It's a ****ing tough job and hat's off to the people who do it right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,026 ✭✭✭Amalgam


    Would some sort of meta-moderation work?

    I get the feeling it has been tried here before though.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    In mod we trust.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,290 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 887 ✭✭✭Podman


    Darragh wrote: »
    Podman, you have (a) experience of being a mod, and (b) obviously a bone of contention about this.

    How do you think the process should work?

    So, user x has been banned from a forum for trolling, let's say. Repeated trolling. he's been warned already, does it again anyways. Comes to Feedback and complains about the moderator who banned him. What, ideally, would happen from there?

    If there's a better process than what we have in place for helping our 550+ volunteer moderators keep their forums clear of spam, nuisance posts and posters and irrelevant, incendiary, unhelpful posts, I'd really appreciate your input of making it happen.

    There are good mods, there are bad mods - same as posters. So, as OP of this thread, what's your feedback on how it should work?

    Cheers

    Darragh

    Every time someone mentions trolling, I have to look it up... (urban dictionary) ..
    basically "being a prick to provoke an emotional response", bullying.

    In that example (you guys know this already), if the thread shows he's trolling, yes Ban.
    If the thread shows he's been provoked, invite the troller and provoker and moderator (and their correspondence) to a hearing (of sorts) with more than one admin, preferably not known to any party, maybe leading to a ban..
    If it gets as far as the helpdesk, and 2 admins have looked into it, he ban will stand depending on their decision.
    The reason I say 2 admins (or 3) is to try to prevent corruption or bullying in the workplace.
    I'm still thinking of a way to identify the bad mods, or better still, have them identify the problem and eliminate it themselves.
    That would just leave the 0.001% who would be complete and utter barstewards.

    The boards process works, but there's got to be a reason why in some cases it seems unfair.
    I think it has to do with emotional involvement. I wouldn't like to see an enraged pilot getting into an airplane, or a drunk behind the wheel of a car, certainly not a provoked one.
    If a mod, or whoever, is in the middle of a ****storm, they should go and cool off. You can't self-moderate if your blood is boiling.
    I'm sure it happens quite often, especially with things your passionate about, and with so many people's ideas in the mix.

    Like I said before, 99% do a bang up job and everyone on boards appreciates what they do, even though people don't say it very often.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,840 ✭✭✭Dav


    Podman wrote: »
    If the thread shows he's been provoked, invite the troller and provoker and moderator (and their correspondence) to a hearing (of sorts) with more than one admin, preferably not known to any party, maybe leading to a ban..
    If it gets as far as the helpdesk, and 2 admins have looked into it, he ban will stand depending on their decision.
    The reason I say 2 admins (or 3) is to try to prevent corruption or bullying in the workplace.
    These are fair ideas, however, it becomes a time sink to have to set up a hearing for every one who feels hard done by (and most who've been banned, irrespective of reason, feel they've been hard done by) and it'll probably still end up here on Feedback or Helpdesk. Also, we don't like to think of this place as a "work place" for our mods. It's not a job, it's an additional contribution to the site if you take my meaning. Mind you, it feels like a job sometimes when you mod one of the busier forums!
    Podman wrote: »
    If a mod, or whoever, is in the middle of a ****storm, they should go and cool off. You can't self-moderate if your blood is boiling.
    I'm sure it happens quite often, especially with things your passionate about, and with so many people's ideas in the mix.
    This has always been our recommendation though, we tell mods to pass it over to their co-mod if they're not in the right frame of mind for dealing with things or if it's become personal.
    Podman wrote: »
    Like I said before, 99% do a bang up job and everyone on boards appreciates what they do, even though people don't say it very often.
    We always appreciate hearing this :)

    I'm glad you're making suggestions and trying to help us out. It's just sometimes, experience has taught us better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 887 ✭✭✭Podman


    I didn't mean to make it sound "work-y".
    "Bullying in the workplace" is already an accepted phrase (unfortunately), and I didn't want to be misunderstood, or seem like I was talking about anyone specifically. Particularly since possible corruption in higher ranks is such a very sensitive subject.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭Kinetic^


    Mods not gods...LOL.

    1 for your kind...users not abusers!

    /gets coat


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,717 ✭✭✭✭muffler


    Podman wrote: »
    So who moderates the Moderators?

    You won't have to search for long in the Helpdesk or Feedback to find complaints about certain Moderators being heavy handed, usually in favor of their own arguments or personal friends. It's not always easy to PM someone if you think they hold a grudge.

    There should be a performance review of Moderators and Administrators every few months, too many complaints and they get the boot. What do you think?
    You're here for all of 2 days and looking to change the planet.

    Good luck with it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 270 ✭✭votejohn


    muffler wrote: »
    You're here for all of 2 days and looking to change the planet.

    Good luck with it.

    is that not an example of trolling?

    Podman has some good ideas!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,479 ✭✭✭Conor


    Amalgam wrote: »
    Would some sort of meta-moderation work?

    I get the feeling it has been tried here before though.

    There is meta-moderation of sorts in that mods who attract legitimate complaints via Help Desk will get taken up on it by CMods/Admins.

    If you want automated meta-moderation where some sort of voting mechanism can be used to rate moderator actions then it gets very tricky to implement for the following reasons:
    • Many moderator actions are wholly or partly invisible to regular users. For example, you can't see the posts they deleted and you can't see the previous revisions of posts they edit. Would it be fair to only meta-moderate the visible bits?
    • Some decisions will be massively unpopular yet required to protect the site. For example, "XYZ Ltd are scamming barstewards" will get removed and people will be annoyed because a) they believe that XYZ Ltd are scammers and b) they believe it's in the public interest that it stay up. You'd then have to adjudicate on the "fair" meta-moderation and the "unfair" meta-moderation and then you're essentially back to square one.
    • Engineering the system to protect it from abuse by axe-grinders is quite difficult. In fact, the subjects of the moderation are the most likely to use the meta-moderation system and hence I suspect most if not all moderator decisions would end up with a net negative rating.

    Personally, I think the moderation of the moderators is a problem best solved socially and not technically. Some complaints are justified and some just boil down to "I broke the rules but I think the rules shouldn't apply to me". The only way to distinguish between the two is to have a human adjudicate on it. That function is currently filled by the CMods and Admins and works most of the time.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,717 ✭✭✭✭muffler


    votejohn wrote: »
    is that not an example of trolling?
    Nope.


    votejohn wrote: »
    Podman has some good ideas!
    He could have although I havent seen anything new yet but I fail to see why he had to register a second account to start this thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 887 ✭✭✭Podman


    Nope.
    ..
    fail


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,219 ✭✭✭✭biko


    Here less than a month and already a gripe OP?

    Edit Ah, beaten to it by muffler I see


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,429 ✭✭✭✭star-pants


    muffler wrote: »
    but I fail to see why he had to register a second account to start this thread.

    I too am curious at this - I don't see the point precisely.

    Regarding moderating mods - there is a system in place.
    Mods > CMods > Admins > God
    thus showing we are indeed not God.

    If there are issues that can't be solved with the mod, it's taken to cmod, if it can't be sorted there, admin.
    Most of the mods/admins wouldn't have these volunteer jobs if they just took the mick. IF one or more of them do start acting the idiot then someone will step in and sort them or get rid of them.

    Helpdesk is here for a reason.
    A lot of people like to throw the 'free speech' line, X mod won't let me say Z boo hoo. A lot of people aren't happy with being banned or infracted but most of them usually deserve it.
    IF they don't - it's not like they can't appeal, they can and do. And if it's deemed they were right in appealing, it's turned over.

    If there are legitimate complaints about a mod then something will be done, we don't just turn a blind eye to it. If a mod comes into one of the forums I mod and acts like a twit, I'll infract/ban. It's not like mods get special treatment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    votejohn wrote: »
    is that not an example of trolling?

    Podman has some good ideas!

    He is not trolling at all, he is asking a legitimate question. Why set up the separate podman account to just make these complaints. Can they not use their existing account? If not why not, have they been banned? Is this whole thread being directed at specific mods that they have a personal problem with?

    This person does not read like a new user with issues with boards, they sound like someone who has been on here a while and if that is the case then they should be posting using their more established account if they want to be taken seriously.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,044 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    star-pants wrote: »
    Regarding moderating mods - there is a system in place.
    Mods > CMods > Admins > God
    thus showing we are indeed not God.

    Which one cos I bet it's Odin.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,429 ✭✭✭✭star-pants


    Thaedydal wrote: »
    Which one cos I bet it's Odin.

    Regular or Marvel?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 887 ✭✭✭Podman


    gandalf wrote: »
    Is this whole thread being directed at specific mods that they have a personal problem with?
    Obviously not, unless you can show otherwise?

    Many people have made positive contributions to the thread, while others would like to see it go off topic, degenerate into argument and be closed.
    I wonder why?

    Also, where does it say you can't have more than one account?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    Why use a new account when you obviously have been a member here longer than two days?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,429 ✭✭✭✭star-pants


    Podman wrote: »
    Also, where does it say you can't have more than one account?

    Where did someone say you couldn't?
    In general people have one account, simple. No particular reason for a second account - why would there?
    *most* people who have a second account do so to troll / circumvent a ban / generally not good reasons.

    So if you have a regular account/are a regular user - why would you feel the need to create a new separate account just to start this thread? By doing so you instantly create suspicion amongst readers.

    I am star-pants, no matter what I say on boards I remain me, I've never seen a reason to not.

    I'm not giving out btw - but merely explaining why people have focused on the fact you've used this new account for an important purpose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 887 ✭✭✭Podman


    star-pants wrote: »
    Where did someone say you couldn't?
    In general people have one account, simple. No particular reason for a second account - why would there?
    *most* people who have a second account do so to troll / circumvent a ban / generally not good reasons.

    So if you have a regular account/are a regular user - why would you feel the need to create a new separate account just to start this thread? By doing so you instantly create suspicion amongst readers.

    I am star-pants, no matter what I say on boards I remain me, I've never seen a reason to not.

    I'm not giving out btw - but merely explaining why people have focused on the fact you've used this new account for an important purpose.

    Well, again, there is no particular reason, other than I just felt like it. And since I haven't made a second one to troll or circumvent a ban, I should be left alone about it.

    I'm glad you see the thread topic to be an important one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 270 ✭✭votejohn


    gandalf wrote: »
    He is not trolling at all, he is asking a legitimate question. Why set up the separate podman account to just make these complaints. Can they not use their existing account? If not why not, have they been banned? Is this whole thread being directed at specific mods that they have a personal problem with?

    This person does not read like a new user with issues with boards, they sound like someone who has been on here a while and if that is the case then they should be posting using their more established account if they want to be taken seriously.

    Gandalf, your missing the post that I quoted

    "You're here for all of 2 days and looking to change the planet.

    Good luck with it."

    there was no question there for Podman, i just thought it seemed like the post served to do nothing except perhaps entice an argument.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,044 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    star-pants wrote: »
    Regular or Marvel?

    DC treats gods a lot better then praise stan lee publishing house.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 93 ✭✭danash


    Also: Evidence or GTFO.

    Thirdly: If any mod is found abusing their power the admins are not long in talking to them. I have seen it happen.

    Fourthly: If you do not wish to pm a mod the Cmods are their to review the case for the very reason you mention. There's a whole food chain there.


    It's very hard to link to evidence when the Mods delete it immediately....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,080 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    danash wrote: »
    It's very hard to link to evidence when the Mods delete it immediately....

    Mods don't delete 'evidence'. They delete crap/nonsensical/libellous threads/posts. And to add to that, these are only soft deleted. They still remain visible to other moderators of that forum.

    So if someone is trying to be a 'god mod' and cover their tracks after committing evil, nefarious acts, they'll be spotted very quickly.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement