WHICH ONE OF THESE CARS WOULD YOU GET

rrrkelly

im debating between these two:

http://www.carzone.ie/search/Honda/Integra/Type-R/200935195051559/advert?channel=CARS

http://www.carzone.ie/search/Toyota/Celica/vvtli/200942195532158/advert?channel=CARS

Berty

The Integra.

What an Awful looking Celica! :eek:

Bobo78

+1 I d definitely go for the Integra.

EPM

Integra here too. That Celica deserves to be on the skanger mobile thread!

colm_mcm

The DC5, that Celica is awful looking and overpriced and I wouldn't buy a spark plug from that garage let alone an entire car.

andy3695

integra definately.

SV

Integra...
god.that celica..crush it.

teednab-el

Integra is a smashing car. I would definately go for that. It has more power too. Most celicas I have seen are fine cars too but I must admit that this Celica here is horrible.

Pah_Connors

I have to say, four of my sons drive toyota celica's, and one of my nephew's has a honda the very same as that. From driving them both, the celica feels a lot more solid on the road, like a lite ace with more power

mildews

Neither!!! You will look like a skanger in both

laoishibee

Probably the Teg. . . . Shes standard
Celica your prob asking for too much unwanted attention!

junkyard

Are ya getting a matching track suit and baseball cap to go with the car?:)

rrrkelly

mildews wrote: »

Neither!!! You will look like a skanger in both

i dont care what i look like in either, ill be able to afford somethin better in a few years after college....

SV

mildews wrote: »

Neither!!! You will look like a skanger in both

What do you drive? Just out of interest.

Gumbo

mildews wrote: »

Neither!!! You will look like a skanger in both

your in the motor forum for what reason????

Integra Type R all day long imo

Wossack

the integra, but ugh, the white....! screams tracksuits tucked into socks to me

mildews

SV wrote: »

What do you drive? Just out of interest.

530 D Auto M-Sport, 2008. It's mine and it's fully paid for.

Lauder

I think neither is the reasonable answer. Both cars have horrible image. Total knacker wagon.

You can get some great cars for that money these days, why waste it on a skanger mobile.

Half the price and YUM
http://www.carzone.ie/search/Alfa-Romeo/GTV/200942195532340/advert?channel=CARS

TT for the same price.
http://www.carzone.ie/search/Audi/TT/1.8-180B/200943195577319/advert?channel=CARS

http://www.carzone.ie/search/Peugeot/406/coupe-2./200936195127174/advert?channel=CARS

Absurdum

in before the Octavia recommendation

Alanstrainor

mildews wrote: »

530 D Auto M-Sport, 2008. It's mine and it's fully paid for.

Let's keep this on topic shall we?

luckyfrank

Integra is very good value go for that

mildews

Alanstrainor wrote: »

Let's keep this on topic shall we?

No problem!!

Alanstrainor

I think it's fairly clear what everyone here would buy, i'd definitely go for the integra over the celica!

luckyfrank

Wossack wrote: »

the integra, but ugh, the white....! screams tracksuits tucked into socks to me

I drive a white altezza im not a knacker or skanger, white is a great colour in the right car real head turner

emurphy

INTEGRA no contest.

CianRyan

I vote the Integra with a respray to this.



Actually, that would probably cost a bomb for a whole respray, wouldn't it?

cabrwab

Just commented on how those teg's are not the scummer mobile they used be.
I know there is a few guys that have them around these parts and pics posted have all looked well.

Go for that integra over that celica,
Surely you could find a better example of that celica.
There was a nice one on adverts i thought.

I kinda like the white, it suits some cars better

Gumbo

mildews wrote: »

530 D Auto M-Sport, 2008. It's mine and it's fully paid for.

good for you, did you get indicators on it?

mildews

Now, Now!!!! Back on topic:D

Atomic Pineapple

Lauder wrote: »

I think neither is the reasonable answer. Both cars have horrible image. Total knacker wagon.

You can get some great cars for that money these days, why waste it on a skanger mobile.

Half the price and YUM
http://www.carzone.ie/search/Alfa-Romeo/GTV/200942195532340/advert?channel=CARS

TT for the same price.
http://www.carzone.ie/search/Audi/TT/1.8-180B/200943195577319/advert?channel=CARS

http://www.carzone.ie/search/Peugeot/406/coupe-2./200936195127174/advert?channel=CARS

A TT and a 406 mentioned as an alternative to a DC5 Type R? Really?

The Alfa is lovely but a 3 litre engine compared to the DC5's 2 litre doesn't make sense.

If only people had a bit of brain power to get over the stereotypes they attach to particular cars and actually see them for what they are.

The Integra by the way but you could find a nicer Celica than that one, Then test drive both and see which one suits you best, the Integra would on paper have more power, handling would be pretty good on both but test drive both to see what suits you best

Max Power1

EPM wrote: »

Integra here too. That Celica deserves to be on the skanger mobile thread!

They are both muppet mobiles imo, you'd look at home in either with a tracksuit and tucked in trainers

mildews wrote: »

Neither!!! You will look like a skanger in both

+1

Barr

I'd prefer a Celica over an Integra but look for a white one

Silver is too common a colour and will blend into the rest of the other silver cars out there.

Atomic Pineapple

Alanstrainor wrote: »

Let's keep this on topic shall we?

Max Power1 wrote: »

They are both muppet mobiles imo, you'd look at home in either with a tracksuit and tucked in trainers

+1

:rolleyes:

If people in a motoring forum cant see a car for what it is without attaching a stereotype to it and adding no other relevant information then why are they posting in a motoring forum?

Just dumbfounds me

Alanstrainor

Max Power1 wrote: »

They are both muppet mobiles imo, you'd look at home in either with a tracksuit and tucked in trainers

+1

This is the last warning i'll post on this thread, the next "They're both skangermobiles" comment gets a weeks ban.

Beta Ray Bill

The Teg

all the way!

Gary ITR

kceire wrote: »

good for you, did you get indicators on it?

I don't know wether to Thank you or Infract you.

Lads keep it on topic. If you want to discuss stereotypes do it in the sterotype forum, if you can't find a stereotype forum suggest one here

Mr.Boots

Teg
The toyota is manky.

Barr

Onkle wrote: »

I don't know wether to Thank you or Infract you.

Lads keep it on topic. If you want to discuss stereotypes do it in the sterotype forum, if you can't find a stereotype forum suggest one here

Don't infract him, its one of the funniest posts I read in a long while

Graham_B18C

The Integra all the way, to me its no contest. Its in a different leauge to the celica. Its far better looking and not as common on the road.

Its a very good price too. Only thing thats bad about the Teg is the insurance, it costs a lot!

rrrkelly wrote: »

i dont care what i look like in either, ill be able to afford somethin better in a few years after college....

And don't speak like that of a DC5!

Guessing by that though I assume you're in your early 20's?

The Insurance on the Teg will make you not want it. The DC5's are really heavily loaded

EDIT: Did you not have a thread up two days ago saying you have a 04 Celica? Why are you debating over buying that 00 one?

antomorro-sei

Get the Teg

JCDUB

Between those two, I'd say the integra, although the colour is far from ideal.

Plenty of nice sleepers out there though..!!

Atomic Pineapple

Grahamo999 wrote: »

EDIT: Did you not have a thread up two days ago saying you have a 04 Celica? Why are you debating over buying that 00 one?

Switching Insurance from Celica 190 to ITR

Replacing suspension on 2003 Celica

Fixing Damage to 2001 Celica

If you have a 03? 01? Celica 190 then why are you looking at a 2000 one as a next car?

B11gt00e

draffodx wrote: »

If only people had a bit of brain power to get over the stereotypes they attach to particular cars and actually see them for what they are.

+1*

Lotta nice kids driving coupe versions of hondas, toyotas etc., out there. They're young, they wanna drive around a bit, they wan't to learn how to modify performance with the minimal finances and the components they've got at hand... Fair play... They'll grow out of that phase and when older and hopefully employed with more disposable incomes, they'll be a more discerning breed of buyer who'll have the technical know-how and income to appreciate higher end production sports vehicles.

Fair play all the way... sure there's gonna be some wee feckers out there jockeying around and giving cars a bad rep... but the whole scangermobile thing is way out of line... Some of us in our late teens would have happily settled for a mark II fiesta, micra, kadett - whatever you could get your hands on... I say roll on the engineers, mechanics, bodyshop stylers(fair enough - chop shop in the odd case:D) of the future. It's always good when young people show a passion and an interest in something... If it's car modification - then lets give them some more venues to test out their drift and drag skills in a safe professional environment where they can get result printouts etc., and keep the bull**** off the streets.

'sall good.

roosterman71

Max Power1 wrote: »

They are both muppet mobiles imo, you'd look at home in either with a tracksuit and tucked in trainers

Like this guy (except its shiny black shoes and not trainers)?

Also, that Celica is muck to look at. I'd take the Integra

colm_mcm

So either the OP has 3 Celicas already, or he's a messer....

Explanation please

Flyer1

Integra everytime. Those celica's aren't very quick at all, i had a go of one on a track with a 1.6 (b16a) civic. Celica did have the advantage in the corners but as soon as we got near a straight I got the pull on him every time, and yes it was the 1.8 vvtli celica.

DC5 integra is a lot quicker then that civic.....

Biro

Pah_Connors wrote: »

I have to say, four of my sons drive toyota celica's, and one of my nephew's has a honda the very same as that. From driving them both, the celica feels a lot more solid on the road, like a lite ace with more power

That's rubbish. The Celica is a fine handling car, but the Integra is better.

Biro

Flyer1 wrote: »

Integra everytime. Those celica's aren't very quick at all, i had a go of one on a track with a 1.6 (b16a) civic. Celica did have the advantage in the corners but as soon as we got near a straight I got the pull on him every time, and yes it was the 1.8 vvtli celica.

DC5 integra is a lot quicker then that civic.....

Yer man couldn't drive then. The 190 Celica would easily have the upper hand on the b16a Civic.

Matt Simis

JCDUB wrote: »

Between those two, I'd say the integra, although the colour is far from ideal.

Plenty of nice sleepers out there though..!!

This is the problem here, that white is not flattering to the Teg at all (and I do like white on many cars).
On the Celica, it looks only very slightly more tarted than most, I dont see what the problem is. Ignoring spoilers and junk, the Celica is a vastly better looking car.
It looks designed as opposed assembled.

Why I wouldnt buy either personally is they are both faux performance cars, like the Hyundai Coupe. If you are going to drive a car that may attract certain negative stereotyping, do it properly:

omb0wyn5ehpij9

Integra everytime.

draffodx wrote: »

:rolleyes:

If people in a motoring forum cant see a car for what it is without attaching a stereotype to it and adding no other relevant information then why are they posting in a motoring forum?

Just dumbfounds me

And this is the main reason I don't post in here. It's full of people who talk rubbish!

I can't believe some of the replies haven't received infractions seeing as tehre was warnings handed down!

Sizzler

The Integra and offer him 7.5k.

The price is off the charts :eek: