Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Science TR071

1131416181974

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 889 ✭✭✭Bajingo


    amacachi wrote: »
    Not a clue. Looking forward to getting it though, should be a kick up the arse I badly need.

    Just curious does the mark go to your end of year result in anyway? They didnt for me anyway..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,315 ✭✭✭✭amacachi


    Bajingo wrote: »
    Just curious does the mark go to your end of year result in anyway? They didnt for me anyway..

    They're telling us it's worth 30 something percent I think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 889 ✭✭✭Bajingo


    amacachi wrote: »
    They're telling us it's worth 30 something percent I think.

    30%! Is it your lab work mcq? That should be around 30%..for a normal mcq I would have thought it would be worth around 5%..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,986 ✭✭✭Craguls


    30% of the marks going for the lab work or 30% of the whole module?
    I've heard reports saying both


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,315 ✭✭✭✭amacachi


    Yer man, beardy lad, definitely said it was 20 or 30 somethin percent of the whole module. I know a lad in 4th year now who said their labbooks didn't count towards the module grade at all, didn't mention an MCQ test though.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,986 ✭✭✭Craguls


    I heard the same here, MCQ must be the only way they assess it then.

    I do suppose unless you had a good lab book or showed up to the labs you wouldn't have been able to do a lot of the MCQ. Makes sense in that train of thought I guess


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,979 ✭✭✭Jammyc


    The MCQ for the practical classes (ie. the one we did) counts for 22% of the first semester Biology module (11% overall) I think then another 8% or so brings it to 30%. Dont hold me to that though.

    I'm looking foreward to finally seeing what I hope to be a fairly goo grade in college, for once.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,523 ✭✭✭ApeXaviour


    So any of you kids doing JF foundation physics by any chance?


    (apologies if you've said what you were doing already, just not arsed reading the 16 pages of this thread to find out)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,315 ✭✭✭✭amacachi


    ApeXaviour wrote: »
    So any of you kids doing JF foundation physics by any chance?


    (apologies if you've said what you were doing already, just not arsed reading the 16 pages of this thread to find out)

    Nope.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,986 ✭✭✭Craguls


    ApeXaviour wrote: »
    So any of you kids doing JF foundation physics by any chance?


    (apologies if you've said what you were doing already, just not arsed reading the 16 pages of this thread to find out)

    I'm not myself but if my memory serves me correctly Jammyc is


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,979 ✭✭✭Jammyc


    ApeXaviour wrote: »
    So any of you kids doing JF foundation physics by any chance?


    (apologies if you've said what you were doing already, just not arsed reading the 16 pages of this thread to find out)
    Craguls wrote: »
    I'm not myself but if my memory serves me correctly Jammyc is
    I am indeedy!:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,315 ✭✭✭✭amacachi


    To anyone who did geography, where's the title for the essay we've to do? Gonna be around tomorrow so it'd be nice to make a start before next week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,523 ✭✭✭ApeXaviour


    Jammyc wrote: »
    I am indeedy!:D
    Your labs wouldn't happen to be on Friday morning with Vincent Weldon would they?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,632 ✭✭✭SligoBrewer


    ApeXaviour wrote: »
    Your labs wouldn't happen to be on Friday morning with Vincent Weldon would they?

    Please do us a favour a be as big a bastard with the marking for the Foundation Labs as they are with our normal Physics labs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,979 ✭✭✭Jammyc


    ApeXaviour wrote: »
    Your labs wouldn't happen to be on Friday morning with Vincent Weldon would they?
    naw thursday afternoon fp lab for me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,979 ✭✭✭Jammyc


    Are the basic chem tutorials on at the same time as last semester anyone know?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 931 ✭✭✭banjopaul


    Jammyc wrote: »
    Are the basic chem tutorials on at the same time as last semester anyone know?

    Whoops forgot about them, what were all the times for last semester? I only ever went to tuesday afternoon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,979 ✭✭✭Jammyc


    banjopaul wrote: »
    Whoops forgot about them, what were all the times for last semester? I only ever went to tuesday afternoon.
    Heres the times from last semester


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,523 ✭✭✭ApeXaviour


    Please do us a favour a be as big a bastard with the marking for the Foundation Labs as they are with our normal Physics labs.
    Afraid we're told to go easy on the life/earth-science people. e.g. they don't have to do any error analysis.
    Jammyc wrote: »
    naw thursday afternoon fp lab for me.
    Pity


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,632 ✭✭✭SligoBrewer


    ApeXaviour wrote: »
    Afraid we're told to go easy on the life/earth-science people. e.g. they don't have to do any error analysis.

    Are you serious. :eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,523 ✭✭✭ApeXaviour


    Indeed. Apparently rigorous error analysis is "discouraging and counter productive" if you're definitely not going to specialise in physics. Which is fair enough, given that the foundation course is only half as long and worth half as much(?). In its stead they estimate the % error and think of two examples of where or how the experiment applies in the biological/medical/earth sciences.

    Count your blessings. As crap as error analysis is, it does help shape you to start thinking like a physicist. You're better able to critically assess all sorts of spurious claims that would otherwise appear perfectly cogent.

    So is anyone here in the foundation physics labs on friday mornings?


  • Posts: 3,539 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm doing JF Foundation Physics, thought it was a good choice since I'd wanted to do it for the leaving but didn't, and then after being slightly lost with the physics based stuff in Morton-Blake's lectures thought it might help me with that.
    Since then all I've heard is bad stuff about it, like how apparently its pretty hard and if I haven't done it for the leaving I'll be completely lost...
    ... is this true??? The more I talk to people about it the more worried I get!!!

    I'm down for the thursday afternoon lab btw.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,979 ✭✭✭Jammyc


    ApeXaviour wrote: »
    Pity..
    So is anyone here in the foundation physics labs on friday mornings?
    I take it youre going to be a teaching assistant or whatever yeah? Does this mean I can pm you for answers I cant (am too lazy) to figure out?:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,523 ✭✭✭ApeXaviour


    Jammyc wrote: »
    I take it youre going to be a teaching assistant or whatever yeah? Does this mean I can pm you for answers I cant (am too lazy) to figure out?:D
    It does and no you can't. Well you can, but I won't answer. If you have a genuine understanding/learning related question on the labs though I would be happy to help.
    Since then all I've heard is bad stuff about it, like how apparently its pretty hard and if I haven't done it for the leaving I'll be completely lost...
    ... is this true??? The more I talk to people about it the more worried I get!!!
    Don't fret. It's a modified course geared specifically towards life science students. You'll be fine. While your JF grades on the whole mean absolutely nothing (unless you're considering graduate school in the US (they try to make up a GPA for you)) I'd suggest taking from this course what you can. It can give you a valuable perspective in other areas science, and to some extent the world as a whole. Plus it'll likely be the last time you study physics.

    Morton Blake's stuff is a little advanced, but since it's chemistry you won't be required to have a rigorous understanding of it.

    Lastly if any of you thursday afternooners are girls, watch out for Ciaran, he's a proper flirt. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,979 ✭✭✭Jammyc


    ApeXaviour wrote: »
    Lastly if any of you thursday afternooners are girls, watch out for Ciaran, he's a proper flirt. ;)
    Tee hee *blushes*


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,243 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    Is physics for life sciences just the JF physics course with half the labs and experiments, or are the experiments actually different this year?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,523 ✭✭✭ApeXaviour


    Same experiments, different course.

    I take it you think the experiments should be different? Why?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,243 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    ApeXaviour wrote: »
    Same experiments, different course.

    I take it you think the experiments should be different? Why?
    Think you read a bit too much there. It strikes me as a possible issue, but I don't have an opinion on whether they should be different or not.

    The fact that errors don't have to be considered to the same detail would definitely make the work more relevant to people studying it for a year. Although if the experiments were otherwise the same, they'd have to go through something equally as challenging as the full module, but instead they'd do it every fortnight/ for a semester. As opposed to experiments every week that have half the workload attached. I'm only wondering here; how challenging do physics for life sciences students find it compared to full physics students?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,315 ✭✭✭✭amacachi


    So... no biology this week. No maths tutorials either. Bit of a pain, looks like I'll just be heading in Wednesday so.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 66 ✭✭danishidiot


    One lecture this Wednesday (chemistry) will I go? Or will I stay in bed? God I sound lazy......I'm gonna go!


Advertisement