Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ubuntu causing lots and lots of problems

  • 18-05-2009 6:54pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭


    I just installed Ubuntu 8.10 on a partition on my hard drive. Trying a Linux Distro for curiosities sake, and apparently Ubuntu is the easiest for Noobs like myself :)

    So anyway I was messing around with system config when it froze. So I manually shut down the computer and restarted.

    When started again I loaded a few things and closed them down. Looking at the blank desktop. Then by a mistake I turned the mouse wheel, which causes Ubuntu to go into the second workspace. Froze again.

    Restarted. This time I messed around with some screen resolutions. The second one I tried returned a black screen. Restarted Ubuntu, logged in only to find the black screen again. I can safety assume that I cant access Ubuntu now and will just have to erase it or something.

    Is it just my computer isnt up to scratch? Ive it installed on a small partition, could this be the issue? You see I've been running XP for three years now and havent come anywhere remotely near to these random freezings.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,952 ✭✭✭corkie


    How much space did you allocate for ubuntu?

    What hardware has your computer (graphics/ram/processor)?

    Did you install through wubi or allocate space with partitioning?

    As you haven't done much with your system, the quickest method to solve your problems would be to reinstall.

    Regards,
    J.

    P.S. You broke my silence --- I wonder did anyone place a bet for today?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭bushy...


    turgon wrote: »
    I just installed Ubuntu 8.10 on a partition on my hard drive. Trying a Linux Distro for curiosities sake, and apparently Ubuntu is the easiest for Noobs like myself :)

    As you'll read in this thread : http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055568371&page=2
    and on the their own forums they are trying to "market" it as the easiest for noobs as you say , and the best ever replacement for windows.

    Unfortunately they seem to be trying to do it all too fast for "their" abilities and basic stuff is getting wobbly - just like you've experienced.

    Few to try for the craic , its just a cd if they don't work and shouldn't be hard to install

    http://www.pcbsd.org

    Debian http://www.debian.org/CD would be much the same since Ubuntu is based on it . Will be much the same to install.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,227 ✭✭✭stereo_steve


    bushy... wrote: »
    As you'll read in this thread : http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055568371&page=2
    Unfortunately they seem to be trying to do it all too fast for "their" abilities and basic stuff is getting wobbly - just like you've experienced.

    Few to try for the craic , its just a cd if they don't work and shouldn't be hard to install

    http://www.pcbsd.org

    Debian http://www.debian.org/CD would be much the same since Ubuntu is based on it . Will be much the same to install.

    Could not disagree anymore with that post!

    @turgon - post up answers to the post corkie wrote and we will help you out.

    Can I ask why you aren't testing out the latest ubuntu 9.04?

    /Steve


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭bushy...


    I wasn't insinuating that imo existing users of Ubuntu had made a daft choice.

    Just that they push it as the best thing ever and the ONLY choice for new people.

    Its far from the best thing and there are many other choices.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 279 ✭✭velocirafter


    It sounds like you might have messed up your xorg settings (thats the bit that controls the graphics) if you can get to a command line try running this command, it will reconfigure your xorg


    sudo dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg



    to get to a command line, once you think it has booted fully press:

    ctrl + alt + F1


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 218 ✭✭Tillotson


    Does this mean that you were manually editing the xorg.conf file?

    If it's a problem with xorg you can find what's wrong by:
    ctrl alt f1
    tail var/log/Xorg.0.log

    If what velocirafter says fails just rename the xorg.conf file, newer versions of xorg don't strictly need an xorg.conf.

    ctrl alt f1
    sudo mv /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf.backup
    reboot
    undo this if fail:
    sudo mv /etc/X11/xorg.conf.backup /etc/X11/xorg.conf

    If success, then go system > administration > hardware drivers > nvidia/ati and get this tool to write a new xorg.conf for you.

    Another option if using nvidia driver is
    sudo nvidia-xconfig
    or
    sudo nvidia-xconfig --composte --add-argb-glx-visuals

    Linux is easy to break... :)
    Stay away from Debian. It assumes you know linux.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭bushy...


    Tillotson wrote: »
    Does this mean that you were manually editing the xorg.conf file?

    If it's a problem with xorg you can find what's wrong by:
    ctrl alt f1
    tail var/log/Xorg.0.log

    If what velocirafter says fails just rename the xorg.conf file, newer versions of xorg don't strictly need an xorg.conf.

    ctrl alt f1
    sudo mv /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf.backup
    reboot
    undo this if fail:
    sudo mv /etc/X11/xorg.conf.backup /etc/X11/xorg.conf


    If success, then go system > administration > hardware drivers > nvidia/ati and get this tool to write a new xorg.conf for you.

    Another option if using nvidia driver is
    sudo nvidia-xconfig
    or
    sudo nvidia-xconfig --composte --add-argb-glx-visuals

    Linux is easy to break... :)
    Stay away from Debian. It assumes you know linux.
    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 218 ✭✭Tillotson


    Highlighting - an excellent way to make your point.

    You sure emphasised the hypocrisy of my post. Now if you have an easier solution, or you want to clarify my post go ahead. Thanks.

    The fact of the matter is that this is going to have to be solved at a terminal.

    Recommending Debian or pcBSD to a beginner is the wrong way to go imho.

    <on topic>
    All these commands can be copy pasted.

    To reboot:
    sudo shutdown -r now

    Good luck, I hope your up and running soon.
    Tip for the future: Always copy config files before editing :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭bushy...


    turgon wrote: »
    I just installed Ubuntu 8.10 on a partition on my hard drive. Trying a Linux Distro for curiosities sake, and apparently Ubuntu is the easiest for Noobs like myself :)

    So anyway I was messing around with system config when it froze. So I manually shut down the computer and restarted.

    When started again I loaded a few things and closed them down. Looking at the blank desktop. Then by a mistake I turned the mouse wheel, which causes Ubuntu to go into the second workspace. Froze again.

    Restarted. This time I messed around with some screen resolutions. The second one I tried returned a black screen. Restarted Ubuntu, logged in only to find the black screen again. I can safety assume that I cant access Ubuntu now and will just have to erase it or something.

    Whatever about the random freezing , for now you need to fix up the file you edited.

    What is happening now is it is reading the file you edited , loading the "wrong" settings and just can't display anything.

    All is not lost at all.

    You can start your pc in "text mode" so you can fix up the file you edited earlier. (it'll be kinda like the command prompt in XP )

    You might see a "Recovery mode " just as it starts up


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,952 ✭✭✭corkie


    If can get into a text mode the easy solution would have been to use :

    X --configure

    (may not work anymore as conf file is not used anymore in ubuntu?)

    But as the OP has already thanked me, I think he fixed his problem.
    More help available from the "Ubuntu Links".

    OT: Now if i could only get W7RC to work on my desktop with out BSOD, something to do with NVIDIA.
    Got it to work eventually by attaching an ordinary monitor to VGA port, instead of dvi. then installed the updated drivers.
    Karmic Koala Alpha 1 server 64 works okay. So why not windows 7.

    Regards,
    John O Connell.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭turgon


    Thanks for all the help guys. My computer has 1gb ram. Ive assigned a partition of circa 18 GB. You see I had both installed Wubi and ran off CD but performance wasnt up to scratch so I went for full install.

    Since the thread start ive re-installed Ubuntu. Im using 8.10 as I have really slow Internet and it would have taken ages to download 9.04 (I think). I has frozen once since install, but Ive had a three hour session and this current 1.5 hour session on it without it freezing. To prevent freezing Ive turned off "special effects."

    So Ive avoided the multi desktop thing and screen resolution. Btw when I was editing system setting it was solely through the gui -> I wasnt editing files. But now that ye have thrown up some commands, I might print out said commands and try to edit the resolution.

    Ive no problem going into the terminal (I actually find it cool in the nerdy way), and I used it yesterday to install Apache, PHP and MySql. Ive also used it to change chmods and chowns and stuff so I can edit GRUB.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭turgon


    As for my experience so far, to comment on the issue of noobyness. (Ive kept this separate to the above post in case of tl;dr.)

    I found the install a very slight pain. This was because I had to put Ubuntu on the same drive as Windows. I was planning on putting it on the second haUd drive but my bootloader doesnt sense my second hard drive. I originally used the Ubuntu partitioner to set up 18GB partition but this froze half way though. I didnt have enough space on the main partition to carve out another 18GB, and ubuntu wouldnt automatically select the 18 GB free space. Thus I had to select manual on the partition manager.

    Now the only reason I could get through this stage was because I had noted down partitions on the first install so I knew I needed two (Linux swap and the other one). Also it asked me to select root partition. The only reason I could do this one is because of some limited experience with web design, I knew what was meant by root. So in summary I couldnt see any total computer noob like any of my parents installing if they had to select manual partitions.

    Apart from the freezing Im happy with Ubuntu. The add/remove thing is just so great. Its really handy the way one "sudo apt-get install apache2" did what may have took a lot longer in Windows. I dont do a whole lot on my OS, mainly Internet browsing, PHP development, Image editing (I used Inkscape on Windows so no change here) and music manager. Due to the free compilers Ive heard I might delve into some other language, like some kind of C.

    So if I get no problems in the future I imagine I will use Ubuntu as my primary OS. I still have to keep Windows for the others though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭bushy...


    turgon wrote: »
    Ive no problem going into the terminal (I actually find it cool in the nerdy way), and I used it yesterday to install Apache, PHP and MySql. Ive also used it to change chmods and chowns and stuff so I can edit GRUB.

    If your happy out using the terminal , tis the way to go imo .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭bushy...


    turgon wrote: »
    The add/remove thing is just so great. Its really handy the way one "sudo apt-get install apache2" did what may have took a lot longer in Windows.

    Most of them ( the non-windows OS's ) have something like that though ,

    Debian ( Ubuntu is based on it) has " apt-get whatever_you_want"

    BSD has " pkg_add whatever_you_want"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,952 ✭✭✭corkie


    turgon wrote: »
    Since the thread start ive re-installed Ubuntu. Im using 8.10 as I have really slow Internet and it would have taken ages to download 9.04 (I think).

    I recently saw a new magazine in the shops "Ubuntu Format" It had a double side DVD of the latest Ubuntu 9.04 with both 32bit and 64 bit on it.

    Handy for anyone with slow internet.

    Regards,
    John.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭turgon


    Ive ordered the free CD of Ubuntu 9.04 off of the website. When it comes I might just to a blanket re-install, I doubt I will have done that much in 5 weeks.

    I know I probably will be scorned for this comment, but one of the reasons Ive latched onto Ubuntu is because the Gnome GUI is a breath of fresh air from that of Windows XP.

    Ive always hated the Vista GUI.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,377 ✭✭✭An Fear Aniar


    corkie wrote: »
    I recently saw a new magazine in the shops "Ubuntu Format" It had a double side DVD of the latest Ubuntu 9.04 with both 32bit and 64 bit on it.

    There's a real magazine called Linux Format which is really good, but this article about Ubuntu Format appears to be a joke (see the date). People are always slagging off Linux Format for covering too much Ubuntu and neglecting other distros.

    .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭bushy...




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,952 ✭✭✭corkie


    There's a real magazine called Linux Format which is really good, but this article about Ubuntu Format appears to be a joke (see the date). People are always slagging off Linux Format for covering too much Ubuntu and neglecting other distros.

    .

    But i did see a "Ubuntu ___________ " in eason's recently? Just can not remember the name.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭bushy...


    turgon wrote: »
    I know I probably will be scorned for this comment, but one of the reasons Ive latched onto Ubuntu is because the Gnome GUI is a breath of fresh air from that of Windows XP.

    Ive always hated the Vista GUI.

    I couldn't put up with the Vista GUI , it makes it too slow and painful to do anything.
    Not sure if you know , you can rip out the Gnome GUI and replace it with another one if you like. Thats one of the sweeter things about Linuxy stuff


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭turgon


    Yeah I know, do many people use KDE instead?

    Just looking at the Wikipedia screen shot - it looks a bit cluttered for my liking. I like the two bars (top and bottom) in GNOME so you can separate things out.

    Although you can probably do that too in KDE?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,048 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    turgon wrote: »
    Yeah I know, do many people use KDE instead?

    Just looking at the Wikipedia screen shot - it looks a bit cluttered for my liking. I like the two bars (top and bottom) in GNOME so you can separate things out.

    Although you can probably do that too in KDE?

    Yes fully customisable ..... and IMO easier to customise than Gnome. But that is just a personal view. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭turgon


    Cool. Ive set up xfce so ill do kde after Im finished updating to 9.04.

    Just one question. On my desktop I've 3 "launchers" which launch to different folders (Linux server location, XAMPP server and my Windows documents). However I have to click on Places>120 GB Media and Places>133GB Media before these hard drives will be registered as "disk" and "disk-1" respectively; and the launchers start working. Is there anyway to register disk and disk-1 automatically on startup?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,952 ✭✭✭corkie


    turgon wrote: »
    ... registered as "disk" and "disk-1" respectively; and the launchers start working. Is there anyway to register disk and disk-1 automatically on startup?

    You will need to edit your "fstab" file more info here

    Regards,
    J.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,048 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    turgon wrote: »
    Cool. Ive set up xfce so ill do kde after Im finished updating to 9.04.

    Just one question. On my desktop I've 3 "launchers" which launch to different folders (Linux server location, XAMPP server and my Windows documents). However I have to click on Places>120 GB Media and Places>133GB Media before these hard drives will be registered as "disk" and "disk-1" respectively; and the launchers start working. Is there anyway to register disk and disk-1 automatically on startup?

    I can only speak to KDE ---- where you can set up the partitions to automount when plugged in rather than having to click on them which mounts them for use.
    There are also other options in the right click properties which allow setting where they mount to ..... I give the partitions a "label" or name and they mount to that.

    I no longer use fstab for any media that is removeable ... USB or others.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭turgon


    Worked perfectly, thanks a million.

    My music loads right as well.

    Having no more problems so far (tough wood!). Upgraded to 9.04 as well. I like the update system, not as pushy as Microsofts. In fact Ive been nothing but impressed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,952 ✭✭✭corkie


    corkie wrote: »
    But i did see a "ubuntu-user" in eason's recently?

    Issue 1: Handy for a complete novice. With guides to get around the OS and packages

    12 euro is expensive enough but for people on dialup only or very slow connection and don't want use up there Download limits. See above post
    Regards,
    John O Connell


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭turgon


    corkie wrote: »
    Issue 1: Handy for a complete novice. With guides to get around the OS and packages

    €12 seemed a bit expensive for information that can be found free on google search


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,952 ✭✭✭corkie


    Linux New Media Launches Ubuntu User Magazine May 28 2009 Lawrence KS USA May 28 2009 Linux New Media USA LLC announces the launch of a new print publication Ubuntu User magazine.

    Read more here

    Funny that it has been on our store shelves for the last two weeks?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,016 ✭✭✭✭vibe666


    i've been using mint for the last year or so (since v5 came out) and decided to give ubuntu 9.04 a go and quickly remembered why i moved to mint in the first place. lickily for me, this was only on wednesday and lo and behold mint v7 had just come out so i flattened ubuntu and moved back over to mint and what a joy it was to have it back. i just can't get on with ubuntu at all. they keep saying it's the best Linux OS for n00bs but it doesn't even remotely compare to mint.

    i know mint has ubuntu at it's core, but it's so much more user friendly and very easy for ex-windows users to get on with by comparison to ubuntu and everything that you have to spend hours configuring in ubuntu us already there in mint and working perfectly.

    i actually don't think i've touched the terminal in the last 3 days since i installed it aside from configuring samba and that was only a couple of minor edits to the default settings to get it configured for my network.

    1 thumb up for ubuntu 9.04, but two thumbs up for mint v7 from me! :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,377 ✭✭✭An Fear Aniar


    I've been looking at Mint 7 in Virtualbox, another awesome impressive release, it looks great and the menus and package management are greatly improved.

    Mint is definitely a step ahead of Ubuntu in terms of ease of use - but I think the only reason Ubuntu don't ship with codecs is some legal ficiton they have to maintain.

    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,016 ✭✭✭✭vibe666


    yes, i believe so. i think it's to do with the fact that for ubuntu to remain 100% free and totally legal with no grey areas things like codecs and restricted drivers etc. have to be disabled by default, leaving the onus on the user to re-enable them.

    mint seems to take a much more free and easy approach to the whole thing though and whilst it may not be 100% above board it's nothing ubuntu users wouldn't re-enable themselves anyway 5 minutes after installing it.

    by throwing everything in that most users would want to set up, they save us a lot of time ourselves and i know a lot of the geekier *nix guys like nothing better than manually tweaking configs in the terminal, but i think the majority of us ex-windows heads just like things to work out of the box whenever possible. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,048 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    vibe666 wrote: »
    ...
    by throwing everything in that most users would want to set up, they save us a lot of time ourselves and i know a lot of the geekier *nix guys like nothing better than manually tweaking configs in the terminal, but i think the majority of us ex-windows heads just like things to work out of the box whenever possible. :)

    I think this is a myth.
    Yes they are comfortable and have no fear of doing such things, but from what I have read, most like it when things work out of box, just like the rest of us. ;)

    Personally I have serious problems with the way Ubuntu is portrayed as 'new user friendly', yet whenever there is a small problem the first thing posted to fix it is some CLi command or other, which gives a completely false picture of what modern Linux is like.
    Other distros have GUIs for most things, even Mint which is Ubuntu based, and to that add Mandriva, Mepis, PCLinuxOS etc.

    It seems to me that 'big bucks' is winning out again while not giving what most desire .... GUI tools for most everything.

    I would never recommend Ubuntu to a new user moving from Windows. I believe Mint, Mepis and PCLOS are much more suitable for the task.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,952 ✭✭✭corkie


    yet whenever there is a small problem the first thing posted to fix it is some CLi command or other, which gives a completely false picture of what modern Linux is like.

    The reason why most techie's or experienced linux users will give helpful instructions to fix things with CLI commands, is because it can be quicker and easier to type up instructions that way.

    Than having to give instructions for navigating through a set of GUI instructions.

    Regards,
    J.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,112 ✭✭✭Blowfish


    Not only that, it can be copied and pasted to ensure you are doing it exactly right.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,016 ✭✭✭✭vibe666


    Blowfish wrote: »
    Not only that, it can be copied and pasted to ensure you are doing it exactly right.
    yes, but i think that can put a lot of people off, if they think they're going to have to get their hands dirty. i know it's just a bit of copy and paste, but it's not exactly conducive to learning new things. (i already know how to copy/paste:)).

    2 years full time at home with linux and it's still the case that every time something goes wrong i have to google it and end up copy/pasting something in the terminal to fix it and am still none the wiser to what I've done when i'm finished. :(

    by comparison, approx. 2 years ago my (wintel server support) job changed slightly to include a lot of exchange admin and backup stuff which i didn't have much experience of at all at the time and i had to learn most of that on my own in a similar sort of way and i'm an old pro at both now. :)

    i think it might just be, that despite my best intentions i'm a windows head whether i like it or not. :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,048 ✭✭✭✭Johnboy1951


    corkie wrote: »
    The reason why most techie's or experienced linux users will give helpful instructions to fix things with CLI commands, is because it can be quicker and easier to type up instructions that way.

    Than having to give instructions for navigating through a set of GUI instructions.

    Regards,
    J.

    You missed the main point of my post ........ for a new exWin user HAVING TO (as it appears to them) use a text console shows them that Linux is so far behind that they may promptly dump it.
    The majority of those new users expect to be able to make changes through GUI.
    Even if it is a very simple GUI like Zenity or such, that is what they want. Yes they may comment on the bad looking zenity boxes and prompts and complain about it not being a 'proper' GUI, but they can use it, remember it, and use it again later if required.

    The impression given by all the command-line instructions to new users is that Linux is still lacking proper GUI tools. Impressions count, particularly in the first days of use.

    That is why I recommend other distro, as mentioned, to new users -- it shows them a familiar environment where things CAN be done with GUI, and if they then wish they can learn that it is much quicker/better (if I dare :) ) to do most things from command line.
    For best experience most new converts IMO should get the opportunity to use a distro with a good GUI control centre ... comparable to Win Control Panel.
    Which distro they choose afterwards is immaterial ... its all Linux. :)

    regards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,952 ✭✭✭corkie


    Haven't got a chance to look deeply into the documentation, but if people want to get familiar with ubuntu. This course material might be of benefit.

    Click here for more info


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,016 ✭✭✭mad m


    Total noob to this, did a live cd with Knoppix, it went without a hitch. Just faffing around with it. found it very easy. Just downloaded Mint 7, so will give it a try out. Would any of the above need an antivirus program? firewall?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,112 ✭✭✭Blowfish


    mad m wrote: »
    Total noob to this, did a live cd with Knoppix, it went without a hitch. Just faffing around with it. found it very easy. Just downloaded Mint 7, so will give it a try out. Would any of the above need an antivirus program? firewall?
    Nope. :)

    They'll have netfilter/iptables by default. If you want a GUI to make life easier configuring it, you can install something like firestarter.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,952 ✭✭✭corkie


    mad m wrote: »
    Total noob to this, did a live cd with Knoppix, it went without a hitch. Just faffing around with it. found it very easy. Just downloaded Mint 7, so will give it a try out. Would any of the above need an antivirus program? firewall?

    Mint 7 / Ubuntu should have "ufw" installed by default, install "gufw" for gui.
    No need for antivirus in Linux, unless your sharing files with window's users.

    Regards,
    J.


Advertisement