Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Who's going to stop the NWO?
Options
Comments
-
They have the right to protect themselves and their property. There are certain suberbs in some US cities where you would want to be insane not to carry protection.Why do you think americans should have the right to bear arms
Hitler disarmed Germany before the people were subjugated. Stalin did the same in Russia as did Mao in Communist China.0 -
Run_to_da_hills wrote: »They have the right to protect themselves and their property. There are certain suberbs in some US cities where you would want to be insane not to carry protection.
Hitler disarmed Germany before the people were subjugated. Stalin did the same in Russia as did Mao in Communist China.
But didn't George W's administration oppose gun control.
Isn't it a core belief of the republican party?
The same party and administration that supported more government powers in law enforcement and has been accused of the biggest NWO plot?
I'm confused.0 -
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
ROFL,Oh God no! The horror!
And what leads you to believe this exactly?
Would it be the all the new human rights stuff the UN and EU are pushing for?
The UN & EU are the biggest culprits on the planet for privacy envision.
They have already imposed electronic RFID chipped passports, and are currently in the process of considering lighter creditcard size "smartcard" versions.
Don't EVER try to explain human rights and civil liberties from globalist elite organizations that tap into our mobile phone, read our emails, and digitally track and trace all our movements with RFID, ANPR & CCTV.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/acd2c66c-c0da-11dd-b0a8-000077b07658.html
0 -
-
-
-
-
Your next passport after 2013 will be RFID unless you loose your current one.But nothing on anything being treated with zero tolerance?
But my passport is valid till 2013. ..
Greatest farce of the EU, ELIMINATE standard inter European passports and introduce RFID track & trace "smartcards" that will impose even MORE on your civil liberties as they will be MULTIPURPOSE. "How convenient bleat the sheeple". :rolleyes:And I see how you neglect to mention the fact you don't need your passport when traveling around Europe. Not exactly imposing.
NOTHING WILL CHANGE IN THE UK, MORE CAMERAS WILL GO UP, THE Oyster card will eventually become 100% Registered, you will no longer be able to move across London without being tracked by "Congestion charge" (Cough!!!) ANPR Police CCTV network.Europe intervening into UK privacy laws = good?
Europe changing laws through the Lisbon treaty = bad?
Not making much sense there.
In fact the UK and Ireland will be doing the EU superstate a favour by setting the groundwork for the forthcoming Pan European Police state.
Newsweek cover depits the exact same image that could be said for Europe.
Proposed Laws usually get passed if it is of interest to "international security" and "war on terror" We have heard all this before. :rolleyes:Those link are about PROPOSED laws, and international police co-operation.
maybe you should post some relevant links sometime.
Millions of Kids are to be fingerprinted by the EU superstate.
http://images.google.ie/imgres?imgurl=http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.com/Buttons/200604/Cam_Watch.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.com/Articles/200607/20060731_EU_Children_Fingerprinted.htm&usg=__ecry8bVTg2jXbyJESpazYKaCXm8=&h=312&w=430&sz=91&hl=en&start=8&um=1&tbnid=UpEg1x-qxb2pUM:&tbnh=91&tbnw=126&prev=/images%3Fq%3Deuropean%2Bpolice%2Bstate%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG0 -
Ok and? I would only have to present it at a border. You know like how it is now.Run_to_da_hills wrote: »Your next passport after 2013 will be chipped unless you loose your current one.
Ok and? Will it have more information than say a drivers license?Run_to_da_hills wrote: »You still need ID which inevitably will be microchipped to an EU/ International standard.
Why is that a bad thing?
Good thing I don't live in English or more exactly the England in your imagination.Run_to_da_hills wrote: »NOTHING WILL CHANGE IN THE UK, MORE CAMERAS WILL GO UP, THE Oyster card will eventually become 100% Registered, you will no longer be able to move across London without being tracked by police ANPR alius Congestion charge CCTV. In fact the UK and Ireland is doing the EU a favour bu setting the groundwork for the forthcoming Pan European Police state.
You have yet to provide any evidence what so ever that the EU have plans to do anything of the sort.
Have you actually read the Lisbon Treaty yet or are you still buying what the CT sites are telling you?
Aren't media sources like Newsweek controlled by the NWO?Run_to_da_hills wrote: »Newsweek cover, the exact same could be said for Europe.
Or are they only controlled when they present evidence against your world view?
Because the war on terror is so popular right now.Run_to_da_hills wrote: »Proposed Laws usually get passed if it is of interest to "international security" and "war on terror" We have heard all this before. :rolleyes:
This really needs to be backed up with something other that bold text.Run_to_da_hills wrote: »Millions of Kids are to be fingerprinted by the EU superstate.
http://images.google.ie/imgres?imgurl=http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.com/Buttons/200604/Cam_Watch.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.com/Articles/200607/20060731_EU_Children_Fingerprinted.htm&usg=__ecry8bVTg2jXbyJESpazYKaCXm8=&h=312&w=430&sz=91&hl=en&start=8&um=1&tbnid=UpEg1x-qxb2pUM:&tbnh=91&tbnw=126&prev=/images%3Fq%3Deuropean%2Bpolice%2Bstate%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG
And you have still to answer my initial question:
What leads you to be the any crime will be dealt with zero tolerence after this RFID bull**** is introduced?
But hey continue to ignore valid questions. Not like it makes your arguments seem much more ridiculous and rambling.0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
RtdH for someone claiming to be so capable of spotting lies and deceit by the NWo, you well.Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
Newsweek cover depits the exact same image that could be said for Europe.
THE MAGAZINE COVER IS A FAKE.
The magazine's issue date is March 17th 2008
These are two example articles from newsweek that day.
Now perhaps I'm wrong. But after spending fifteen searching the Newsweek site I can see no mention about security chip implants, or cellphone banning.
Perhaps you could produce something of more substance than a fake newsmagazine cover done up in photoshop.0 -
Mahatma for someone claiming to be so capable of spotting lies and deceit by the NWo, you well.
THE MAGAZINE COVER IS A FAKE.
The magazine's issue date is March 17th 2008
These are two example articles from newsweek that day.
Now perhaps I'm wrong. But after spending fifteen searching the Newsweek site I can see no mention about security chip implants, or cellphone banning.
Perhaps you could produce something of more substance than a fake newsmagazine cover done up in photoshop.
eh ... Mahatma didn't post that cover. RtdH did. Getting your Conspiracy Theorists mixed up? Or do you have a fixation?
0 -
-
Psychics, no, prediction, yes.We do not have psychics predicting future crimes.
Where exactly in any laws or upcoming laws can you be convicted of a crime you will commit in the future?
My criminology lecturer once made the joking point that if anyone was SERIOUS about stopping violent crime, you'd just put all the 16-30 year old males away somewhere where they couldn't, y'know, rape and kill everyone else.
Point being, you can produce probabilistic risk modelling systems to predict behaviours, including crimes. Arthur C Clarke said that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic; in this case, sufficiently advanced prediction is indistinguishable from being psychic? Our prediction mechanisms have advanced considerably...
Given the high likelihood that all of us commit some form of crime or malfeasance during our lifetimes, being subject or not to increased surveillance becomes a critical variable in conviction; it's one reason for why recidivism rates are so high. PK Dick was a prescient man in many ways, and precrime is currently an operational concept, whether on the basis of genetic predisposition, architectural layout, or pattern recognition as in RtdH's example. Problem is this is refexive; lets assume black males are violent, hence search them more frequently, hence arrest them more, hence more of them in prison...positive feedback loops all the way, baby!
Maybe the UN and EU can't, if you are using some very good crypto and are a leet haxxor. But if they can't they are Incompetent Brussels Bureaucratic tards tbh...I mean if the Swiss, French and Swedes could manage it, why not those grey-suited Brussels clowns? I'd rather my Elite-Technocratic Cliques be competent, wouldn't you?Also the European Union and UN cannot tap our phone or read our emails.
Such as the Communications Data Protection Directive, perhaps? Mandatory retention of data since 2006? Oh, sorry, I missed the word indiscriminately. Structures of total surveillance are fine, as long as they only track, like, nonces and criminals and such...The innocent have nothing to hide, right?Nor is there any law in the works that would allow them to do so indiscriminately.
Philosophically, it's an interesting question whether being potentially monitored at any given moment is equivalent to actually being monitored, but it's interesting to note that this was the basis of Bentham's classic Panopticon. Similarly, as long as the monitoring and flagging is done by 'distributed automated monitoring and analysis' as per the EU Futures Group, surely that's not as intrusive as, like, some bloke listening to me shag?
So, short story long, the technological and legal conditions for mass surveillance are already present, imho, even if you ain't a paranoid fantasist. Mind you, I has a fever atm so nothing I say should be trusted...0
Advertisement