Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

M20 - Cork to Limerick [preferred route chosen; in design - phase 3]

Options
11415171920276

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,468 ✭✭✭BluntGuy


    Assuming the scheme finishes on a roundabout anyway and AFAIK has no intermediate junctions then it really isnt a big issue. A trumpet would be nice but there just isnt the AADT for it.

    It's lacklustre, but yes, I agree that it will have ample capacity (a dumbell would be underpowered in this case).

    However, I don't think it was the AADT in this case, it was more likely the connection to the existing N20. Had there been no connection, they probably would've gone for an M9/N10-style trumpet, as it only requires the one bridge, as opposed to the two required for the roundabout interchange.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    An extra large twin lane roundabout like the N19/N18 one at Shannon should do the job but not a twin dumbell fannyabout :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Assuming the scheme finishes on a roundabout anyway and AFAIK has no intermediate junctions then it really isnt a big issue. A trumpet would be nice but there just isnt the AADT for it.

    They can buld a trumpet here, trumpets are not built because it has to have a high traffic demand. Trumpets are not expensive to build:rolleyes:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    mysterious wrote: »
    They can buld a trumpet here, trumpets are not built because it has to have a high traffic demand. Trumpets are not expensive to build:rolleyes:

    They cannot build a trumpet because the junction is supposed to serve the N21 and Croom both.

    If they build a junction on the general scale of the N18/N19 junction and with 2 lanes all around the top and no overly sharp bends or inadequate sightlines then that is perfectly adequate.

    There can be no trumpet unless you crayon Croom off the face of the earth :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,468 ✭✭✭BluntGuy


    The junction is ample capacity for the projected traffic.

    A free-flow N21 East --> M20 North movement is provided as well.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    The simple facts are as follows.

    Once you are past Croom to the south and Adare to the west the traffic levels towards

    a) Rathkeale / West Limerick
    b) Cork / South Limerick

    are circa 12500 AADT each ( 2008 and 2009 statistics)

    The sections of the M20 that now justify Type1 and Motorway designation are

    a) Fanningtown ( North Croom) to Limerick Ring Road
    b) Velvetstown/Buttevant to Cork.

    (and that is including a built N21 Adare and Cork NRR)

    The section between Velvetstown and Croom, strictly speaking, could be a 2+2 EXCEPT that unlike pissant roads to Mayo and Kerry the M20 connects the second and third largest cities in Ireland and ALSO the fourth and second largest.

    An argument can easily be made that any improvement over the goat track we have now will naturally lead to greater commercial interaction between those cities on the west coast and that a day 1 traffic scenario could jump considerably from 12500 to nearer the 20000 that would justify a Type 1 but which is not now the case.

    A further argument needs to be made that an express bus service would be able to get from Galway to Cork , non stop , in well under 3 hours. This is about the limit of tolerance most people have for buses but nevertheless important.

    Consequently we should look carefully at the National Imperative of strengthening this commercial corridor from Galway to Cork and should, in the case of the road from Croom to Buttevant....jump ahead of ourselves with a Type 1 and with motorway status.

    The EIS has not looked at the Cork - Galway corridor in any great depth and this is a manifest weakness. The staging of the M20 into south and north may be designed to deliver this traffic ramp that will ( post facto) justify the Type 1 Motorway further north. I believe that a wide ranging investigation tying in the west would justify it now..or at least contemporneously with the southern section ....no matter what someone like Peter Sweetman tries on :(

    Other than the equally clear case of Mullingar - Longford there is no National justification for any more interurban Type 1 motorways bar the odd bit on urban fringes of Sligo and Cork and Tralee east and Castlebar-Westport at a push but there is no national imperative implied there save north of Sligo. There are regional imperatives or local ones of course...but not National.

    2+2 it shall be, at best, everywhere else. Lets get real and lets keep the powder dry to deal with the loonies who want us to stick to cycling our goat tracks for ever more or building silly train tracks where there are no people.


  • Registered Users Posts: 488 ✭✭fresca


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    Consequently we should look carefully at the National Imperative of strengthening this commercial corridor from Galway to Cork....

    I believe that it is now critical to development of our nation that the government adopt a strategy that specifically targets growth in this corridor - cork/limerick/galway.

    We must work to achieve some demographic balance in this country.
    We need to be extremely careful or we're going to end up with a completely disproportionate demographic in the greater dublin area.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    fresca wrote: »
    We need to be extremely careful or we're going to end up with a completely disproportionate demographic in the greater dublin area.

    We already have that. However long term planning in the Cork - Galway corridor is particularly affected by green idiocy such as costly and unsustainable light rail schemes where we need a robust express bus network as much as anything.

    We need to shoot down this infestation of silly sh1te rail schemes wherever they may be found and to focus instead on a simple and clear deliverable.

    Con from Cork should be able to charge his 400mile max range electric car in Cork.

    He should then be able to drive from Galway to Cork, and back, on one charge. This requires an efficient motorway network where Con can maintain a constant speed and not run out of juice in Buttevant on the way home.

    Con should also have the CLEAR option of taking a bus, doing a days bizness in Galway and coming home to his family again, unfrazzled.

    Only a motorway will let Con from Cork do a sustainable days business in Galway and come home to the bosom of Cons sustainable family in Cork and Cons loving kiddies who sustainably want to see Con before they are sent to bed. Con wants to read a sustainable bedtime tale of butterflies and green aphids to the kiddies too.

    Idiot sh1te rail schemes that leave Con unsustainably scratching his hole in Limerick Junction cannot and will not do this. Down with that sort of thing for the good of Cons kiddies :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 624 ✭✭✭Aidan1


    He should then be able to drive from Galway to Cork, and back, on one charge.

    Con will also need to be doing this at some point in the distant future, because it will be a long time before this type of range will be possible in a BEV. 200miles is not beyond the bounds of possibility in the medium term though - the state of the art in a 'normal' car is around 110 miles atm.

    Agreed that M-Way is long over due in this corridor, but I wouldn't entirely rule out rail either in the long term - particularly if Limerick Junction can be bypassed. The development of Motorway will have to be met with very well applied controls on rural housing too though - otherwise you could end up further dispersing the nascent critical mass in both city regions across Co Cork and Limerick.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Aidan1 wrote: »
    The development of Motorway will have to be met with very well applied controls on rural housing too though - otherwise you could end up further dispersing the nascent critical mass in both city regions across Co Cork and Limerick.

    You may take it that there shall be no new housebuilding along that corridor for at least 10 years. North Cork and rural Limerick are simply rotten with empty one offs and ghost estates.

    NAMA will probably show up at the Oral hearing with a plan to get LTEV out of these places ....and requiring a motorway :)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    The simple facts are as follows.

    Once you are past Croom to the south and Adare to the west the traffic levels towards

    a) Rathkeale / West Limerick
    b) Cork / South Limerick

    are circa 12500 AADT each ( 2008 and 2009 statistics)

    The sections of the M20 that now justify Type1 and Motorway designation are

    a) Fanningtown ( North Croom) to Limerick Ring Road
    b) Velvetstown/Buttevant to Cork.

    (and that is including a built N21 Adare and Cork NRR)

    The section between Velvetstown and Croom, strictly speaking, could be a 2+2 EXCEPT that unlike pissant roads to Mayo and Kerry the M20 connects the second and third largest cities in Ireland and ALSO the fourth and second largest.

    An argument can easily be made that any improvement over the goat track we have now will naturally lead to greater commercial interaction between those cities on the west coast and that a day 1 traffic scenario could jump considerably from 12500 to nearer the 20000 that would justify a Type 1 but which is not now the case.

    A further argument needs to be made that an express bus service would be able to get from Galway to Cork , non stop , in well under 3 hours. This is about the limit of tolerance most people have for buses but nevertheless important.

    Consequently we should look carefully at the National Imperative of strengthening this commercial corridor from Galway to Cork and should, in the case of the road from Croom to Buttevant....jump ahead of ourselves with a Type 1 and with motorway status.

    The EIS has not looked at the Cork - Galway corridor in any great depth and this is a manifest weakness. The staging of the M20 into south and north may be designed to deliver this traffic ramp that will ( post facto) justify the Type 1 Motorway further north. I believe that a wide ranging investigation tying in the west would justify it now..or at least contemporneously with the southern section ....no matter what someone like Peter Sweetman tries on :(

    Other than the equally clear case of Mullingar - Longford there is no National justification for any more interurban Type 1 motorways bar the odd bit on urban fringes of Sligo and Cork and Tralee east and Castlebar-Westport at a push but there is no national imperative implied there save north of Sligo. There are regional imperatives or local ones of course...but not National.

    2+2 it shall be, at best, everywhere else. Lets get real and lets keep the powder dry to deal with the loonies who want us to stick to cycling our goat tracks for ever more or building silly train tracks where there are no people.

    Its going to be motorway.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    With those AADT figures the R117 to Enniskerry should be at least a 2+2 and the N81 to Blessington a motorway! :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,950 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    The N81 could definitely do with some sort of upgrade in my opinion. (Or a ban on Toyota Yarises and Micras).


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    And a ban on SUVs, quarry lorries, agricultural vehicles, No 65 buses and all the rest that clog this goat track on a semi-permanent basis!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Wild Bill wrote: »
    And a ban all the rest that clog this goat track on a semi-permanent basis!

    Capacity and Level of Service are intertwined.

    A road has less capacity at level of service D than at level of service C . That is because the cars are going faster at D than at C.

    If you set a Level of service low enough a goat track would carry as many vehicles as a Motorway, albeit very very slowly :)

    Major Inter Urbans such as Galway - Cork are designed to provide level of service D , continous 94kph on dual carriageway and continous 105kph on motorway.

    M20 Constraints 2008 Page 18 of 200

    Maxima

    A Reduced Dual Carriageway can handle 21000 ( Rural) and 27,000 ( Commuter)
    A Wide Dual Carriageway can handle 34600 ( Rural) and 45,000 ( Commuter)
    A Motorway ( Wide dual form like M6) can handle 43500( Rural) and 56500 ( Commuter)

    However absent the hard shoulder it is very easy to take a lane out of a reduced dual carriageway which is not an issue on a wide dual carriageway and thereby throttle its capacity and this is a particular issue where cars overheat from crawling in heavy traffic.

    It is absolutely vital that there is no confusion about whether the M20 is a "MAJOR INTER URBAN" otherwise Isaac and his mates will play puck with the Buttevant to Croom section and will do their damndest to turn it into a 2+2 rollercoaster. National Policy is to have High service level motorways on Major Inter Urban routes and 2+2 roads connecting "Linked Hub" towns ....towns named in the National Spatial Strategy by the way.

    If the regions themselves do not use the correct phrasing they are inadvertently playing into the hands of Isacc and the green nutjobs.

    I recommend that EVERYBODY reading this from Cork and Limerick read their draft regional development plans and ensure they get the phrase "MAJOR INTER URBAN" inserted early and often into those regional development plans where the M20 and its corridor is mentioned.

    Public submissions close shortly and time is short. The South west plan ( Cork) is here and the Midwest plan ( Limerick ) is here. email your submissions and tell your friends to do the same.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,864 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    I have no idea what a Technical Advisory Services contract is but heres one for the M20 South.

    http://www.e-tenders.gov.ie/search/show/search_view.aspx?ID=MAR145096

    Whether the M20 PPPs are still on ice, as the NRA originally said, or whether they've gotten moving again I dont know. The equivalent contract for, Arklow - Rathnew was awarded on the 16th of December 2009 and the M17/18 one almost exactly a year ago.

    So who knows whats happening at the moment. Perhaps an email to the NRA might be in order.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    A Reduced Dual Carriageway can handle 21000 ( Rural) and 27,000 ( Commuter)
    A Wide Dual Carriageway can handle 34600 ( Rural) and 45,000 ( Commuter)
    A Motorway ( Wide dual form like M6) can handle 43500( Rural) and 56500 ( Commuter)

    Is the difference due to poor driving skills by the rustics??

    @Chris1234567

    Certainly good news they are going ahead with Newlands Cross and Rathnew - Arklow. They get some priorities right! :D

    Are some folk falling down when it comes to describing Cork-Limerick as "inter-urban"? Who? Why? When? Name and Shame them Sponge.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,864 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Ok some more information on the Southern Section, which is scheduled to go first. The contract for construction is due to be signed in December 2011, which construction to begin presumably early 2012. Given that this has a hell of a lot of online sections we could be looking at a timescale similar to that required to do the Nenagh bypass upgrade.

    Theres still a reasonable chance that the Southern Section will be done by end 2015. As for the Northern Section? No idea yet.

    Edit: And it definately seems that the Southern Section PPP is NOT including the Cork NRR Phase 1. 37km of motorway, 6km of DC, 32km of S2 and an MSA do not allow enough km to build any of the NRR. The numbers just wouldnt add up.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Wild Bill wrote: »
    Is the difference due to poor driving skills by the rustics??

    No, entirely due to closer spacing in heavy traffic creating more room for cars Bill :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,864 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    And heres the best image of the scheme so far. Note that Adare isnt shown, presumably because the route selection wasnt done at the time this image was made.

    m20.jpg

    Edit: And for the road nerds, note how the junction numbering starts from the Cork side, which is the opposite of what is currently on the ground.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,725 ✭✭✭charlemont


    it badly needs the motorway ..the road north of twopothouse to croom is a scandal


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,544 ✭✭✭Hogzy


    Say a motorway is built, What will the journey time be from Cork to Limerick?40mins to an hour? If so that would make it commutable between the two cities!


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,864 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    About 90km (give or take) at 120kmh speed = Approx 45 minutes from Blackpool to Rossbrien.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,468 ✭✭✭BluntGuy


    About 90km (give or take) at 120kmh speed = Approx 45 minutes from Blackpool to Rossbrien.

    In other words... journey time reduced by over 60%.

    This is no small reduction. Cork and Limerick will become very close with a 45-50 minute journey time as opposed to a 2 hour + one.

    While I don't believe motorways magically trigger economic growth, it could certainly help act as part of a springboard to increased economic activity in the overall region.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,544 ✭✭✭Hogzy


    BluntGuy wrote: »
    In other words... journey time reduced by over 60%.

    This is no small reduction. Cork and Limerick will become very close with a 45-50 minute journey time as opposed to a 2 hour + one.

    While I don't believe motorways magically trigger economic growth, it could certainly help act as part of a springboard to increased economic activity in the overall region.

    Jaysus such a piece of infrastructure would certainly influence my choice of masters,UL is great for postgrads. Wait a minute what forum am i in? :p


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,864 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    To put it in perspective its about the same distance from Doughiska in Galway to Moate on the M6, or from Dunkettle to the northern end of the Cashel bypass on the M8. And we see how easy and predictable both those journeys are now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭dubhthach


    BluntGuy wrote: »
    In other words... journey time reduced by over 60%.

    This is no small reduction. Cork and Limerick will become very close with a 45-50 minute journey time as opposed to a 2 hour + one.

    While I don't believe motorways magically trigger economic growth, it could certainly help act as part of a springboard to increased economic activity in the overall region.

    Well that and you consider the time saving going from Cork to Galway, with a combination of M20, shannon tunnel (m7?) and M18/M6 it would be a huge saving.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,025 ✭✭✭✭-Corkie-


    That would be great im living west of mallow and hate the weekly spin to cork shopping. That road is so hateable. ggrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 306 ✭✭busman


    SARASON wrote: »
    That would be great im living west of mallow and hate the weekly spin to cork shopping. That road is so hateable. ggrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!

    +1000


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭jank


    So what is the latest timeline for tendering, funding, building this road?
    Is the route selection done and dusted now?


Advertisement