Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Mommy and Daddy

Options
2

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,139 ✭✭✭olaola


    If the dog is well disciplined and knows its place, you can call it (or yourself) what you want in my book!

    We're similar to Jip - I'll often tell the dog to 'ask her Daddy' when it's time for a walk.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,418 ✭✭✭Jip


    sorella wrote: »
    And have you noticed how few mention names here?

    That's because people don't epxect you to know who you're talking about if they mention a name. I use 'the dog' around here also instead of his or her name as I don't assume everyone here knows my dogs names.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 125 ✭✭dollydrops


    I don't use the mammy & daddy terms but I do find myself talking to my dog in a voice that I would talk to my 1 year old godson sometimes.

    It doesn't bother me when other people do it really. My friend and her partner treat their dog like he is their son but he is a miniature Yorkshire terrier so he is like a baby really.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,596 ✭✭✭anniehoo


    EGAR wrote: »
    I personally find it annoying and sickingly anthropomorphic.
    I dont have a problem with it at all. The difference is knowing when you've gone too far i.e. putting clothes on them, putting them before your own children.

    Where is the harm in referring to your pet as your "baby", the animal hasnt a clue what you're saying no more than "jack" or "molly" its a tone of voice to them. We also anthropomorphise animals all the time "Dumbo/Free Willy/Lassie anyone?". Its a side of human nature that should be endearing not weird. We're nurturing creatures, so be it a dog or a cat or an actual baby, caring for another living soul is a good thing and if the odd affectionate term pops out then so be it. Too much neglect and abuse happens in our world this should be the least of your niggles Egar.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 103 ✭✭igglou


    Men refer to their cars as 'she'. That annoys the crap out of me, though embarrassingly it has slipped out of my own mouth a couple of times!

    Cars, ships, planes, trains etc are often referred to as 'she' and I found out long ago its because like females, they are carriers/vessels of life in that they have people inside them. :) Just some useless information.

    As for my own dogs, I don't call them baby but i do talk to them like they are my best friends. I think out loud and run my thoughts by them and find they are great listeners! :)

    It doesn't bother me what anyone calls their dogs as the dogs don't know, they are just familiar words they respond to. As for dressing them up (not for old age or greyhound coats etc.) thats just so wrong and cruel.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 228 ✭✭kazza90210


    OP you would hate me so, Im my little buddies mommy and the other half is his daddy, and my mum is his granny, more use the granny to annoy my mum then anything else!!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,026 ✭✭✭Amalgam


    One of our cats has 'Uncles and Aunties*' (mostly Aunties), all over Dublin and beyond.. :D



    * people that have called to the house and met the orange maggot.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,776 ✭✭✭Noopti


    EGAR, what names do your animals have? ;)

    I hope they aren't human names. :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    anniehoo wrote: »
    Where is the harm in referring to your pet as your "baby", the animal hasnt a clue what you're saying no more than "jack" or "molly" its a tone of voice to them.

    We also anthropomorphise animals all the time "Dumbo/Free Willy/Lassie anyone?". Its a side of human nature that should be endearing not weird.

    You're right, what you actually call your dog is of little consequence ...but ...
    Dumbo/Free Willy/Lassie is exactly what's wrong with anthropomorphism.

    Anthropomorphism means the projection of human characteristics onto non-human creatures, beings, phenomena or forces of nature.

    In the case of dogs, antropomorphism is anything but "endearing". It is a very basic and grave misunderstanding of what a dog actually is. By projecting human characteristics onto the dog you are denying it its own individual character.

    Dogs don't "tick" like us, they live to a different standard, based on entirely different parameters. Measuring them with our own yardstick is doing them a great disservice.

    Simple example: There is no such thing as a "bad" or "evil" dog. The dog may be untrained, poorly socialised, frightened, acting on instinct or whatever, but it never is "bad" or "evil".

    In order to understand and live with our dogs we need to know and see them for what they really are and not as little people.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,596 ✭✭✭anniehoo


    peasant wrote: »
    You're right, what you actually call your dog is of little consequence ...but ...
    Dumbo/Free Willy/Lassie is exactly what's wrong with anthropomorphism.

    Anthropomorphism means the projection of human characteristics onto non-human creatures, beings, phenomena or forces of nature.

    In the case of dogs, antropomorphism is anything but "endearing". It is a very basic and grave misunderstanding of what a dog actually is. By projecting human characteristics onto the dog you are denying it its own individual character.

    Dogs don't "tick" like us, they live to a different standard, based on entirely different parameters. Measuring them with our own yardstick is doing them a great disservice.

    Simple example: There is no such thing as a "bad" or "evil" dog. The dog may be untrained, poorly socialised, frightened, acting on instinct or whatever, but it never is "bad" or "evil".

    In order to understand and live with our dogs we need to know and see them for what they really are and not as little people.
    Fair enough Peasant...yes i know exactly what you are saying and i do agree that understanding the innate characterisitics that make a dog a dog or cat a cat is paramount for being a responsible pet owner. Of course as you say every species doesnt "tick" like us, but id have no doubt that quite a good few of us on here are guilty of "humanising" our pets to a certain extent-this doesnt make us bad owners. Myself and my dog obviously are different species and i do my best to understand her needs as much as im sure she tries to figure out my behaviour too. Im guilty of thinking she feels "sad" or "annoyed" that ive taken her off the couch" but its hard to "think like a dog" as im not one so the odd slip of the tongue re: calling her baby etc im not going to berate myself for as i do my best like many other pet owners.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 312 ✭✭cloudy day


    peasant wrote: »

    Anthropomorphism means the projection of human characteristics onto non-human creatures, beings, phenomena or forces of nature.
    quote]

    glad i now know what that means.

    auntie had a dog that was called boy. i had a girl dog when i was little that i insisted have a certain boys name ( was the name of a dog of a lad i had a crush on) my brothers cursed me for being cruel. we had a dog that was called pup and he was still pup when he years old.

    all dogs in our family have names and are treated as individuals, whole family talks about each one by name even OH - now that took some training heh heh. :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,776 ✭✭✭Noopti


    I don't think referring to a dog as "baby" or saying things like "go to Daddy" in anyway means that the person in question expects the animal to behave like a baby and not like a dog.......


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭sorella


    Words matter.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,829 ✭✭✭CrowdedHouse


    Maybe slightly OT but this is from an email that I received.....hits a lot of spots with us...


    TO ALL NON-PET OWNERS WHO VISIT AND LIKE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT OUR PETS:

    (1) They live here. You don't. (2) If you don't want their hair
    on your clothes, stay off the furniture. That's why they call it
    'fur'-niture. (3) I like my pets a lot better than I like most
    people. (4) To you, they are animals. To me, they are adopted
    sons/daughters who are short, hairy, walk on all fours and don't
    speak clearly.

    Remember, dogs and cats are better than kids because they (1) eat
    less, (2) don't ask for money all the time, (3) are easier to train,
    (4) normally come when called, (5) never ask to drive the car, (6)
    don't hang out with drug-using people; (7) don't smoke or drink, (8)
    don't want to wear your clothes, (9) don't have to buy the latest
    fashions, (10) don't need a gazillion dollars for college and (11) if
    they get pregnant, you can sell their children ..

    Seven Worlds will Collide



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 132 ✭✭spiderdog


    :D:D:D:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 569 ✭✭✭boodlesdoodles


    We use mammy and daddy in this house but it doesn't mean we demean our dog's place in the pack. In fact, when I say to him: where's daddy? he looks directly at the OH and vice versa when it's me. I treat my dog with the respect and discipline he deserves but he is a part of our family and there's only me and the OH and this furry monster who makes the day's happier. As long as a dog is treated well and loved (like it deserves) then who cares what the owners call it or each other. Though I will say, I hate ribbons on dogs, if the hair shouldn't be in their eyes cut it don't ribbon it.:P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 470 ✭✭animalcrazy


    Sometimes it annoys me and sometimes it doesn't, it depends how the person uses the word. I call my rabbits my babies, and so does my neighbour who is forty something :D
    But I wouldn't call myself their Mammy or anything. I kind of just say ''aww baby'' or ''are you hungry baby'', what does annoy me though when people say ''aww come up here to Mammy'' etc.


  • Registered Users Posts: 505 ✭✭✭CamillaRhodes


    Read this thread with interest, as I sometimes find myself referring to my cats as my babies, or my 'girls', and to myself as their mom (and frankly I find even referring to myself in the third person to be a bit disturbing). But I take this to mean (as they are the first pets I've had as a grown adult) that I am establishing a responsibility dynamic, or a pecking order, with them. I am at the top, they are lower. I think this is treating them in an adequately 'pet-like' fashion. At the same time, I love and adore them greatly, thus I give them doting pet names, calling them baby etc, as we humans tend to do with those we love. So I don't see it necessarily as anthopomorphic, simply an assigning of identity based on role and affection.

    To pick up on a couple of things others said...
    peasant wrote: »
    There is no such thing as a "bad" or "evil" dog. The dog may be untrained, poorly socialised, frightened, acting on instinct or whatever, but it never is "bad" or "evil".

    You're right, but do you mean to suggest there is such a thing as a bad or evil human being? Are not all humans born as innocent babies, who somehow grow into "bad" or "evil" adults, as a result of poor education, socialisation, trauma, whatever? I think while you mean to credit animals here, you are in fact doing a great disservice to human beings!
    sorella wrote: »
    Words matter.
    No, semantics matter. The meaning of words matter. Words, when delivered in a language we don't understand, are utterly meaningless. However, if you get the gist of what someone is saying, from their tone of voice / body language etc, that can impact on you. Think about any time you've had a confrontation with, or heard words of love from someone not speaking english. Even though the words they're using to you do not matter, they could be speaking gibberish, when you pick up on the meaning, through tone of voice / body language / whatever, suddenly the conversation has impact on you.

    This is how it is with animals. They don't know that "come to Mommy" means anything different than "come to CamillaRhodes". They understand tone of voice, body language, the dynamic which has been established between you on the basis of your training and relationship. The words don't matter a damn. So if I choose to be 'mommy', or if my cats are my 'babies', it doesn't make the slightest difference to them.

    Having said all the above, I acknowledge that I am a person who tends to use affectionate terms in conversation with humans in my company, e.g. I'll say "thank you, love" to my assistant in work, will call my friend "sweetie", address my boyfriend as "babe". So, if you're the sort of person who hates all that cutesie sh*t, I imagine you'd be highly irritated by me :D But please don't take my love for my cats as anthropomorphism or idiocy - I simply extend the same degree of affection to all those for whom I hold affection, regardless of their species :o


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    You're right, but do you mean to suggest there is such a thing as a bad or evil human being?

    This is going off topic, but let me put it this way ...dogs are incapable of deceit (self or otherwise) :D

    EDIT:
    Actually that's not entirely true. I have often watched one of our dogs fake interest in something in order to draw the other ones away from something it wanted ...but ..well ... ah, youknowahaddamean


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,874 ✭✭✭EGAR


    Very interesting to read through this thread (I ignore the insults since I did not insult anyone, c'est la vie).

    The emotional avalanche of the mommy and daddy posters is quite amazing and I wonder when all this started. When I was a child no one ever called their animal "Baby" - it is a relatively new trend IMHO and I wonder what set it off.

    I don't "hate" anyone who does it - I just find it annoying.

    My own dogs do not have human names but alot of the rescues have. I have rehomed well over a thousand dogs and I will never forget when a young couple from Dublin surrendered their dog to me because the girl was pregnant and "couldn't possible" have a dog AND a baby. The dog wore a leather collar with gold embossed letters: No 1 Son. Yeah right...

    Lauagoesmad: the internet is a good tool for googling words one doesn't understand.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,132 ✭✭✭Sigma Force


    "When I was a child no one ever called their animal "Baby" - it is a relatively new trend IMHO and I wonder what set it off."

    Not a new thing at all people have been doing it for years but perhaps not as open as they are now lol.


    "EDIT:
    Actually that's not entirely true. I have often watched one of our dogs fake interest in something in order to draw the other ones away from something it wanted ...but ..well ... ah, youknowahaddamean"

    lol my little dog does that with our collie when she wants to nick her food.

    I refer to our dogs as the little one and the collie just so when talking people can tell which dog I'm talking about, once they know my dogs names then I use their names but at home the any animal from a cockatiel to a guinea pig has a daddy and a mummy and a sister not a subsitute just a habit really coz they are part of the family.

    Even the wee sparrows outside are our new babies...have I gone too far..


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,874 ✭✭✭EGAR


    I wrote "when I was a child" and I do presume that you are not in the same age bracket as me judging by your posts on PI.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,132 ✭✭✭Sigma Force


    20 plus years ago people were referring to their pets as their baby just perhaps not as openly as nowadays. As I remember, we'd visit many a house as kids and there was usually a pet around that was the usually the center of attention. People also in general waited a bit longer to have kids so any pet they got was kind of their baby before the kids came along.
    At least that's the way it was where I grew up.

    What do you mean judging by my posts on PI?? Not sure I get your drift missus.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 312 ✭✭cloudy day


    People also in general waited a bit longer to have kids so any pet they got was kind of their baby before the kids came along.
    At least that's the way it was where I grew up.
    quote]
    :o as i recall they were getting hitched and knocked up near enough as soon as they were old enough. durty beggars.


  • Registered Users Posts: 527 ✭✭✭Call me Socket


    Great post CamillaRhodes:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭sorella


    "Baby" as an general endearment is American in origin.

    Interesting re names. Always I have given names that reflect the animal. When we took in twin orphan lambs, they were simply Ram Lamb and Lamb Lamb. One of our rescued cats is simply Boycat; we were told initially he was female so there was a change made there :)

    Sandy was her name when she came and she knew it. But when I call them it is mostly "Dogs!" It is the voice and tone they respond to of course.

    We worked with someone in Canada with a "problem " dog;( we are trainers there)

    It refused to come to its name. The man called it and sure enough, it did not come. Not a flicker.

    " See what I mean? YOU ARE STUPID!" he yelled; and the dog came. He had called it stupid so often the dog thought that that was his name.

    You can only say it is semantics and not words that matter if everyone is identical; clearly that is not so from this discussion.

    Like EGAR find it annoying, but also see the loneliness of many old ones who only have a pet in their lives. Would that it were else.

    Thankfully we are not clones.....
    EGAR wrote: »
    Very interesting to read through this thread (I ignore the insults since I did not insult anyone, c'est la vie).

    The emotional avalanche of the mommy and daddy posters is quite amazing and I wonder when all this started. When I was a child no one ever called their animal "Baby" - it is a relatively new trend IMHO and I wonder what set it off.

    I don't "hate" anyone who does it - I just find it annoying.

    My own dogs do not have human names but alot of the rescues have. I have rehomed well over a thousand dogs and I will never forget when a young couple from Dublin surrendered their dog to me because the girl was pregnant and "couldn't possible" have a dog AND a baby. The dog wore a leather collar with gold embossed letters: No 1 Son. Yeah right...

    Lauagoesmad: the internet is a good tool for googling words one doesn't understand.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,898 ✭✭✭✭seanybiker


    (5) never ask to drive the car,
    My dog never asks to drive the car. I just see her running outside with the keys and off she goes in the car. Kinda annoying really. Never puts petrol in the car either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,418 ✭✭✭Jip


    EGAR wrote: »
    Very interesting to read through this thread (I ignore the insults since I did not insult anyone, c'est la vie).

    I haven't seen any insults aimed at you, however I do find you extremely condescending to all those who don't agree with you with the following comment

    EGAR wrote: »
    The emotional avalanche of the mommy and daddy posters is quite amazing


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 923 ✭✭✭sorella


    I do not see that as condescending; honest certainly.

    It is amazing.

    Interesting also.
    Jip wrote: »
    I haven't seen any insults aimed at you, however I do find you extremely condescending to all those who don't agree with you with the following comment


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 505 ✭✭✭CamillaRhodes


    sorella wrote: »
    We worked with someone in Canada with a "problem " dog;( we are trainers there)

    It refused to come to its name. The man called it and sure enough, it did not come. Not a flicker.

    " See what I mean? YOU ARE STUPID!" he yelled; and the dog came. He had called it stupid so often the dog thought that that was his name.

    You can only say it is semantics and not words that matter if everyone is identical; clearly that is not so from this discussion.

    Hi Sorella, I actually think we agree on this point, rather than disagreeing! Semantics are not always (or ever) fixed. Your case illustrates this clearly. The man did not have a good relationship with his dog, had not trained it well or established a dynamic with him. The dog recognised the word 'stupid' when stated by the owner loudly, and thought that was his name. Therefore the dog, trying to be a good dog, came running when he heard the word 'stupid' uttered at a particular town of voice.

    This illustrates that the meaning of the word 'stupid' for the dog meant 'my name'. The dog did not understand english, nor understand that the term 'stupid' is pejorative. The dog was simply trying to please his master, but without the correct cues to do so. The word 'stupid' did not matter to him, what mattered was his understanding of the 'meaning' of that word for him. Thus, in general, words themselves don't matter.

    So, whether I refer to my cat as 'cat' or as 'baby' makes little difference to the cat, or to the love I feel for the cat. What matters is the meaning behind the words I use; if I use them in a loving way, then the cat understands this and expresses love for me in return. If I shout at her while calling her 'baby', the affection in the word is lost entirely.

    I think we're on the same page here, just looking at it from slightly different angles ;)

    Last comment: can I hazard a guess that those who object to people calling their pets their babies, or themselves their pets' mommies/daddies, are the same people who would object to being referred to as "love" or "mate" by a stranger, or as "darling" or "baby" by a loved one?

    I think the use of affectionate pet names for humans can be pretty controversial, I've been told off by people for doing so (though I mean it with the best possible intentions). Is it maybe the same reason people don't like similar usage regarding animals?


Advertisement