Is Obama a Alien?

JohnGalt

Well, is he?

No you say? Why the fcuk not?

Fajitas!

No.

Dunnie1982

JohnGalt wrote: »

Well, is he?

No, he's a human, or maybe a dancer.

Sleipnir

Yes. No. (Repeat)

6th

JohnGalt wrote: »

Well, is he?

Can you add a bit off meat to this. You've pretty much posted the bare minimum.

• Do you think he is an alien?
• Why do you think he is an alien?
• Do you think other people think he is an alien?

JohnGalt

6th wrote: »

Can you add a bit off meat to this. You've pretty much posted the bare minimum.

• Do you think he is an alien?
• Why do you think he is an alien?
• Do you think other people think he is an alien?

Good idea. Done

JohnGalt

JohnGalt wrote: »

Well, is he?

No you say? Why the fcuk not?

No because there is no evidence or reasoning to support such a claim.
It's ridiculous.

we are all aliens

JohnGalt

King Mob wrote: »

No because there is no evidence or reasoning to support such a claim.
It's ridiculous.

The lack of evidence is evidence for the conspiracy. They have covered it up so well that no evidence has been left: Proof that there is a conspiracy

wilson10

If Obama was a Alien he'd be an alien.

I think he's an Offaly nice human being.

JohnGalt

JohnGalt wrote: »

The lack of evidence is evidence for the conspiracy. They have covered it up so well that no evidence has been left: Proof that there is a conspiracy

I honestly can't tell if you're being serious or not.:pac:

6th

JohnGalt, send me a PM and convince me this thread isn't a pisstake. Then I'll re-open this thread.

6th

Thread re-opened following PM from JohnGalt.

Penn

does this mean the OP is going to provide proof that Obama is an alien?

Veni Vedi Vici

paddyirishman85 wrote: »

does this mean the OP is going to provide proof that Obama is an alien?

Exactly. Are we privy to what justified the re-opening of this thread 6th?

6th

Hold off til he responds, if he doesnt then the thread gets locked again.

Penn

Sorry, deleted what I just said as you replied. Fair enough, I look forward to his reponse. I really do

Veni Vedi Vici

6th wrote: »

Hold off til he responds, if he doesnt then the thread gets locked again.

He's offline for the time being. Hopefully he's compiling something worth the server space.

nyarlothothep

his head is quite big so yes

Veni Vedi Vici

nyarlothothep wrote: »

his head is quite big so yes

Can I get an approximation on the diameter please? :pac:

Indeed...

6th

This thread has about 24hrs then its gone.

Veni Vedi Vici

6th wrote: »

This thread has about 24hrs then its gone.

Just a regular day for ol' Jack Bauer.

Harolds+

I think if you google "NEW WORLD ORDER" you might get the scare of your life

JohnGalt

Why do you reject this conspiracy theory? How do you know that this is not true? Similarly how do you know conspiracy theories which you do believe in are true? What is your standard of evidence? Have you considered Occams razor? Just wondering?

Veni Vedi Vici

JohnGalt wrote: »

Why do you reject this conspiracy theory? How do you know that this is not true?

A question isn't a theory. You've only provided a question. (in reference to OP)

JohnGalt wrote: »

Similarly how do you know conspiracy theories which you do believe in are true? What is your standard of evidence? Have you considered Occams razor? Just wondering?

This is blatant thread de-railment.

Veni Vedi Vici

Harolds+ wrote: »

I think if you google "NEW WORLD ORDER" you might get the scare of your life

Here's a link to pursue such a search:
http://www.google.ie/search?hl=en&q=NEW+WORLD+ORDER&meta=

Were we supposed to encounter any new knowledge here?

Veni Vedi Vici

nyarlothothep wrote: »

the deflector dish can be used as a weapon

I don't care for your impressive Trekkie trivia lest you can speak it in Klingon.

6th

The star trek stuff is bad enough and klingon and and I start deleting posts!

nyarlothothep

nyarlothothep wrote: »

the deflector dish can be used as a weapon

The crew of the USS Enterprise-D used the deflector to channel an extremely large amount of energy at a controlled rate - both as a weapon against a Borg cube in 2366 (TNG: "The Best of Both Worlds", "The Best of Both Worlds, Part II") and as an energy source hoping to escape a Tyken's Rift in 2367. (TNG: "Night Terrors") Although the energy beam had a greater power output than the ship's complement of weapons, using the deflector for this purpose was extremely impractical and only ever used on two occasions



Obama is made the live long and prosper sign, its photographed, he must be an alien making us ready for the arrival of his race, the Vulcans

And that is clearly the Enterprise NCC-1701 from the original series above Obama. Minus 3 nerd points.

Penn

JohnGalt wrote: »

Why do you reject this conspiracy theory? How do you know that this is not true? Similarly how do you know conspiracy theories which you do believe in are true? What is your standard of evidence? Have you considered Occams razor? Just wondering?

We reject it because you haven't given a reason as to why this might be true, or why you believe it to be true. The onus is on you to back up a claim that you made, otherwise how can you possibly expect us to discuss it?

Conspiracy Theories are normally presented with reasoning as to why its plausible. Like the contaminated vaccines theory, about how the company which caused it may have done it on purpose to increase profits of the vaccines. Or the WTC7 discussion about what may have caused it to collapse. You just asked us to say why he's not an alien. As the OP, the onus is on you to say why he is.

6th

Lads I've deleted some of the crap. Lets keep it down. Theres an off topi thread if you want to get yore trek on.

Veni Vedi Vici

6th wrote: »

Theres an off topi thread if you want to get yore trek on.

Based on the definitions of 'topi' and 'yore' that sentence actually reads as:

"Theres an off Saharan antelope thread if you want to get the expedition of old activated." :pac:

I'm sorry 6th but its hard to re-rail a de-railing train that should have never left the station in the first place.

6th

Well the OPs question seems to be: How do you decide which CTs to believe?

My answer would be: By looking at the basis of the idea and any possible sources which may or may not tlend credence to them.

Seems like a genuine question which he unfortunately went the wrong way about asking?

spirtus09

John Galt wrote: »

Well, is he?

No you say? Why the fcuk not?

Hi all I only signed up tonight

The answer to your question is no he's not an alien.
He's a puppet,a front man who is good at reading an autocue.

Veni Vedi Vici

6th wrote: »

Well the OPs question seems to be: How do you decide which CTs to believe?

Is this not a complete deviation from the title and question posed in the initial post?

You gave him the oppurtunity to flesh out the question.

He fails to do so here by asking us to flesh out why its not true.

JohnGalt wrote: »

Why do you reject this conspiracy theory? How do you know that this is not true?

He fails to do so here by asking a completley different question to what he originally proposed.

JohnGalt wrote: »

Similarly how do you know conspiracy theories which you do believe in are true? What is your standard of evidence? Have you considered Occams razor? Just wondering?

Derailed.

6th

His original post was an attempt to get people to say its rubbish so that he could ask why thats rubbish and all the other stuff isnt?

Penn

6th wrote: »

His original post was an attempt to get people to say its rubbish so that he could ask why thats rubbish and all the other stuff isnt?

If so, then isn't this basically the same as the "What is your conspiracy thinking" thread thing thats recently been started?

SolarFlash

YES, he is an illegal alien.

K-9

6th wrote: »

His original post was an attempt to get people to say its rubbish so that he could ask why thats rubbish and all the other stuff isnt?

What?

Anyway, more importantly, is the new charter extinct, is it a CT?

K-9

• Claims, Evidence, Proof
If you are stating something as fact please post your sources or any relevant links/info. Doing so will strengthen your point. Where someone states something as their opinion it is just that, an opinion. Asking "why" they believe something if fine, demanding proof/evidence is not.

• Making the natives restless
This is a catch-all rule for general trolling, bitching and similar. Posting in a manner purely to get a reaction from someone will not be tolerated. If a moderator feels that said poster is doing this intentionally or is the cause of the mess, then the poster can and will be infracted and/or banned. This rule will hopefully put an end to the bitching going on in here of late.



IMO, FAIL on those 2 points.

This crap doesn't help if CT wants to be taken seriously.

Veni Vedi Vici

K-9 wrote: »

This crap doesn't help if CT wants to be taken seriously.

Thats exactly my concern. Again I reiterate that a question is not a theory.

6th

And not a single post reported?

bonkey

And a bit less of the back-seat modding, please[\b]