Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

We Can Cure the Gheys!

Options
124

Comments

  • Options
    #92
    Nevyn
    Closed Accounts Posts: 43,045 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    ntlbell wrote: »
    one can handle the smell and the other can handle the pain, then go for it.

    If you are finding it painful your doing it wrong. :P


  • Options
    #93
    ntlbell
    Registered Users Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    Thaedydal wrote: »
    If you are finding it painful your doing it wrong. :P

    I wasn't doing it wrong, HE was...


  • Options
    #94
    Nevyn
    Closed Accounts Posts: 43,045 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    ntlbell wrote: »
    biphobic. lol

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biphobia
    Biphobia is a term used to describe fear of and aversion toward bisexuality and bisexuals as a social group or as individuals. People of any sexual orientation can experience such feelings of fear and aversion. A source of discrimination against bisexuals, biphobia is based on negative bisexual stereotypes and bisexual erasure.


  • Options
    #95
    Nevyn
    Closed Accounts Posts: 43,045 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    ntlbell wrote: »
    I wasn't doing it wrong, HE was...

    Oh dear so bold and brash online but can't tell your bf in person how you want to be buggered, that's awful. Awful funneh.


  • Options
    #96
    orestes
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,972 ✭✭✭orestes


    ntlbell wrote: »
    I just find it very odd that the boom in bisexual activity came about a few months after the release of windows 95

    I can't think why that is.

    Watching gay and/or lesbain porn when you got your first internet connection does not really count as a perceived increase in bisexual activity


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #97
    ntlbell
    Registered Users Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    Thaedydal wrote: »
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biphobia

    lol I'm not buying what your selling. no sir.


  • Options
    #98
    ntlbell
    Registered Users Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    orestes wrote: »
    Watching gay and/or lesbain porn when you got your first internet connection does not really count as a perceived increase in bisexual activity

    I was tuned in long before windows95 ;)


  • Options
    #99
    ntlbell
    Registered Users Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    Thaedydal wrote: »
    Oh dear so bold and brash online but can't tell your bf in person how you want to be buggered, that's awful. Awful funneh.

    I didn't want to dent his ego, he's a delicate little flower :o


  • Options
    #100
    Nevyn
    Closed Accounts Posts: 43,045 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    ntlbell wrote: »
    lol I'm not buying what your selling. no sir.

    What you are buying the services of the guy who is buggering you and still can't
    find the gumption to have it your way?

    No need to call me sir, in your case Goddess will do.


  • Options
    #101
    CPT. SURF
    Closed Accounts Posts: 321 ✭✭CPT. SURF


    Reflector wrote: »

    Also they wont find a single cause of homosexuality because there is no cause. We all have different sexualities, all of us!. It's like your personality it is unique and intrinsic to you.

    Dead right. Everyone is different sexually.

    I think this quote from ntlbell isolates the poster's simplistic and naive views on human sexual interactions and relationships:

    "course it's broken:rolleyes:

    the penis goes into the vagina

    like the kinder garden cop twins

    boys have a penis, girls have a vagina..."


    So naive. People achieve sexual gratification through an unimaginable myriad of physical and mental stimuli. Every single person on this planet each has their own individual quirks when it comes to sex. Some people like toys, some anal, oral, bondage, torture, beastiality; heck, there are straight people who prefer to crap on each other than have the traditional penis into vagina sex. Should we be searching for cures for all of these things aswell? Some of them are even more off-putting to most of society than homosexuality.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #102
    Cookie_Monster
    Registered Users Posts: 24,485 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Kintarō Hattori wrote: »
    We Can Cure the Gheys!

    Horray



    :P


  • Options
    #103
    ntlbell
    Registered Users Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    CPT. SURF wrote: »

    So naive. People achieve sexual gratification through an unimaginable myriad of physical and mental stimuli. Every single person on this planet each has their own individual quirks when it comes to sex. Some people like toys, some anal, oral, bondage, torture, beastiality; heck, there are straight people who prefer to crap on each other than have the traditional penis into vagina sex. Should we be searching for cures for all of these things aswell? Some of them are even more off-putting to most of society than homosexuality.

    Easy to tell ye've never had the pleasure of this animal in the sack.

    the above is all true, but there's a slight problem

    I'm not sure what the sex ed was like in your school

    but as far as I'm aware and it very well could be my naivety you can't reproduce by taken a dump on someone's face, clattering the arse off someone with a whip. or any other such nonsense.

    Nice insight into your weekends tho, sounds like your having a ball


  • Options
    #104
    Dennis the Stone
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,358 ✭✭✭Dennis the Stone


    CPT. SURF wrote: »
    Dead right. Everyone is different sexually.

    I think this quote from ntlbell isolates the poster's simplistic and naive views on human sexual interactions and relationships:

    "course it's broken:rolleyes:

    the penis goes into the vagina

    like the kinder garden cop twins

    boys have a penis, girls have a vagina..."


    So naive. People achieve sexual gratification through an unimaginable myriad of physical and mental stimuli. Every single person on this planet each has their own individual quirks when it comes to sex. Some people like toys, some anal, oral, bondage, torture, beastiality; heck, there are straight people who prefer to crap on each other than have the traditional penis into vagina sex. Should we be searching for cures for all of these things aswell? Some of them are even more off-putting to most of society than homosexuality.

    Hear, hear. Really surprising to see how naive and immature some people are


  • Options
    #105
    Dennis the Stone
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,358 ✭✭✭Dennis the Stone


    ntlbell wrote: »
    Easy to tell ye've never had the pleasure of this animal in the sack.

    the above is all true, but there's a slight problem

    I'm not sure what the sex ed was like in your school

    but as far as I'm aware and it very well could be my naivety you can't reproduce by taken a dump on someone's face, clattering the arse off someone with a whip. or any other such nonsense.

    Nice insight into your weekends tho, sounds like your having a ball

    Do you have sex only to reproduce? Hmm....


  • Options
    #106
    ntlbell
    Registered Users Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    Tago Mago wrote: »
    Do you have sex only to reproduce? Hmm....

    Did I say that?


  • Options
    #107
    orestes
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,972 ✭✭✭orestes


    ntlbell wrote: »
    Easy to tell ye've never had the pleasure of this animal in the sack.

    the above is all true, but there's a slight problem

    I'm not sure what the sex ed was like in your school

    but as far as I'm aware and it very well could be my naivety you can't reproduce by taken a dump on someone's face, clattering the arse off someone with a whip. or any other such nonsense.

    Nice insight into your weekends tho, sounds like your having a ball

    So because a sexual activity/preference does not lead to reproduction it is invalid or unnatural? I take it you would say no if anyone should anyone ever offer to give you head then? There is 1 form of sexual contact which can lead to reproduction, and literally hundreds that don't, hardly reasonable to refer to them as nonsense


  • Options
    #108
    ntlbell
    Registered Users Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    orestes wrote: »
    So because a sexual activity/preference does not lead to reproduction it is invalid or unnatural?

    the fact you would only be attracted to another making it impossible for the two of you to reproduce would seem unnatural no?


  • Options
    #109
    CPT. SURF
    Closed Accounts Posts: 321 ✭✭CPT. SURF


    ntlbell wrote: »
    Easy to tell ye've never had the pleasure of this animal in the sack.

    the above is all true, but there's a slight problem

    I'm not sure what the sex ed was like in your school

    but as far as I'm aware and it very well could be my naivety you can't reproduce by taken a dump on someone's face, clattering the arse off someone with a whip. or any other such nonsense.

    Nice insight into your weekends tho, sounds like your having a ball

    Back to reproduction eh? You can't separate that from sexual gratification and that is why you do not understand this subject. The fact is that some people will develop, for whatever reason, methods for achieving sexual gratification that is not conducive to reproduction. As I pointed out, and as can easily be seen by observing human sexual behaviors, these methods are often adopted or fabricated by people who are heterosexual.

    Your attempt at humor was desperate


  • Options
    #110
    ntlbell
    Registered Users Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    CPT. SURF wrote: »
    Back to reproduction eh? You can't separate that from sexual gratification and that is why you do not understand this subject. The fact is that some people will develop, for whatever reason, methods for achieving sexual gratification that is not conducive to reproduction. As I pointed out, and as can easily be seen by observing human sexual behaviors, these methods are often adopted or fabricated by people who are heterosexual.

    Your attempt at humor was desperate

    I thought the aul penis and vagina had a strong grounding in reproduction so when talking about them yes, it's back to "what they're designed for"

    no humor was attempted just pointing out your pointless argument.


  • Options
    #111
    orestes
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,972 ✭✭✭orestes


    ntlbell wrote: »
    the fact you would only be attracted to another making it impossible for the two of you to reproduce would seem unnatural no?

    So infertile people or old people being attracted to other people is unnatural too?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #112
    CPT. SURF
    Closed Accounts Posts: 321 ✭✭CPT. SURF


    ntlbell wrote: »
    I thought the aul penis and vagina had a strong grounding in reproduction so when talking about them yes, it's back to "what they're designed for"

    no humor was attempted just pointing out your pointless argument.

    You still cannot separate it, I'm starting to think you might be a simple at this stage. Don't try clawing back from your shyte joke either. "Know what you do with you wknds!" ha ha im funny. Thats lame mate.

    My argument is not pointless either, it is crushing yours right now. For example, my mouth is designed for eating and communicating mostly. Yet, I like to whistle. Why do I do this? It is not eating, it is not communicating, I just do it for fun.

    Now precious; people do things with their reproductive organs that are just for fun. Understand?


  • Options
    #113
    ntlbell
    Registered Users Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    orestes wrote: »
    So infertile people or old people being attracted to other people is unnatural too?

    Sexual attraction by design to increase the chance of reproduction.

    the fact that her reproduction system is "broke" is not relevant to my animal instict.

    not sure where your going on old people


  • Options
    #114
    ntlbell
    Registered Users Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    CPT. SURF wrote: »
    You still cannot separate it, I'm starting to think you might be a simple at this stage. Don't try clawing back from your shyte joke either. "Know what you do with you wknds!" ha ha im funny. Thats lame mate.

    My argument is not pointless either, it is crushing yours right now. For example, my mouth is designed for eating and communicating mostly. Yet, I like to whistle. Why do I do this? It is not eating, it is not communicating, I just do it for fun.

    Now precious; people do things with their reproductive organs that are just for fun. Understand?

    people can do things with their reproductive organs for fun, correct.

    gay's CANNOT reproduce

    see the difference?


  • Options
    #115
    CPT. SURF
    Closed Accounts Posts: 321 ✭✭CPT. SURF


    ntlbell wrote: »
    people can do things with their reproductive organs for fun, correct.

    gay's CANNOT reproduce

    see the difference?

    Wrong again. Gay people are perfectly able to reproduce. THE POINT is that certain people have developed and adopted, again for whatever reason, sexual methods and practices that are not conducive to sexual reproduction. I feel I must reiterate that these methods have been adopted and are preferred by some people who only engage in sexual behavior with members of the opposite sex.

    So there is no difference. Gay people can reproduce but they are unlikely to do so because of their sexual preferences; the same can be true for straight people. It is like your personality, everyone is a little bit different. There is nothing that needs to be cured.


  • Options
    #116
    ntlbell
    Registered Users Posts: 16,288 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    CPT. SURF wrote: »
    Wrong again. Gay people are perfectly able to reproduce. THE POINT is that certain people they have developed and adopted, again for whatever reason, sexual methods and practices that are not conducive to sexual reproduction. I feel I must reiterate that these methods have been adopted and are preferred by some people who only engage in sexual behavior with members of the opposite sex.

    So there is no difference. Gay people can reproduce but they are unlikely to do so because of their sexual preferences; the same can be true for straight people. It is like your personality, everyone is a little bit different. There is nothing that needs to be cured.

    If you ever throw the little fella into another man's ar$e and he gets pregnant, let me know, I know a few people who would love to talk to you.


  • Options
    #117
    CPT. SURF
    Closed Accounts Posts: 321 ✭✭CPT. SURF


    ntlbell wrote: »
    If you ever throw the little fella into another man's ar$e and he gets pregnant, let me know, I know a few people who would love to talk to you.

    The words of a beaten man.:D

    Have a good wknd dude. I'm outta here


  • Options
    #118
    Kintarō Hattori
    Registered Users Posts: 14,976 ✭✭✭✭Kintarō Hattori


    ntlbell wrote: »
    the fact you would only be attracted to another making it impossible for the two of you to reproduce would seem unnatural no?

    No not at all.


  • Options
    #119
    Nodin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Well, well, well.......
    ntlbell wrote: »
    a genetic malfunction or whatever name .
    ntlbell wrote: »
    I think it's wrong that there's ailments we still can't fix.
    I think homosexuality is based on _something_ going "wrong"
    .
    ntlbell wrote: »
    If two men want to bum f*ck
    one can handle the smell and the other can handle the pain, then go for it.
    .
    ntlbell wrote: »
    the same way we should try and help people with depression, social anxiety etc .

    I was wondering what the creaking noise was...going on the above, its probably the case for your defence hanging by the neck....


  • Options
    #120
    K4t
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,362 ✭✭✭K4t


    Nothing wrong with people who are gay.

    One can only laugh at religion interfering where they don't belong because it is always going to happen/ Most people just ignore them.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #121
    philologos
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    K4t wrote: »
    Nothing wrong with people who are gay.

    One can only laugh at religion interfering where they don't belong because it is always going to happen/ Most people just ignore them.

    I'm curious to see how religion does interfere where it doesn't belong. The main objection here for the most part is that in Christianity, Judaism and Islam, homosexual relations are seen to be morally wrong. That's a part of their belief system, it gets blown out of proportion completely, and people tend to focus on this a lot more than other moral rulings in the Biblical text, which I think is highly unfortunate.

    Anyhow. The idea in Christianity is, that we don't expect for non-Christians to follow the Biblical rulings. We believe that God's authority is ultimately binding on all, but it is only through faith in Christ that people are likely to accept God's rulings. That's my view on it anyway, given what Paul advocates concerning judgement on sexual immorality in the church:
    1 Corinthians 5:13 wrote:
    God will judge those outside. ‘Drive out the wicked person from among you.’

    I think it isn't so much the case that religion interferes (infact we aren't meant to deal with anything external to the church), but rather that people ask Christians what they think about the subject, and then they get offended, and deem that it is "interfering". Interestingly the following is mentioned on the first page of this thread:
    wudangclan wrote: »
    perhaps the same therapies could be used to make these religious types more tolerant

    However, I am increasingly seeing that the "tolerance" that people promote, doesn't work two ways, rather it works one way. It's more "hold my views on this subject, and I'll tolerate you", rather than an equal sharing of ideas and beliefs on the subject.


Advertisement